Hope Crex can handle the load. There’re nice coins traded on Crex24.
DSTRA will be next :-)
Will be great seeing dstra on an exchange. Finally know what people think about it and want to pay for it. AD5 well received, thx team. Keep it up. Waiting for AD6 distribution |
|
|
|
Look's like we will be swapping this week to masternode! Can't wait!
Looking forward too. Anybody know How the swap is going to be done. Must have missed that part. Send in and get new coins? Exchange swap? Or just open old wallet.dat in new wallet? Anybody know something? |
|
|
|
Wow, BitcoinGoat just showed the discord people a preview of the up coming masternode wallet. It looks really cool!
Tiered masternodes!! So it really gonna have tiered masternode? This is great news for member who still got few TRAW Sure is. Tiered master node is indeed the way forward. Gives everybody a chance to join. Wonder how many levels tho? And amount. Max is 65k goat said. Wonder about min., and other lvl. |
|
|
|
|
What are you on about BADecker? You point me to an article about ID and origin of life, primarly, Which i actually says has Lots of good points, and is overall a very good article - and you accuse me of trying to discredit it!! Do me the courtesy of Reading before you answer. Thank you.
Its not me Who has come up with a theory for ID, you pointed me to ID, remember! You dont belive in evolution, fair Enough. But just because evolution is not true acording to you, does not make ID true default. It does not work that Way, cant be one thing, must be the other. Just because i cant Walk on water does not make it imposdible for all others. One just needs to figure out that you need to frezz it, then you Can. Its called lack of knowlage.
You fiercely resist evolution, yet accept ID! A consept with zero proof What so ever. How come? Where did your need for 100% proof go Here?
|
|
|
|
The EVOLUTION OF BLOCKCHAINS and SMART CONTRACTS ..
Why would they not be able to make connections between calcium objects?
Say in a 100000 years We dig up a cellphone anno 1990 and a smartphone anno 2018, not knowing anything about phones, Why would We ever Think they are related? Dont look anything alike, Can barely communitcate, have very few simarly funktions. What on Earth would make us Think they are related? Just metal, plastic and wires in Common. But the fact is they are related. Its called evolution.
Its not one thing, in the case calcium that makes the proof, Its all the small dots, function, shape, size, materiale, etc. And Its called evolution.
Neither of you is talking evolution theory evolution (ETE), which is the kind of evolution shown in the OP. Rather, you both are using semantics - playing with the language. This shows that evolution doesn't have a leg to stand on. Consider one of the basics regarding missing link determinations in ETE. The amount of mutation change has to be so small between evolution stages, that you would not be able to tell the difference between directly before and directly after evolved creatures without DNA measurements. Why does the mutation change have to be this small? Because if it weren't, we would be able to find evolution changes going on right now (if they existed), among all kinds of species all over the place. Yet we haven't found even one that we can prove. That's why ETE promoters theorize that the mutations have to be this tiny. It gives them a chance to suggest that evolution exists, even though they can't prove even one instance. The whole idea of using skulls dated multiple thousands of years apart, gives ETE a chance. But it most definitely doesn't factually show or prove even one instance of ETE. Read the article at https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/07/fred-reed/signature-in-the-cell-and-intelligent-design/ to understand why evolution is extremely doubtful. Since it is extremely doubtful, promoting evolution as fact turns evolution into a hoax being perpetrated by jokers who know it is not factual, and who know it is extremely doubtful, but talk it up as being factual, anyway. Evolution is a hoax.  Very good article. Lots of very good points. Unfortunatly Its about origin of life primary, not evolution. On the origian of life, Well your guess is as good as mine. You Can bring Down the hand of god Or aliens if you like. The article use countless word saying evolution cant be prove, just to replace it with another theory, ID, that has abdolutly no proof What so ever! If it cant be this, it must be that! Narr thats not How it works. Proof of ID Thank you, Or dismiss it. That is What you do to evolution (never mind there is plenty of proof for evolution). Forgot all the scenice along the way? What a cruel programmer it is! Invent the mosquito, put a bug in it, and have it kill of a billion of my other creations. Hmmm How is that for ID? Maybe it should just be D  |
|
|
|
|
Why would they not be able to make connections between calcium objects?
Say in a 100000 years We dig up a cellphone anno 1990 and a smartphone anno 2018, not knowing anything about phones, Why would We ever Think they are related? Dont look anything alike, Can barely communitcate, have very few simarly funktions. What on Earth would make us Think they are related? Just metal, plastic and wires in Common. But the fact is they are related. Its called evolution.
Its not one thing, in the case calcium that makes the proof, Its all the small dots, function, shape, size, materiale, etc. And Its called evolution.
|
|
|
|
Is it true that TRIS and F0me are the same people?  If this is true than I am going to be really mad at you peanuts for not learning from the last scam No Its not true. If tris and fome should be the same person they fooled me greatly!! They do not, even remotely, Act nor write the same Way. Im santaclause if they are the same. So no Its completly wrong info. Tris is a very good and helpfull guy. Its just the philipines vs the Internet right now |
|
|
|
Found this little beauty yesterday at Knossos Crete, proof that traw is for the long run. 1000 of years old, including text  |
|
|
|
Are MN coming soon or they are already live ? Can someone tell me exactly how many coins are needed in order to have a MN for DSTRA ? Thanks
Don't know the amount, don't think team has settled on an amount yet. We will know in time I guess. Looking at the sneakpeeks, they are already running at least one master node, maybe it's a test mn on a test net or a real one on the current chain. Can't really say. But looking good anyway |
|
|
|
well i missed up this airdrop but any news about exchanges ? i want to sell them who wants to buy ?
Ill buy them, 1sat each!! Dont know about exchange, working on it i think. Why you mess up airdrop? Very simple rules and the more active the more gold you get. You must have gotten one Or more drops, since you have some to sell. |
|
|
|
|
Let's for a moment entertain that you are right, evolution is a hoax. If you apply the same analytical skills towards the bible, don't you arrived at the very same thing? Lots of if, if, if, stories and no proof? Why do the bible not require proof? Don't say faith, cause then you might as well take evolution on faith!
|
|
|
|
When I studied at junior high school and learned about evolution theory as Charles Darwin said that the human is from apes. I disagree althought my teacher said that.
I do not want to be equated with apes. And I also rethinking: Why there are still monkeys that are still alive?
Why would there not be? Not all humans look the same, and they are still around. I mean you Got asian, african, European, etc. They dont look the same, so clearly humans evolved seperate in groups for some time and monkeys likewise-and seperate from humans |
|
|
|
Yes. Start using your head. 1. Evolution theory evolution is impossible. Google "impossible evolution." The rebuttals to impossible evolution rebut themselves by being filled with assumptions, circular references, and ambiguities. 2. In a previous post I showed an article where mitochondrial DNA for life could not have existed beyond 200,000 years ago, scientifically speaking. The point is that science agrees that it is self-contradictory regarding when the first life appeared. Time to throw the baby out with the bath water. 3. All the supposed missing links in the fossil record, cannot be proven to have been missing links. Why not? Because the jump between any of them would have to be so great that the number of mutations from the before, to the ML, is unequivocally impossible in any form of evolution theory imaginable. 4. All supposed evolution forms that have been found, fit adaptation far easier than they fit evolution theory evolution. 5. In a previous post I showed that some of the smartest evolutionists agree that evolution barely has a leg to stand on, Stephen Gould being one of them. 6. No scientifically provable example of evolution has ever been found. In other words, evolution as reality is impossible. If thinking evolutionists said that evolution was simply an idea, things would be different. But because they tout evolution as reality when nobody knows that it is... Evolution is a hoax. 1) Of course you find what you want if you google your predefined opinion. That’s actually circular logic. You should google evolution and then arrive at your opinion. You like the bible, right? Try google it and words like assumptions, circular references, and ambiguities? 2) So? Google again and find 200.000 articles that will show mtDNA have existed beyond 200.000 years. If you talk about mtDNA-Eve well 200.000 years sounds about right. 3) Of course it cannot be proven, its missing! The rest is just your opinion. 4) Yes it does! Because adaptation is evolution! Any change is evolution! 5) Hmm… now how smart are they really if they don’t believe in their own title? Are they evolutionist if they don’t believe in evolution? Very strange! I’m one of the smartest Creationists 6) Open your eyes. It’s all around you, trillions and trillions of examples. In other words, evolution as reality is possible! Evolution is reality |
|
|
|
I know, I know. You want me to do the research for you. Then you won't accept it anyway. First, check the Bible to see that folks lived over 900 years in some cases, before the Great Flood, and 400 or more, in some cases, in the first 500 years after. Second, consider that the earth was much more fertile in those days, because devolution didn't have as much time to set in as later years. Next, get out your Excel spreadsheet, and set a woman's average lifespan to 400 years (could have been 600 to 800). At 20-y-o a woman starts having kids. She has one every year for 400 years, both because sex is fun, and because everything is healthier (less devolution). Now, considering that half the kids were male, and half were female, the approximately 1,600 years before the flood would produce billions on the earth. Do the math, or at least look it up in a search engine. https://answersingenesis.org/noahs-ark/pre-flood-population/http://www.ldolphin.org/pickett.htmlhttps://biblescienceguy.wordpress.com/2014/06/18/4-population-growth-how-many-died-in-noahs-flood/ = trillions https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/32623/what-was-the-population-of-the-world-at-the-time-of-the-floodNarr not really. Capable enough to find my own answers. It’s all assumptions! If and if and if, all the lovely things you complain about in evolution! Not dealing with all the issues of incest and inbreeding, after all you only have one male and female to begin with, and never mind turning women into nonstop breading machines – for 100s of years at a time, you also surpassed growth percent of a factor 100 vs. any other time in history. And how about the food for this massive population explosion? All other animals and plants have also just been created, they need time too, to super populate like the humans. And while this is just in the beginning – few humans and few animals, humans start to build super structures of massive sizes all over the world. Impressive! Never mind I disregard the Neolithic structures predating 4000 B.C, cause I don’t know how they were build, since no humans where around? |
|
|
|
The only clear place where we see 6,000 years is the Bible. Other literature or ideas are not clear on the 6,000-year point. And even the Bible was not meant to be a historical record that shows 6,000 years, even though it does. How does the Bible show 6,000 years to, say, 6,200 years (not 10,000)? Indirectly. Here is the link that shows how the Bible does it - http://www.albatrus.org/english/theology/creation/biblical_age_earth.htm. This limited timeframe of 6000 years just brings up a lot of continuity questions. Everything has to fit inside 4000 B.C to now. Who build all the ancient structures? I mean, people did, yes we can agree on that – but where did the people come from? You need labor and God only created two of them! Where did all the manpower come from to build these structures located all over the world within 500-1500 years of creation? How did we go from two people to 150-300 million in just 4000 years? (to year 1). Do the math. |
|
|
|
In Finland they just made Crypto-Crypto trades taxable and it has a very high taxrate from profits and you cannot cut the losses. Was a sad day for the Finnish cryptospace :/
Ohh thats not good - hope it does not spread to other Nordic countries, that would indeed be very sad. From when is that in effect? |
|
|
|
According to the bible, the world and universe are about 6 to 10k years old at most. Obviously science has shown they are much older so that's already a big mistake. Badecker believes in creationism yet there is literally 0 evidence for it. He might think all the evidence we have for evolution is wrong but he doesn't even have 1 piece of evidence for his claim.
I see. 6000 years is a hard one to defend! Even with skill there are just too many things past that age. Wonder what the take on dinosaurs is then? All those bones and not one older than 6000 years? Even if c14 method is a bit off, it should be a lot off to account for this timeframe. |
|
|
|
a quite pre-view from DISCORD ---> new wallet in building   look like DSTRA might be release maternodes very soon I agree. Let's have patience in waiting for the masternode feature to be implemented with DSTRA. Right now, let's help build in making the community stronger. Let us make twits and retweets about DSTRA in social media. Let us also help DSTRA to get listed in good exchanges. So now let's HODL!  All true, and we do have patience. Not to worry. However it is very interesting to see images like this. Makes you wonder what’s going on behind the scene. More important that something IS going on. Sort of like small teasers for a good upcoming movie. I like to hear more! |
|
|
|
I'm not referring to the price of Bitcoin (we all know it's going to be $250,000/coin by 2022), but the goal that it would be a legitimate alternative to inflationary government fiat currencies. When the altcoin market is examined, it is inextricably linked to the price of Bitcoin. Where Bitcoin goes, so does the rest of the cryptocurrencies. There's even somewhat of a dismissive attitude toward other crytpos in some investment circles; strangely this was a similar sentiment held by those "respectable" investors when Bitcoin was in its infancy.
What do you think? I'd love to hear from some crytpo veterans.
Bitcoin was never meant to be an ssest in the first place. People began to buy bitcoin because of its value. Bitcoin was made to be like fiat money only decentralized. So in terms of reaching the goal I think bitcoin has a long way to go before reaching its goal. Very well said! I too believe it was meant to replace, at least live side by side, with fiat money. In that sense it’s a long way from its goal. And btc fee is the very thing that prevents it from fulfilling its goal. |
|
|
|
Evolution is a hoax. I had to go to page 1 of this thread to see what the original question was for this thread. “Why there are still monkeys around if they were part of our evolutionary beginnings”. Which is a rather easy question? Romans coins, in the millions, are also around, despite not being used for 1500 some years. Evolution is a hoax according to you. We spend 150 some pages of post arguing about that. I try and turn it around. If evolution is a hoax, how does it all work according to you? What is instead of evolution? creation?, limited evolution?, adoption?, something else? Are we carved in stone, all species? I have seen the number 6000 years several times in this thread, what is this number? Where does it come from, and what meaning does it have? Is it to be understood that nothing was before that time? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
