Anyway, I doubt that these two facts has something in common. I doubt that 1xbet and their money were the one that put scales on the side of signing Messi. 1xbet are just official partners, not major sponsors.

This is for sure, if 1xbit returns to this forum today or tomorrow under this same brand, there will always be some users ready to promote them through their signature ad campaign, but the good thing with this is that, every account found to be promoting them will always get a negative tag from DT members of this forum, that is enough discouragement already, only those who really have decided to destroy their reputation on this forum will still go ahead to promote a generally known scam to the detriment of their own self.

As far i know,  They both have played 24 T20Is where the india able to defeated Sa in 13 matches while South Africa also proved their ability and registered winning in 10 matches. rest of one match ended without any fight. Here india is dominating but SA is pretty strong which will make india efforts hard to win today

Martingale works in the beginning; I have used it quite some times on various times and always got away with it. Offcourse, it will go bad one day and that happened already to me 2 times so I quit doing it. It is such an easy strategy and sometimes I still think of using it, but most of the times I can hold myself from doing it.

Well, I actually thought that the performance from Glen Maxwell was actually more important for Australia. Because if he was unable to pull off that performance, Australia might have never actually reached the final.  And I think the way he performed in that match was incredible. He literally stood on one leg and smashed every other ball to the boundary.  Yes I understand that the performance from Travis Head was also very important. But the thing is Australia was actually able to reach that situation because of Glenn Maxwell.

You are right, there is actually a big difference between using a martingale in a pvp game and using it in a dice game, first of all, the notable difference is that pvp games like the one duelbit just launched is a game that comes with a zero house edge, and also, In some pvp games, your skill is what determines your wins and loses, though there are still some pvp games that are purely luck based.

But for the dice game, it's completely a luck based game, using martingale on such games is something I personally would recommend, it's one of the fastest ways to lose money, regardless that one could win big money if he or she is lucky while using this strategy, but in essence, I have not come across any gamblers who has a good testimony about martingale.

Martingale is not a strategy, I will repeat it again that martingale is not a gambling strategy, it does not increase one's chances of winning any game, both in the short of long term.
Do not mistake your being lucky and winning while applying martingale to your gambling, as that it's the martingale that helped you win, it's absolutely not..

But people should have that kind of self control to self exclude themselves and that's where the problem rises.
Many gambling addicts don't really have the self control to self exclude themselves from gambling sites.

Yep, showing proof of a donation like a signed message or transaction record does add credibility over just words.
The Giving Block seems a decent fundraising site from what I've heard, though I gotta ask - how'd you land on which charity or cause to give to?

To many people discuss about Martingale strategy since they really find this interesting but as said people have different level of patience that's why we see people execute this strategy differently that's why each of us got distinct results.