How is this project going? The tokensale is not live yet? Is there any minimum contribution for the later sales?
Not live yet i guess, not sure about minimum and maximum contribution. you can join their telegram chat to get lastest information about that bro |
|
|
|
This project is a dead end.
Sorry, in advance, for your losses.
How could you said that? Do you have any problem with the project? |
|
|
|
Hello everyone!
Is the tokensale already started?
As far as i know, the private sale has been completed and soon will open for pre-sale phase |
|
|
|
|
Combining blockchain technology with IoT devices to create Intelligent Machine Economy is an idea that should be appreciated. Moreover, having to compete with its predecessors makes this project more interesting to observe its development. Hopefully all the team hopes can be realized.
|
|
|
|
Do you guys have any kind of roadmap of what you expect to be accomplished when? Also, what do you have done so far?
Maybe you can open the official website of Skynet because there has been described what steps and the extent of progress carried out by the team so far. [/quoteThere are always friends asking some ignorant questions, why not take the initiative to find answers Well, Maybe he is a lazy person to find information. Just want a quick way to get an answer. |
|
|
|
Where can I find ICO white list? And is KYC needed? If so, where can I find the link?
You must join the Skynet comminity at https://t.me/SkynetOpenNetwork for now. KYC also seems necessary. Although there is no place to sign up for the current KYC and Whitelist but when we announce the official token distribution date, there will be a dashboard where you can register and verify your identity. It seems so. Another inconsequential question.  Why 1 Trillion SON? Do you know or ever read about it? |
|
|
|
|
Where can I find ICO white list? And is KYC needed? If so, where can I find the link?
|
|
|
|
What about IoT? It seems that this project also uses it on the blockchain network, what will be another obstacle?
I think that's true because the Network architecture can't handle billions of interactions that IoT devices make every day, and doesn't support adoption in the real world. This blockchain also cannot interact with each other when they focus on their own applications rather than working together. Even newer DAG solutions have heavyweight operations, where sending transactions forces small devices to do proof of work. As a result, traditional blockchain and even newer versions are not suitable for IoT devices. What happens if it stays forced? Will something terrible happen? I just want to know. Of course, from what I have read, I am still forced not to be able to do Proof of Work Mining because smaller devices cannot be converted into miners because they face calculations and restrictions on power. And also can't save data because they face memory and storage limitations. And there are still a number of other points. But the worst is Cold Storage, with IoT devices hacked from things like BotNet, devices cannot store or use cryptocurrency safely. As a result, some distributed applications in learning and blockchain operations may not be suitable for Internet of Things devices. It turns out that it is very risky if it is still forced. Indeed, everything that is felt not all ends as expected. But I hope the team has found an intersection so this project can run as they want. |
|
|
|
What about IoT? It seems that this project also uses it on the blockchain network, what will be another obstacle?
I think that's true because the Network architecture can't handle billions of interactions that IoT devices make every day, and doesn't support adoption in the real world. This blockchain also cannot interact with each other when they focus on their own applications rather than working together. Even newer DAG solutions have heavyweight operations, where sending transactions forces small devices to do proof of work. As a result, traditional blockchain and even newer versions are not suitable for IoT devices. What happens if it stays forced? Will something terrible happen? I just want to know. |
|
|
|
|
What about IoT? It seems that this project also uses it on the blockchain network, what will be another obstacle?
|
|
|
|
|
How does the team ways to development SON Virtual Application Layer on this project?
|
|
|
|
Is the pre-sales countdown time on the website definitely accurate? Or is there a possibility of changing the launch schedule?
Looks like the counters on their website aren't too accurate. But the possibility remains. Why can you assume that? Do you have information about this? Because if that's true as if we are willing to invest money to the teams that have degrees from high universities and have the support of several large companies, but they can't just make their countdown time to function. This sounds pretty strange. |
|
|
|
|
Is the pre-sales countdown time on the website definitely accurate? Or is there a possibility of changing the launch schedule?
|
|
|
|
|
In which part I can find an explanation about the machine reputation on this project? Can anyone help?
|
|
|
|
Will Skynet have a separate blockchain? And is this token security or utility?
I've heard this before, and basically they created something called Skynet Open Network, Fabric, which you can think of as the "root" of all trees. This is a blockchain platform that allows the creation of Proof-of-Stake blockchains that can have their own independent governance, virtual machines, etc. The token that stalks the original for this is Skynet and the original cost token for this is called Light. Only to this extent do I know. But is this type of token security or utility? |
|
|
|
|
Will Skynet have a separate blockchain? And is this token security or utility?
|
|
|
|
|
What kind of end-to-end solution does Skynet apply to this project?
|
|
|
|
|
As far as I know each token is still on the Etherium network. For this project itself, will it be during Eth's chains or will it launch its own chain?
|
|
|
|
But apart from all that there is a question. Although still in one container organization is usually big companies are not origin in taking decisions to establish partnerships with fellow members. Of all the partners that Sknet has in a Foundation that is intertwined in this project do they all agree to use their core? And is Skynet sure that their partners will give full support to this project?
The latest information on the partners has not yet determined whether to use the core of this project. Between Skynet and the partners are still doing a conversation to discuss it. I think this is because until now Skynet does not have a functioning product. And so far their relationship is only limited to technology partners and there is no work relationship. Until now there has been no further confirmation from the team about how clear their work relationship. we should be patient with this project like this because it's a very big project and it's combined with some new hardwares to be produced for many blockchains and also the partners in the skynet network. Yes, right, but if until now there has been no recent confirmation of this matter from the team it is very unfortunate, considering the concept they made is quite interesting for many parties. Especially with the latest news about their Co-Founders coming out because of differences in interests. Will this affect the change in interest in this project, both from the investors and the users later? |
|
|
|
|
But apart from all that there is a question. Although still in one container organization is usually big companies are not origin in taking decisions to establish partnerships with fellow members. Of all the partners that Sknet has in a Foundation that is intertwined in this project do they all agree to use their core? And is Skynet sure that their partners will give full support to this project?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
