If you support the Gold Standard you are now officially an extremist according to FBI:
They want a world of false scarcity. And they want, so bad, for us all to believe them.
|
|
|
I know some people on this thread don't like watching videos,
Distaste for watching videos isn't the problem, it's distaste for the truth for people.
|
|
|
Much sooner than that. Some might say it is already bad for small miners. But I suppose it depends on what you consider "bad for small miners"? If it takes a typical miner several hours to find a share, that is going to lead to painful variance.
I made a chart to illustrate what happens as the pool gets larger. The chart is based on an overall bitcoin difficulty of 1.4 million (approx what we are now and will be for the next round).
Thanks for that chart. Definitely important for any small miner. I have a lot to learn here but there seems to be no point at all mining in p2pool if you're a small miner. And small miners will figure this out quickly and move back to their favorite pool.
|
|
|
Funny! Check out "keiser report" on rt.com
re-hypothecation is equally absurd as quantitative easing The latest is negative bond yields (I think that's what they're calling it)
|
|
|
Creature-Jekyll-Island-Federal-Reserve
Yes, a very popular book. Can also get lots of info from author's site and newsletters, www.realityzone.com/un.htmlBut I find that some people really are happier not knowing the truth. It's a harsh reality to discover that pretty much everything you thought you knew turns out to be make believe. I heard that Ft. Knox has had no third party audit since the 1970s. Why would they not want an audit. Something to hide? The lies go deep and wide. Like standing in a 20 mile diameter crater. You don't know even know until you do your own exploration.
|
|
|
Quoting wikipedia as fact. Really?
|
|
|
its important to take into consideration the great mass of people who might recoil in horror from a bitcoin address or the thought of anything more than copy and paste html code. Paypal is widely used for these very reasons.
BTC is anonymous. Paypal's not. If someone recoils in horror at a bitcoin address then how would they have BTC? It's something that you get used to quickly and eventually it's trivial. Are you saying you want traceable donations? Seems to be against what eff is supposedly about. I do have my doubts and feel like eff is yet another controlled-opposition. Of course you wouldn't be privy to that info as only the eff pupper masters would know meanwhile keeping staffers shiny and happy.
|
|
|
The Federal Reserve is mainly a government agency
This makes no sense. An agency is either a govt. agency or it is not. The federal reserve is not federal and has no reserve. It's private and they are leading the world to ruin.
|
|
|
It does, just start a new instance in another command window with your desired arguments. They will be forwarded to the running bitcoind and the values returned to you.
Then it is cool. Works great.
|
|
|
Here's a great command to list found blocks: bitcoind listtransactions
It would be cool if bitcoind had a side-channel interface so that queries could be made while it was running. Probably via http or ssh.
|
|
|
P2Pool should listen on port 9332 on all interfaces. Is this a problem..? You mentioned just needing to connect external miners, which many people already do.
It's not a problem for me now, I modified main.py. I tried to add the diff to an issue for p2pool on github. I'm pretty sure that my diff got garbled on github. sorryboutthat I'm not githubish yet. I have tested it and it does work.
|
|
|
line 764 of p2pool/main.py has a reactor.listenTCP where you can provide an interface argument, but doesn't. So, wait on forrestv to code the means of changing that via argument or take the initiative.
Thanks will look, I'm not very pythonesque. Pythonista? Pythonovite? Pythonian? Pythoner?
|
|
|
p2pool interface: --p2pool-port PORT use port PORT to listen for connections (forward this port from your router!) (default: bitcoin:9333, litecoin:9338) -n ADDR[:PORT], --p2pool-node ADDR[:PORT] connect to existing p2pool node at ADDR listening on port PORT (defaults to default p2pool P2P port) in addition to builtin addresses
worker interface: -w PORT, --worker-port PORT listen on PORT for RPC connections from miners (default: bitcoin:9332, litecoin:9327) I am probably missing some detail. I've read the manual, etc. "connect to existing p2pool node at ADDR listening on" That's not clear to me. It says to connect to an existing p2pool node. I'm running p2pool to listen for my miners not to connect to an existing node.
|
|
|
I don't pay for power
If you don't pay for power than you just have to recoup HW costs. So might as well buy a bunch of cheap HW.
|
|
|
I have multiple interfaces on a host and I want run_p2pool.py to listen on 9.8.7.6:9332 How do I do this?
|
|
|
have a look at FPGAs, cablesaurus selling them. Are you okay (with that rig you spec'd) with getting half as many BTC before end of year? There's some speculation that it may happen this year and then mining becomes less worthwhile unless you can get power costs way down.
|
|
|
Ok, you're on a super slow connection, like a modem it seems. If you can download the software you should be able to figure out how to file a bug report. It's all on bitcoin.org. You may also see a solution for your problem.
|
|
|
Butterflylabs said they are shipping their first round of production soon.
They look a bit scammy to me. They say 4-6 weeks for first product.
|
|
|
What's ccapp.exe? Is that anti-virus stuff? What version bitcoin? Have you filed a bug report yet?
|
|
|
Nice setup. The PV systems are almost as bad as those huge 3-blade wind turbines. The price is too high. It's more about feeling good to be doing something for the enviro. They just cost too much and that cost is too slow to recoup. You end up paying to maintain them too.
The real free energy is all around us. Check out the guy that heated his big, old midwest home using a $200 digester. He was getting 90,000 BTU.
|
|
|
|