Latest posts of: lawrencelyl

Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5]

on: July 27, 2015, 01:32:47 PM

Quote from: sp_ on July 27, 2015, 07:51:34 AM Quote from: MehZhure on July 27, 2015, 05:28:51 AM I keep seeing people talk about "non-opens source" mining software. Where can we purchase it? I have tried to find it, but all I have found is open source software. Google wolf0. He has made a neoscrypt kernal that is 300% faster than the opensource kernal. I am not sure he will sell it though because some of the kernals have been stolen and distributed on the internet for free. With wolf0's code, a single 290x will outperform 2 furyx mining neoscrypt. That's why sharks with 1000+ gpu's are willing to pay alot of BTC to keep the kernals private. So is there any private miner that can boost neoscrypt to >200% on Nvidia?

on: July 19, 2015, 03:14:05 AM

Quote from: hashbrown9000 on July 19, 2015, 03:04:08 AM Quote Quote from: hashbrown9000 on Today at 01:25:29 AM looks like the Quark honeymoon is over. Now 0.187 on hashpower Explain plz? Well, for people that pay for electricity anyways. For me, at $0.11/kwH , it's just about breaking even = no point to keep the rigs running. In my country, I pay $0.137/kwh excluding tax.

on: July 18, 2015, 01:24:48 PM

Quote from: sp_ on July 18, 2015, 12:35:01 PM submitted another optimalization in bmw512. Visible improvement in the the quark algo the gtx960 is up 50-100khash Compiled and observed about 100++kH/s speed increase for gtx980

on: July 17, 2015, 03:37:55 PM

Quote from: MaxDZ8 on July 17, 2015, 02:20:11 PM Quote from: lawrencelyl on July 17, 2015, 11:42:10 AM Quote from: MaxDZ8 on July 17, 2015, 08:19:06 AM The main problem is hashing rarely causes cards to go full load. I'm pretty sure groestl at 30.6MHs on 980Ti isn't full load nor qubit at 17.4. Running quark algo pushed my gtx980 over 100% load. However, x11 algo seems to be slightly less than that. Nice to know, I believe we should ask ourself questions at this point as that's impossible. You probably don't know, officially my house heater has 109% efficiency. Well, at least from the power consumption perspective it's hitting full load. My card registered 200W when running quark algo. From benchmark (of the same card) that I have read on other site, full load for my card is around 200W. So, I think it is pretty close - minus the VRAM loading perhaps.

on: July 17, 2015, 11:42:10 AM

Quote from: MaxDZ8 on July 17, 2015, 08:19:06 AM The main problem is hashing rarely causes cards to go full load. I'm pretty sure groestl at 30.6MHs on 980Ti isn't full load nor qubit at 17.4. Running quark algo pushed my gtx980 over 100% load. However, x11 algo seems to be slightly less than that.

on: July 17, 2015, 11:34:41 AM

Quote from: sp_ on July 17, 2015, 10:36:35 AM Another yaampclone has added sharkcoin: http://ffpool.net/ 9GHASH hasrate of quark so far. (a payout of 0.4046btc/GHASH the last 24hours) Nicehash/westhash are only paying 0.25BTC/GHASH and the net hashrate is 85GHASH@quark. I see that ffpool payout for quark has dropped to 0.2555 ...pretty much inline with nicehash/westhash now.

on: July 16, 2015, 03:38:23 PM

TDP is usually accurate for reference design card in terms of power consumption. For example a reference design GTX970 will consume around 145W under full load while GTX980 will consume around 165W. However, if the card is not based on reference design, then usually the manufacturer will increase the TDP to hit higher clock speed to squeeze out more performance.

on: July 16, 2015, 03:41:50 AM

Quote from: joblo on July 16, 2015, 02:13:26 AM Quote from: hashbrown9000 on July 16, 2015, 01:37:49 AM not using a bat, and running straight from the command line, what's the command to enable only a single GPU? -d 0, it's in the help. Also depends on which gpu you're trying to enable. If first gpu then -d 0 If second gpu then -d 1 ..... and so on...

on: July 12, 2015, 08:46:04 AM

Compiled latest sp commit and my GTX980 is getting 18.8-18.9MH/s in quark algo. About 300kH/s increased in speed

on: July 12, 2015, 03:59:04 AM

Quote from: Schleicher on July 12, 2015, 03:52:30 AM Quote from: lawrencelyl on July 12, 2015, 02:42:01 AM Any guide available to compile ccminer in Windows environment? Sure. Here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=826901.msg11179460#msg11179460 Great! Thank you

on: July 12, 2015, 02:42:01 AM

Any guide available to compile ccminer in Windows environment?

on: July 11, 2015, 03:06:54 PM

Quote from: sp_ on July 11, 2015, 01:03:42 PM One of my rigs: 6x750ti's The driver version is from 2-jun-2014. standard clocks. release 54 + Driver: 9.13.2 The results are verified at the pool. That's a very good speed on a bunch of 750Ti

on: July 11, 2015, 02:28:25 PM

Quote from: sp_ on July 11, 2015, 09:38:09 AM If you compile the latest version or wait for release 55 you will get a small increase in the quark hash. My gigabyte 970 went from 15.8 Mhash to 16.1 Mhash on the standard clocks. Any quick guide to compile latest version? Or when will release 55 come out?

on: July 11, 2015, 03:34:55 AM

Currently I'm using ccMiner 1.5.54-git SP-MOD on 2x GTX980 and I achieved around 18.5MH/s per card running quark algo. All default setting except +100MHz on GPU Core clock - with default power limit since I want to keep both temperature and wattage low. Is the hashrate I'm getting good?

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5]