 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5]
|
Dev(s), Also, I don't know the dev(s) is/are who work on the github repository at https://github.com/vivocoin/vivo/, but most of the markdown (.md) documentation refers to links and resources that do not exist (404/not found) or straight up belong to another organization (like http://www.vivo.org/). This is making information and documentation quite confusing on github.  You know I had early access to a lot of publicly published info and pre-release wallets and code pre-ANN on github and the website (why public and not private nor obfuscated? I dunno.) When I tried to point these issues out and assist as an outsider with an unbiased fresh look, I was met with hostility, criticism and just plain immature name-calling on public forums and via PM (which I had to block as well). I hope with multiple devs, you found a professionalism and maturity in the past few days that is needed for vivo to succeed. Also, the download file names refer to 0.12.1.2 but it loads and runs as "v0.12.1.5-fd73133"? (Always has since last week actually) Another inconsistency. (or am I in the future...?) I know the devs have been really busy the past few weeks trying to get the ANN out, but it wouldn't hurt to dot your i's and cross you t's when it comes to consistent documentation and links. (2-4 devs with specialization? 3 diffe[Suspicious link removed] hosts on initial/pre-ANN masternodes via https://whois.domaintools.com/ at least. Same background net image coincidentally!) Nice website for vivo though! Some great work with templates and stock images. My compliments. (The actual https://www.vivocrypto.com/ to not be confusing) Still confusing with the similar VIVO logo and the Chinese telecom co. VIVO with their international re-sellers, etc. I see their pre-existing similar logo when I do a search (Google, Facebook, etc.). (minus the dot on the i, of course) Looking forward to acquiring some vivo on an exchange soon since you would not respond to my PM inquiries without abusive language. :\ Also, since all the devs have not been made public, who should be contacted depending on the issue? (github, code, masternodes, website, app pages/forums, etc.) I know it's an early coin still in development, but not owning VIVO, I have no stake and thus no bias towards nor against it nor an incentive to assist constructively as I have tried. Any and all information helps in clarity, consistency and transparency that is needed for trust, security and faith in VIVO (Las Vegas! had to...). Thank you. Regards, c_p "Brother, can you spare a thousand VIVO?" "Vivo Las Vegas!"TM VIVO: VLzVKK8NYKzaBUGfmgb7hC18zZmihkyrez |
|
|
|
Wow, The *4* pre-ANN masternodes are reaping in the 50% rewards now that miners/hashrate went up significantly on the 2 pools. Like all pre-mine PLUS half all current mine. :\ Just amazed that the ANN went up with no one else but dev and pre-ANN holders able to get & hold coins in limited masternodes while pushing the mining for half the take. 4 pre-ANN nodes = decentralized security? I'd like to see Vivo succeed long term, but a lot of initial tangential and derivative issues not really thought out for non-dev(s) interested in vivo. (miners, potential masternode ops, people waiting weeks for this ANN) Just my 2 cents. (which I can't use to buy vivo. yet.). Regards, c_p Buddy, can you spare a thousand vivo? Vivo Las Vegas!  VIVO: VLzVKK8NYKzaBUGfmgb7hC18zZmihkyrez |
|
|
|
I really wish we could vote on here to ban certain people from the community. Sick of people coming on here to just FUD and spam. If you think its such a bad coin why even come on here to tell us over and over again. Do you think you are some kind of Saint or Savior of us all. Go away and let us grow strong as a community with DAS.
I can reply as I wish. . . dev is a scammer, slowly dumping his coins. If not for MAX LEE. . . this coin won't be worth a sh*T. vergegod and others with similar statements without proof, If you make a statement like that, PLEASE show the proof. What wallet(s)? Amount(s)? Dates? Not converting some DAS at high from dev fund/premine to BTC for site and exchange expansion? Paying bounties or donations for contributions? Are you making statements based on opinion or FACT? Proof please. Do you have some unique insight and information to justify such a statement? I've reviewed the Explorers and richlist/wallet distribution and have found no activity in the past few weeks to justify your statement. OR prior ones like yours that have intentionally manipulated the DAS market to lows so day traders & shorts can buy, pump, dump and repeat. Opinions are fine (ie, IMHO). But statements like that require FACTS and PROOF. Thank you. Regards, c_p PS: Feel free to PM me if you have info that you don't want to make public for privacy/security reasons. |
|
|
|
Indeed, after the last update, the wallet works fine! I was convinced of this!
The next update is a minimum of changes in the source code! Next, we will optimize the source code under the code 0.12.5!
Please, for those who wish to update DAS! Do not offer suits and such! I will not depart from my concept! Das will be as he originally thought!
Later all services are returned to the official logos! Wait for new exchanges soon!
Thanks for the quick update, Truckman.  |
|
|
|
|
In reading the whitepaper, I was NOT impressed at all. WAY too much information and generalization of blockchain and the cryptosphere in general but nothing new, unique, improved nor fundamental from what is already out there. No specific on tech or anything substantial on what is unique about them. PlexCoin is NOT unique and does not look viable in the short nor long-term.
They don't want to compare against competitors, but keep comparing vs. Bitcoin history to pump and hype this coin. Bah! To compare themselves to BTC in any way is an offense to the long history and intense dev of Bitcoin as a currency and blockchain tech.
IMHO, PlexCoin is crap and a scam. If you can't put your own name and $$, have an app or other anything in alpha or beta to share or get anyone else to partner/grow, you are already too late and will go nowhere. Have fun in your own little token world, but I see this being an example of what NOT to do or invest in.
Ignore the hype. Ignore the pump. Go for facts and tech. I don't see anything at all that is appealing in this project, token, offerings or environment. It seems it's made to benefit a central core of participants while fleecing those who are late in the game. (rapid inflation). Reading everything sends off RED FLAGS in my gut and conscience.
I wish them luck, but be TRANSPARENT, HONEST and REALISTIC. If it is SO damn good, pull back the curtain and show the core team and their skills/experience that want to take your fiat or crypto. But they won't. In my opinion, it's anonymous hype, pump and dump MLM/referral/Ponzi scheme.
Regards,
c_p
|
|
|
|
These guys already did it and are further along with more backing and acceptance: https://www.tenx.tech/Regards, c_p |
|
|
|
In doing my due diligence on this ICO, I cannot find any specific names, registered business entities, trademarks nor patents associated with PlexCoin, PlexCorps nor any of it's product names. The group seems to use French as it's primary language for communication (hence the English translation spelling errors) and basic Canadian and France business entity searches revealed nothing (although MANY other countries use French as it's primary language; any ideas?). Plexcoin.com (created 5-24-17) whois (proxy/private contact): http://whois.domaintools.com/plexcoin.comPlexcorps.com (created 6-28-17 AFTER?) whois (again proxy/private): http://whois.domaintools.com/plexcorps.comPlexcoin.io: (created 2 DAYS AGO): http://whois.domaintools.com/plexcoin.ioPlexCorps was apparently formed in August of 2016 per FB About (word only; no actual dated proof). Approx "40" unnamed parties involved and an ICO with great expectations in less than a year from initial idea stage? Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/plexcorps/https://www.facebook.com/plexcoin/https://www.facebook.com/PlexCoinWorldTeam/FB Groups (public): https://www.facebook.com/groups/1276054719108946/https://www.facebook.com/groups/452940718402425/https://www.facebook.com/groups/1164078193717760/ (Promoters) Twitter: https://twitter.com/Plex_Coin(just created this month! only 7 tweets with 59 followers?!) Here's the Etherscan TokenTracker summary: https://etherscan.io/token/0xb3203DB25a01fa7950a860B42b899Ad7Da52DDD6(only selling 40% on ICO? Use and ownership of remaining 60%=600,000,000 tokens? I hope whitepaper properly addresses this.) Other than that NOTHING. No whitepaper review until AFTER the pre-sale registration almost ends (WP release Aug 4, pre-sale reg ends Aug 7). No person or dev ("engineer") willing to put their name publicly behind the product(s). No investors, backing, relationships, partnerships, associations, etc. NO public APP in alpha nor beta! (nothing online or Android/Play Store that I can find) Only a "powerful app" image just like the image of last month's whitepaper. (Only v1.2 in a year?!) Getting things registered and in the public IS your security from having it stolen ("plagiarized") behind the scenes (and prevent duplicating someone else's efforts who may be farther along with more backing and the internationally recognized patents/trademarks to prove it). Right now EVERYTHING is centralized and secret but we need to trust an unknown entity that they will deliver on a new, better, powerful decentralized "currency" (Uh-um: token banking system). We'll see the details *JUST* before the pre-sale begins with no time for feedback, analysis, corrections or thorough due diligence. As an experienced stock investor (& cypherpunk/early CPU miner of BTC) recently back in the cryptocurrency world, this ICO's lack of information, no personal backing (not even an alias or advance public whitepaper like BTC but it will be better?!), no corporate registration information, no trademark or patent registration available and VERY recent creation raises my concerns VERY much. I've seen scam ICO's with much more information than this so until I know who, where, when and specific answers instead of generalized hopes and dreams, I am staying away. The is a classic pump and hype with referrals on EVERY link I can find. Accelerators and hackerspaces around the world are creating "pie in the sky" startups like this like wildfire now. If you can't provide the unique firm basics and a firm feasible path well in advance but only promote, promote, promote, there is something very wrong. I see nothing unique about this ICO that can actually deliver. What about security?! With 3 fiat and 3 crypto currencies and SO many users involved, security not addressed anywhere I can find. I can get together with a couple hacker friends and do everything they currently have publicly showing (AND more, ie, dev names, business reg, template whitepaper, TM/patent ref, alpha apps, followers, etc) within days or a week on the outside. Easy. Summary as of now: A couple recently made http webpages with a lot of extraordinary promises, a couple recent FB pages/groups, a recent Twitter account, NO APP, NO WHITEPAPER, NO NAMES, NO DEVS, NO LOCATIONS, NO REGISTRATIONS, NO PATENTS, NO TRADEMARKS and website BASIC SECURITY. All this in less than an hour because there is nothing more than what you see. Just a LOT of HYPE so far. If anyone has anything to add, PLEASE DO. The SOONER the better. Thank you and good luck. I'll do my DD if/when more information becomes available to actually do DD on. "I may be onto something or I may be full of shit. Only time will tell." (My life's "caveat") Regards, c_p |
|
|
|
|
