hope GPU does well 

the new site looks nice, I noticed you were going to produce wallets for OSX and Linux. I do not own a Mac, well not since the first wave of trendiness. The compile looks quite straightforward, though. It is not a bizarre and time consuming compile like Windows.

LINUX?? people used to just compile their own, and there is always the issue of shared libraries, blah.

If you want one, I can do it, based on the assumption that "chmod +x" will be enough for anyone to use to make it executable.

Raspberry Pi .... oh .. er  lol

Welcome back! I sent you a couple of PMs, so I figured you were engaged elsewhere.

You had about 423,000 when I closed the trump explorer down (I took records of accounts), so I can verify (with records) that BTCdoaA is legitimate and should get his stake back given he was an original recipient.

He might be late, but people that were never part of the deal have had handouts since then, so I back the claim.

@BTCdoaA, I am certain you will get paid, speak to NN if you have not already.

Best Wishes,

MD

Faucets are okay in principle, but open to abuse and theft, and I am not sure that they provide exposure that is meaningful, given there are thousands, paying a cent a go.

I think you are right.

Twitter, and a good bot is far more beneficial. A variation on an ebooks bot, without ebooks in the name. Insane is totally primed to be outrageous and gain followers by this simple method.

It only requires Ruby on Rails and python.

14,000 blocks ... nearly.

Excellent job, NN, and you have grown into the role of the face of INSANE. Impressive ending to the last 8 weeks.

I know more than most the barriers you faced, but you stuck at it, and deserve credit for that.

I am not doing the sums, however, the coin count goes up via staking at 30%. It is not a PoW. At 100,000 blocks, the figure given by welshy, the premine percentage sounds about correct.

If he is giving much of the sum away, he cannot even stake so much.

Honesty, the majority of non-developers have no clue at the cost of introducing an altcoin. Pay his hosting, pay his pool fee, give hime the 0.05 or whatever for buying the coin. Give him what he would have paid at coinmaret.io, will probably pay yobit, and any other exchange.

///////////////////

Some confusion. Coinmaker used a Bullshitcoin as an example. That is not this coin.

Give him a chance, or don't mine it. but bring evidence to the table before making accusations. Bitcointak altcoin section is full of scammers, but it is equally full of people that go around and make spurious accusations with seemingly no comeback. They cause as much damage as the their evidence is often thin and personalized, dripping with confirmation bias.

The exchange seems kind of schizophrenic. The time to send coins there is extremely long, when you could have sent coins to any other exchange, made a trade, transferred the BTC to your wallet, Nova often is still confirming due to the added confirmations it requires.

The Npoint wallet will not synch past 18th December. But there appears to be some funds moved to new accounts, and some staking from a few older accounts till last week.

The spread looks a bit odd, with coinbase at 34 on the rich list.

So is the wallet broken, in which case it can be fixed, or dumped, and a new one made. It would not be a big coin swap.

Could David, perhaps, confirm what is going on, as there are suddenly a series of big sells, that are replaced when they are sold.

It is a an issue that deserves an explanation, as either someone has a lot of NPoints on the exchange, or the exchange has a lot of NPOINTS on the exchange, but it is impossible to know which, given he wallet has stopped.

Will it not synch because it is broken, or because there is nobody to synch it externally given they lack funds to stake?

If the first, it is nova-style clone, and they are pretty easy to make.

Currently nothing can leave or come in, and no explanation is given, and someone or more is able to monopolize a market, which resembles profiteering.

FAO Development

Did you have any changes to make to the default settings in IQUIDUS explorer. I see you use one. There are a few things that IQUIDUS suggests to do when troubleshooting, but he is not always the best explaining them.

I am only asking because I have a clone of a clone, and made changes, but I cannot seem to get it past block 1.

The obvious stuff like index.pid, the cron, is fine. Either I broke my attempt to adapt a clone of CJC, or I need to change settings somewhere. (Stack size exceeded or something).

http://node1.cryptojacks.com/

Nice colours.

PS: I have made about 20 IQUIDUS before, so I reckon I just fucked up with the changes I made to the code. But any tip appreciated.

Best wishes.

md

Why is it run by scammers and how is "not knowing how to handle promotion" still enough to give it a coin market cap of 1,700 bitcoin, ranked 65 in the charts?

One of the developers is the Iquidus guy, so if he is a scammer, at least he paid back with his free and open source explorer.

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/sar/#
http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/SARcoin/
http://www.sarcoin.com
https://github.com/iquidus/explorer
https://github.com/sarcoin/SARCoin

Volume going down is not such a big thing, and can be rectified easily anyway.

I created a lot previously, Crunck did as well. I think we were in a fight to the death, trying to get the upper hand.

I have spent setting things up, Crunck spent and had energy, NN is a good person, so it deserves to go forward.

A collective wall will set your stall out. You own the majority now, I guess. So you juts work out what can be dumped.

NB: A lot of addresses in  the top are empty in reality. They are Yobit addresses.

When you get a pay-in address, it is not your personal address. An explorer will log money going in, and money going out of the address.

But make a 500,000 withdrawal, and look at all the addresses used to send that withdrawal.


You can spot them by looking at staking activity.
That is one reason why rich lists are not always a good indicator. Exchanges know your balance, but they do not keep a special address for you.

One word for Crunck, I disagreed with some tactics, but he still worked harder than most, all the reds appearing in a week and the sudden influx of public negativity was not nice to see. It is like a knife in the back.

Away from the morbid stuff, a slight lull is nothing, it can be dealt with easily if you agree a minimum price and back it.

So keep going, and maybe when you take it past 500, I will dump my last XXX,XXX.XX on you. :-)

No Devs here.

I suspected that the link would not be updated.

Hence, I gave a no-nonsense copy paste on Github and just left the other as was, and assuming it would now be wrong,  put a direct text link in addition.

https://github.com/insaneinthemembrane/v2

I would recompile your daemon, take my  source from my repo, not the repo made by cryptominers designed for quick set up for a pool which was put up on the fist page for whatever mysterious reason.

Welshy owns the pool, and has been excellent and a reliable node to compile into the daemon (but in about 4 weeks, it will be turned off (PoS)).

Play about with net.cpp, leaving out the OVH IPs.

Just fork it.

Fill the nodes in with the most reliable, cryptominer has changed IP I think (he is the 84.XXX.XXXX node (crowncloud I think)), so best to reflect his updateas it has been a good and instant connection.

The nodes on the first page of this thread, only 1 I think works. One is with a port, which is pointless.  Plus they are compiled in your daemon (I presume)

I have thrown some checkpoints in as well. You can fill more in if you want. for a quicker synch.

Run in it with

reindex=1
txindex=1

in the .conf, although Iquidus only mentions one, the two are more reliable.

I find more connections on a simple make -f makefile.unix rather than using USE_UPNP=-

Enabling IPv6 on the server also helps.



Before 14,000 blocks, but you could do it anytime from now, switch to POS only and use GETINFO as your call in settings.json.


You know all the techical shit anyway, but just giving you the the tools to do what you are doing so you don't have to mess about looking for info.



If I got your node wrong, which I put in the source code, feel free to slap my ass, but it is not compiled into any wallets, just the the three which are given as addnodes (?)

Novaexchange is in now
You are in
Welshy is in (temp)


A couple more including Crunck's node (91.XXX.XXX (I think, you can see it)), but not the the 37.XXX:XXX, because it changes port and country.



net.cpp is is normally filled in incorrectly, but you have no option but to  follow that.

It needds:

"seed1", "domain"·
"seed2", "domain"

etc

LOL

S: There is no need for an apostrophe in your LAST seednode

(no (NULL, NULL) at the end)).

I don't rely on the info from blockchain.info, the wallet  diverted me there when I chose the option to check the tx on the blockchain.

I have never had need to get frustrated before, so assumed the wallet would divert me somewhere relevant. I rarely check any txs, because they always confirm, until yesterday. Plus I do not send many txs, although I receive a few.

But  obviously I went to other places to see what  was said  there. I may have mentioned that above.

Just noticed what was written above by Magical, I  paid about that fee. This is the first time I have ever had an issue. It was only for 0.07, plus the two tests. It was kind of weird when they leaped into action, I think it was the push tx site, not blockr (it did nothing), and I forget which one, I just looked at the list on Bitcoin Wiki).

No proof to offer, it is just that they started moving about 3 or 4 minutes later. It  could be coincidence of course.

Oh, just to say, I must have paid a good tx fee on all, given the blockchain stated I was a "Priority"

I just use the tx fee that is set by default, I figure that is enough, or it should be set higher. My txs confirmed, after about 16 hours. I am not sure if it was a coincidence, but I used a couple of those push/txs websites, after I had started the client anew on my friends computer.

But I sent 3, paid the fee, so maybe it  was the server I was attached to having issues. Speed of lightning.

But they went through.

I have 2, the second a test, but 6 hours without a confirmation, despite paying the tx fee set as default in the wallet.

I feel paranoid about sending anything from hereon.


Dear Manager,

I would like to draw your attention ...

lol

But f...ing confirm please.

Transfered the repo over to normals, so update the links.

I am over and out, but what started as a piss take at Trump who is a threat, which I re-branded to INSANE for the sake of marketability, and due to notnormals hard work and him getting Secco and Bitz involved, and the work of former steering group, we put a 20k market cap on insane in less than a month. You three could make a good trio.

I would say, that it is a great result, and can be built on.

I am down 1 or so BTC from the dump soaking and server costs, but up 2 million INSANE. So no dumps from me, I will wait till 250! and filter a bit down.

Best of luck

M O U N T A I N D (PS.: I am not fat, I just like mountains..)

 


٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶

Reckon CMC would change it, given 3.7m are dead?

Opportunity

Film the event for the youtube channel and media.

It would be ideal if Secco pushed the button.

NB:

8 minutes spacing is average, choose a time of day when the difficulty has peaked, and is declining (not going up)

addnode=91.134.120.210

That is the only one you need. The other three are compiled into the client, and two no longer work.

The node above is not in the client, and it is the official explorer, so when you hook up with that, it will feed connections to you. The other 3 will not make any difference to connecting, with perhaps the reiteration of 91.121.67.93 giving a double kick to the wallet. The other 2 put extra strain on it.

If a wallet thinks it has to connect to node X, a dead node, it will keep on trying.

That is why it is always best to compile generics, so as nodes change, connections do not, but A Records do.

node.example.com

then you alter the A Record when necessary and relieve the wallet of the energy and strain on the computer searching for nodes it will not find.

I updated the automatic connections in the source so it is okay if you are compiling, and I included cryptochat explorer and novaexchange's nodes.

In fact, net.cpp is used incorrectly by virtually every alt (including by me), but I won't bore with the details. But Muddafudda is good on connections if interested.  

username=
password=
daemon=1
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcport=8029
port=8028
addnode=91.134.120.210

no need for "listen=1" either, as it is coded as true anyway.

sounds nice, not too many late nights I hope .. ;-)