I guess ICO is not the thing that makes a casino good or bad, you can have ICO and be a great casino or have ICO and be a horrible one, at the same time you can have no ICO and be a great casino but have no ICO and be a horrible one. Which means when it comes to casinos its about who runs it and what type of team they have more than if they have ICO or not.

There are plenty of huge casinos that are very old as well but take investments for example, you give them your money to run their website and they take no risk at all but we are all fine about it because we already know those websites and can decide if we want to invest or not, ICO only takes that trust away and of course you can totally doubt investing into ICO but that doesn't mean they have to scam anyone, they can turn out good too.

If the website is working (which we don't really know) you can see it from the wagers very easily. Go there put your money in, bet on a mouse, if you win withdraw, if you lose well there is not really much way to see if the site works or not when you lose because its all the same.

Of course, everyone could have reservations against playing on a website they do not know or do not trust just yet but without OP constantly talking here and promoting their website we can't really know how much they are trustworthy at all. All we can do is rely on people who actually play here and than write on the topic for us. This website will not take off a lot unless OP starts to do a decent marketing here honestly, having to rely on players instead of the owner is not really a good way to bet on a website.

They surely have relationship with the team, but not a direct relationship but on a business relationship, because I believe that no bounty manager will just pick up a project to manage that they are not contacted to do.

It is just as if you say hunters does not have any relationship with bounty manager, without a bounty manager contracting a portion of it out for us to promote, how do we get to know about such project, but what I do not agree with people is the issue of KYC for bounty manager, yes, they will do their own KYC too for these developers, just like everyone of us, but not for us to ask them for KYC as if they are the ones deliberately scamming us.

The last token I got that really paid me much was a health related token. DOCS token, I participated in their bounty and they paid me up to 2600 of its tokens that increased to about 2690 dollars when it got listed on an exchange, a reputable one which is Binance and some other exchanges, I sold off half of it, leaving the rest to go, shortly after I withdrew the half, it started declining in price and I think the remaining value now is less than 20 dollars.

It really pained me that I didn’t get the chance to remove the remaining one before turning to shitcoins, at least they are still better than about 67 tokens that I have without entering exchange. It is really a wasted effort and time.

Any team could lose points at any given time, do not forget that this is the league that Leicester city won a championship recently. So, all in all while you are looking at Liverpool and city not losing points to someone they will meet difficult for them, they could potentially lose to someone that is fighting for not dropping to regulation as well. This is football and anything could happen at any given time, a team that is at 15th spot can easily beat the team going for championship if they have the momentum in the game.

I still believe strongly that both Liverpool and city will lose points before season ends, it will not be an unbeaten road from here to end for both of those teams. They have to take care of the cup the league the champions league and all that which tires players out a lot.

I do not think it is fake for all the God's sake.

Do you know that couple of decades ago, the digital market was not even known to anyone but few out there. Today, its value is more than 3 trillion US dollar and the contribution of cryptocurrency is more than $140 billion which gives a very nice message that the market cap is not a joke because you could easily see the coins around being demanded and traded. So, better invest rather than doubt on this recovery phase. Because time is running out to catch the train from the beginning point itself.

Moreover, I just see these types of discussions are just the FUDs to collapse the confident among new investors in crypto space as these kind of things are not having any proof to catch those exchanges while manipulating their volumes and price levels.

Thanks OP for the sites you just shared, I believe it’s not only for newbies, also for those who are already in the trade and would need to also freshen their memory, or those that has been out of trade for a while and would need to return back to trading.

All newbies in trading should really take their time to get enough training and become skillful before entering into trade, they can only come up with a strategy if they are well educated and informed about what the trading is all about, coupled with enough practices that they need to do too. If they don’t get enough trading and rush into trading without strategy, they will have no other way but to lose their trades.

I don’t see anything bad in its price movement, the ones that have jump high or skyrocket in price, where are they now, they get pumped and then dumped, which makes them become shitcoins.

Coins like waves will be more reliable to hold for long and use for payment than other volatile coins, when the volatility of a coin becomes too high, people strictly uses it for investment purpose and not for payment, because they fear that at the time they accept it as means of payment for product and services, it could drop far in value and go below the worth of the item. So a stable and steady coin like Waves will be more useful in this case.

I don't think binance took the decision they took because the coin is a fork from the bitcoin blockchain because we have a lot of bitcoin fork already and they were not deleted from the exchange, I believe that the binance team delisted BSV from their exchange because of the claim of one of the owners trying to impersonate satoshi nakamoto who is the father of bitcoin and the blockchain itself.

Hence, I think it is a good thing they did and I wish to see more of this in the future, so that people will know that we are serious in this crypto community.

You got it perfectly well as though it has happened to you over and over again, the problem about bounty is that it is by trial and error, that way it can't be taken as a source of living because you might end up being disappointed, bounty is a very good thing but it is very difficult to detect which project is going to pay out at the end of everything because most project are out there not to create something new for the investors, but to find ways to enrich their pocket and make away with people's hard earned money.

Most genuine airdrops now request for KYC since it is still coming from the same company that offers ICO, and since most Airdrop now request for it, it is either we don’t get to participate on any of it or we just do the KYC.

I don’t see need or reasons for this too, and I wish the document they are requesting for are not so complicated, I still understand why projects ICO are requesting for, at least they could back it up with the claim of protecting the system against fraudulent act, but what of airdrop, is there also any fraud activities too from the receivers, I think we need to just avoid airdrops completely for now, till something is done or the regulation reversed.

I don't think we need to go with the exchange route, because than you will have to consider the exchange rates as well, this is a casino not an exchange so using other coins to deposit but than using bitcoin to play and withdraw wouldn't be as good as actually using other coins.

If devans wants to put other coins in as well he can just start to collect the funds first, like let people invest in ethereum for example and after a week he can decide if there are enough ethereum investors to justify the ethereum crash game as well or not, if he decides there is enough interest than he can keep the game going but if he sees that there is not enough interest he can just send everyone money back to them without the game. That option would allow us to see how much people want it or not.

For you to hate gambling this much, I am sure you must have lost alot from it, But on the contrary not your ideology of no one winning in the long run is incorrect. There are many winning and who will continue to win but gambling game require a lot of skills and wisdom to play. In gambling, if you jump in without experience, I can assure you will jump out soon with record of huge loses.

Although I do not know your experience with gambling and I wish you can share but many times I have seen that 80% who has lost terribly in gambling loose because of greed. Please lets know your experience, I am sure someone would learn from you

What is so true about what he has just said because I have not seen anything tangible to grab from the comment other than the one the OP has posted, even if it was a means of AD, at least it has successfully educated a lot of people, especially newbies and despite my long years of trading, I have still been able to grab one or 2 things from the article.

Lest endeavor to always pick out positive out of the negative, we have negative minds towards the market, we still have negative approach too towards a little educational write up, is there anything we don’t get emotional about?

Most of these coins have already bottomed and I think this will be the best time to invest more if we are still interested in adding more to our portfolio. What most short term traders does is to enter the market at any lower price they are opportune to see, and that is why it seems as though they make enough profit more than a long term investor.

I personally don’t stop invest, I keep upgrading my portfolio at every opportunity I get to, I invested when price became $5000 and now taken the little profit on the increase, while I await another good point to enter the market again.

That is right; any project that is sure of its product doesn’t have to go through a dice site to make its project popular, a good project has a way of showcasing itself to the world through a very simple advert, no matter the medium used.

Just like you said, the team must really be hardworking to really survive in this market that is so full of lots of competition, and in order for them to stand out among other projects, they need to put all their focus and strength in creating a product that will be very high in demand for it to really gain a very fast attraction to the community.

ICO was too loosed and because it was not regulated, and you and I know that where there is no law, there is no sin, you can’t compare something that is being regulated to something not regulated.

IEO might not be completely regulated, but at least it still has the involvement of third party who can control what is being displayed to the public by verifying it first before publishing, Scammers might try all their best to penetrate the IEO market but the only way they can succeed is if money hungry exchanges too gets involved in IEO.

Provided IEO I still being controlled and operate by top exchanges such as Binance, Bitmex, Huobi and many other ones, I doubt if scam will be able to penetrate.

I was at around 20th thousand for couple of faucet bets and I sent couple of coins to see what I could do with the positions and all that, while waiting for my deposit and such I had the chance to play with faucet, literally just 20 satoshis or so that I can wager, I just it "wager over 2" that max thing most guaranteed win (even though it still somehow always more frequent to me than the odds Lol) and I managed to get to 12th thousand spot.

From 20 thousand to 12 thousand with just faucet was like the basic thing that showed me there is no way you can't make money from this, anyone that plays only a bit would get something out of this for sure. Even if you do not want to deposit (which you should, makes it more guaranteed) you can totally make money from wagering with the faucet and even make more money afterwards.

I do hate when people do go against casinos blindly, there are so many things you can go against but you fail to see them all and just attack them for attacking purposes. I suppose he might be a person that lost a lot of money here and that could cause him to be blindly attacking eosbet.

Look at the bright side buddy, at least you will make some money from the dividends. I am an openly anti-eosbet person myself as well and I have always publicly told how I feel like 1/20 rate is not good, it should be at least 1/5 not 20 but I am at least trying to make sense.

Put real tangible stuff that you are against and talk about it, I love how eosbet works on decentralized ways and I support the "casino", I am in love with the casino, I just dislike the "business" parts of it, if you could separate them all of course. If you do not like some things in eosbet thats fine, nobody should love everything about a casino, there must be some stuff that you feel could be improved, thats how business' get better but in order for them to better you need to tell them what you think could be improved.

What platform are they even building? If it is  a project that requires a standing product, they only need to get their building erected, manufacture the products and market it to the world provided whatever they choose to market to the world is a product really needed and be high in demand.

These developers are not just serious, that is why they get not to been able to do anything with the little they have raised. A serious project should be able to do something tangible with their softcap, and the too much quote they do ask is why scammers picked interest in ICO which has eventually destroyed its value.