I have a few questions though:
Why is there a "rounds played" variable? is this round going to end sometime and I'm going to have to pay another fee? If so, I didn't see that information anywhere... D:
In the "settings" tab, I can check or uncheck "automatic rotation". What's that?
I wonder also. |
|
|
|
|
+1, maybe set a post/rank requirement before one can change username.
|
|
|
|
So many projects appeared recently, looks like I'm not keeping the pace the community is going with =) BTW, I made my new project, which is currently running on http://rand.bitcat.ch/ I've not announced it yet, so think of it as a some kind of unreleased project, but I think, I'll announce it in this week. Great! im in =) http://rand.bitcat.ch/?ref=3 |
|
|
|
|
What is the difference between RPC command "getbalance account" and "getreceivedbyaccount account"?
|
|
|
|
|
ah ok, yes I had one account with negative balance.
|
|
|
|
|
Can RPC command 'getbalance' be less than 'getbalance "account"'?
|
|
|
|
|
I have created some accounts via bitcoin client GUI. When I use the RPC command getaccountaddress to get the address, it creates a new address instead and when I try to rename the new address created by RPC via GUI it renames in GUI but still not via RPC.
Example
Lets say I have
Account Address
Test 1BmAsnzVSfXd4xg6n3ufkEaRCD4advdgqg
I now call RPC getaccountaddress Test. It return a new address (1BUDcUr1WR6H12Vot7qprZoWeZUBunPuMg)
Now I have two accounts
Account Address
Test 1BmAsnzVSfXd4xg6n3ufkEaRCD4advdgqg
Test 1BUDcUr1WR6H12Vot7qprZoWeZUBunPuMg
If I rename the new address (1BUDcUr1WR6H12Vot7qprZoWeZUBunPuMg) to Test2 in GUI and then call RPC getaccountaddress Test it still return 1BUDcUr1WR6H12Vot7qprZoWeZUBunPuMg
Im using win vista and the portable bitcoin client 0.3.24.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree, I vote for disable images in signatures.
* This will also save bandwidth when I surf on my iphone^^.
* Faster page loading time
* Less distraction when reading, which result faster reading.
|
|
|
|
Is it intentional that under the current rules depositing more money reduces your chances of getting selected randomly? If you wanted it the other way around, try this: SELECT MemberId FROM bpMember ORDER BY (fromWallet+1)*rand() DESC LIMIT 1;
Both algorithms are correct and favor members who deposited more. I tried both of them 1000 times and here are the results. Which one would you choose?  Not fair, Im not in the list  hehe |
|
|
|
|
Btw 11pm-4am UTC is bad time for me, im in CET (UTC+2)
4pm-10pm UTC is best time
|
|
|
|
his Game will go on for 48 hours Winners When you get payed please post Send 1-2 BTC to 17C8wvVHvTeE6ZnoQM8wkSJEWYirfZjsDk - Do not send less than 0.50 and dont send more than 1
- Don't use EWallet
- fee 2%
will post the bitcoin addresses of the people who entered here(once they are confirmed) ▼ [Date&Time] [Bitcoin address] [amount] [amount payed back to user] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- eh? "send 1-2 BTC" and the rules says "dont send more than 1"? |
|
|
|
|
Go to PROFILE > Personal Message Options and check Save a copy of each Personal Message in my outbox by default.
|
|
|
|
|
Very very bad news if this happens =/
|
|
|
|
|
I have a suggestion, how about limit the withdrawn so you max can withdraw 2X of what you deposited? If you maxed the withdraw it will go to some random untill you deposit again. This will result more people getting profits and more money getting deposit.
|
|
|
|
|
hmm, isnt it better to stick on one db engine? Stick to InnoDB
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
