I actually never saw a single 1080Ti running without crashing with mem above +500. Most of them have problem with +400...
OTOH , the only 2 GTX-1080 (Not Ti) I have can run with +700 without crashing.
When everyone will understand that there is no +XXX on one GPU equal to +XXX on another? Especially if you set P0 state. Never, people are throwing some offsets of mem core and +% of power limit not knowing that these numbers alone meaning absolutely nothing. On one card +100 could be 1950 on other 1800mhz even the very same model. Also most of the high end cards(no matter the chip series) go different default TDP. For example, lowest 1070 got, 151W TDP, Jetstream got 170W, Zotac Amp Extreme got 250W, so 60% of each is totally different number! Conclusion: People are jsut stupid and dont realize that little knowledge could increase their efficiency and profit! About the Hash refinery pool and yiimp clones, best you can do is to mine algos with short block, like skein, nist5 and neoscrypt. WhyTF they mine lyra2v2 hitting 10 blocks per day, or skunk hitting five blocks per day or X17 hitting 30 blocks per day when neoscrypt for example is hitting 20-30 per hour! Use this: http://pool.hashrefinery.com/site/multialgo. If you want to play lottery there better places. Bet almost nobody disable P2 states on their Nvidia cards... |
|
|
|
@tutulfo, any thoughts on this question? I guess you missed it. Basically anyway to call a bat file or a command right before the miner starts based on the algo? I'd like to add overclock profiles that automatically run when a miner for a given algorithm is launched. There are 3 profiles - memory only, core only and balanced, each with different voltage points. The profiles are applied by running a similar command line: C:\nvidiaInspector.exe -lockVoltagePoint:1,850000 -setBaseClockOffset:1,0,200 -setMemoryClockOffset:1,0,250 What would be the easiest way to achieve this? Sorry I missed it as you say. Without add this option in sourcecode I think only one posibility exists, it is replace each miner .exe for a .bat. This Batch must listen input parameters, call your program and call real miner with parameters. I will add an option to each miner called PrelaunchCommand to next release, I think it is easy to do. Edit: it was really easy, I will upload next release with this feature in one hour. Thanks, but its better to be based on algorithm, is it possible? Probably setting in the config file? |
|
|
|
@tutulfo, any thoughts on this question? I guess you missed it. Basically anyway to call a bat file or a command right before the miner starts based on the algo? I'd like to add overclock profiles that automatically run when a miner for a given algorithm is launched. There are 3 profiles - memory only, core only and balanced, each with different voltage points. The profiles are applied by running a similar command line: C:\nvidiaInspector.exe -lockVoltagePoint:1,850000 -setBaseClockOffset:1,0,200 -setMemoryClockOffset:1,0,250 What would be the easiest way to achieve this?
|
|
|
|
Hi there, I just decided to try the nvOC, didnt change the default servers and address , they look ok but when the terminal runs it stopes here: LAUNCHING: Mining Process
process in screen miner; attach with: screen -r miner
and thats all. What could be the problem? |
|
|
|
I agree, no OP activity, and basically no updates on the miner is not the way to keep miners engaged with the project. I understand the stability and easy of use idea but, there is no need to add 5 algos to release a new version. Better make 3-4 updates for this month so the miners keep using the project.
here is my response to this post also ... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2054431.msg21535386#msg21535386#crysx Funny, I dont see how your other post responds to my post... 1. I've never meant disrespect and i dont even see how a grown man can see any disrespect in my post! 2. I've never said you are dead, never said you are doing a bad job or something. 3. I've never asked a question, so no need to answer me at all! 4. I simply expressed opinion/suggestion which main point was "I understand the stability and easy of use idea but, there is no need to add 5 algos to release a new version." so this way you are gonna keep the beta testers(which seems from time to time you dont really respect much) way more engaged with the project. If you didnt like my opinion no need to bitch about it. 5. I like your project, i was one of the first beta testers, i also supported your project by no changing my donation setting in the account for some of the time i mined and i threw totally of 2GH at your pool for the most of the August. Yes 2GH are not much but its not less either when the total of the pool was between 30 and 80GH And no you are not Brad Pitt or Angelina Jolly so i dont know much of you or your history. So i cant assume anything of you from before. I dont know about theFARM(I looked about it, couldnt find anything... ) so accept my apologies for not being familiar with you and not knowing your background  Cheers! #Completely Unknown DUMB Beta Tester  hmmm ... disrespect can be seen from many different aspects ... agreeing with another that says its a 'dead' project without KNOWING anything about the background processes can be seen as such - so i take the posts as i see them ... this is a TEST system - and yet people are looking at the project as something they have a complete RIGHT to ... no one has except CWI ... opinions are worth their weight when they are honest opinions - so agreed with you on that point ... but grown men / women should never have to make out as if they are owed something when they are owed nothing ... especially in the sense tat we are doing this FOR the miner - NOT the 'user' per se ... and i understand you qualms with non-communication and lack of time frames to adhere to - as it does cause some unsettling ... so there WILL be some of those impatient people in the community - but there is NO NEED for comments like that ... you opinion IS valuable ... but again - if we decide to add 100algos in the miner - surely that couldnt be an issue with regards to functionality would it? ... i see your point - but agreeing with someone that makes a statement that this is a dead project implicates you in the process ... and as 'bitching' about it? ... it was merely FACTUAL points stated - thats all ... so 'bitching' over ... ... so you think we should just release CWIgm-0.9.9 with the next two algos and updates / changes? ... the next revision after CWIgm-0.9.9 will take a lot longer for us to release for the changes we want in CWIgm-1.0.0 - so i really would hate to see those comments about the CWIgm development being 'dead' when its months in the making rather than days ...  ... all good tho - and we are really happy that the project is 'liked' by so many ... its the one thing that continues driving this all to happen ... #crysx Again i didnt quote him with a reason. I said "I agree, no OP activity, and basically no updates on the miner is not the way to keep miners engaged with the project." meaning exactly this. You are running a product which depends on the certain market. Crypto market is changing extremely fast and the best way to keep the customers/beta testers/clients engaged is to frequently updating the product to the market. If you wanted to contain the growth of the product meaning(not attaching too many beta testers) thats another story. So the only thing that i meant was that instead of waiting a month to release the next version with another 4 algos and bunch of changes would be better for the us(beta testers) to have 2 updates with 2 algos and less changes for the same amount of time. That way we will have more stuff to do with the product(miner) and we will spend more time with it(meaning more hash for your pools). Thats all! Impatient is the last thing i'm because my crypto strategy is bag holding for the most of the time So i really dont see how you referral post is great answer(never wanted one, as i said its just an opinion) for my post. Keep the good work, i hope i will be back with your project once we have 9.9! |
|
|
|
I agree, no OP activity, and basically no updates on the miner is not the way to keep miners engaged with the project. I understand the stability and easy of use idea but, there is no need to add 5 algos to release a new version. Better make 3-4 updates for this month so the miners keep using the project.
here is my response to this post also ... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2054431.msg21535386#msg21535386#crysx Funny, I dont see how your other post responds to my post... 1. I've never meant disrespect and i dont even see how a grown man can see any disrespect in my post! 2. I've never said you are dead, never said you are doing a bad job or something. 3. I've never asked a question, so no need to answer me at all! 4. I simply expressed opinion/suggestion which main point was "I understand the stability and easy of use idea but, there is no need to add 5 algos to release a new version." so this way you are gonna keep the beta testers(which seems from time to time you dont really respect much) way more engaged with the project. If you didnt like my opinion no need to bitch about it. 5. I like your project, i was one of the first beta testers, i also supported your project by no changing my donation setting in the account for some of the time i mined and i threw totally of 2GH at your pool for the most of the August. Yes 2GH are not much but its not less either when the total of the pool was between 30 and 80GH And no you are not Brad Pitt or Angelina Jolly so i dont know much of you or your history. So i cant assume anything of you from before. I dont know about theFARM(I looked about it, couldnt find anything... ) so accept my apologies for not being familiar with you and not knowing your background Cheers! #Completely Unknown DUMB Beta Tester |
|
|
|
|
I agree, no OP activity, and basically no updates on the miner is not the way to keep miners engaged with the project. I understand the stability and easy of use idea but, there is no need to add 5 algos to release a new version. Better make 3-4 updates for this month so the miners keep using the project.
|
|
|
|
|
@tutulfo, any chance adding a config value for do not change algo unless there is one at least 15%(1.15 example) more profitable? This will prevent script to jump coins too frequently.
Also i find it more useful to have selectable algos in the bat file instead of coins...
|
|
|
|
30 hours ago I started my own test of HR vs Nicehash vs zpool vs MPH(auto exchange to BTC) vs Ethermine(just ether). Put 5 rigs each 4x1070 clocked exactlye the same with locked voltage on 0.900v, 1797mhz and 4400 mem. So 30 hours after the start: Hash Rafinery: 0.00201 BTC Nicehash: 0.00223869 BTC zpool: - got too many times API down and no mining and had to stop mining on it. at the time of the stopping(10 hours after the start) it was like 15-20% behind HAsh rafinery. Honestly this site has bad reviews and i got bad experience with it for the last 30 hours. MPH: 0.00181131 BTC + some not exchanged yet coins - https://vgy.me/UVopzn.png . I think its on par or little ahead of Nicehash, but i will know once i stop the race and wait everything to be exchanged. Ethermine: 0.02778 ETH which on exchange rate right now(0.075) is 0.00208 BTC, on the exchange rate from last night(0.080) is 0.00222 BTC |
|
|
|
|
Why all my benchmark results are around 5% less then the actual speed in the miner console?
|
|
|
|
|
@tutulfo If i want to remove the Dual mining from nicehash, which file i need to edit?
Regards!
|
|
|
|
DNR mining:
1080 Ti Aorus 97-102 MH
1080 Aorus 70-75 MH
Core +100 Memory -500 TDP = 0.7
But mining of denarius is not profitable today. Speed need to be at least 20% more MH from cards like in "SP tribus MOD"
SP mod is 68 on 1070 and 2% fee and 0.1 btc CWIG is 58 on 1070, its not that much difference, 8 mh difference = 0.000639btc per week in perfect luck. which means you need 156 pieces of gtx 1070 to cover the initial 0.1 btc you need to pay for sp mod and you will pay it back in a week. |
|
|
|
have not received any transaction for over 2 hours.
should I stop mining?
Its been almost 4 hours without the pool hitting a block. The pool should hit the block about every 70-80 minutes with the current hashrate. The last two hours before the last block the pool hit 5 blocks which was great, so its normal to be little dry now. For the last 24 hours it hit 25 blocks which was great because half of that time the pool was with almost twice less hashrate. I hope we will start hitting blocks again very soon. If it goes more than 6 -7 hours without a block we can speak about a problem but i doubt it will get to that. And we just hit a couple blocks in the last 30 mins, so everything is good with the pool Bad thing that halfing is just in 3 hours...  |
|
|
|
have not received any transaction for over 2 hours.
should I stop mining?
Its been almost 4 hours without the pool hitting a block. The pool should hit the block about every 70-80 minutes with the current hashrate. The last two hours before the last block the pool hit 5 blocks which was great, so its normal to be little dry now. For the last 24 hours it hit 25 blocks which was great because half of that time the pool was with almost twice less hashrate. I hope we will start hitting blocks again very soon. If it goes more than 6 -7 hours without a block we can speak about a problem but i doubt it will get to that. |
|
|
|
Since last night the pool has extremely good luck(unlike previous days), for 16 hours i got what i was suppose to get for 24 hours I dont know if its coincidence but its since i changed to the new 9.8 version of the miner. |
|
|
|
|
Did you released an update?
|
|
|
|
My rig has 6 pcs of 1080 , hash rate about 221 MH/s.
It alway connect to port 6000, that is for hi-diff.
Do I need to change to port 2000 , lo-diff? and How?
if you are using the current CWIgm-0.9.7 - this is not possible ... the current miner is locked to lodiff port 2000 ... this will change as we will add a port parameter for you to choose in the next small update ... the diff was a little too high a target for the lodiff stratum port - thats changed now - and will not hit higher than 2.5diff ... port 6000 however - starts at that diff ... and can handle all the hash you can throw at it ... #crysx Mine always connect to 6000:  |
|
|
|
|
So far a few hours pretty stable on 4x1070.
Running all of them on 1850/4000 and 900mv.
26.5-6MH per card
|
|
|
|
|
@chrysophylax
As I'm mining with only 4x1070, should i change to "lodiff - stratum+tcp://stratum.chainworksindustries.com:2000/" but i dont see a parameter for changing server as the default is connected to 6000?
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, for some reason usewindow had top be changed in MinerControl.conf not in General.conf, is that bug or normal?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
