Also. I am trying to do the pool mining. Here is my Conf: addnode=explorer.biblepay.org
pool=https://pool.biblepay.org
workerid=iowaiowa
gen=1
genproclimit=1 Output is this for mining info: "blocks": 141280,
"currentblocksize": 6255,
"currentblocktx": 3,
"difficulty": 4812.805875096818,
"errors": "",
"pooledtx": 1,
"chain": "main",
"genproclimit": 1,
"networkhashps": 483287.588282664,
"hashps": 0.5556035973711518,
"minerstarttime": "08-28-2019 17:57:19",
"hashcounter": 257,
"pooledtx": 1,
"chain": "main",
"biblepay-generate": true,
"poolinfo1": "",
"poolinfo2": "",
"poolinfo3": "",
"poolinfo5": "",
"abninfo": "",
"gsc_errors": "",
"poolmining": false,
"pool_url": "",
"required_abn_weight": 125000 I have created the worker on the pool site. Any clue why this isn't working? Could you please paste the output of 'exec createabn 125000'? Adding 'minersleep=-1' to your config will also help speed up the miner. On a side note, if you tail the end of debug.log and search for 'miner' there is probably an error (that is supposed to be bubbled to getmininginfo however). EDIT2: You may need to run with an unlocked wallet for now (we have a new command for headless unlocking that you can script if you want); but this unlocked wallet allows the core to create an ABN for the miner. Here is the output: 
{
"Command": "createabn",
"xml": "<MT>ABN</MT><abnmsg><nonce>320a036e4bc93bc38c048c1c9a2005a2c0c29831c11fd632d70fe739cf96b429</nonce><ppk>ppk</ppk></abnmsg><abnsig>IEfxcMe+61odCZHt7yBjVBzkt/JiCb/nnOeMdw8qea6NR5AbP0v1IGYbjDgGGLPdZF41yR/HH/CbwCkkDSAnROg=</abnsig><abncpk>B7vyYsLLpR1D59fGqGHNWLN5chDkeP9TGp</abncpk><abnwgt>125000</abnwgt>",
"err": "",
"coin_age_data_selected": "1.0510(170.28)=[170.28] depth=34762, <ROW>1.0320(170.44)=[170.44] depth=34794, <ROW>22.5742(191.78)=[4219.07] depth=39098, <ROW>157.7800(168.80)=[26502.18] depth=34469, <ROW>198.7185(169.87)=[33633.69] depth=34674, <ROW>290.1681(179.03)=[51918.01] depth=37339, <ROW>321.2411(179.03)=[57467.87] depth=36929, <ROW><TOTALREQ>992.56</TOTALREQ><TOTALAGE>174082</TOTALAGE>",
"success": "c9820885d38ed10aded2cb2b3589d10cd4b01136bc644464631907724e9525d3",
"coin_age_data_pre_select": "1.0510(170.28)=[170.28] depth=34762, <ROW>1.0320(170.44)=[170.44] depth=34794, <ROW>22.5742(191.78)=[4219.07] depth=39098, <ROW>157.7800(168.80)=[26502.18] depth=34469, <ROW>198.7185(169.87)=[33633.69] depth=34674, <ROW>290.1681(179.03)=[51918.01] depth=37339, <ROW>321.2411(179.03)=[57467.87] depth=36929, <ROW><TOTALREQ>992.56</TOTALREQ><TOTALAGE>174082</TOTALAGE>",
"audited_weight": 175807.7228347543,
"vin_coin_age_data": "\nGetVINCoinAge: Output #0, Weight: 58067.31, Age: 180.90, Amount: 321.00, TxTime: 1551390951...Output #1, Weight: 170.28, Age: 170.28, Amount: 1.00, TxTime: 1552308157...Output #2, Weight: 33634.66, Age: 169.87, Amount: 198.00, TxTime: 1552343341...Output #3, Weight: 4218.95, Age: 191.77, Amount: 22.00, TxTime: 1550451304...Output #4, Weight: 170.44, Age: 170.44, Amount: 1.00, TxTime: 1552294251...Output #5, Weight: 53043.13, Age: 182.91, Amount: 290.00, TxTime: 1551217091...Output #6, Weight: 26502.95, Age: 168.81, Amount: 157.00, TxTime: 1552435222..."
}
I checked the debug log and don't see any errors. Just a mention that the miner is starting. Wallet is also unlocked. Things look OK from what I see - you have a valid self funded ABN. You are mining, except your pool mining is not working. What HPS are you mining at now btw, is it > 50K? I don't see you hitting the pool. I see your workerid was set up correctly as self funded. The biblepay.conf looks OK. One thing I would suggest is copying the values out to notepad, recreate your biblepay.conf natively on your machine, be sure to manually press <ENTER> between each row and re-save and restart. Ive heard of a few reports where people are somehow saving the biblepay conf with the wrong crlf delimiters for the platform. That might be why biblepay cant see your pool settings. On a side note, you can test that by entering: genproclimit=10 in the biblepay conf, restart the core wallet and see if you are mining on 10 threads. That means its reading your file. |
|
|
|
Also. I am trying to do the pool mining. Here is my Conf: addnode=explorer.biblepay.org
pool=https://pool.biblepay.org
workerid=iowaiowa
gen=1
genproclimit=1 Output is this for mining info: "blocks": 141280,
"currentblocksize": 6255,
"currentblocktx": 3,
"difficulty": 4812.805875096818,
"errors": "",
"pooledtx": 1,
"chain": "main",
"genproclimit": 1,
"networkhashps": 483287.588282664,
"hashps": 0.5556035973711518,
"minerstarttime": "08-28-2019 17:57:19",
"hashcounter": 257,
"pooledtx": 1,
"chain": "main",
"biblepay-generate": true,
"poolinfo1": "",
"poolinfo2": "",
"poolinfo3": "",
"poolinfo5": "",
"abninfo": "",
"gsc_errors": "",
"poolmining": false,
"pool_url": "",
"required_abn_weight": 125000 I have created the worker on the pool site. Any clue why this isn't working? Could you please paste the output of 'exec createabn 125000'? Adding 'minersleep=-1' to your config will also help speed up the miner. On a side note, if you tail the end of debug.log and search for 'miner' there is probably an error (that is supposed to be bubbled to getmininginfo however). EDIT2: You may need to run with an unlocked wallet for now (we have a new command for headless unlocking that you can script if you want); but this unlocked wallet allows the core to create an ABN for the miner. is everything ok after the superblock was generated.. Started getting alerts from my miners like this 2019-08-28 19:18:00 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader: block 70a5ba2a33f04880bbad605d2463cd835704086c11a0bb988d952908ba48e3ed is marked invalid 2019-08-28 19:18:00 ERROR: invalid header received 2019-08-28 19:18:00 ProcessMessages(headers, 2269 bytes) FAILED peer=4 2019-08-28 19:18:00 Misbehaving: 23.95.70.118:40000 peer=3 (0 -> 20) 2019-08-28 19:18:00 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader: block 70a5ba2a33f04880bbad605d2463cd835704086c11a0bb988d952908ba48e3ed is marked invalid 2019-08-28 19:18:00 ERROR: invalid header received 2019-08-28 19:18:00 ProcessMessages(headers, 2269 bytes) FAILED peer=3 2019-08-28 19:18:00 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader: block 70a5ba2a33f04880bbad605d2463cd835704086c11a0bb988d952908ba48e3ed is marked invalid 2019-08-28 19:18:00 ERROR: invalid header received 2019-08-28 19:18:00 ProcessMessages(headers, 2269 bytes) FAILED peer=13 2019-08-28 19:18:00 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader: block 70a5ba2a33f04880bbad605d2463cd835704086c11a0bb988d952908ba48e3ed is marked invalid 2019-08-28 19:18:00 ERROR: invalid header received 2019-08-28 19:18:00 ProcessMessages(headers, 2269 bytes) FAILED peer=8 2019-08-28 19:18:00 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader: block 70a5ba2a33f04880bbad605d2463cd835704086c11a0bb988d952908ba48e3ed is marked invalid 2019-08-28 19:18:00 ERROR: invalid header received 2019-08-28 19:18:00 ProcessMessages(headers, 2269 bytes) FAILED peer=18 2019-08-28 19:18:00 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader: block 70a5ba2a33f04880bbad605d2463cd835704086c11a0bb988d952908ba48e3ed is marked invalid 2019-08-28 19:18:00 ERROR: invalid header received 2019-08-28 19:18:00 ProcessMessages(headers, 2269 bytes) FAILED peer=15 2019-08-28 19:18:01 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader: block 70a5ba2a33f04880bbad605d2463cd835704086c11a0bb988d952908ba48e3ed is marked invalid 2019-08-28 19:18:01 ERROR: invalid header received 2019-08-28 19:18:01 ProcessMessages(headers, 2269 bytes) FAILED peer=16 I have tried zapping wallet and no changes.. Ill run my new hash report. Hang on. |
|
|
|
On the topic of wallet links, there is a wallet page (with latest release version): https://www.biblepay.org/wallet/I do think on the menu, some links (like this one) are getting kind of hidden with the current design some of the first level and second level menu items are actually links vs just the leaf/end submenu items being the only links Yeah, the wallet menu on the home page is not good - primarily because the hashes were just added to it. Someone suggested another level being added to it to clean it up. To simplify things we could probably move the hashes to the wallet page (so they auto-update like our object tag does for the biblepay version on that page) and leave them only there permanently, at least it would would simplify the top level home page quite a bit. |
|
|
|
Also. I am trying to do the pool mining. Here is my Conf: addnode=explorer.biblepay.org
pool=https://pool.biblepay.org
workerid=iowaiowa
gen=1
genproclimit=1 Output is this for mining info: "blocks": 141280,
"currentblocksize": 6255,
"currentblocktx": 3,
"difficulty": 4812.805875096818,
"errors": "",
"pooledtx": 1,
"chain": "main",
"genproclimit": 1,
"networkhashps": 483287.588282664,
"hashps": 0.5556035973711518,
"minerstarttime": "08-28-2019 17:57:19",
"hashcounter": 257,
"pooledtx": 1,
"chain": "main",
"biblepay-generate": true,
"poolinfo1": "",
"poolinfo2": "",
"poolinfo3": "",
"poolinfo5": "",
"abninfo": "",
"gsc_errors": "",
"poolmining": false,
"pool_url": "",
"required_abn_weight": 125000 I have created the worker on the pool site. Any clue why this isn't working? Could you please paste the output of 'exec createabn 125000'? Adding 'minersleep=-1' to your config will also help speed up the miner. On a side note, if you tail the end of debug.log and search for 'miner' there is probably an error (that is supposed to be bubbled to getmininginfo however). EDIT2: You may need to run with an unlocked wallet for now (we have a new command for headless unlocking that you can script if you want); but this unlocked wallet allows the core to create an ABN for the miner. |
|
|
|
Why are there no mentions of earning BBP through campaigns on the main website? We don't have a web developer any more (Jaap went on Sabaatical about a year ago). We are a volunteer project, if you would like to volunteer please volunteer to help. We need a wordpress developer. Hey nsummy, what ideas do you have on this? Could you write out what you would like to see and where?, Currently the links to mining lead to the reddit mining guides, and they have links to the campaign stuff https://www.biblepay.org/mining/On the topic of Why, we could talk about it, but Im not sure its worth the time talking about though On being a volunteer project, I disagree with Rob, as I have historically on this topic, anyone can get paid BBP through the monthly budget for their workhttp://wiki.biblepay.org/UnderstandingGovernanceRob, on the topic of saying "we need a wordpress developer", what work on the website do you think needs to be done? Ill post my open TODO list again On my "volunteer project" comment and your disagreement: I probably should have used a different term, like paid/volunteer project. But my point is people need to either volunteer or accept paid positions within BBP to get things done (in contrast to simply complaining about things that aren't done, which makes me feel like these complaints are all aimed at me to put them on a God list or something and program them myself). This will at least make people aware that this project doesn't magically becoming a top 10 by itself. In my personal position, I have an over 160 hour backlog of things that need done (related to development work). I expect that we have a web developer in this project to maintain web development work in parallel. I guess the thing that is not communicated by me to you Togo is that I think we need someone to fill the web development maintenance position permanently. Someone that keeps a thread open with issues that can be corrected by that person on a regular basis (IE every two weeks). They can turn in hours for this yes we all would agree - this is to be compensated. Then things from NSummy would get pasted in the thread and handled. Regarding what I think needs done to the site, as you know I revamped it once a little bit - when I was forced to go from PODC to POG and stopped. I dont have much bandwidth to go back and correct the rest of it. To be very specific, I would say the Getting Started guide (for Evolution and for GSCs) that NSummy didnt find just now to help him with his questions should be placed somewhere on the web site. Then when you answer him you can paste the link. Regarding the "as you have historically" comment I don't think you have a good basis to say that nor understand the negative ramifications of your comment. I think I have been very clear and productive and on-target exactly with my explanation of what we are, what a DAC is and how we handle compensation. I also think I've been clear about my feelings that we should be efficient on what we spend on and that we should not set bad examples (compensating "some" in testnet and only chosen few get to turn in testnet invoices). And finally, yes, there is a lot of volunteering that goes into BBP. I for example run three free sancs and the testnet thread and dont count hours for it. A lot of people man positions here for free, etc. Its still a partially volunteer project (as we can't really afford payroll as a business can). Yes, after I posted that, I did find this: https://wiki.biblepay.org/Quick_StartThis document is very easy to follow and fully explains everything in easy terms. If the information on this page was easily findable on the Biblepay website then I think it would alleviate a ton of confusion! Thanks Nick. I'll see what I can do about the squirrely Downloads menu. That was introduced when we added sha256 hashes, and we haven't had much time to move to a new menu. |
|
|
|
Why are there no mentions of earning BBP through campaigns on the main website? We don't have a web developer any more (Jaap went on Sabaatical about a year ago). We are a volunteer project, if you would like to volunteer please volunteer to help. We need a wordpress developer. Hey nsummy, what ideas do you have on this? Could you write out what you would like to see and where?, Currently the links to mining lead to the reddit mining guides, and they have links to the campaign stuff https://www.biblepay.org/mining/On the topic of Why, we could talk about it, but Im not sure its worth the time talking about though On being a volunteer project, I disagree with Rob, as I have historically on this topic, anyone can get paid BBP through the monthly budget for their workhttp://wiki.biblepay.org/UnderstandingGovernanceRob, on the topic of saying "we need a wordpress developer", what work on the website do you think needs to be done? Ill post my open TODO list again On my "volunteer project" comment and your disagreement: I probably should have used a different term, like paid/volunteer project. But my point is people need to either volunteer or accept paid positions within BBP to get things done (in contrast to simply complaining about things that aren't done, which makes me feel like these complaints are all aimed at me to put them on a God list or something and program them myself). This will at least make people aware that this project doesn't magically becoming a top 10 by itself. In my personal position, I have an over 160 hour backlog of things that need done (related to development work). I expect that we have a web developer in this project to maintain web development work in parallel. I guess the thing that is not communicated by me to you Togo is that I think we need someone to fill the web development maintenance position permanently. Someone that keeps a thread open with issues that can be corrected by that person on a regular basis (IE every two weeks). They can turn in hours for this yes we all would agree - this is to be compensated. Then things from NSummy would get pasted in the thread and handled. Regarding what I think needs done to the site, as you know I revamped it once a little bit - when I was forced to go from PODC to POG and stopped. I dont have much bandwidth to go back and correct the rest of it. To be very specific, I would say the Getting Started guide (for Evolution and for GSCs) that NSummy didnt find just now to help him with his questions should be placed somewhere on the web site. Then when you answer him you can paste the link. Regarding the "as you have historically" comment I don't think you have a good basis to say that nor understand the negative ramifications of your comment. I think I have been very clear and productive and on-target exactly with my explanation of what we are, what a DAC is and how we handle compensation. I also think I've been clear about my feelings that we should be efficient on what we spend on and that we should not set bad examples (compensating "some" in testnet and only chosen few get to turn in testnet invoices). And finally, yes, there is a lot of volunteering that goes into BBP. I for example run three free sancs and the testnet thread and dont count hours for it. A lot of people man positions here for free, etc. Its still a partially volunteer project (as we can't really afford payroll as a business can). |
|
|
|
Also I am trying to generate a keypair and am getting this error:
"Command": "cpk",
"Results": false,
"Error": "Unable to sign CPK B7vyYsLLpR1D59fGqGHNWLN5chDkeP9TGp (Private key not available)"
}
Most likely the wallet is locked. |
|
|
|
Why are there no mentions of earning BBP through campaigns on the main website?
We don't have a web developer any more (Jaap went on Sabaatical about a year ago). We are a volunteer project, if you would like to volunteer please volunteer to help. We need a wordpress developer. |
|
|
|
our existing exchanges daily total volume according to Coingecko:
SouthXchange 64,000 $
CoinExchange 247,165 $
CryptoBridge 463,618 $
you can see, that exchanges CE and CB have more than 4-7x volume than Southxchange.
But Biblepay volume on these exchanges is minimal.
Yes, I think the problem is that number of daily visitors can be feik as well on Coingecko. For instance I dont believe coinexchange has almost 2 milion visitors daily, not possible. So if volume can be feik, visitors can be feik, so whole coingecko and coinmarketcap we can take with caution only. I also think this is a matter of being available to Asia. I think all the US users use SX because it has the greatest liquidity for BBP. When CB first listed us we had a lot of volume for a month (as people liked CB over CCEX). Once SX came on and CB put us in maintenance the volume never came back on CB. The question is, will we see more than $5k per day distinct and new USD traded on Tokok if we spend 2 btc? If we think this is a pie in the sky idea then we don't want to risk it. Otoh, if we think we will it may be worth it for the additional distinct accounts and potential for our orphans. |
|
|
|
Tokok has more than 90% fake volume, just take a look at their markets. I watched couple of markets, and they are doing wash trades, imaginary trades inside spread, between buy and sell price. These trades are not real, they are executing but they never been in buy/sell order list. It is done just to increase their volume. Asian exchanges are well known for this behaviour. The same thing is with FUBT, they are not even on coinmarketcap. In my opinion, it doesnt help to Biblepay, its not WORTH that listing price. I would spare funds for one of these exchanges with real volume: https://bitcoinist.com/bitcoin-exchange-10-real-volume-bitwise/Thanks. Just to explain part of the problem in getting in a top 10 exchange, you have to pay an attorney to certify you as a utility and then be picked by them to pay the $100,000 listing fee plus the attorney fee - so for now we haven't been able to find a top 10 exchange that will accept biblepay first, and then offer a possibility with fees - although Im optimistic about that in the future due to our orphan collage. Before giving up on Tokok however, we see the CoinGecko adjusted volume at 1 mil per day, which is pretty good as related to their proposed listing fee. Its a privilege to be listed on an exchange (a person cant go to an exchange and say List us). EDIT: And I want to say, I am being cautious on this. I take this very seriously. Im comparing this to this: https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/southxchange/https://www.coingecko.com/en/exchanges/tokokI'm comparing $55k per day to $2.1MM per day. I'm speculating what would happen if we have 1 mil new trading accounts in Asia available that may be interested in BBP - or more realistically 36* more exposure. This is speculative, but with normalized volume and a distinct market its possible we grow. |
|
|
|
I see we have a quite new topic in forum.biblepay.org regarding new exchange listing. We have two choices, first one FUBT exchange and second one TOKOK exchange. I tried to make an account and look at them. I was a little bit dissapointed when I tried to make an account on FUBT exchange. Directly in register form I need to put in confirmation code sent via short message or via email. Unfortunatelly short message even email confirmation have not worked in my case. I used Slovak phone number and @gmail.com email. I haven't receive anything. I tried it from France IP, email confirmation worked but I receive email in Chinese. Translated via google translator. After registration I tried to log in, again I needed to confirm log in by code but I havent receive anything. Ok I closed this issue with statement that FUBT is not very user friendly in Europe. Ill try it maybe later ones again.
On the other hand I had no problem with TOKOK exchange, fast registration, everything worked just fine. Exchange platform looks fast enough even in Europe and looks user friendly.
Regarding coingecko parameters both of them are looking very good on the first look. On the second look both of the exchanges has much more lower daily Normalized Volume as Daily Volume. In my opinion this means they have many trading robots and their volumes are penalised and Normalized volume decreased. This is not good sign. So real volume we can say FUBT about 400k daily and TOKOK 2mil daily normalized volume. In comparisn with Southxchange has max 100k daily.
So when I compared daily volumes TOKOK looks much more better and according to information from Rob's post on forum.biblepay.org listing fee is cheaper. It means 2 BTC for Exchange with 2mil daily volume. Furthermore TOKOK has 4 times more daily visits as FUBT.
When you take a look on trading statistics it looks that biggest percentage of trades are in trading pairs with USDT. What do you think about that? I dont know if we have possibility maybe list BBP/USDT trading pair. It looks this should be good move?
According to my first comparism I will vote for TOKOK exchange.
Here is the Tokok thread for the sanctuaries who are interested in making your voting decision: https://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=440.new#newPlease look at all the Prod proposals for this month as we have a few important ones: https://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=442.0https://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=439.0https://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?board=5.0... |
|
|
|
Guys I wrote here day before yesterday one post regarding new exchange listing. FUBT vs TOKOK. This post just disapiered. Do you know why? I did not receive any message regarding post deleting as in past.
No, as you know I've only deleted the extremely rude and bad messages. There was nothing deleted by me or MIP, maybe it either didnt save or bitcointalk deleted it. I don't see anything on the FUBT or Tokok threads either; it should be posted there. Rob I know you have not deleted. Post was there maybe 2 hours and then just disapeard. I did not receive any message from BCT, anything. Strange. Sunk wrote me that he saw the post so I have one witness :-) Anyway, I need write it again then, cause I have not made a copy of the text. Ok, thanks. I look forward to any input on FUBT as we near sanc voting time. |
|
|
|
Guys I wrote here day before yesterday one post regarding new exchange listing. FUBT vs TOKOK. This post just disapiered. Do you know why? I did not receive any message regarding post deleting as in past.
No, as you know I've only deleted the extremely rude and bad messages. There was nothing deleted by me or MIP, maybe it either didnt save or bitcointalk deleted it. I don't see anything on the FUBT or Tokok threads either; it should be posted there. |
|
|
|
Outdated Github Links:https://www.cryptomiso.com/#BBP(Ive submitted the new link a few times already, we may have to contact them directly explaining the situation, other than their limited "add repo" form, these are the only other contacts I could find https://twitter.com/crypto_misohttps://twitter.com/bartclaeys) ===== https://coincheckup.com/coins/biblepay/https://isthiscoinascam.com/check/biblepayhttps://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/biblepayhttps://www.cryptocompare.com/coins/bbp/overview/BTC-- exchanges missing https://cryptoslate.com/coins/biblepay/-- masternode collateral https://coincodex.com/crypto/biblepay/-- explorer https://www.livecoinwatch.com/price/BiblePay-BBPhttps://stakinglab.io/coins/biblepay-coin-- ann link not bitcointalk ===== https://coinlib.io/coin/BBP/BiblePay-- logo, 2nd website, explorer https://cryptorival.com/coins/biblepay/-- explorers https://www.marketbeat.com/cryptocurrencies/biblepay/-- mineable yes, telegram, 2nd explorer, facebook https://bitscreener.com/coins/biblepayhttps://www.worldcoinindex.com/coin/biblepay-- mineable yes, max supply, exchanges, all links bottom right https://coin.market/crypto/biblepay-bbp-- exchanges https://coinpaprika.com/coin/bbp-biblepay/https://coin360.com/coin/biblepay-bbp===== OTHER: https://www.coinexchange.io/market/BBP/BTC-- just 2nd explorer Ok thanks; On cryptomiso, I just notified him on his sister site creativeskills. Ill reply to some of these other things asap. |
|
|
|
Why BBP has no any commit on Github from the end of March?
Thanks
It was moved to another repository: https://github.com/biblepay/biblepay-evolutionNoko proves my point from earlier: I strongly believe we should use the original repository and now merge the new commits to it. Many users and particularly tracker websites are following the original repository, so BiblePay is falling down in their algorithmic rankings, due to perceived stopped development. Exactly that is the reason why im asking. BBP is falling in rankings on approp websites. Please paste a website that we are falling in rankings in and help us with a list that needs updated. We will make sure our github location is updated on every site. Its been updated on CMC and our core threads. Please paste how happy you are to see millions of new lines of code in the biblepay-evolution branch also. Togo, Inblue, please help us locate any site that is falling in ranking(s) or that needs a github pointer updated. Cryptomiso.com Updated. |
|
|
|
Why BBP has no any commit on Github from the end of March?
Thanks
It was moved to another repository: https://github.com/biblepay/biblepay-evolutionNoko proves my point from earlier: I strongly believe we should use the original repository and now merge the new commits to it. Many users and particularly tracker websites are following the original repository, so BiblePay is falling down in their algorithmic rankings, due to perceived stopped development. To help our third party sites (and any lost biblepay-classic users) realize we moved: Since github supports repo redirects, I have added a github redirect file to our old repo: https://github.com/biblepay/biblepayAnd added a note that we have moved also. Note that moving Evo to BiblePay would not be possible (unless we first decided to Delete the BiblePay repo during our last mandatory upgrade)- but since I decided to maintain both repos for an additional quarter (while classic was being maintained from a code perspective and prod perspective), that decision was made for a smooth transition, and now, it is not possible to move Evo back to BiblePay (without breaking all kinds of scripts, deployments, exchanges, integrations and relationships) - and there are many places in the code that relies on the github location - and - it would require a very large effort and a mandatory upgrade with every provider. Now, they all should know us as "biblepay-evolution" and they need to upgrade to our new github location - and realize we have a new product name to update. If we ever decide to move back to "BiblePay", or to a new name, we will have to take all of this into account before the mandatory upgrade. (I'm not insinuating we made an error; the change was deliberate because we were maintaining a prod branch while running side by side with Evo to make sure it was compatible). Our product is now Biblepay-Evolution. |
|
|
|
Hey guys,
I'm new at BBP. Can you pelase take a look at my issue.. I think I have good PC (Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v3@ 3.5GHz, 6 Cores, 12 logical processors. I set my genproclimit=12. That was very low because my PC utilization was just at 10%. I set genproclimit=60 (it is the max before switching to solo mining) and the utilization raised just to about 20%. Is there any way to increase HPS (I just have from 5000-8000 in leaderboard at pool.biblepay.org while genmininginfo shows 120 000 HPS). Don't you know why is there so differential between those 2 numbers? What is the real HPS?
Another Q: I have joined POG and Healing. Of course I wasn't sure about is so I unjoined with "exec unjoin pog" and "exec unjoin healing". I want to join it again. When I type "exec join pog" it says "false" because I'm actually in, but I can't see myself in leaderboard. So am I in or not?
Thanks guys and sorry for my trivial questions.
On #2, what is your nickname, and does 'exec sentgsc' show a report of sent transactions into POG, if so please paste one txid. If you haven't sent a GSC transmission in > 24 hours you won't be in the leaderboard. I'll let the others respond to the mining. EDIT: On a side note, please add "minersleep=-1" to your file, and see if hashing increases. |
|
|
|
Yes I deleted that as well.
Please stop the client, delete again peers.dat, then add these nodes in biblepay.conf addnode=8.6.193.83 addnode=209.250.243.91 and re-run. MIP, thanks for the info. I was gone all day so couldn't try. However, my 4th attempt at uninstalling, deleting all files and folders, re-installing, copying wallet.dat and bbp config files finally worked. Or at least appears to be connected and sync'd for the time being. I will try adding those the next time I run into an issue. You don't need to uninstall biblepay to resync. Just restart with -erasechain=1. |
|
|
|
Why BBP has no any commit on Github from the end of March?
Thanks
It was moved to another repository: https://github.com/biblepay/biblepay-evolutionNoko proves my point from earlier: I strongly believe we should use the original repository and now merge the new commits to it. Many users and particularly tracker websites are following the original repository, so BiblePay is falling down in their algorithmic rankings, due to perceived stopped development. Exactly that is the reason why im asking. BBP is falling in rankings on approp websites. Please paste a website that we are falling in rankings in and help us with a list that needs updated. We will make sure our github location is updated on every site. Its been updated on CMC and our core threads. Please paste how happy you are to see millions of new lines of code in the biblepay-evolution branch also. Togo, Inblue, please help us locate any site that is falling in ranking(s) or that needs a github pointer updated. |
|
|
|
is coinexchange on right chain? i did deposit but nothing appears there, could anyone check?
Did they receive your deposit btw? Ill run my global hash report. no deposit until now, but bbp is now in maintenance mode so i need to wait... Ok, they resolved it. Now lets move forward with no issues for a solid year. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
