All bulls*t, IBM is in da house project tested 480TPS and will show this live in the upcoming months.
Invest now or cry later!!!
AHAHAHAH are you really this retarded? Nah, you are just trying to hype it. I`m retarded yes making a lot of money indeed and what are you doing? spreading FUD and not making any money because you focusing on FUDDING |
|
|
|
All bulls*t, IBM is in da house project tested 480TPS and will show this live in the upcoming months. Invest now or cry later!!! |
|
|
|
Some recent posts on Reddit laughing at Credits:
Ethereum scaled to 1.5 mil tps for fun, how is Credits manipulating with ignorant people? So just some random guy on the Internet decided to scale Ethereum for fun. Ignoring every possible safety or blockchain feature he managed to scale it over a million tps. It took him one day. https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-scaling-ethereum-to-1-5-million-tps-cd10f5e3f7ccIn case you can't be bothered reading through all of this, just a quick summary: "1.5 million “TPS” achieved. TPS is less important than, how we measure TPS, and TPS as a theoretical excercise vs TPS in a production environment are two incredibly different things. You want to get rid of PoW and only use trusted nodes? Sure, you can exponentially increase that TPS. You want to make sure those trusted nodes are high end? Sure, you control them afterall. There are so many factors you can control to create the perfect TPS environment, but none of this is true blockchain, it’s just another form of centralization, you trust those nodes, you trust their owners, true decentralization is about a complete lack of trust, you don’t trusts those nodes and you definitely don’t trust their owners. This is what makes blockchain so wonderful. My mentor decades ago taught me, when you develop two systems, you develop them like system A does not trust system B. I architecture that way even today, because people, and especially systems are inherently evil. So why are we throwing away this wonderful solution of blockchain, and instead favoring the old centralized way, where the richest and most influential control all the power? Blockchain was about shifting that power from them to the masses, and instead we are rewarding these centralized solutions more and more with our money. Anyway, there is your Ethereum with 1.5 million “TPS”, it took me less than 24 hours." Why is this relevant? Because non-technical people are getting fooled by flashy titles and claims by Credits. If you check a review published in this sub ( https://np.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/85btx8/commentary_of_credits_second_alpha_test_post/), you can clearly see that they did pretty much the same in order to achieve 400k tps. It is basically pointless test completed only to brag about, because most people don't understand a thing about this. They would just look for a product claiming of 123 tps because it must clearly be better than 85 tps or something... Not to mention that this effect is so much more powerful with Credits when you know that Ethereum is doing much less than 100 tps as a working product. Then these marketing gimmicks come and say they are doing 400 000. Do you think any serious blockchain project would even consider doing such immense hype over such pointless claims and tests? Imagine if Vitalik did this, credibility lost forever among [Suspicious link removed]munity and experts. Credits claim they have been developing their product for 3 years (??), then release a laughable product that can be done in days. Not to mention that their coding skills are hideous ( https://np.reddit.com/r/coinjudge/comments/8440es/credits_red_flags). "The coding practice is terrible and no professional with a year or more of experience would code like this; Go to line 34, the function ClReceiveRequestThread. Line 69 is the start of the for loop within that function. Line 82 is an if statement within the for loop. We are now one level deep. Line 192 is the start of another function within ClReceiveRequestThread, with a switch statement. We are now two levels deep. Line 197 has a case statement which leads into another switch statement. We are now three levels deep. Line 203 has a case statement which leads into an if statement, we are now four levels deep. On Line 211, we have an if statement within the previous if statement, so we are not five levels deep. It is a clear sign of a beginner programmer, when we see multi layered logic statements. As a programmer, it would be hell to debug this code, and it is just one file, with arguably the easiest part." People are saying 'this will be huge' or 'I don't care as long as it get me money' or 'It's worth a risk'. How ignorant is that? This shitcoin can be profitable only with irrational hype and delusion. That's a proper pump and dump stuff right there. Based on their own tests and some hilarious 'partnerships' they claim to have. They are creating hype out of thin air in order to keep the flow going, at the same time censoring anyone exposing them. This is pretty much the cheapest looking marketing campaign done in crypto since Bitconnect. There is absolutely a huge amount of people completely unaware of what's going on. If this guy from Medium article get's an idea to publish a flashy whitepaper one day, he would probably be able to fool people just like Credits. There was an article few days ago: 'Nearly Half of 2017’s Cryptocurrency 'ICO' Projects Have Already Died'. Some of them were instant scams, most of others just money grabs fooling people and doing nothing. You can be sure that this shit will get regulated pretty soon in order to create a healthy environment for investors and institutions. Then those marketing specialists like Credits might be prevented in time. Bla bla we're up 40% today, your FUD is not woring because this project is awesome and legit! You going to cry when we hit 10+ dollar this year hahaha bye bye FUD hello awesome project!!! blah blah still a scam hit 100$ still a scam don't be ashamed of making profit out of scam  Lol this is the same as Ethereum back in the days, everybody said scam bla bla and look at it now... Credits will go high this year if you like it or not  Said every bitconeeeeect holder You going to compare Bitconnect with Credits? haha hope you are trolling... |
|
|
|
Some recent posts on Reddit laughing at Credits:
Ethereum scaled to 1.5 mil tps for fun, how is Credits manipulating with ignorant people? So just some random guy on the Internet decided to scale Ethereum for fun. Ignoring every possible safety or blockchain feature he managed to scale it over a million tps. It took him one day. https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-scaling-ethereum-to-1-5-million-tps-cd10f5e3f7ccIn case you can't be bothered reading through all of this, just a quick summary: "1.5 million “TPS” achieved. TPS is less important than, how we measure TPS, and TPS as a theoretical excercise vs TPS in a production environment are two incredibly different things. You want to get rid of PoW and only use trusted nodes? Sure, you can exponentially increase that TPS. You want to make sure those trusted nodes are high end? Sure, you control them afterall. There are so many factors you can control to create the perfect TPS environment, but none of this is true blockchain, it’s just another form of centralization, you trust those nodes, you trust their owners, true decentralization is about a complete lack of trust, you don’t trusts those nodes and you definitely don’t trust their owners. This is what makes blockchain so wonderful. My mentor decades ago taught me, when you develop two systems, you develop them like system A does not trust system B. I architecture that way even today, because people, and especially systems are inherently evil. So why are we throwing away this wonderful solution of blockchain, and instead favoring the old centralized way, where the richest and most influential control all the power? Blockchain was about shifting that power from them to the masses, and instead we are rewarding these centralized solutions more and more with our money. Anyway, there is your Ethereum with 1.5 million “TPS”, it took me less than 24 hours." Why is this relevant? Because non-technical people are getting fooled by flashy titles and claims by Credits. If you check a review published in this sub ( https://np.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/85btx8/commentary_of_credits_second_alpha_test_post/), you can clearly see that they did pretty much the same in order to achieve 400k tps. It is basically pointless test completed only to brag about, because most people don't understand a thing about this. They would just look for a product claiming of 123 tps because it must clearly be better than 85 tps or something... Not to mention that this effect is so much more powerful with Credits when you know that Ethereum is doing much less than 100 tps as a working product. Then these marketing gimmicks come and say they are doing 400 000. Do you think any serious blockchain project would even consider doing such immense hype over such pointless claims and tests? Imagine if Vitalik did this, credibility lost forever among [Suspicious link removed]munity and experts. Credits claim they have been developing their product for 3 years (??), then release a laughable product that can be done in days. Not to mention that their coding skills are hideous ( https://np.reddit.com/r/coinjudge/comments/8440es/credits_red_flags). "The coding practice is terrible and no professional with a year or more of experience would code like this; Go to line 34, the function ClReceiveRequestThread. Line 69 is the start of the for loop within that function. Line 82 is an if statement within the for loop. We are now one level deep. Line 192 is the start of another function within ClReceiveRequestThread, with a switch statement. We are now two levels deep. Line 197 has a case statement which leads into another switch statement. We are now three levels deep. Line 203 has a case statement which leads into an if statement, we are now four levels deep. On Line 211, we have an if statement within the previous if statement, so we are not five levels deep. It is a clear sign of a beginner programmer, when we see multi layered logic statements. As a programmer, it would be hell to debug this code, and it is just one file, with arguably the easiest part." People are saying 'this will be huge' or 'I don't care as long as it get me money' or 'It's worth a risk'. How ignorant is that? This shitcoin can be profitable only with irrational hype and delusion. That's a proper pump and dump stuff right there. Based on their own tests and some hilarious 'partnerships' they claim to have. They are creating hype out of thin air in order to keep the flow going, at the same time censoring anyone exposing them. This is pretty much the cheapest looking marketing campaign done in crypto since Bitconnect. There is absolutely a huge amount of people completely unaware of what's going on. If this guy from Medium article get's an idea to publish a flashy whitepaper one day, he would probably be able to fool people just like Credits. There was an article few days ago: 'Nearly Half of 2017’s Cryptocurrency 'ICO' Projects Have Already Died'. Some of them were instant scams, most of others just money grabs fooling people and doing nothing. You can be sure that this shit will get regulated pretty soon in order to create a healthy environment for investors and institutions. Then those marketing specialists like Credits might be prevented in time. Bla bla we're up 40% today, your FUD is not woring because this project is awesome and legit! You going to cry when we hit 10+ dollar this year hahaha bye bye FUD hello awesome project!!! blah blah still a scam hit 100$ still a scam don't be ashamed of making profit out of scam Lol this is the same as Ethereum back in the days, everybody said scam bla bla and look at it now... Credits will go high this year if you like it or not |
|
|
|
Some recent posts on Reddit laughing at Credits:
Ethereum scaled to 1.5 mil tps for fun, how is Credits manipulating with ignorant people? So just some random guy on the Internet decided to scale Ethereum for fun. Ignoring every possible safety or blockchain feature he managed to scale it over a million tps. It took him one day. https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-scaling-ethereum-to-1-5-million-tps-cd10f5e3f7ccIn case you can't be bothered reading through all of this, just a quick summary: "1.5 million “TPS” achieved. TPS is less important than, how we measure TPS, and TPS as a theoretical excercise vs TPS in a production environment are two incredibly different things. You want to get rid of PoW and only use trusted nodes? Sure, you can exponentially increase that TPS. You want to make sure those trusted nodes are high end? Sure, you control them afterall. There are so many factors you can control to create the perfect TPS environment, but none of this is true blockchain, it’s just another form of centralization, you trust those nodes, you trust their owners, true decentralization is about a complete lack of trust, you don’t trusts those nodes and you definitely don’t trust their owners. This is what makes blockchain so wonderful. My mentor decades ago taught me, when you develop two systems, you develop them like system A does not trust system B. I architecture that way even today, because people, and especially systems are inherently evil. So why are we throwing away this wonderful solution of blockchain, and instead favoring the old centralized way, where the richest and most influential control all the power? Blockchain was about shifting that power from them to the masses, and instead we are rewarding these centralized solutions more and more with our money. Anyway, there is your Ethereum with 1.5 million “TPS”, it took me less than 24 hours." Why is this relevant? Because non-technical people are getting fooled by flashy titles and claims by Credits. If you check a review published in this sub ( https://np.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/85btx8/commentary_of_credits_second_alpha_test_post/), you can clearly see that they did pretty much the same in order to achieve 400k tps. It is basically pointless test completed only to brag about, because most people don't understand a thing about this. They would just look for a product claiming of 123 tps because it must clearly be better than 85 tps or something... Not to mention that this effect is so much more powerful with Credits when you know that Ethereum is doing much less than 100 tps as a working product. Then these marketing gimmicks come and say they are doing 400 000. Do you think any serious blockchain project would even consider doing such immense hype over such pointless claims and tests? Imagine if Vitalik did this, credibility lost forever among [Suspicious link removed]munity and experts. Credits claim they have been developing their product for 3 years (??), then release a laughable product that can be done in days. Not to mention that their coding skills are hideous ( https://np.reddit.com/r/coinjudge/comments/8440es/credits_red_flags). "The coding practice is terrible and no professional with a year or more of experience would code like this; Go to line 34, the function ClReceiveRequestThread. Line 69 is the start of the for loop within that function. Line 82 is an if statement within the for loop. We are now one level deep. Line 192 is the start of another function within ClReceiveRequestThread, with a switch statement. We are now two levels deep. Line 197 has a case statement which leads into another switch statement. We are now three levels deep. Line 203 has a case statement which leads into an if statement, we are now four levels deep. On Line 211, we have an if statement within the previous if statement, so we are not five levels deep. It is a clear sign of a beginner programmer, when we see multi layered logic statements. As a programmer, it would be hell to debug this code, and it is just one file, with arguably the easiest part." People are saying 'this will be huge' or 'I don't care as long as it get me money' or 'It's worth a risk'. How ignorant is that? This shitcoin can be profitable only with irrational hype and delusion. That's a proper pump and dump stuff right there. Based on their own tests and some hilarious 'partnerships' they claim to have. They are creating hype out of thin air in order to keep the flow going, at the same time censoring anyone exposing them. This is pretty much the cheapest looking marketing campaign done in crypto since Bitconnect. There is absolutely a huge amount of people completely unaware of what's going on. If this guy from Medium article get's an idea to publish a flashy whitepaper one day, he would probably be able to fool people just like Credits. There was an article few days ago: 'Nearly Half of 2017’s Cryptocurrency 'ICO' Projects Have Already Died'. Some of them were instant scams, most of others just money grabs fooling people and doing nothing. You can be sure that this shit will get regulated pretty soon in order to create a healthy environment for investors and institutions. Then those marketing specialists like Credits might be prevented in time. Bla bla we're up 40% today, your FUD is not woring because this project is awesome and legit! You going to cry when we hit 10+ dollar this year hahaha bye bye FUD hello awesome project!!! |
|
|
|
Come on guys! You can be better than this. So obvious what you are doing you piece of sh*ts! I prefer to support this project instead of listening to those fudster, it's my money and my time anyway I have seen the interview and check the team composition and I believe they will not ruin their reputation with this accusations let's see how it goes when they launch their platform.
For now I prefer to support this project instead of listening to those fudster too, it's my money and my time anyway I have seen the interview and check the team composition and I believe they will not ruin their reputation with this accusations let's see how it goes when they launch their platform. And I believe in that proj and keep these coins and I think after some time everything will be fine and the coin will grow.
You are desperate of creating a hype for your scam ico. Dont trust these scams guys. Be cautious hahha can I ask how old you are? 12? talk like a normal person not like a keyboardwarrior! |
|
|
|
Bam1!! great news! Already said 10x this is legit and late buyers will cry....
LMAO yeah a legit advisor who got paid to like them on Twitter and retweet thier hideous claims. Anyone who thinks this has anything to do with IBM is a moron. This guy is probably disgusted that he has to do this in order to meet the agreement as an advisor. Go ahead and ask him on Linkedin, how he feels about that alpha test on a single server, on the same computer in parallel threads. He probably hates himself for having to retweet this scam. Two guys are from IBM so it has everything to do with IBM. How long are going to spread FUD here? What is your purpose to do this? Go invest in something you like and is legit in your point of view and stop acting like a little kid here. |
|
|
|
Bam1!! great news! Already said 10x this is legit and late buyers will cry.... |
|
|
|
You really think guy`s of IBM going to work with a scam project
YES!hahahah ok I`m done with you... |
|
|
|
488 403 transactions per second during the testing, all your articles say that coding sucks etc but still 488TPS.
So if the coding sucks why is it still faster then all other competitors?
That means that all other competitors have more suckie coding because they don`t get 488TPS....
Have you EVEN read any of the articles? https://np.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/85btx8/commentary_of_credits_second_alpha_test_post The only thing they have is a pdf they created which they called it whitepaper and a video that shows transactions between 2 nodes running on same computer with zero network latency due to hyper-v.Whatever, I can`t change your mind so doesn`t matter what I say. Good luck with calling this a scam, but I think you`re making a mistake.. Oh fuck it you can't be this dumb and ignorant, you just acting like it and trolling I hope... No I`m not trolling. make your decision following things: * Nitin Gaur and Kyle wang IBM ADVISORY BOARD * Alpha test 488 TPS * Partnership with Messenger Bank
You really think guy`s of IBM going to work with a scam project hahaha and you call me ignorant and dumb... |
|
|
|
488 403 transactions per second during the testing, all your articles say that coding sucks etc but still 488TPS.
So if the coding sucks why is it still faster then all other competitors?
That means that all other competitors have more suckie coding because they don`t get 488TPS....
Have you EVEN read any of the articles? https://np.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/85btx8/commentary_of_credits_second_alpha_test_post The only thing they have is a pdf they created which they called it whitepaper and a video that shows transactions between 2 nodes running on same computer with zero network latency due to hyper-v.Whatever, I can`t change your mind so doesn`t matter what I say. Good luck with calling this a scam, but I think you`re making a mistake.. |
|
|
|
488 403 transactions per second during the testing, all your articles say that coding sucks etc but still 488TPS. So if the coding sucks why is it still faster then all other competitors? That means that all other competitors have more suckie coding because they don`t get 488TPS.... |
|
|
|
Very interesting, that the transaction video did not cause a big price effect! I thought we will see 1$ and more, but seems like even the majority of the crypto hyping idiots now accepting that this project is not legit until they release their code!  Yea we need to wait lot of people are skeptical about Credits, time will learn that this is a awesome project! |
|
|
|
If processing 400K transactions per second was possibly believe me it would already be done by another devteam. It`s done by Credits deal with it... You just jealous I guess? No one will be jealous on idiots Credits lol Apparently you're, you keep fudding here and can`t reply like a normal person. Tell my why Credits sucks on a technical manner? |
|
|
|
If processing 400K transactions per second was possibly believe me it would already be done by another devteam. It`s done by Credits deal with it... You just jealous I guess? |
|
|
|
I'm hugging 100k VOISE price 500sat, please someone tell me the price will go up no
Its will go higher then where we are now, wait till the end of 2018 and you will be happy |
|
|
|
Credits is about to break into the 100 on cmc. Go credits!!!!
yes, creadits will go to 100 on coinmarketcap, as we can see today the price is more than $1 value, this very unpredictable price movement Now CS continues to increase and has been confirmed listed on kucoin. I think this is a good time to buy a CS and keep it for a long time because the CS price may reach $2 today or tomorrow and in the next few months the CS will reach $ 10 and be in the top 50 coinmarketcap. This will probably happen in the future just to buy and hold Wait till Mainnet is released in June, then you will see way higher prices. |
|
|
|
It is about 70 % increased price than yesterday, what happened?
Whats happened? This coin is just launched and it have the best Transaction Per Second (TPS) of every blockchain. Comparing:Bitcoin: 4 TPS Ethereum: 10 TPS EOS: 300.000 TPS Credits: 1.000.000 TPSSo I think it can be much higher.. In june they launch Credits.. High expectations about this coin. Haha that's bullshit, totally SCAM Credits CAN'T and COULDN'T handle 1000000 TPS IOTA promised the same, how much they can handle now? 5 tps?¿ Scammers are learning fast, now they are going Justin Sunstyle. Partnerships after partnerships. I guess people never learn. Credits hype is pure speculation. It delivers nothing, and will never. So stupid read the whitepaper!!! Alpha already tested with 500k TPS so... |
|
|
|
A nice start we have for voise on cobinhood,I hate the interface and color of the exchange and we have zero volume until now.There is no night mode on the exchange, they should have added this feature as well. is it safe to trade in cobinhood? actually i haven't tried it. im afraid to use exchanges that are not well known yet. also, what is the ico price of voise token? so i can compare the present price it it already surpassed the ico price? If you want to see the price it hit the market, all you have to do is look up the old symbol VSM Just do a search with "VSM coinmarketcap" and you will get a link to the old symbol Just remember, VOISE did a 1:1000 split from the old VSM symbol, so you will have to adjust the price accordingly If I recall, with VOISE at 1 penny USD, it's about 3 times from when it was released. So, right now it's about 8 times larger then it was when it first hit coinmarketcap.com visited the coinmarketcap and saw that voise current price is around more than 300 sats per token. someone told me that he has VSM and just hold it until the swap. he told me that the price during the swap was below 100 sats, if it is true then the price now have just amazed me. True, I had VSM and 1 VMS was 1000 Voise. so Yes I`m happy and there is still more to come |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
