Thank you again, supreme leader, for your flawless timing. Supreme Leader, your filthy, moustachioed, lustful Italian acolyte salutes you. The Queen of Foxes guides us. The Queen of Foxes teaches us. The Queen of Foxes protects us. In your light, we thrive. In your mercy, we are sheltered. In your wisdom, we are humbled. We live only to serve. I Our lives (+wives, + holes) are yours.
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.talkimg.com%2Fimages%2F2023%2F12%2F29%2FIisDW.jpeg&t=663&c=6GxjS8O3TAteHw)
|
|
|
Ninjastic.space reports that the forum has seen over 1.87 million posts since the beginning of the year, and this number is expected to reach around 1.9 million by the end of the year.
Last year that number was ~2.6 million and year before that ~2.9 million that just confirms something we are all aware, that forum activity has been on the decline for years and with the mixer campaign ban I expect numbers to go down even more. Mixed feelings on this. Surely less posts is not a bad thing per se. Just remember the merit system was introduced to reduce the number of posts (but increase the quality). On the other hand, reducing activity too much is bad for the forum, which has already his own problems (outdated platform, attraction and retention of new users)
|
|
|
I am bringing up this thread from the history of bitcointalk. It’s almost 13 years old, and an excellent example of the greatness of the users of this forum, who lived 10 years in the future. Maybe ARK took the inspiration for his filing from this thread!
|
|
|
ho fatto il teleport anche io, ma ripeto onestamente e' come se mangi cioccolata e il giorno dopo mangi broccoli. Sono cose diverse e dipende dai gusti principalmente.
Chiaramente non lascerei mai il forum per andare in altcoinstalks.org. Ma certamente se si potesse fare teleport dei posts, allora magari si troverebbe il motivo di mangiare broccoli, non credete? Vediamo che succede. non devi abbandonare bitcointalk per andare su altcointalks. diciamo che se vuoi sfruttare le campagne firme, visto che alcune non potranno più esistere allora una capatina la farei. ma non puoi teleportare i tuoi post, solo il tuo rango. diciamo che sarai una leggenda anche là e visto che sei uno dei più apprezzati in questo forum ti daranno anche un distintivo (credo) ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Tanto per raffreddare gli entusiasmi ho dato uno sguardo alle campagne firme e mi paiono molto più basse del forum qui. Mi sa che la fatica non vale il gioco, almeno per ora. Anche perché non si possono (per ora) tele portare i post…
|
|
|
I am human (there are enough AI or quasi-AI users here on the forum) and sometimes I make errors. I have done the last round from the mobile, so yes, I could have overlooked this rule, but I do confirm it is still valid. Thanks for pointing out.
Are you still checking the old submissions? I had a submission on 21 November but never got any response. (I know you are only human, not a robot). I understand. I'm just checking if everything is still in the process or not. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5412657.msg63193692#msg63193692Thanks for the hard work. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) -DS Of course, I am still progressing. Slow and steady. For your guidance, it’s pretty straightforward to see where I got reviewing, as I usually give merit to the post with the links. I am currently around 28 of September, or page 43. I am also travelling, so I have some difficulties on these days without my usual setup to get on par with distribution pace.
|
|
|
grayscale said this a Grayscale spokeswoman said. "Aligned with Grayscale’s commitment to responsible growth, we are pleased to welcome Mark Shifke, Matt Kummell and Edward McGee to Grayscale’s board of directors, Grayscale and our investors will benefit from their respective experiences in the financial services and asset management industries as we prepare for Grayscale’s next chapter."
so yep SEC did not have confidence in the old management teams lack of experience in fund management of an ETF I find this quite amusing, as the SEC is now telegraphing each move to every ETF applicant right now. Being overzealous toward the ETF sponsors maybe means less cautious when approving, letting the all the bunch of issuers fight to get the bigger share of the market. SEC is now terrified to be accused of picking a winner (or a loser, fwiw) that is now worried about everyone doing theri homework and having the ETF approved.
|
|
|
ho fatto il teleport anche io, ma ripeto onestamente e' come se mangi cioccolata e il giorno dopo mangi broccoli. Sono cose diverse e dipende dai gusti principalmente.
Chiaramente non lascerei mai il forum per andare in altcoinstalks.org. Ma certamente se si potesse fare teleport dei posts, allora magari si troverebbe il motivo di mangiare broccoli, non credete? Vediamo che succede.
|
|
|
Mille grazie. Mi piacerebbe che passasse entro la fine dell'anno, ecco... dall'altra parte non sono purtroppo ferrato particolarmente in materia per mia ignoranza e non ho ancora capito di preciso cosa accade se si lascia lì, che ne so, ipoteticamente per un mese (cosa che comunque non farei) e se esiste un "punto di non ritorno" passato il quale non si può sovrascriverla con fee maggiori.
Non si sa. La mempool non è consenso, vuol dire che ogni nodo ha le proprie regole e ci sono solo delle "pratiche consigliate" , ma nessun obbligo. Di solito i nodi pruning le fees dopo due settimane, vuol dire che dopo 14 giorni i singoli nodi non fanno più rebroadcast della transazione. Mia ripeto, è una policy di ciascun nudo. Esistono degli script dove puoi fare rebroadcast della transazione ogni tot blocchi, o giorni dall'ultima volta che è stato fatto, ma ancora una volta dipende dalle policy della mempool degli altri nodi.
|
|
|
CarnagexD He has done three posts in gambling section where merit is given. For which I asked you.
I am human (there are enough AI or quasi-AI users here on the forum) and sometimes I make errors. I have done the last round from the mobile, so yes, I could have overlooked this rule, but I do confirm it is still valid. Thanks for pointing out.
|
|
|
I mean is there any proof that they are actually buying? It will be good to see even some indirect evidence
I don't mean to evade your question - because I don't know about the actual proof - however, a public company lying in their making those levels of detailed disclosures, would be in pretty deep shit, including the various principle officers may well end up with criminal charges.. and pretty severe penalties... so even though I don't have any problems about being doubtful and/or a skeptic, but certain kinds of proclamations are supposed to be able to rely upon them.. so public statements in official quarterly release documents by companies are the kinds of documents we should be able to mostly rely upon... In addition to these very correct statements, please remember there are auditors of public companies, who should assess the quality of the information on the balance sheets. So it wouldn't only be MicroStrategy making up numbers, but also KPMG would need to be involved. This would be quite a plot twist. As they are doing self-custody of their coins, instead of resorting to a custodian, we haven't a separate, direct assessment of their holding, but I anyway think that the information should be quite reliable.
|
|
|
Very lovely and very neatly presented. I will play more extensively with this in the coming weeks. I would suggest implementing some more complete “views” of the future scenario: how will my stash be depleted if Bitcoin grows in the future according to a few data points?
|
|
|
As for my timing: the kids have Christmas vacation, and sleep a bit later now. So we were busy, it turns out MehMeh is very interested in tools. Fun times ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Time for some quality time father-daughter bonding: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic3.srcdn.com%2Fwordpress%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F01%2Ftool-time-cropped.jpg&t=663&c=QIVgEUCyRkHCBg) One of the best shows I have ever seen, when TV shows were not so popular and in high budget. Prilliant!
|
|
|
Thank you for your flawless timing.
I hope LoyceV is okay enough to reply sooner or later in the thread. Which illness week is this one?
|
|
|
Ma no dai, avrà usato il nick ispirandosi all'assassino. Non è che è lui, prima ha commessso i crimini, e poi si siede al PC e si inventa la storia dell' hyperbitcoinisation . Oppure ha commesso l'omicidio e si è fatto beccare per essere sicuro di poter hodlare bene per almeno 30 anni.
Tornando in topic, giusto per darvi un aggiornamento che le mie spie mi hanno detto, i mixer si stanno spostando su altri forum alternativi, bastera questo per dare un colpo brutto a questo forum? Credo di no, ma possiamo dire che questa cosa fa riflettere un poco, su come si stia evolvendo la situazione Quali sarebbero i forum alternativi? Io una volta ho visto un forum che si chiamava shitcointalk.org. Abbastanza ridicolo devo dire. Comunque ci si dovrà riorganizzare. Il forum sopravviverà ovviamente, ma dovremo trovare nuove formule.
|
|
|
La situazione non la vedo particolarmente rosea. Ci siamo abituati per troppo tempo a fees troppo basse. Se per puro culo torneremo ad avere un momento di fees basse, si dovrà operare saggiamente. Consolidare UTXO (evitando di fare cazzate, ma per evitare di avere dust in portafoglio), spostare su LN, etc. in modo da essere pronti al picco successivo.
Spetta spetta caro mitico fillippone, cosa vuoi dire con consolidare UTXO, parla potabile! Scherzo, non ho capito cosa intendi. Spostare su LN mi pare una idea super saggia, ma quanto spostare? Quando spostare? Avete in mente un piano voi anziani del forum, dateci qualche informazione anche a noi. Consolidare UTXO vuil dire riunire in un’unica “moneta” le “monetine” chd sbbismo nei noistri indirizzi. Perché pagare 10,000 satoshi con 6 input costa molto di più che pagare 10,000 satoshi con un solo input. Allora quando le fees sono basse prendi tutte le monetine “piccole” e le riunisci in una banconota utilizzabile. Già, perché quando le fees sono piccole magari le fees si mangiano quasi tutto il valore della transazione (mi è successo recentemente con una donazione).
|
|
|
On an Italian Bitcoin chat someone higlhited this proposal from an Italian drveloper: SCIDADDRESS https://gist.github.com/araspitzu/415876f8bffd90a9d7d6b46a41b8914c SCIDADDRESS is a draft specification of a short, reusable and permanent address to be used with the Lightning Network nodes and wallets.
The new address format represents a directed short channel id and has the following syntax:
[sign][SCID]@[sign][SCID]
+693x1x0 (simple format)
+693x1x0@ (extended format with short route hint)
+693x1x0@-634x61x1 (extended format with full route hint)
What do you think guys of this idea?
|
|
|
Come on, Rikafip, you can skip this month and get back to kicking my ass on Friday 5th of January!
Haha no way, I haven't skipped a single overview since I started doing this and I don't plan to start now. You can expect it out later today or tomorrow morning at the latest! Actually, if you skip that, I am also skipping the update of the missing parts ib in my post AND blaming you for this. It’s a win-win situation! I would rest: get a full recovery and much needed rest to start next year at full throttle!
|
|
|
Microstrategy bought another clip: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.talkimg.com%2Fimages%2F2023%2F12%2F27%2FIc2Jj.jpeg&t=663&c=y0XWrmNEiV_m1w) No matter if the are in profit or in loss, they are DCA-ing their purchases at a constant pace. Probably they want to front load next year when they will change their accounting rules.
|
|
|
By the way, I started the work on monthly overview and it should be out by the end of the week
Bro forgot what he was doing, and started partying. <...> That made me giggle. Above all because I can totally relate to that. Been there so many times, you just want to get the work done, yet you don’t want to feel it like a chore. Come on Rikafip, you can skip this month and get back to kicking my ass on Friday 5th of January!
|
|
|
non mi sorprenderebbe affatto un'altra impennata simile... poi ci sono anche gli ordinals e shitcoin che girano sulla blockchain... insomma... se ci fosse da scommettere io scommetterei su "fees in alto!"
La situazione non la vedo particolarmente rosea. Ci siamo abituati per troppo tempo a fees troppo basse. Se per puro culo torneremo ad avere un momento di fees basse, si dovrà operare saggiamente. Consolidare UTXO (evitando di fare cazzate, ma per evitare di avere dust in portafoglio), spostare su LN, etc. in modo da essere pronti al picco successivo.
|
|
|
|