Well thanks for your information. I gather much from you. I use multiple browser before and i found out that there will be a vulnerability on other browser can't name one but the safest browser i use is Google Chrome. I will buy hardware soon as soon as the bull market return then i will short my funds.
glad i could help. if you do not have the funds /abiliry to get a hardware wallet for now consider a paper wallet, or at least use a windows version and use 2FA. stay away from web-based wallets ( where you use your browser, type in xxxx walet.com and enter your info ) that is the worst practice ever especially if you do not have a 2FA |
|
|
|
wow, thanks for the information, I even found out if using google DNS is very dangerous, I used to use it to stabilize my modem connection, and now I will never again do, thanks again for the information
you are most welcome . glad i could help. I'm not really into hardware wallets either to be honest, all it takes is one bad apple among employees and your private key might be compromised.
nothing is 100% secured,but it's not bad as you make it sound. a bad apple ammong empoloyess won't be enough to compromise your PK. it's a little bit more secured than this  It sounds like the biggest concern is a public DNS server that is very commonly used. If you are able to find a public DNS server that is relatively unused would that then mitigate most of the concern for hacking through that route?
Not really. Picking an uncommonly used DNS is really just security by obscurity. You're not actually doing anything to be more secure against attacks, you're just reducing the chances of being attacked. Kind of like how people MacOS is "safer" than Windows just by virtue of it being much less likely to get targeted. I'm pretty new to all of this, but how is your ISP DNS anymore protected than a public DNS that is used equally as much?
It's not more protected. Google's isn't necessarily better either. Google's is just perceived to be better because most people trust that Google does their job in securing their DNS better than their respective ISPs. I don't know if that's true, of course, but if we go by the assumption that Google is better at security than your ISP, it would come down to a choice of "more likely to be attacked but more likely to fight them off", or "less likely to be attacked but less likely to fight them off". It's essentially hiding versus arming yourself. There's no clear winner that will always be better so you just have to decide for yourself. I think it is pretty clear that what i meant by saying that your ISP DNS is more secured than GOOGLE's is nothing technically related. it's something we can't tell, statistically google's DNS is more secured than many other's COMBINED. but the fact that it's widely used, it's on hackers top list!.simply due to the reward! |
|
|
|
Yeah it is risky if you use public dns. what i wonder is why google dns can be hijacked.
for me, using myetherwallet alone is not secure to operate. just use metamask or other secure wallet.
you see the most secured things are those" unknown" things. the more a service is used the more people want to hack it because the reward is much bigger. think about it this way. you transferring a million dollars in cash from your house to your friends. you have 1 options to secure them. 1- Do not tell anyone about the money you transferring 2-Hire a SWAT team to protect you transfer the money now option two may seem like a more secured choice but it really is not. just the fact that you allow people to know about the 1 million $ you transferring puts you in a big risk regardless of how much protection you have. this thing applies to public DNS perfectly. even though Google pays probably 1000000x times more than most other DNS's for security, the fact the it's well known and so many people use it. it's very seductive to hackers, who would waste time and effort trying to hack a local DNS that only a handful of people use? and yes you are 100% right. people should stay away from web-based wallet. |
|
|
|
I always use VPN to transact. I do not know if this is risky or not for me. And so far I am grateful my coins are always safe. Whether through MEW or Exchangers, I'm always wary of using both because we know that Hackers can use DNS from MEW or Exchangers to get Private keys and Passwords. They are smart. However, risk is the part we have to deal with.
using a VPN to transact doesn't mean anything, it could be safe as much as it could be less safe. there really isn't a tight risk ratio attached to using VPN. a DNS attack is not on MEW it self , it is on rout from your PC to the WEB WALLET. anywhere in between. i still insist on using hardware wallet for best security practice. |
|
|
|
DAILY BUMP
AS SOON AS POSSIBLE I WILL GIVE MORE INFO ABOUT WITHDRAW.
ACTUALLY IT NEEDS TO SEND SOME MAIL POST TO GET THE MONEY.
MY FRIEND DONE IT YESTERDAY , NOW WAITING TO BANK TRANSFER MONEY
Today sent a compiled form via Mail Post , im from italy and costed me 2,95€ to get paid. Anyway they take the 20% of the total withdraw. , i get only 250€ from 316€ earned. so are you saying payment has to be via mail post or what? please claify on how can we withdrawal the money, also provide a proof of payment. |
|
|
|
Hi I am selling USA virtual cards. These cards are VISA-branded and are open to all transactions(international or domestic) Cards can be reloaded and therefore perfect for long or short term use Can issue you one card a day or 10 a day there is no limit Fully anonymous Rates are listed hereCard Issuance - $20 USD Card Top Up Fee - 5% so topping up $50 will require $55 Until I prove myself with a few sales I'm happy to do all sales with escrow with the escrow services listed on bitcoin talk https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2439910.0Any more questions feel free to contact me how can be these cards be re-loaded? can we fund them using crypto ? can we fund them without having to get back to you ? |
|
|
|
|
tried to message you but you do not allow newbie messages, send me a pm or give me your email for contacts.
|
|
|
|
|
depends on how you define SCAM.
my definition for SCAM in crypto coins is a road-map that can't be met !.
most coins have a GREAT road-map where they claim really amazing things to happen!. so people invest in that coin based on that. only to realize after a while that non of the so called plans worked out. and the worst part is when the devs themselves know they can't achieve their road-map so the dump their coins before others do leaving everybody else with BAGS!
to stay safe, only invest in TOP coins. less reward yet less risk.
|
|
|
|
Guys why does 20K seems like an impossible thing to you ?  The fact that the crypto-market is very small (way less than 1 Trillion $ in total ,420 Billion as for right now) makes it very easy to move to both directions in no time, some traders compare crypto to forex which is wrong, there is well over 5 Trillion $ trading volume only. just remember that ! - BTC went from 6K to 9.5 K in less than 18 days this month !!! ( well over 40% increase ) - Last year btc went from 5k to 20K in 35 days ( 250% increase) Now fundamentals are a major factor and everything can change at any second. but technically speaking we broke a major down trend, we building a new support/up trend which has been tested couple times and proven to be strong enough. the biggest obstacle would be the double top at 11-12 K. it may take weeks to break that but the road from 12 K to 20 K is going to be much smoother. as much as i want crpyto to MOON in no time, i would love to see a slow and steady growth. I do not think it is impossible at all to reach 20k $,the only problem is how do you define "soon"? Based on last year BTC has a much better starting point for new ATH this year-as you say it take only 35 days from 5k$ to 20k$ and now we have 7 months by the end of this year and current price above 9k $ level.The real question is whether the last year scenario can be repeated,or people will be a bit more cautious with their money. I personally expect at least 20k $ by the end of this year,but it is realistic to expect even more. you see that BTC grows by 1000$ in no time ? it's not hard for BTC to make it to 20K by the time i expect it to, it only takes about another 400B in total market cap to bring btc to that level, 400B is nothing. the only obestecle ahead is the double top at the 11000-12000$ . once we break that i expect we would see a crazy rally just like last year end. don't worry FOMO will get us there |
|
|
|
I didn't follow the technical news on the previous days, so I do not know of what happened with Myetherwallet wallet. As a result of the increase in the prices of these currencies, there has been a lot of news that talk about such attacks, so I do not find the traditional protection methods will withstand for a long time. So I prefer a paper wallet with public address(use any block explorer to check your balance) + mixing services (for privacy).
move your post to Beginners & Helppaper wallet is safe until you decide to move your coins, if you use a compromised pc to do so then you are doomed ! paper wallet is for sure much more secured than online wallets but still a hardware wallet is much more secure. |
|
|
|
exactly, ! and guess what my list which i was selling for free has just got deleted . so is it possible that one of the scammers has access to a moderator / admin account ? since i am just newbie here, maybe somebody else should with better understanding for how this forum works should sell the list I don't think there is a conspiracy. Post a thread in Meta and ask why your thread was against the rules. As far as I can see there is no rule against but I might be wrong. I will try, thanks. |
|
|
|
you can imagine that you can make an infinite number of trades. would you be profitable in the long run?
go set up a demo account and figure. place random 1000 trades with 1:2 risk/reward ratio not saying you should trade randomly, but adding a good risk/reward ration to your trading strategy is a KEY. |
|
|
|
The probability of an event that the coin will grow by 500 is much lower than the probability of a fall by 250. So these strategies are theoretically the same.
not true at all, the probability of a coin growing by 500 vs fall by 250 is 50/50!.. the probability of a coin growing 1000% is exactly the same as falling 1%. simple proof is when BTC was at 1$ a trader who set SL at .9$ and TP at 16000$ had a 50/50 chances regardless of what happened price doesn't need to fall by an x % before growing x%. it doesn't work this way. look at the chart and you will understand ! |
|
|
|
I'll try to summarize this for all you guys who want a TL;DR: basically the best practice is 2:1 ratio what this means is that after you buy you set your sell target at a 10% profit and set a stop-loss at 5% below the price you bought.
You can't do this sort of thing, if you have a stop loss at 5% you're going to hit that in a day in crypto.Crypto goes up 5-10 percent in the matter of a few hours, if you are to follow this you're going to miss out on some big gains in crypto -- if the market does go up. If you put the stop loss at 25% that makes more sense and matches the crypto volatility -- do that and you'll be good. Set sell target at 10-15 percent. Goodluck folks -- I still like HODL more then any other strat. so you risking 25% for 10% gains ? good luck |
|
|
|
So after I disabled the 3 hot GPUs from the rigs, other gpus are below 80 deg F (27 deg cel). I plan to just use a 6 gpu rig to hold these three cards ( they will have 6 inches ) in between and run them in the new rig. Hopefully it will help. Outside the temp now is 86 (~29 celcius) and all gpus are below 80 F (27 Cel)
what are you using to SEE those temps ? there is no way on planet earth that a gpu will run at 27 cel unless it's doing nothing !! |
|
|
|
- The coupons can be applied to only new purchases of the Antminer S9, L3+, T9+, A3, V9, D3 or X3.
This ^ is wrong
|
|
|
|
As is normal here, sadly this thread will be moved to "scam accusations" so no one who needs to see it would. Scams are allowed to perpetuate forever here but these posts go into neverneverland.
This is honestly pretty terrible, but in my opinion, if we made a thread about the most common ways of scamming with digital goods, it would have a fair chance of staying in that section as long as it was not directed towards any users in particular. Something sort of what I described in my previous post would probably get the green light by the mods, although of course, I can't be sure. If I have time later tonight I might do it myself, but it does get annoying to have the same sort of sales in there that for those of us who are experienced are obviously scams. Just not allowing LOCKED or SELF MODERATED threads in the DIGITAL sections would resolve probably 75% of the problem. Not all for sure ... but a lot more than the posts that no one reads anyway. exactly, ! and guess what my list which i was selling for free has just got deleted . so is it possible that one of the scammers has access to a moderator / admin account ? since i am just newbie here, maybe somebody else should with better understanding for how this forum works should sell the list |
|
|
|
congrats you have been just moved to the top of the list because you have the guts to come here and say bullshit when almost everybody knows you are nothing but a scam |
|
|
|
As is normal here, sadly this thread will be moved to "scam accusations" so no one who needs to see it would. Scams are allowed to perpetuate forever here but these posts go into neverneverland.
you just gave me a good hint ! you inspired me to do this > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3507445.msg36200191#msg36200191selling the scam list , i do not think anyone has the right to move my topic else where !! check it out You should charge .0000000001 BTC but have the buyer drop a penney in a collection box to officially make it a sale. for that we need to chose a coin that has 0 or low fees BTC transactions are kinda high :d. let's see, i don think they will move it ! but should they do, then i'l charge a whole PENNEY for the list |
|
|
|
here are a few tips for easier browsing for the user.
1- set the default number of gpus to 1 instead of zero, disable all of them by default keep 570 / 580 on by default
2- for ASIC mining you have all algos checked, so calculating one algo the user have to un-check all by 1 by which is annoying.
also i noticed a bug, when i turn on " Unreliable coins" i get Sekin on rx570 even though the hash rate is 0 so i have to uncheck the algo which is a bad practice, i suggest your code should exclude algos that has 0 value even if they are checked.
aside from this , everything looks great. well done.
Hello, 1- default numbers are adapted for one 1080ti but after any change all the values are saved. 2- I understand you but you just have to do this only one time, after that all algos should be saved as unchecked for you. Thank you for your tips, nice comments and the bug(now fixed) you have pointed out. Good work |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
