BFXcoins:
|
|
|
Good luck with that. I'm out until incentives come back.
your choise. It could be a loss for me, but surely it's a loss for you Not at all: I did not made a single sale since when you started the new scheme.
|
|
|
1 - Your REF will discover that my discount is higher AFTER using your ref, because i've written only in my last replies (and not in the title or in the OP) that i'm giving a discount. AND i'm sure (because all people are doing this way) they will ask me "But the Discount using REF XXX Is comulative with your discount?"
2 - As i told in point 1, user will continue use your ref, even if discount is not cumulative, and you continue get your 0.1, that is probably the most important answer to question 2.
Good luck with that. I'm out until incentives come back.
|
|
|
As far as referrals goes , Sampey offers discounts to ANYONE . So you can give a friends name if you want or just don't give any name and ask him discount , he will provide it.
In fact I wonder why Sampey destroyed any incentive for his referral program by offering discounts himself which cannot be cumulated with referrals. I'm offering a temporary discount while i'm watching BTC Price status after-halving. Your incentive must be the 0.1 BTC/REF, not the amount of discount your ref will get. From Ref program You can offer Max 10% Discount, i'm giving (actually) 25%, so it's 15% More and your ref could only be happy about that. Your ref price doesn't change. So what's the problem? The problem is: so why my ref should give you my name if he gains nothing from it? And then why I should advertise CAT if he has no incentive to give you my name?
|
|
|
Yes, keeping them on Bitfinex
|
|
|
As far as referrals goes , Sampey offers discounts to ANYONE . So you can give a friends name if you want or just don't give any name and ask him discount , he will provide it.
In fact I wonder why Sampey destroyed any incentive for his referral program by offering discounts himself which cannot be cumulated with referrals.
|
|
|
wtf do you think this is??? the US stock market + QE1 2 3 4?
sounds like an idea for a Plunge Protection Team.
|
|
|
Now check your balances and prepare to trade your freshly minted BFXcoins. It looks like we gonna need a BFXcoin wall observer thread too now -or maybe not, if they drop to zero and stay there as I would expect.
|
|
|
its not a half bad deal if you consider the alternative of taking them to court and having to wait years for what would end up being a repayment of pretty much the same as there bail-in ~65%.
lol on the "not" a half bad deal. The owners and managers should have paid out of their pockets if they were serious. But what makes you think that no one will sue them?
|
|
|
What do you think? Could they actually pull it in some effective way? “The European Commission – the executive arm of the European Union – has proposed a directive aimed preventing the use the financial system for terrorist financing which includes a central database for bitcoin and virtual currency users’ identities and wallet addresses accessible to government financial intelligence units (FIUs). The proposal seeks to require member states to bring into force the regulations necessary to comply with this directive by Jan. 1, 2017. The updated anti-money laundering rules adopted May of 2015 marked an important step to improve the effectiveness of EU attempts to combat money laundering from criminal activities and to fight financing terrorist activities, the proposal noted.” https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/eu-central-database-bitcoin-users/
|
|
|
So... Let me get this straight... A solution for you is to keep a ledger of all the addresses that the money goes by... till the world becomes a police state and you can get your money back. Hmmm??
someone will try, and it will be an interesting test on the effectiveness of mixers vs. blockchain analysis.
|
|
|
120,000 coins could clear every book on every exchange down to single digits. Correct me if I'm wrong.
that would make the hole in Bitfinex much smaller, not to speak of making the scene 10 times more wild and interesting. But it can't happen. It's not like BTC has been hacked or hardforked by a coup d'etat. What makes you say that? The Stamp hackers got away with the loot, didn't they? And why do you assume static books? Once the dust settles, it's game on again. I can even imagine myself buying moar at a good discount.
|
|
|
120,000 coins could clear every book on every exchange down to single digits. Correct me if I'm wrong.
that would make the hole in Bitfinex much smaller, not to speak of making the scene 10 times more wild and interesting. But it can't happen. It's not like BTC has been hacked or hardforked by a coup d'etat.
|
|
|
.... ah no, this is complete bullshit. People were keeping coinz on finex so they could lease them out for shorting or so they could gamble with 10x leveraged (on margin) trades on sometimes very short terms ... casino speculation aka day-trading.
on the plus side all those tens of thousands coins for rent at a stupid 0.01% day rate to short BTC with leverage are vanished, and won't come back nowhere near the same rate if ppl learn the lesson.
|
|
|
1KppXsMSUShSahEMGKaNN7PS8ZFJGet47E
|
|
|
for today i'd be content over joyed with a green candle to 699
The last time I got impatient a few months ago I converted several BTC in gold and silver, right after a +30% rally of PM and BTC flat in the 400s. Since then, a few months ago, PM went nowhere and BTC is up 30%+, so I would be much better off if I did nothing. When in doubt, doing nothing may be the best option.
|
|
|
Thanks, but the form for international transfers says just: "Company address" and do not asks the personal info of the receiver. Does it mean that I can send money just to firms and not to persons?
|
|
|
Can Bitwala be used to wire money out of Europe, let's say to Africa?
|
|
|
|