I like the point that you are emphasising here and it is true that if we are ready to invest in the DCA way, especially if we have started it, then I think there is no specific reason to look at how vulnerable the price is because consistency must be maintained.
The problem that often happens is when we're already working on DCA and we get bogged down with the thought of price, which in the end will make our strategy fall apart in the end.
My initial period in 2002 was like this because I was dizzy with my thinking that was based on price but over time that became the main problem I had because when I was based more on price we would be dizzy so I tried to learn from the beginning and indeed for now it can be said that my method is much better than before with DCA which should not be too concerned about price.
I don't really understand what you are saying. In fact, your explanation is quite roundabout. I also asked what the year 2002 meant. Bitcoin was created by Satoshi in 2009. Even if I had to say that in 2010 only a handful of people bought Bitcoin because at that time many of us or those out there had not heard of the name Bitcoin. So if you want to buy and hold Bitcoin then do it in any way you like, even with DCA or your own way. But in essence, buying and holding via DCA is a pretty good option, even many of them apply the DCA strategy as the best option for accumulating Bitcoin. In this period many of us have missed Q1, Q2 and now we are entering the end of Q3. So to what extent are you consistent in accumulating Bitcoin, is there a big plan for you to hold for a long period like the next 5 years or just wait for the BTC price to record a new ATH and you get out at that time? You misunderstand here friend because we are not discussing about how bitcoin grows but we are discussing the strategies that are carried out when buying bitcoin funds I don't mention anything about bitcoin growth because we already know it and have gone off the topic we discussed in the initial thread. For 2022 it was the beginning of my DCA and it was only as a view and example when we are wrong in positioning ourselves then we will actually be confused as happened to me in 2022 because at that time I wanted to do DCA but my focus was only on the price which made my DCA disturbed. this is a complement to what @Moreno233 said about the DCA method not caring about the base or price. |
|
|
|
In contrast to the performance of the last season, Hoffenheim have started the new season very well. Now they play against Dortmund at Friday. Dortmund has won the last few games by just one goal more. But I think this time they will not win and the game will end in a draw.
I am also curious to see how Union Berlin will play against Heidenheim. Union Berlin has not have a perfect start and Heidenheim could make a draw in this game.
Hoffenheim's 4 game winning streak has given them the confidence to talk further and continue to secure their position and indeed the start of this season is very different from what they did last season but I still feel that the match against Dortmund could be an obstacle for them. Dortmund are not having a good season this time but looking at their difference from the squad I'm pretty sure Dortmund can bring points in this match although it will definitely be a little difficult because Hoffenheim can always surprise but this can definitely be passed by Dortmund. |
|
|
|
Here's a person who has enough capital as well and wants to accumulate 1 Bitcoin but He's not sure about the bottom He stared his DCA and now he got a DIP and here changed the strategy from DCA to instant Buying of 10% of capital and again started DCA and again he bought the DIP.
It has been abundantly stressed that DCA method does not care about the bottom or the price. That is to say that seeking for the bottom while at the same time claiming to be applying DCA is a little challenging to understand because you might be mixing up entirely different concepts. The beauty of DCA is that it even help you eliminate the worries that comes with seeking the bottom. I like the point that you are emphasising here and it is true that if we are ready to invest in the DCA way, especially if we have started it, then I think there is no specific reason to look at how vulnerable the price is because consistency must be maintained. The problem that often happens is when we're already working on DCA and we get bogged down with the thought of price, which in the end will make our strategy fall apart in the end. My initial period in 2002 was like this because I was dizzy with my thinking that was based on price but over time that became the main problem I had because when I was based more on price we would be dizzy so I tried to learn from the beginning and indeed for now it can be said that my method is much better than before with DCA which should not be too concerned about price. |
|
|
|
One win doesn't mean anything, but I agree it can help the team have more confidence. Chelsea really has to improve after spending a lot of money on it, but in my opinion Pochettino's task is very difficult in the midst of a crisis of confidence among his players. The team's form is still very difficult to hope for but maybe Pochettino still has hope and time to improve it.
The match against Fulham will probably be another benchmark for Chelsea this season and of course Chelsea must win it and avoid losing points. Every win will help the team gain good confidence, I agree Chelsea should try in the next match.
Mauricio Pochettino is out to scout the best performance of Chelsea, atleast he's job is not longer on the line. You're right, one win doesn't really matter in this case, perhaps the team needs all the necessary aides they could be able to lay hands on, and confidence is another thing that will boost the club's performance. Eliminating Brighton from the Carabao Cup, brilliant start for the blues, Jackson scoring the winning goal that made the difference. Chelsea have Fulham this weekend in EPL, I hoped they will be able to force their breakthrough by to winning games just as Liverpool and Arsenal. 1 victory against Brighton should not be used as a benchmark that he is safe with his position because in the end of course there must be other proof especially the victory in the Premier League that still cannot get. Chelsea still have to continue to strive to improve their performance and Brighton's victory although it was very good but if they are confident in their performance and think Chelsea has changed it is clearly a mistake. There are still some obstacles that Chelsea must face, especially for improving their performance in the Premier League this season. There is still a lot of work to be done by Pochettino before he can be comfortable with his position as Chelsea coach. |
|
|
|
So I learnt of this rumour. It is about Manchester United fans being allowed to switch allegiance to city. Hehehe... Link: https://www.instagram.com/reel/CxdmhqJsI6q/?igshid=NjZiM2M3MzIxNA==Do you think with the performance so far that Manchester United has put up, will the fans at this moment not wish that this news were true? If were anything close to being true, I don't think I have heard any kind of rule in football that allows this. Everybody is free to choose their favourite club and I don't think there's anything to get worked up about in this regard regardless of whether it's a form of disappointment or whatever it is for the fans I think when changing the club they love then they should know that it's too simplistic to say poor form is the problem and it doesn't mean they support City wholeheartedly because it's a form of disappointment and an outlet. I personally don't have any problem with this because liking a club doesn't mean you can't look away but when the reason given is just disappointment in the previous club it's ridiculous and they are not fans. |
|
|
|
Lecce could not show any presence in the match. It was a solitary game for Juventus. Even though they had more chances to score goals, they did so with only one goal. The 1-0 victory was important because it was enough for them to win 3 points. Lecce suffered its first defeat in a season that started well. It was a good match and Juve won.
Actually, Lecce had several opportunities to score goals but was not able to control the ball well In fact Lecce had difficulty controlling the ball because Juventus played a very good role in controlling the ball and also Juventus actually had several opportunities to score goals but unfortunately the kicks were not on target. I saw this match even though Lecce was the host but was unable to dominate the match because Juventus' performance was superior and it looked like Lecce's performance was very far from Juventus in terms of pressure It seemed like Lecce was under pressure in this match and I counted only a few times that Lecce had a chance to score goal. I didn't see that in this match. During the 90 minutes, Lecce only managed to get 2 chances and even then they were not on target because the header of the dead ball during the free kick was not aimed at all. On the other hand, seeing Juventus' performance and the passing they did I think they were very good in this match, it's just that in terms of finishing they are still in a hurry which makes some opportunities wasted like when Rabiot who always forces to take a shot from outside the penalty box, even though it's good but it just wastes the opportunities they get. It would be better if Juventus could control and maximise their finishing but even so, their match was actually very good especially the 3 points they got back. |
|
|
|
It can take a real long time to make up for some of the losses that happen, so when any of us is looking at our investment portfolio, we have to be careful about not losing our principle. So we should be figuring out ways to establish our various position sizes in such ways that we are not putting our principle at risk.
Yes, I know easier said than done.. but first of all figuring out how much we are going to invest into BTC or other investments, such as 10% of our salary (or some other reasonable amount that allows us to continue to live a reasonable lifestyle). .and then once we have figured out our budget then we have to figure out what to invest into.. If you are a brand new investor, then there does not seem to be anything wrong with putting all or most of your 10% amount into bitcoin until you reach a certain level of 20% to 50% of your annual salary or some other number that you believe to be reasonable and then at some later point, then figure out how to diversify.. and most likely not shitcoins but instead property, equities, commodities, bonds, and cash/cash equivalents... and sure if you cannot resist getting involved in various shitcoins, then restrict your investment into them to no more than 10% of the size of your bitcoin investment.. unless you figure out some angle that is actually good information about some project that you are going to invest into and to go beyond 10% of ther size of your bitcoin investment.
Anyhow, the point is that many times, it does take a long time to build back principle when you end up losing a lot of it (or even all of it) because you got to greedy and/or you failed to limit your position size based on how much risk you were entering into.
Diversification is the next big step that I will need to figure out. Once a certain level of capital is reached, its preservation will be an important issue, and in this case, diversification into less risky investments will be a logical solution. It seems simple until you actually experience it personally, then you begin to understand that there are many options, and with little capital you want to choose the best one possible, but this is not so simple. I've never dealt with stocks or bonds, I've only had a little experience with real estate, but I'm not sure that's what I'd like to invest in. If we talk about goods, this will most likely imply that I will be doing business, but this is not very interesting to me either. At the moment I have achieved a good standard of living and have begun to value my time, so I would like to spend more time with my family. And Bitcoin looks like a very good investment in this case, I buy Bitcoin and wait for my goals, it doesn’t require much of my time. I've actually heard this word a lot but I've never even done it. Maybe it's true for most people who have been able to manage their finances well and have enough wealth Disification can be important but on the other hand when it speaks only for myself I still won't do it because my focus is still on the investment that I always run, namely in bitcoin. Even though according to other people it is good but for capital that can be said to be mediocre like me, I better focus on one field first (bitcoin) as my form of investment. Forcing diversification with fairly mediocre capital will actually make us dizzy so that when our capital and finances are too minimal, it would be better to focus on just one investment rather than doing it by branching out but the results are not optimal. |
|
|
|
G. Ramos made the most of the chance given to him. All PSG players must be ready when the task is given. G. Ramos showed this and won the admiration of the coach. He may choose coach G. Ramos in the next matches without hesitation.
Some moments are special for football players. This match was like that for Ramos. I hope he gets more playing time and contributes more to his team from now on.
I agree with what you said because the changes that were not really expected from the PSG camp seemed to be a blessing because Goncalco Ramos who did look very good in this match. This is clearly a new hope where when Mbappe is not there PSG can still do their best in terms of scheme and Enrique seems to be slowly finding a good rhythm for them to navigate the season even though there is no Mbappe and I actually think this is something very good because with this indirectly slowly their problems can be resolved even though this is still uncertain how their next performance will be. |
|
|
|
|
Ini bukan masalah yang baru sebenarnya karena memang melihat dari catatan sejarah yang bisa kita lihat saat ini perkembangan zaman yang semakin maju justru mengikiskan keinginan atau minat anak muda kepada budaya atau adat tradisional mereka. Bisa kita lihat, hampir semua anak muda saat ini lebih tertarik kepada budaya asing daripada budaya asli dari negara atau daerah mereka sendiri dan itu sangat terlihat jelas bagaimana perkembangan dari segi fashion, musik atau bahkan mungkin dari cara bicara saja saat ini sudah sangat terlihat bagaimana pengikisan budaya ini seperti telah di tinggalkan.
Contoh kecil saja mungkin dalam hal ini adalah ondel-ondel yang sering kita jumpai di beberapa pesta rakyat atau beberapa perayaan untuk sebuah peringatan karena dulu masih banyak orang yang menganggap bahwa ini adalah sebuah ciri khas dari sebuah kota (Jakarta) selain itu ondel-ondel juga memiliki arti yang sangat dalam yang mana dulu begitu di agungkan dan tidak lengkap rasanya sebuah pesta tanpa ondel-ondel tetapi sekarang ketika pengikisan itu terjadi membuat nilai dari ondel-ondel jatuh karena jangankan ada untuk sebuah pesta atau perayaan besar, ketika peminatan anak muda menurun saat ini bahkan ondel-ondel banyak dijadikan sebagai alat untuk ngamen dan itu menjadi sebuah kondisi dimana adat dan budaya yang ditinggalkan dan tidak terlalu di minati.
Kiblat kita sekarang sudah sangat berbeda dan bahkan terkadang anak muda zaman sekarang bahkan saya cukup yakin mereka tidak tahu ciri khas dari daerah mereka seperti tarian atau pakaian budaya sebagai lambang daerah mereka.
|
|
|
|
Chelsea has a good plan but the scenario is different when the EPL has started, this is already a lot of disappointment because the results continue to deteriorate there is no change at all.... They are now experiencing a lot of demands after spending so much money while Pochettino as head coach still cannot bring Chelsea to a straight path.
Don't know maybe the management? But they have spent a lot of money whichever player they buy. - Is it maybe because the players don't have confidence when at Chelsea? All of that must be overcome as a form of Pochettino must complete it.
I don't even see Chelsea's plan as good this season, especially when releasing so many senior players and some players who can actually still be retained, it already makes me less sure about the planning Chelsea is doing this season. Indeed, when seeing a new coach, Pochettino must want to make some updates that will be carried out according to the plans he will do but by selling players who already have experience in the EPL and letting new players immediately play in the EPL with hot competition I think it's a careless act. Talking about Management should now be what should be thought of because trying to replace several players and coaches until now does not get any results then the wrong is the management that is not competent to find players and coaches that fit Chelsea's criteria. |
|
|
|
Real Madrid's defeat to Atletico Madrid 3-1 really made us realize that no matter how good ball possession is, if you don't have a sharp striker, then it's really in vain. Not only will they not be able to face other big teams later in the UCL, Even against Atletico Madrid they couldn't penetrate Atletico's back line strongly.
This is a huge blow for Madrid but on the other hand, the worst case scenario is that Madrid always apply the same scheme hoping that Jude can always provide more strength in every match, but in the end, the scheme and formation that they have always done over the past few matches has a gap that can be penetrated and this will happen sooner or later. Overall I really don't like this but on the other hand it is also good for Madrid because with this they can realise that what they have always done by not looking for a competent pure striker in the end they will only become ordinary and I hope this is a concern because once they lose then other clubs as Madrid's opponents in other matches will know what they have to do. |
|
|
|
I am not an expert in economics but when I look at the performance of a government I think they must also be aware that when they pay off the debt they have immediately it will disrupt the financial system they have because after all stability is important and rather than doing something risky by immediately paying off large debts they must have a basic budget that is used as a benchmark and they have other priorities such as in infrastructure or other things that they think so surely they will prioritise the agenda they set up rather than immediately paying off large debts in cash.
I also see it this way, surely a country's budget has been planned long ago and surely they will prioritize it more than paying off their debts first. One of the country's income is from taxes paid by each citizen and maybe they have other considerations. I think it's understandable why that happens, because I'm trying to make a problem on a personal scale. For example, I'm in debt, my income is not enough to pay the debt in full every month, and the option is to pay it in installments. It's possible that I could pay off my debt in a month, but of course I can't do anything including basic needs that might not be met. Facilities such as health, education and some infrastructure improvements sometimes depend on taxes paid by the public so in this case, when looking at the debt for each country, it is actually not too scary if in the end the country knows what to use the money borrowed and they (the government) know that by borrowing apart from having relationships from ties they are also aware that this can help them improve conditions in their country without worrying about finances even though they have to pay the installments but it doesn't matter because by borrowing money before they get some projects whose progress can be very good for them in the future. As long as the government knows what the debt is for and some of the planned projects go well, it is not too wrong to go into debt and there is when the instalment option why do we force to pay the whole amount because it can actually interfere with their electability in the economy. |
|
|
|
Manchester United abandoned their first choice and signed André Onana from Inter Milan, that decision was unwise because the new goalkeeper doesn't fill in the vacant position, conceding goals and causing irrelevant mistakes that leads to goals. David De Gea enjoyed his moments at Old Trafford, received his accolades. He's currently without a club due to the high earning salary, we just hope he's able to make things right in his career and return to what he does best. In due time, the spaniard will make his choice if he would return or continue his adventure to win more significant titles.
Firstly goal keeper department wasn’t the major problem at United but it definitely needed a change soon and Ten Hag felt it is time to change it. Onana was on the top of the list because of his ability to play with his feet and no body is denying that. Now to the goals united conceded this season wasn’t all Onana’s faults except the opening goal which we have one way or the other seeing with DeGea before. Many fans are just angry or are picking on Onana calling him a bad goalkeeper because of the way De Gea left which angered everyone but saying Onana isn’t a good goalkeeper is just wrong because this is the same person who is nominated for numerous awards this season. Also De gea had more of a bad start to his United career than Onana and later went on to be a club legend. But when looking at what is happening now and Manchester United need results that actually force a little for Onana's adaptation it is still a little difficult because a few matches have gone Onana's performance is still not up to what Manchester United expected. He is not to blame I quite agree with this but on the other hand he also has to be able to adapt to his new club now because seeing from what he always does on this field still does not reflect he is a goalkeeper with a price of 55 million. Onana himself has also said that he is still not in the same condition as when he was at Inter and that means he realises that he is still lacking in terms of performance so he must start to make a difference because after all he will definitely continue to be compared to De Gea who is the previous Manchester United goalkeeper. |
|
|
|
The thing is, the list may be a good suggestion but they are not all free as an investment. Education, Health, Networks, and skills, all need funds to develop. If one does not spend money on any of these, it will stagnate to the point of becoming obsolete as time passes by. Yes education can be learned everywhere but using this kind of learning can only lead to incomplete learning. Health needs money to maintain, and skill needs money to sharpen and mastered.
That's the point because for now nothing is really free to get something. To get health, education etc. mentioned as free in the OP's view is all a cliché because in the end if we calculate such things it does not really become free. There are some things that need to be sacrificed in this case for example in my country there are free health facilities and free education from the government but it is not really free because in the end this is taken from the taxes we pay and in terms of facilities it will obviously be different because it will not be possible to be the same when it is free and paying obviously the treatment will not be possible to be the same in terms of facilities or services. |
|
|
|
Undoubtedly the most important match of the French Ligue 1 today will be between Paris Saint-Germain and Marseille. Paris Saint-Germain lost to Nice last week. But during the week they beat Borussia Dortmund in the Champions League. Mbappe and Hakimi have been performing very well in recent weeks. I expect a good performance from them again in this match... Things are very complicated in Marseille. After Igor Tudor left Marseille, they started the season with Marcelino. Now they fired him and now they have signed Abardonado. It is not hard to guess that Marseille are going through a chaotic period... I think Paris Saint-Germain will win this match or not lose to Marseille...
This match is worth waiting for even though the performance of these two clubs is not very good at the beginning of the season, but this is a big match in ligue 1. Marseille and PSG still have not found the rhythm of the match until now and it clearly disrupts their consistency at the beginning of the season, currently in terms of standings Marseille is still superior because PSG lost last week's match. However, I think PSG will still be the favourites in this match and that can be seen from the odds given by the bookmakers.  To be honest, I'm not too surprised by this as PSG are clear favourites, especially considering they're playing at home and where their strengths lie, they're bound to be favourites in every game they play, but I wouldn't place a bet on this match as I think it's risky. |
|
|
|
I think by looking at the statement you made, it indirectly suggests that it depends on the situation whether we will hide our identity or admit directly that we are a gambler. I agree with this because when we discuss with a friend who is a gambler then I don't think we need to cover ourselves that we are also a gambling player but on the other hand when we talk to people who are not gamblers then we should not admit that we are a gambler because surely the judgement will be different.
Do we really need to be ashamed of being called gambler? From my points gambling is something that can never be covered just as I do say before, but one should be happy for it because there are many people who mades a living from it except those that are misrepresenting or that are not taking proper action towards their characters on how they present themselves to people before they could see its as a bad habit. Judgement always comes when we don't gamble responsible and present ourselves properly before someone could say a bad thing towards our actions is when we might have displayed to some irresponsible acts. Wait. I don't feel that making a living in gambling is appropriate in this case and I don't recommend it to be done, after all gambling is still gambling where we are just looking for the lucky option for profit and it will not be suitable to be used as a source of making a living because in the end such a thing cannot happen and will not be possible. As for whether we are ashamed to be called a gambler, in this case as I said earlier a few days ago where it depends on the situation. If you're an ignorant person then you probably won't have a problem it's just that not everyone is like that because some people including myself definitely believe that people's judgement matters to them so when you don't want to be considered a gloomy person because of gambling but you want to be in that pre-gambling then it's better not to admit outright that you're a gambler. |
|
|
|
I think keeping your activities as a gambler a secret is also a positive thing when you try to keep it a secret because in this case the treatment or view of each person to gamblers is a little different. I don't know about other countries but in the country I live in, especially in the area I live in, the stigma of "gambler" is seen as someone who has a bad habit and is viewed differently.
Even though there is no prohibition for us to gamble because it is the right of each person but still the view will be bad so that when we say clearly that we are a gambler then surely we will be labelled as a bad person.
For some people it may not be a problem and tend to ignore people's judgement but for others of course it is very disturbing so it is better to keep it secret than we end up being seen differently.
Gambling is something that has natural forces whereby you may not know when to showcase yourself as a gambler but whenever the discussion are being carried out by friends you don't know when you would join the discussion freely and exposed yourself as a gambler. One thing about gamblers they are not always hidden no matter any circumstances you still can reveal yourself without knowing you had already did, what just matters is that we should only be mindful with the way we discussed with friends especially when A knows about your gambling nature it's very easy for B go know you gambles because it could be leaked by A that you are a gambler. So what I am trying to say is that it's very difficult to remain unrevealed about your gambling habit hence you are much more at risk of being exposed to people out there all less don't associates with friends and relatives. I think by looking at the statement you made, it indirectly suggests that it depends on the situation whether we will hide our identity or admit directly that we are a gambler. I agree with this because when we discuss with a friend who is a gambler then I don't think we need to cover ourselves that we are also a gambling player but on the other hand when we talk to people who are not gamblers then we should not admit that we are a gambler because surely the judgement will be different. I think keeping your activities as a gambler a secret is also a positive thing when you try to keep it a secret because in this case the treatment or view of each person to gamblers is a little different. I don't know about other countries but in the country I live in, especially in the area I live in, the stigma of "gambler" is seen as someone who has a bad habit and is viewed differently.
Even though there is no prohibition for us to gamble because it is the right of each person but still the view will be bad so that when we say clearly that we are a gambler then surely we will be labelled as a bad person.
For some people it may not be a problem and tend to ignore people's judgement but for others of course it is very disturbing so it is better to keep it secret than we end up being seen differently.
Keeping your gambling habit a secret is at some point important and necessary because some persons can really become dramatic and discriminate you when the get to know you gamble but then it's really funny how they would love to benefit from the proceeds you make from gambling with you, nevertheless don't make it know to such persons if you have them around. In oder to avoid that stereotypes and be seen in a perspective you wouldn't find comfortable and ideal it's advised you keep your gambling habit a secret when necessary but amongst your fellow gambler where you are sure of not been judged you can speak up as you can as well share ideas which can be of great help in the way you approach gambling. It's sad that most persons have a stereotype for gamblers due to what have been seen of some gamblers out there who probably got addicted and became a menace to the society or probably resulted in unhealthy practice, this has made people find it difficult to believe that there are people who healthy engage in gambling and still have themselves under control. This is true so even if someone admits that he is a gambler openly and does not really care about the opinions of others it is also something that can be done but it would be better if we keep our activities as a gambler secret because in the end it will also be very good to do especially if we do not want to be bothered by the views of others about ourselves who are considered negative even though we have not done anything wrong because in the end when someone becomes a gambler it is their right. |
|
|
|
|
Sebenarnya untuk hal seperti ini saya rasa itu bukan masalah dari kota mana itu berasal karena pada akhirnya ini tergantung kepada setiap pengguna lalu lintas, alasan jakarta yang disorot dalam hal ini adalah karena kota Jakarta saat ini adalh ibukota dan bisa di ibaratkan saat ini Jakarta adalah pusat dari segala jenis etnik dan suku untuk mencari peruntungan.
Disisi lain, banyak jalan dan aturan yang harus dipatuhi membuat terkadang kita bingung bahkan saya pribadi juga pernah merasakan hal yang sama ketika mencoba mengemudi di Jakarta dan itu cukup wajar ketika seseorang yang baru mencoba mengemudi di Jakarta karena ada beberapa peraturan yang sekalipun tidak ada plang larangan disana tetapi harus tetap dipatuhi sehingga ini yang memungkinkan untuk menjadi sebuah indikasi dimana banyak orang selalu bingung dan melanggar.
Tetapi dalam hal ini tentunya masalah lawan arus itu adalah salah satu contoh pelanggaran lalu lintas dan ketika berbicara tentang pelanggaran lalu lintas saya rasa tidak hanya terjadi di kota besar saja karena pada dasarnya setiap daerah atau kota juga sering terjadi sehingga saya rasa sebuah kota tidak bisa dijadikan patokan dan judgement bahwa kota xxx adalah kota yang paling melanggar atau lawan arus seperti yang ada di judul utas.
|
|
|
|
|
Number 32 is still blank, can I fill it
32. Ryu_Ar1
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
