|
Nice speed improvement! Let's see price evolution.
|
|
|
|
|
What it's happened with Vcash is wrong. It could be a test .... but I don't think so. Cryptoworld is still very fragile.
|
|
|
|
|
Lisk it's a great project, price in this stage is not so relevant, for some is low, for some is high, if blockchain applications will be useful then price will reflect that.
|
|
|
|
|
I am from the beginning with Alcurex and it's fine and improved with every new version.
Keep up the good work!
|
|
|
|
Radeon 7850 2GB - 110 H/S
R7 370 - 122 H/S
R9 7970/280x HACKED BIOS - 220 H/s
Radeon 7950 - 200 H/s
R9 290 Stilt bios - 280 H/s
Worst is ....
RX 470 4GB - 180 H/s
For 290 what core/mem you use. thanks. |
|
|
|
I know this old miner, it works, but I am curious if in this miner is some optimisations for scryptjane. It's aready optimized up to AVX2 so it's as good as it gets. Edit: Upon further analysis of the code scryptjane:18 might work for yac. When I first ported scryptjane I just did a quick functional test on Nicehash and it worked with default options. That was good enough and I Ieft it at that. I hadn't noticed that the default NF was 1024 which made no sense and that Nicehash was NF16. I'd like to retest at Nicehash with NF16 but the stratum is down due to lack of orders. I know nothing about scrypt so I have no idea of the effect of the wrong NF. If the wrong NF works maybe the right one works better. I'm not that interested in setting up a user on a yac pool just for a quick test but if it works for you I'd be curious. Thanks for your response. -a scryptjane:18 miner say "Unknown algo: scryptjane:18" -a scryptjane:16 seems to work, but as far I know, there is no coins at NF16 (LEOcoin switched to POS) to mine scryptjane need to use corect NF for respective coin Tue, 08 Aug 2017 16:15:28 GMT YAC NF will be 19 http://download.muuttuja.org/yacoin/countdown/ UTC will stay forever at NF 14 Are you sure the miner isn't expecting N instead of NF? So for NF18, maybe you should specify scryptjane:524288 instead (according to the table in the link you provided) That's part of it. There is inconsistent handling of N vs NF. The command line parser expects algo:n but scyptjane expects algo:nf. scryptjane:18 fails because it is not a power of 2. This is not an area I am familiar with so some suggestions are welcome. NF seems more user friendly than N. Is it a convention to use algo:n notation or is algo:nf acceptible? Can software reliably distisguish a NF spec from N spec by its value? For example if the value is not a power of 2 and is smaller than some limit it is interpreted as NF, else N. What would be that limit? Any personal preferences on how to handle it? -a algo:nf or -a algo -n nf I still don't understand why the default NF=1024 worked on Nicehash (Leo). This was actually interpreted as NF=2. As far as I know scryptjane is not scrypt:n, is not only to change N, is different algoritm, in scryptjane algo in miners need to put some aditional parameters --starttime --nfmin and --nfmax, to automaticaly calculate NF, but in some miners is manual you need to put NF --scryptjane:NF. In Nicehash miner v1.3.0.3 (cpuminer_x64_AVX.exe) scryptjane algo work corect with -a scyptjane:NF, (tested with YAC -a scryptjane:18) I mined LEO at NF 16 and before NF 15 ... 14..., but with GPU. If I put cpuminer with -a scryptjane (NF16) to YAC (NF18) miner work but submited shares is rejected. |
|
|
|
I know this old miner, it works, but I am curious if in this miner is some optimisations for scryptjane. It's aready optimized up to AVX2 so it's as good as it gets. Edit: Upon further analysis of the code scryptjane:18 might work for yac. When I first ported scryptjane I just did a quick functional test on Nicehash and it worked with default options. That was good enough and I Ieft it at that. I hadn't noticed that the default NF was 1024 which made no sense and that Nicehash was NF16. I'd like to retest at Nicehash with NF16 but the stratum is down due to lack of orders. I know nothing about scrypt so I have no idea of the effect of the wrong NF. If the wrong NF works maybe the right one works better. I'm not that interested in setting up a user on a yac pool just for a quick test but if it works for you I'd be curious. Thanks for your response. -a scryptjane:18 miner say "Unknown algo: scryptjane:18" -a scryptjane:16 seems to work, but as far I know, there is no coins at NF16 (LEOcoin switched to POS) to mine scryptjane need to use corect NF for respective coin Tue, 08 Aug 2017 16:15:28 GMT YAC NF will be 19 http://download.muuttuja.org/yacoin/countdown/ UTC will stay forever at NF 14 |
|
|
|
I know this old miner, it works, but I am curious if in this miner is some optimisations for scryptjane. |
|
|
|
Hi. How to use cpuminer-opt for scryptjane algo at NF 18?
Did you try "-a scrytpjane:18" ? Edit: That's not going to work. The Nf code is messed up. By default it runs scrypt(N,1,1) with N=2 which works on Nicehsash scrytjanenf16. Looking at the code I have no idea why it works and Nicehash is down due to lack of orders. If you know of anywhere I can test I can play with it. Thanks for your response. YAC pool (NF 18) http://yac.yacoin.club/UTC pool (NF 14) http://utc14.yacoin.club/Best regards. |
|
|
|
|
Hi. How to use cpuminer-opt for scryptjane algo at NF 18?
|
|
|
|
Hi, Another question, exist an updated miner for AMD, (apart from old yacminer and nicehash scrypt-jane). Thanks.
Hi devlin - sorry I know nothing really about GPU mining of UTC This appears to be the most recent this may be an update I'm not a GPU miner - maybe someone who knows more will steer you in the right direction. Cheers - usukan Thanks for your response. Best regards. |
|
|
|
Can someone who has a Reference R9 290 factory stock run theirs at 1100/1450 and post their Sol/s. I am wondering if the STILT BIOS mods make any difference, I am getting 169Sol/s. With Elpida  Reference R9 290 stock Elpida 1100/1250 147 Sol/s; 1100/1450 143 Sol/s only a few sol. increase from stock settings (947/1250 141 Sol/s) If you can please post bios rom for Reference R9 290. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
Hi, Another question, exist an updated miner for AMD, (apart from old yacminer and nicehash scrypt-jane). Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
MSI 7870 59+
His 7950 102+
GB 280X (Elpida) 118+
Saphire 290 (Hynix) 152+
Saphire 290 (Elpida) 138+
MSI 390 (Hynix) 179+
with zec old card is back in bussines.
|
|
|
|
|
Now LEOcoin is listed in more exchanges, more exposure, I think this is good for LEO. Cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, new cards with 8G is efficient at N14?
|
|
|
|
|
now big farms with private miners earning much less.
I think in backstage is real war. Farms pay developers for private miners and/or to not release public efficient miners.
|
|
|
|
|
in v.5 is less heat, good work.
|
|
|
|
|
7950 82-89 h/s
7870 46-51 h/s
15.12 win 7
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
