Implementation of db would require 1 year if cz do it alone(the code must be rewritten from scratch), 9k usd x 12 month is big money to personal but not to company or btc whale.
Sorry but you are very far from the truth. There are at least 5 people who can give you BBR running on the latest Bytecoin or Monero code for no more than 5k-10k usd. Nice, send them my way, we have dev funds for this specific purpose Would love to chat about some nuances with the epee library. Andrey Sabelnikov and other cryptonote devs have always been tough to collaborate with, from LOOOOOONG before I showed up here. So I don't know why people put so much stock in my collaboration with a person that was assumed Missing In Action. This is happening, lets speed it up! Andrey Sabelnikov is that CZ real name? or someone else you refer to? I think although you may not have contributed any code as yet have at least brought some community back to this coin. I think you deserve props for this anyway. Imho, CZ(CryptoZoidberg)=CB(CryptoBender)=Satoshi Nakamoto. Creator and inventor of Bitcoin protocol, Boolberry protocol, who can create protocol pruning and alias system like Boolberry except the inventor itself. That would be interesting. Although would he need dev funding at all? why not just dip into the bitcoin super wallet for a couple of btc now and then? Although some top level designers and coders on here have said before he is obviously a super level dev ...so perhaps.... There is little story, the first code of bitcoin protocol is really unorganized, barely unreadable but it works, in the hand of great vision bitcoin developers then it become like now, yes maybe sn has the old wallet but as we all know journey of bitcoin is not easy may he has sold all the bitcoin long time ago. Now the boolberry code is quite a mess to, so clintar is the one who reorganized the code to be readable. If you ever read the first boolberry code you may remember the story of bitcoin as well. Don't know where you got that from. I haven't done anything like that. My eyes glaze over trying to read most of the code.
|
|
|
Got this 2017-Feb-15 13:30:11.482038 [P2P7]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds 2017-Feb-15 13:30:13.493096 [P2P2]Connecting to 107.170.228.11:10101(white=1, last_seen: never)... 2017-Feb-15 13:30:18.501810 [P2P2]Connect failed to 107.170.228.11:10101 2017-Feb-15 13:30:18.509959 [P2P2]Connecting to 107.170.97.197:10101(white=1, last_seen: never)... 2017-Feb-15 13:30:19.893200 [P2P2]Connect failed to 107.170.97.197:10101 2017-Feb-15 13:30:19.899714 [P2P2]Connecting to 188.226.215.102:10101(white=1, last_seen: never)... 2017-Feb-15 13:30:21.029640 [P2P2]Connect failed to 188.226.215.102:10101 2017-Feb-15 13:30:21.035445 [P2P2]Connecting to 128.199.196.65:10101(white=1, last_seen: never)... 2017-Feb-15 13:30:23.034797 [P2P2]Connect failed to 128.199.196.65:10101 2017-Feb-15 13:30:23.045237 [P2P2]Connecting to 107.170.228.11:10101(white=1, last_seen: never).. can't sync ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) try this https://www.reddit.com/r/boolberry/comments/5rhvq3/connecting_to_bbr_peers_for_the_first_time/
|
|
|
Oh, there's the info about this. These things are too hard to find info about. I didn't know this page existed. I've been wondering the status of it.
|
|
|
and the scam continuous ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Zoidberg is NOT working with 1blockologist. 1blockologist added nothing in 4 months to bbr and will also not add anything they only created a group to pump up the price. there is no real wallet. boolberry is outdated for years watch out all! Older bitcointalk members already exposed the scam on page 384/385. They also faked zoidberg on the slack to get people hyped. Too bad they now completely ruined a good project with a scam The faked zoidberg was very bad. Looks terrible in that respect. However since now we see the real CZ and some other people who have contributed are now also posting it may not be all bad. real CZ is not working on it ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) clintar added some seed nodes so nothing new. And clintar is directly connected to the block development company I don't consider myself connected. I'm willing to help with things, though. Really, I want to wait until crypto_zoidberg can come back when he's got his other stuff taken care of. He'd be the best at getting things moving.
|
|
|
FYI, anyone having problems with syncing, you can use my repos. They have some patches to get them mining. I haven't hard coded any new seed nodes, though, so try: --add-priority-node 45.79.180.42:10101 --add-priority-node 52.15.111.162:10101 --add-priority-node 78.47.186.74:10101 --add-priority-node 5.9.44.154:10101 --add-priority-node 213.186.170.110:10101 --add-priority-node 218.58.75.24:10101 https://github.com/clintar/boolberry for classic crypto_zoidberg's version. Just needed same checkpoints as Blockchain Development company version. https://github.com/clintar/BDC_Boolberry for segfault fixes in that version.
|
|
|
trying to mine boolberry on suprnova, getting login failure, after it already worked... i'm using bbr-cudaminer MBK's pool is working
ocminer has strict requirements for how old the scratchpad can be at bbr.suprnova.cc. The miner won't get a new version until it's a lot older than he requires. Maybe he should offer a modified miner with a shorter scratchpad time allowance. *Hint Hint*. Anyway, just remove whatever local scratchpad file every time you connect to suprnova ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) edit: oh, thought i was responding to a new message. nm. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Speaking of people around from beginning, is btc-mike back? I thought you abandoned ship long ago. You want it?
Nope. I am just here to watch the drama. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Good to see you just the same!
|
|
|
Hi folk ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I am all out of BBR, sold the remainder of what I had on recent little pump. I am currently the top mod on /r/Boolberry though. I messaged /u/boolberry who is second a couple of days ago to see if he wanted absolute control in anticipation, but he hasn't replied. At the moment, if I remove /u/boolberry and myself, then shadowcoin guy Sebastian will be top on mod list. So, I just wanted to see if clintar or any other folks that have been around since beginning want control, or I should just let /u/boolberry or sebsebastian have it. clintar? dga? Space lobster? Shojayxt? I don't want it. I don't even reddit...
|
|
|
I allways have to install tons of libraries,to change the gcc version from 4.7 to 4.9 then to change ur mom with ur dad and so on,useless morons
Maybe mining isn't for you. which distro and version are you running with that old of boost?
|
|
|
Here are some peers if anyone needs them. --add-priority-node 52.15.111.162:10101 --add-priority-node 78.47.186.74:10101 --add-priority-node 5.9.44.154:10101 --add-priority-node 213.186.170.110:10101 --add-priority-node 218.58.75.24:10101
|
|
|
Why have this error $ ./boolbd --add-priority-node 62.201.213.25:10101 --add-priority-node 95.85.21.33:10101 --add-priority-node 107.170.97.197:10101 2017-Feb-01 07:59:12.674065 Starting... 2017-Feb-01 07:59:12.677690 Boolberry v0.3.0.41(abcdeab) 2017-Feb-01 07:59:12.678378 Module folder: ./boolbd 2017-Feb-01 07:59:12.681069 Initializing p2p server... 2017-Feb-01 07:59:12.682129 Binding on 0.0.0.0:10101 2017-Feb-01 07:59:12.684123 ERROR /home/roky/build_system/boolberry/contrib/epee/include/net/abstract_tcp_server2.inl:475[bool epee::net_utils::boosted_tcp_server<t_protocol_handler>::init_server(uint32_t, std::string) [with t_protocol_handler = epee::levin::async_protocol_handler<nodetool::p2p_connection_context_t<currency::currency_connection_context> >; uint32_t = unsigned int; std::string = std::basic_string<char>]]Exception at [boosted_tcp_server<t_protocol_handler>::init_server], what=bind: Address already in use 2017-Feb-01 07:59:12.684229 ERROR /home/roky/build_system/boolberry/src/p2p/net_node.inl:271[bool nodetool::node_server<t_payload_net_handler>::init(const boost::program_options::variables_map&) [with t_payload_net_handler = currency::t_currency_protocol_handler<currency::core>]]Failed to bind server 2017-Feb-01 07:59:12.684367 ERROR /home/roky/build_system/boolberry/src/daemon/daemon.cpp:150[int main(int, char**)]Failed to initialize p2p server. 2017-Feb-01 07:59:12.684516 Mining has been stopped, 0 finished
$ ./boolbd --seed-node 95.134.54.226:10101 2017-Feb-01 08:34:22.096045 Starting... 2017-Feb-01 08:34:22.096972 Boolberry v0.3.0.41(abcdeab) 2017-Feb-01 08:34:22.097118 Module folder: ./boolbd 2017-Feb-01 08:34:22.097892 Initializing p2p server... 2017-Feb-01 08:34:22.098448 Binding on 0.0.0.0:10101 2017-Feb-01 08:34:22.098783 ERROR /home/roky/build_system/boolberry/contrib/epee/include/net/abstract_tcp_server2.inl:475[bool epee::net_utils::boosted_tcp_server<t_protocol_handler>::init_server(uint32_t, std::string) [with t_protocol_handler = epee::levin::async_protocol_handler<nodetool::p2p_connection_context_t<currency::currency_connection_context> >; uint32_t = unsigned int; std::string = std::basic_string<char>]]Exception at [boosted_tcp_server<t_protocol_handler>::init_server], what=bind: Address already in use 2017-Feb-01 08:34:22.098908 ERROR /home/roky/build_system/boolberry/src/p2p/net_node.inl:271[bool nodetool::node_server<t_payload_net_handler>::init(const boost::program_options::variables_map&) [with t_payload_net_handler = currency::t_currency_protocol_handler<currency::core>]]Failed to bind server 2017-Feb-01 08:34:22.098993 ERROR /home/roky/build_system/boolberry/src/daemon/daemon.cpp:150[int main(int, char**)]Failed to initialize p2p server. 2017-Feb-01 08:34:22.099352 Mining has been stopped, 0 finished Address already in use means you are already running a daemon on that port.
|
|
|
Thanks clintar2... why isn't your pool listed? I took it down because of major DDOS following recent interest, but I'm going to be coming back. New domain, http://mining.blue but I'm not sure I'm ready to go with the mining nodes, yet. There is a network graph and alias list showing there now if you want that. Maybe I'll put together a pool hashrate chart. Ok, I set it to be live. Let's see how this goes. Anyone want to mine on my pool? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Just already jump in to catch some bbrfish, thank you. Thanks you for your support. The network graph link is http://mining.blue/munin/BoolBerryStats/BoolBerryStats/index.html with the list of aliases if anyone wants that info. I'm also planning on adding node in asia soon.
|
|
|
Thanks clintar2... why isn't your pool listed? I took it down because of major DDOS following recent interest, but I'm going to be coming back. New domain, http://mining.blue but I'm not sure I'm ready to go with the mining nodes, yet. There is a network graph and alias list showing there now if you want that. Maybe I'll put together a pool hashrate chart. Ok, I set it to be live. Let's see how this goes. Anyone want to mine on my pool? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
claymores miner is done now ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Where? You mean the windows version, or did I miss the linux one? I also see only Windows miner. Anyway i tested silentarmy and i need do some little bigger update for rigs as it require python 3.5 to Be installer. Try these instructions to get around that. https://gist.github.com/n1koo/7c0455b674d3c3a9d4cccf53837b270e
|
|
|
any one face issues running ./silentarmy - ubuntu 14.04 - iMore@m90r-1:~/silentarmy$ ./silentarmy Error calling ensure_future(): 'module' object has no attribute 'ensure_future' Please update to Python 3.4.5 (or above) - see https://github.com/mbevand/silentarmy/issues/8
**Python 3.4.5 already installed check https://gist.github.com/n1koo/7c0455b674d3c3a9d4cccf53837b270e
|
|
|
claymores miner is done now ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Where? You mean the windows version, or did I miss the linux one?
|
|
|
REALLY need to get silentarmy's full miner on here now that he has his own stratum miner.
|
|
|
Couple of requests. Can we get a cpu miner on here? And is there a way we can have an option to run multiple instances per card of the zcashgpuminer with individual settings? I've got different card types in a machine where one can and one can't do he silent version. Thanks! This is awesome, btw!
|
|
|
|