Yes, I noticed it too. A rather strange pattern is that if a strong club flies out of the Champions League and ends up in the Europa League (or initially ends up there), then instead of taking the title, it rather flies out of there. This is probably due to the fact that the Europa League has almost zero attractiveness for top clubs, so they don't try there. And I also heard that the income from playing in the Europa League is about 5 times less than the income from participating in the Champions League.

On the one hand, this game will take place more than two weeks before the decisive game in the Champions League (where Liverpool already has a good advantage) and thus one cup competition will not interfere with another. But the regular season hasn't gone away, and given that any point loss there will cost Liverpool a chance at the championship, Liverpool is unlikely to give 100% in this final. If Chelsea have the motivation to win the FA Cup, then I think they will be able to do it because Liverpool will not have enough strength to fight on three fronts.

To be honest, I rarely read the Politics section and the like, so I didn’t notice that there are a lot of socialists here, it’s sad if so.

As for the stupidity of the leftists and the fact that their prohibitions are easy to get around - yes it is. But I believe that bypassing the ban is a losing path, because by trying to get around the ban you recognize that someone has the right to restrict you. It is unacceptable.
Plus, it should be borne in mind that they never stop (until they get a rebuff), for example, in the case under discussion, their next step will be to ban access to online casinos (as has already been implemented in many countries). This can be bypassed with the help of VPN, but they will again come up with the "next" ban. This is a road to nowhere, it is better not to start it.

It is a pity that it is difficult to use all the bonuses offered (they greatly reduce the advantage of the casino/bookmaker) due to the fact that it is impossible to keep a deposit in 5-6 casinos at once and withdrawals usually cost substantial fees. Perhaps this is just due to the fact that otherwise gamblers would run from one casino to another to collect bonuses.

Sad to hear. Although the idea was initially bad (trying to win money given that you have debt to service). I could be wrong, but judging by the amount of the bet, not everything is so bad and you can recover even just by keeping earnings from your signature.
In any case, thanks for your thread. Many gamblers brag about their winnings and the fact that you shared a loss will be useful for those who might think that everything is so simple and easy here.

If you're talking about how quantity becomes quality and PC users play better than mobile users simply because there are more of them, then I don't agree. Firstly, this contradicts what was written above - the number of mobile device users is constantly growing (and there may already be more of them than PC users). Secondly, just for reasons of common sense, I cannot imagine how a player with a mouse and keyboard will be inferior in control to a player who plays using a touchscreen.

Hi, I see you have been running this thread for three years, but nowhere are there any statistics on the success of your predictions (paid or free) and no reviews. Do you think this approach is normal? It seems to me that a potential buyer of your product must see at least something attractive in order to make a purchase.

But you are missing two points, the first one is that Roma is in 5th place in Serie A and they are close (mentally) to the leaders, while Leicester is in 10th place in the EPL and it definitely does not have a winning mood in this position. Secondly, Roma's coach is Mourinho, who is undoubtedly a great specialist in English teams and the likelihood that Roma will be able to realize the advantage that it has already received is very high.

I am not an expert in Australian politics, but judging by the initiative and the fact that the name of the party contains the word "greens", these are just another leftist idiots who "invented" how people should live and will now try to force people to conform to their fictions. I hope that in Australia there is a conscious population and a strong gaming lobby and they will not allow idiots to tell adults how they should live and where to spend their honestly earned money.

If Taleb's theories had anything to do with reality, then he would probably have shown in practice their effectiveness in earning a lot of money in any of the markets - be it the usual financial market or sports betting. But for some reason I have not heard anything about his success in this area. Instead, he prefers to publish books (which, by their volume, hint at the fact that he is a storyteller) and lecture, suspicious, isn't it?

There is no free internet in Russia. There is no complete information blockade yet, but most free resources (like twitter) are blocked and local resources are filled with paid bots that glorify the war around the clock and spread hatred against Ukraine. In fact, for ordinary users who initially do not have broad views and critical thinking (plus a good paid VPN), the Internet in Russia is not much different from a TV.

All large and reputable projects have approximately the same line, the odds of sporting events are almost the same for them. But there are certain differences in the bonuses that they provide - somewhere they are cumulative, somewhere one-time. For example, sportsbet once a day provides an opportunity to take an booster for a bet, which significantly improves the chances, by about 2%. I think that taking into account these differences, the bettor should choose from these available (not only those that you have listed) bookmakers of the one that is most beneficial to him.

Очередной конкурс от sportsbet.io:

Sportsbet.io ⚽ EFL Championship ⚽ Prediction Round #45 (Apr 29)

Чушь откровенная. Я вам уже написал почему. С учетом того, что вы не читаете обсуждение, из темы выхожу.

Centralized exchanges undoubtedly still dominate, but this does not mean that it will always be so. People's awareness of various possibilities is already high, and when certain circumstances occur (for example, more stringent government regulation), rapid qualitative changes can occur. WEB 3.0 is an important piece of infrastructure for such a transition and it will play its role (if it will be truly decentralized).

If we're talking specifically about sports, then PC users will always beat mobile users, simply because on a PC your control is much higher than when playing on a smartphone. If we are talking about making money, then companies, of course, climb into all niches, and if I remember correctly, casual games for smartphones that have nothing to do with sports bring much more profit than any eSports games.

Yes, bookmakers allow you to bet on Canello with odds of 1.3, while on Bivol as much as 4.7. This suggests that Canelo is a clear favorite and some advantage in physical data does not mean anything. As you rightly noted, the challenger has three times fewer fights, and the champion has already beaten everyone he can, and for him it will be a fight with another average fighter.

Singapore lol! Late entry into the industry plus many restrictions (even paid admission to the casino) but still a solid second place. Very interesting statistics, but I see a real problem - this rating is based on nominal indicators and not on percentage ratios of lost money to people's "budget". Obviously, with this approach, no poor country has a chance to get into this rating, which we see - only rich countries with a high per capita income are in the table. I think that other more objective ways of compiling such a rating would completely change the picture, since I heard that gambling is much more common in poor countries than in rich ones.

My Betja Username- Boristhecat
Screenshot-

А зачем мне говорить точно и определенно сколько стоит картинка? Я как раз утверждаю обратное - картинка стоит от нуля и до бесконечности, но от того, что вы "добавили" к стоимости картинки залог, ее стоимость не поменялась. Если она дерьмовая и стоит ноль, то она не изменилась и продолжает стоить ноль.

Это вы как инноватор должны пытаться доказать что есть хоть какой-то смысл в таких манипуляциях.
На данный момент вы "добились" того, что продукт (картинка + залог) стал стоить не от нуля и до бесконечности, а от стоимости залога и до бесконечности. Доказательств/обоснований того, что это не является лишним действием хоть кому-то нужным (проще брать кредит под залог, а не под "залог + дерьмовая картинка") и доказательств/обоснований того что стоимость картинки равна стоимости залога вы не привели никаких.