All we seem to here is credits bad code this and credits scam this when the facts are:
- Live test shown ( Most other coins have not done this)
- Good code/Bad Code ( That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, your code can have the best flow structure, recursive code, dynamic code generation
methods and let me tell you that is all bullshit. What counts is fast code especially at Alpha/beta level, make your code fast, as long as the final result is fast then
the rest is bullshit which will be improved upon just like the bullshit wallet problem that everyone seems to focus on)
- Code reviews ( Bullshit again at this point, its so easy to look at written code and rip it apart, show that O, yes I could of written this method better or
structured that class better.
Writing code from scratch in a completely new field like Blockchain which is still in its infancy is super hard. So before these
so called super coders rip the Credits code apart, stop and realize that Credits have written their own code from the bottom up. Should they follow best
practice, of course. Is there a best practice in Blockchain programming, I don't think so. Continuously pointing out negatives and not positives is a bullshit
review. So many stupid pompous reviewers who should be taken with a grain of salt.
- Working product ( Continuous and prompt delivery. Working, working, working. These guys are hustling every day to bring out something revolutionary that works.
Careful when investing in crypto, its a risky market. But more importantly watch out for all of these paid fudders spreading negativity. Crypto/Blockchain is big business and there are many people trying to suppress it.
Again some positive preachers trying to sound smart. No one is paid to explain why this is a shitcoin. However, people are paid to shill this all over the place if you haven't noticed already. They said they are developing this garbage for 3 years. That should be enough to realize how bad it is. Looking at your last bunch of posts. All fud aimed at credits just like Sebastian. I am not trying to sound clever, Credits is showing promise. I can see by the way you write you are biased based on nothing more than your own agenda. Your opinion means nothing without facts. The fact is there is working code and tests to prove it. Here is a fun fact for you: even the "visibility of working live testnet" doesn't work. It just doesn't. They spent a lot of time already to make it look like it is working, but it still shows some mocked stuff. Untill today there was no proof whatsoever, that they actually have somewhat working blockchain behind all this. And by blockchain I mean some verifiable by consensus data structure. Also there was no description, even vague, about how exactly their "algorithm" works. They just keep pouring out a set of modern terms and abbreviations with the explanation what they actually mean, just like wikipedia  Omg, so now when companies release code its automatically assumed to be fake. So when crypto companies release a alpha/beta/testnet, then you say fake. When crypto companies release software you say fake. When crypto companies establish partnerships you say fake. In summary no matter what crypto companies do they are fake. Are you reading your own sentences. Your logic is completely upside down. And if this is you Sebastian under a different name, you tricks will still not work. Their code is shit, their product is absolute shit. Their approach is beyond cheap. Their marketing is everything they got. Their partnerships are laughable, non existing or scams. That is the exact logic behind it, let's act like we are doing everything a successful blockchain would. This must be legit then. You don't even need to look for other people's opinions when you see some blatant and obvious shit they have come up with. It's just insane how they do their business "Their code is shit" Again with the shit code...Come up with something better. Shit compared to what? Maybe not constructed according to best practice but if it works and its fast SFW. "their product is absolute shit" So trying to create a blockchain solution is shit. Why are you even here? "Their approach is beyond cheap" The Ceo attends talks and gives interviews. They release code according to a timeline that actually works. Cheap according to what? " let's act like we are doing everything a successful blockchain would" What is a successful blockchain? what makes a successful blockchain? Have you a written a rule book? "You don't even need to look for other people's opinions when you see some blatant and obvious shit they have come up with" That says it all. Your arguments like the other fudders are just nonesense and baseless. There is great promise in Credits. Price is stable, they are sticking to their deadlines and producing a product which is more than I can say about other Cryptos. Don't underestimate Russian programmers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACM_International_Collegiate_Programming_Contest#2018_World_FinalsSebastian if you have difficulty reading and understanding, Russia is number 1. I know the temptation is to reply to these clowns but I think we are wasting our time. The project is legit and has been fudded to shit but still moved up in a severe bear market where everything has been dropping. Remember something when people fud like this its nearly always bullish. Dont waste your time. |
|
|
|
Its sad everyone is calling its a scam  I sold all my coins in order to avoid any loss. Well you are not alone it seems some people are selling theirs too, but the telegram channel is still hype on this coin, I don't know why the team let this thing happen maybe purposely so they can buy this coin again a much cheaper price then launch their platform. if there is really one, that will look great like Ethereum. I don't think it will look like Ethereum. Consider how long an army of developers has been working on Ethereum now. Why do you think someone else can pull it off with a small team within a fraction of the time that the ETH guys needed? Its something I come across all the time. Everyone looks backwards and can't seem to see that every big project now came from usually small beginnings. Bitcoin was one guy lets not forget with a handful of helpers early on.(yes I was here from the almost the beginning but had my account hacked) ETH wasn't such a big project early on and was really just the brainchild of Vitalik, again one man. Bitshares, Steemit, DASH, NXT, Litecoin etc all one man with an idea. And actually their team seem quite big already with about 30 people in various roles. And sorry to break it to you but ETH was hated early on and fuded to death and wasn't expected to do well at various points. My take is that its very likely not a scam. No one does a scam like this in public and is foolish enough not to think they will get into trouble with the law the way the SEC is looking into ICO's. The team and this involved really should leave the project and distance themselves from it if they think its a scam cause they may well serve prison time if it is. So that considered all the red flags need to be taken with a pinch of salt and the best assumed and that means the ROI is gonna be massive. Fudders seem to be trying too hard to convince me. Looks to me like they want to buy more cheap IMO. I don't see how they can hold the price down much longer. You are spreading weird theories here and nothing more. Since when is it known who and what Satoshi Nakamoto was? An individual, an individual + helpers, an organization, a government agency etc? Since when do you know what you just presented as the truth? Ethereum never was a one man show, that is complete bogus. Ethereum was the most massively launched project in blockchain's early days. Conferences all over the world, dozens of coders etc. Today it has an incredible ecosystem that will be hard to overtake for any of its competitors. The projects I mentioned literally were started by one guy, Dash, NXT and LTC, as I also said ETH was the BRAINCHILD of one man, again a fact. Bitshares and Steemit are Dan Larimar who was once a bitcointalk noob on this very forum you are on now. ETH took while to get going with a major false start and actually while it was big at the beginning it wasn't any bigger a team as what the average ICO has these days Credits has like 30 plus people!! So no you're wrong. But more importantly you miss the actually important thing about projects and that is if they are any good and ETH is famously shit. lol And what do you even mean by massive ecosystem? loads of ICOs that no one will use? And when in any area is it a tribal winner takes all, Is Google unable too make money as well as Apple, Facebook, Snapchat, etc etc. Very Tribal, very fanboy and very dumb. |
|
|
|
Hi all, this is my first message here. At first I was very positive about Credits (I got some...), but then I begin to follow this dev third party analysis: https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-code-review-credits-cs-beta-29-03-2019-5ffce7313a38Iam lost out here...how is possible this so critical analysis about the code, and the Credits team claiming that the will deliver state of art tech? Am I missing something here? I look to guarantee qualifed teams (ADA, QTUM, ETH, EOS, etc) and look like they are keeping pushing hard to get to their targets, that don't looking so ambitious as Credits. So why should I expect Credits will suceed? Iam thinking about selling everything... Thanks in advance and sorry for the no so good english. :-) If you read through it carefully he is quite positive in many of his comments. His main criticism is he doesn't have full visibility which he wants. Its not the complete code so he can't see the though put of the 400k tps he wants to see but and no one said it was the fuil code yet. For context look at the guys other reviews, even big respected projects he's pretty negative on. I think he is sincere reviewer of what he can see at this early stage but its others suggesting the review is only bad who are twisting the truth. Like you newbie fudder. lol This review is not a comment on the overall project, scope, or success thereofSo far, I’m not seeing anything new from the Credits team, but they are using a bunch of cool technologies, this is less a ground up build and more a Frankenstein approach (I like a good Frankenstein approach though), let’s continue"Unfortunately, we can’t interrogate the Node, and we can’t send transactions, so nothing we can continue there unfortunately, so we can’t confirm their TPS claims just yet. |
|
|
|
some parts of the new beta codereview....No. Just. No. Come on Credits team, you guys are better than this, let’s have a telegram chat or something and discuss this architecture and design, but it hurts me to keep seeing implementations like this, as a blockchain community we can do a lot better and we should do a lot better! New coins are created and saved locally in a CSV.
Ok guys, I’m done for now, I really loved that the guys from Credits gave me the client early, and I really wanted to like the code more, but it’s still very very basic and very junior. This is student level code unfortunately, they did improve from last time, but it’s still so far away from being something real, we aren’t at PoC level yet, we can’t be talking about beta already.
Conclusion: They did update MD5 to Blake, but the rest is unfortunately still no where near the level it needs to be able to compete in this field or against the caliber of developers out there. Credits team, let’s talk, I want to help
still amateurish........... WTF!!! What other project is attacked and moaned at like this? Since when has anyone done code review on ETH or EOS and their only thing they can grab hold of is why no Telegram? All I see is echo chambers in Crypto. Inability to think for themselves and follow the crypto herd in one big its going to the moon clusterfuck. Jesus think for yourselves people. Credits has completely been overlooked due these scam allegations which had no basis in fact. They are a young smallish team doing something special, why can't people see that? NONE of the shitcoin ICO projects got attacked like this. My only thought is lots of EOS and ETH fanboys have to attack what threatens their investments. The FUD is now moving from oh its a lie and a scam to oh its amateurish lol. The project has show it does 500k tps. This should be the biggest news of 2018!!! EOS couldn't manage it with an army of coders. No pun intended but credit where credit is due.  |
|
|
|
Good article whereby the whales swim in CREDITS pool right now and they prevent the price from falling even amid the plummeting market. Encouraging also is the news on big players such as Goldman Sachs, Novogratz and BlackRock. Many will miss getting in early on Credits due to as far as I can see Russiaphobia (I'm serious) and some daft you tubers Fudding it. Only when Credits gets to 1BN MC will people be pissed they missed the train and will turn on fools like Ivan on Tech. |
|
|
|
When scammers dont know what to say, they will start talking about english letters missing from comments, if parents know you're online, loosing work, bla bla bla and moon!
As usual no value. Just talking sh*t about 1000x prices.
Look can you like FUCK OFF now you have been proved wrong. You fucking retard. Why continue now? I will be here for as long as you are trying to convince newcomers to invest on your scam project for your personal investment. Dont get angry and dont cry like a little girl. God you're anoying.. |
|
|
|
|
And somone else who as I suspected is a total fucking idiot is that Ivan On Tech. Ironic as he doesn't seem to actually have any understading of tech and couldnt evn say the word Noob right, saying Nuub. Seriously there is having a strong accent and then there is being a fucking moron. I saw him once have an interview with one of those scammer direct marketing multilevel guys and he said he was his main inspiration. So people are listing to a youtube moron for tech info who is just another Trevon James with a better mic. Man this market is full of idiots.
There is nothing that will stop Credits getting to at the very least 1BN MC and will probably do a lot more. No amount of FUD from EOS holders is going to stop it.
|
|
|
|
When scammers dont know what to say, they will start talking about english letters missing from comments, if parents know you're online, loosing work, bla bla bla and moon!
As usual no value. Just talking sh*t about 1000x prices.
Look can you like FUCK OFF now you have been proved wrong. You fucking retard. Why continue now? |
|
|
|
current blockchain is quite slow, what stands out from Credits is its fast tps
You should inform everyone here that the TPS they showed us is from multiple nodes on a single machine, all nodes on the same LAN, validation is disabled, without encryption and storing data, without updating and checking the accounts balance, memory absent, ignoring the transaction costs of running smart contracts.
So they decide to test all of their nodes running on a single server running in virtual machines. There is no real Internet delays, no lag time, no bandwidth restrictions. The test they ran is an optimal speed test, not a real performance test.They keep feeding sh*ts to everyone. Uuuh yeah. of course cause Credits is not live yet, how the fuck else can they show if not in a controlled test, Noob. Or as Ivan on Tech says Nuub. Guy can't say Noob right and he is guiding everyones opinion!!!!! Bloody Newbie Noobs Normies in Crypto. |
|
|
|
|
This was always a scam. I told people from the beginning this guy Alon is the cofounder of Getgems. That was a fucking clusterfuck of a scam that bait and switched the promises of a working app to a become a fucking Telegram clone reskined and its innovative attention model became a fucking Telegram group which ANYONE can set up for free. This guy Alon is a scammer at heart. Expect not straight up exit scam but promises unmet and goal post moves and eventually oh shit sorry but we had to abandon this project.
|
|
|
|
|
Nexus seems massively undervalued at the moment. As market recovers I expect big moves from this one.
|
|
|
|
I've called out some scams in my time. But I simply can't see how this is a scam. Look at the team!!!! Look at all these quality people, does anyone think they would ruin their lives being involved in a complete scam? NOOOOO way. This is a legit project. Hey it might not be as amazing tech as 1m tis suggests. I mean there are other chains that boast something similar. Its gonna go at least 10x probably more. And I am willing to eat my penis if this is a scam, cause there is no way people with these talents would be fooled into one or stay involved in a scam. Fud has really damaged many peoples opportunities on this one. Look deeper, its the same for XBY. Stuff that looks a bit scammy or get s FUD but is 99% likely to be a solid project are THE BEST investments you can make in crypto. https://credits.com/en/Home/Team |
|
|
|
To newcomers here following the thread.
You will see some new fake accounts calling us fuders.
So ask yourselves some simple questions.
Is FUD asking for proofs?
Is FUD telling that they banned many accounts asking for proofs for their statements from telegram and EVERY social media?
Is FUD telling that their sh*ty coin used MD5 for providing private keys?
Is FUD telling that their shady representatives are using bots and fake accounts to promote their sh*ty coin?
Is FUD telling that some of their "special" partners they claim are scams?
Is FUD asking to see their Github and their progress as a project?
Is FUD showing that anyone could send 7 credits and receive 100 on the test they made?
Is FUD showing the owner's address and 2 more multisignature wallets sent the same day 700 eth to a new address and then this money went on binance wallet?
Is FUD showing that the last days the owner's wallet is distributing 50% of his balance to 6 different addresses for no reason?
Is FUD they deleted many posts on medium and reddit that exposed their shady project?
Is FUD that credits used Suppoman the ICO clown scammer for promoting them?
Is FUD we see every day new accounts just saying pretty words trying to convince newcomers to invest in this project while they see it diying?
Is FUD we provide links with researches on the code, on tests and on updates they make about new partners they claim?
These are FACTS no fud.
Give some time to learn more things about where you are going to invest your money because soon they will dump you all.
Thanks for helping us make this thread popular I am now 10 cents in profit from my Credits shares I'm going to hold it until it reaches $10 who knows it gets, even more, you are not doing anything wrong just giving facts and asking for transparency I hope soon they will come out another video about your allegations, you made this thread very interesting. Nice talk about this project, I do not care much about if it is a scam or not since I have sold out my CS tokens with more than 4x profit and I do not want to buy them back if it falls since I think the total market is cold, it is better to hold btc and eth in my opinion. My friend. BTC is about to crash to 3k, are you serious? BTC just had a death cross which nearly always means a massive crash. Credits is about the only thing that might survive the bloodbath, otherwise you need to be holding fiat or Tether. Sorry but you were tricked out of the real big gains of Credits by organised FUD. |
|
|
|
Its sad everyone is calling its a scam I sold all my coins in order to avoid any loss. Well you are not alone it seems some people are selling theirs too, but the telegram channel is still hype on this coin, I don't know why the team let this thing happen maybe purposely so they can buy this coin again a much cheaper price then launch their platform. if there is really one, that will look great like Ethereum. I don't think it will look like Ethereum. Consider how long an army of developers has been working on Ethereum now. Why do you think someone else can pull it off with a small team within a fraction of the time that the ETH guys needed? Its something I come across all the time. Everyone looks backwards and can't seem to see that every big project now came from usually small beginnings. Bitcoin was one guy lets not forget with a handful of helpers early on. ETH wasn't such a big project early on and was really just the brainchild of Vitalik, again one man. Bitshares, Steemit, DASH, NXT, Litecoin etc all one man with an idea. And actually their team seem quite big already with about 30 people in various roles. And sorry to break it to you but ETH was hated early on and fuded to death and wasn't expected to do well at various points. My take is that its very likely not a scam. No one does a scam like this in public and is foolish enough not to think they will get into trouble with the law the way the SEC is looking into ICO's. The team and this involved really should leave the project and distance themselves from it if they think its a scam cause they may well serve prison time if it is. So that considered all the red flags need to be taken with a pinch of salt and the best assumed and that means the ROI is gonna be massive. Fudders seem to be trying too hard to convince me. Looks to me like they want to buy more cheap IMO. I don't see how they can hold the price down much longer. |
|
|
|
|
I tire of you already. I guess your just trying to fud credits but either way I dont care. The more you post the more many will think this project is legit cause your points are weak and could be leveled at any project really. I got 90k of credits. Pretty sure its gonna make me some money. So
do yourself a favour and invest or put your energy into investing in something else.
|
|
|
|
What the fuck is wrong with people. Ok there are some red flags we get it. I appreciate issues being highlighted its great but once you have then surely your job is done and then you just let people take on a high risk investment or not. Many were saying Xtrabytes was a scam early on and now its a relatively respected project that has had a great roi for early investors.
If people continue to fud after everyone is aware of the risks then you got to be suspicious of their motives. I migjt say its genuine concern for those they think they are protecting but im not seeing any concern and actually seem pretty happy about some becoming fucked by credits.
So leave people alone now to make their own decisions. We aren't fucking children.
The difference with credits is that everyone tech-knowledgeable clearly sees that every "news" from the team is a complete bullshit. Just a bunch of terms and fancy abbreviations connected with each other without any specific meaning. For any other investor it may look like a real-deal news. Why you using a sockpuppet? You're the one acting suspicious at this point. A legitimate issue could be voiced through your main account. Its not so much the test that makes me think this project is legit its many things. For one you dont put your face all over the internet and go to conferences if you have zero tech to back up your claims. Scams dont do that. They either are at heart a scam like Bittconnect or a total fake project like confido. If they dont have tech to back this up then they are damn foolish cause they have made public claims like their code has been reviewed etc. In this current climate of crypto if the project is a scam then the team would probably serve prison time and have assets taken. Im willing to take a risk they arent that fucking stupid. |
|
|
|
|
What the fuck is wrong with people. Ok there are some red flags we get it. I appreciate issues being highlighted its great but once you have then surely your job is done and then you just let people take on a high risk investment or not. Many were saying Xtrabytes was a scam early on and now its a relatively respected project that has had a great roi for early investors.
If people continue to fud after everyone is aware of the risks then you got to be suspicious of their motives. I migjt say its genuine concern for those they think they are protecting but im not seeing any concern and actually seem pretty happy about some becoming fucked by credits.
So leave people alone now to make their own decisions. We aren't fucking children.
|
|
|
|
Why do you think mangocoinz eventually failed, even though many users were making profit out of it?
Is there any other such android based coin?
This project cpuld be huge if rebranded and launched. Fordt to mobile.mining. look at electroneum this has huge potential if relaunched |
|
|
|
Your information is deficient. You just say that the coin is good and underrated but you do not base your information anywhere. Maybe you have interest to say this?!
I didn't say buy it. I said you should research it. Big difference. I'm assuming on readers intelligence not they will just accept my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
