If the gambler is currently at the stages of those situations mentioned by OP, they are now at a critical level.

At this stage, a gambler can't think of a good thing anymore as their mind is now corrupted.

They need immediate help as they can't help themselves anymore. If found a person like that in your community, don't hesitate to give their family advice to now seek help from any gambling-related rehabilitation centers. It's ASAP before anything much worse happens.

I thought what I would read here was a real health benefit of online gambling but it's not.

OP what you shared should be called PROS of online gambling. It's not a health benefit.

Staying away from crowded places is the recommendation and advise given by the Doctor. There's no connection to that in gambling in terms of giving benefits. I understand that the person is a gambler but it doesn't mean that since there's an online gambling, it's already a health benefit.

Overriding with emotion is hard and too tough while gambling.

In any kind of situation, we will always follow what our emotions are telling us to do even if it's not the advisable or recommended thing to do. When we are winning, we always follow what our emotions are telling us to do which is to just continue and increase our bet. The result ended up bad after a long time of playing. There's no other way to get out of it but to force ourselves to do what should be right.

You should already know the answer just by analyzing the situation you have shared. Let's think about this, a gambler is truly addicted to gambling but in real life, still a person on their self and responsible. We can say that the gambling addiction of that person is not that bad but there's always a possibility that it might turn into bad if unable to keep it that way for long.

But looking at the real situation in gambling, those who are addicted are mostly ended up as irresponsible people.

I think this is too much overreacting. Yes, I don't rule out the idea that even in big leagues, game fixing does happen but do you think big leagues will ruin their reputation over game fixing? It can't just be done by a few guys. Besides, their careers are at stake if those players and officials participate in match-fixing. Not worth trying the risks.

The best advice would be, don't patronize betting on small leagues where game fixing mostly happens.

Going all in is not a good idea, not because of game fixing but rather because it will kill your bankroll instantly. \

Even a person who is not a gambler will surely know and it should be obvious that any kind of lucky paraphernalia doesn't have any connection to attract luck. That kind of activity in some way is traditional and has been a practice that was passed through the next generations. I don't believe in such lucky stuff but I don't see it as a wrong practice.

Maybe just depends on our own beliefs and we should respect each other regarding that matter.

It's the first time I heard that there's a gambling proverb that acts as a trigger stuff to gamble. Am I understanding it right?

Anyway, I don't think that any of these gambling proverbs are a big deal to most gamblers.

Or might be at some regions where gambling is seen as traditional, these proverbs might playing a big role in terms of influence.

To cover our spending on gambling, it's very important obviously to have a source of income. Not just a simple source of income, but a stable income-generating way. Gambling can change anyone's emotions during the process and the person involved has a great chance to spend more money.

The important thing there however is, that even with a stable source of income, if the person reaches the level of addiction where they won't able to control their temptation of gambling anymore, they will end up the same as those without a stable source of income.

I just wondered, some gamblers gambled a lot but had no source of income.

That's where some people end up if they have no other choice. What are their other options if they have already done everything they can? The sad reality in life where it's hard to look for someone or some institution that will give a loan even if there's collateral.

Some people got lucky from gambling with their last money. That's a big luck! But unfortunately, there are far more people who end up losing it all. I hope those people who experienced the latter will about to get back on track and survive the problem they are currently dealing with.

Hi shasan. Requesting again for a no-collateral loan. The same receiving address will be used. Thank you.

Loan Amount: 30 USDT
Loan Purpose: Personal
Loan Repay Amount: 35 USDT
Loan Repay Date: 2 weeks
Type of Collateral: None
USDT (BEP20) Address: 0xae67be55aac976b6acb96a87336674217e0df949

SIGNED MESSAGE
Address: 12aULrfecRHPG1e4xErwseEUyf8PrRfxqj (staked here)
Message: Heartilly is asking for a loan from Shasan. The date is 1/29/2024.
Signature: IKwxjKNKk9mCEwxX3bCZZ4OB1LaxMKabniN6GwRjdn0jSBQp74OUPZTwP7EaKLjZzDwLVKkyGE4++ws2REYawZU=

Repayment Sent! I noticed that the transaction was tagged as an internal transfer (Binance) while checking for the TX hash.

It's a good thing since much faster and quicker. Thank you so much.

As far as I know, in most cases, it only needs 1 confirmation to access and connect to the site and every action from there like placing a bet doesn't require any further or new confirmations. If let's say that is not the case, we all know already that Metamask supports several token networks based on ETH and it should be obvious that we won't use a coin that has insane fees that are not worth gambling with.

Not a technical person here but someone can correct me if my statement is wrong. \

Can we determine the aggressiveness in gambling just by knowing how much average amount we use in gambling? What if $300, $500, and so on?

If we can state an average amount therefore we are not aggressive already since we were able to keep up with that "average". Regardless of the monthly income, if a gambler just plays around the average amount, then they are not aggressive much. But to keep up with the topic, I'm just a minimum wager in our country. There's no average amount I can tell that I used in gambling since it depends on how much left to my salary that I can use for not priority things.

Don't put "vs" in the subject as we should not compare the purpose of the gamblers to why they gamble.

I have noticed that those who are saying that they gamble for fun are not regular gamblers. I have never seen a regular gambler saying they are gambling just for fun. These regular gamblers are risking money on gambling in an attempt to reach their target satisfying win. That's more way fun.

Those who consider gambling to end the financial struggle depend on the financial situation of a person. If the said person is currently on the verge of losing hope, they will put their trust in gambling to save them from the problem. On the other hand, if not, I don't think most gamblers will consider gambling to serve that purpose.

Regardless of the reason why we gamble, keep responsible all the time.

I was curious with the reason why you end up asking that question. Gambling has no boundaries. As long as the gambler is capable of doing gambling, they can do whatever they want in their life regardless of their age. There's no big deal if we see a 70 or 80-year-old person still gambling as long as they know what they're doing and use their own money. What are we supposed to expect from a 70-year-old? Just lying in their bed the whole day? If they can still do those activities they already used to do for a long, then just let them be like that.

You won't understand it from the gambler's perspective, especially for a person who hugs gambling as one of their usual activity regularly.

The one in my signature is a decentralized casino where betting can also be done directly through connecting various crypto wallets (e.g. Metamask).

Website: https://just.bet
ANN Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5453737.msg62287190

As for my view regarding gambling sites with a wallet connect feature, it's not something a big deal to me. What is more important to me is trustworthiness, good customer service, better overall service, no scam-related issues, and anything positive things that most gambler wants.

There will be no proper argument about that. Aside from that topic being unethical to talk about or discuss, especially between gambling and religion, the cycle of repeated arguments will never end since the source of all responses will based on people's respective religions.

To make it short, just follow our religion's view towards gambling be it as an official law or a traditional approach. If planning to do something that is against the religion's book, then just make sure to be ready for consequences. In today's generation of gambling, we will notice gamblers from different religions regardless if gambling is prohibited or not based on their respective religions.

Using money that is not ours is considered the worst attitude. In a state like that where our kid uses our money secretly for the sake of gambling, is the scenario if the kid won instead of big money a proper argument? If that's the case then we should just tolerate everything since after all, there's a chance of winning big even. Sounds stupid right?

Regardless of the reason, stealing is stealing. The kid in that story highly needs proper and serious guidance.

It's generally a rule of thumb in gambling that always be patient.

There are lots of situations in gambling where our patience will be tested. If we allow ourselves to fall on a quick decision, it will cost us a huge loss. On the other hand, if slowly but surely, it will be a smooth way and we can manage it.

But don't blame yourself for that mistake. It's a test. It's part of the experience.

At least next time, we should know what to do.

What if he's currently on a winning streak? You can't convince that guy to switch on sports betting if he's currently on the winning side.

Just let him have his fun and don't interfere even in the long run we all know he will lose. What if he able to cashout all his winnings from before?


Introduce might not be a good term for it but rather just tell him in a simple way that, you found him a fan of football, why not try sports betting?

If you introduce him to sports betting, it's like pushing him to do it. Let him decide based on his interests.

Not all sports fans are fans of sports betting anyway.