Yesterday's dump was because of some miner who transferred 2500 BTC in Bitfinex and sold directly. He was not a trader, because a several hours earlier, he could have sold to an ask wall of 1180 BTC at 4230$. This guy clearly went above the electricity expenses and decided to take his profit. May be he read the old news article: https://coinnounce.com/cryptocurrency-regulations-in-china-the-journey-and-the-current-status/When Chinese n00b miners read about the incoming ban (it will happen very soon indeed), I imagine how nerveous they get to sell their precious BTC's only to be able to pay the electricity and other expenses. I hope this year we will lose forever those weak hands and be able to recover in the ATH area at least. But even if these imbecile dumps hold us for another year, after the halvening we will shoot to the moon! Can I ask where you got this info from?
|
|
|
Why does the guy in the illustration have such a short skirt? Maybe he's Roman.
I have a question: does someone generate these images before hand and then put a caption in the text bubble?
|
|
|
the coins he is running is BTSX, C4L and REVU previously he was running BEATX which he exited ans closed everything down
OK thanks. If you could post links to your screenshots here, I will red tag the OP. I also sent you a Merit so now you can post pictures, I think...
|
|
|
hacker1001101001 should have had 2double0 verify his signature publicly, in the thread, instead of just instantly filling the loan. it's also peculiar to me that both users just starting posting frequently in Meta around the same time.
|
|
|
-snip-
Care always has to be taken care off regardless of the operating system because you never know on which side of the bed the hacker might wake up from one day ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Hence my personal text xD ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) You should probably respond to this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5113985.0
|
|
|
I have screen shots from this dev about asking me to build up sell walls and to not launch more masternodes to falsify ROI details on MNO. And also his constant saying he will fix the projects and not doing anything for over 2 and a half weeks now.
Can you post them here? What Telegram group are they in? I'd like to spy on them.
|
|
|
Awesome! Will have something to look forward to after work. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgflip.com%2F2dlf1q.jpg&t=664&c=r-lSgQ12ptdLcA) notbatman seems to be avoiding having to intake this knowledge, which means it must be pretty good.
|
|
|
Here goes my take on this volume: its a bearish signal because these orders were specifically placed to draw in chart analysts. If it was sincere action these would have been purchased in smaller, measured increments so as not to catch many eyes. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsbtc.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F02%2Fcmefutures.jpg&t=664&c=-8tPVIFWUR-vhw) Bearish for the next 3-7 days. Called it! The only time I believe in TA is when CW all agrees upon the same thing, in which case the opposite of what people expect is likely to happen.
|
|
|
On photos can be determine the real she or is taken from the Internet. So hardly anyone to buy into this Scam. But it's still good that you warned us.
hemm indeed must be careful of digital currency business, I hope you have to examine in detail in order to get the right information so you can trust. to avoid fraud I hope you trust BITCOIN we know bitcoin is the core of all altcoins. Just FYI you're promoting a scam in your signature. Bizzillion(s) a HYIP, which is a nice word for "scam." You will lose money if you invest in this. If you don't, just know whatever profits you made are at a loss to somebody else who _did_ get scammed.
|
|
|
You forgot to include the part where he copy/pasted all the merits the original had received ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) 🔴💥 SCAMS of our bitcointalk 💥 July 18, 2018, 07:41:59 PM Merited by xtraelv (2), paxmao (2), coinlocket$ (2), gospodin (2), mhanbostanci (1), ivan1975 (1), digaran (1), Piggy (1), julerz12 (1), FIEX (1), kewlc3s (1), rDieminger (1), joniboini (1), sunno330 (1), 1993jochico (1), Coolcryptovator (1), MbyzIco (1), gullu (1), morvillz7z (1), Cashi (1), Crypto-DesignService (1)
What a nutter. I reported it an hour ago, its still there I guess.
|
|
|
Thanks for taking the time to go through the WP. Couldn't bring myself to give it a second glance after going through their CEO's background and realizing that he's a failed has-be. Probably saw ICOing as the easiest route to that castle in the sky he's been fawning all his life over. Hopefully, he's going to rant one more time before ejecting himself out of the community. I've got popcorns...
This guy claims to be an academic. He should have more respect for the white paper process. I'd say at least half of his white paper is plagiarized. Then to have the pompous attitude he does. Not a good combination. BTW, mass spectrometry is not the same thing as "refining." Its used to analyze the contents of a sample. The entire idea is a load of b.s. If he tried to go public he'd immediately be sued for fraud.
|
|
|
Anyways, it was a loan out of Bitcointalk as previously described.
Then it basically never existed and doesn't count as proof of anything. 2double0 is not my account and does not belong to me.
Then maybe you can lend your friend the BTC.
|
|
|
Nuti, Plagiarism? There was no claim of plagiarism - you're just making this up to make your earlier baseless assertion stick.
I pointed out to you exactly what was plagiarized. I might have to withdraw from this forum if there are no SENSIBLE discussions.
Good. Fuck off. Find some other place to run your scam.
|
|
|
Well, that was an interesting read (read the first 16 pages, up through the ICO). Congrats on making it this far, guys. I'm bookmarking this thread to keep track of future developments.
|
|
|
I smell something fishy with this thread, seems the people behind are using the controversy of JPM about being critical to Bitcoin, and they are using it now to collect funds? New era of scamming people isn't it?
I am agree with you,something is not right here. I am currently research the links provided by op. Honestly, project looks like too good to be true. What links? This project is so badass it don't need no stinkin' links. Maybe its just not for you, bro. If you can't handle the heat, don't come a knockin'. Or something. edit: how can this guy be currently researching links if they don't exist??Trust me, he just takes forensics to a different level. He'll come back. With results. I know these guys on this forum. They find evidence where nothing exists, and they find nothing where evidence exists. Unfortunately that account was hacked or sold in 2017 to become a full time shitposter. Those guys never come back. They shitpost into the wind and never return.
|
|
|
I just realized this scam was trying to piggyback off of another project of the same name, but with a different website. Real project website: https://s4fe.ioScam project website: https://s4fe.worldI think its dead because the scam website url now redirects to the real website url.
|
|
|
Here goes my take on this volume: its a bearish signal because these orders were specifically placed to draw in chart analysts. If it was sincere action these would have been purchased in smaller, measured increments so as not to catch many eyes. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsbtc.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F02%2Fcmefutures.jpg&t=664&c=-8tPVIFWUR-vhw) Bearish for the next 3-7 days.
|
|
|
re Square Cash app, i was fascinated to hear a snippet from Jack Dorsey in https://stephanlivera.com/episode/52iirc he said 'we have a huge network of buyers' now either that's good businesstalk for 'we have very few buyers' or he's truthful, which I buy, and a huge network by his standards is pretty large. pretty pretty large people use it i gather to dollar cost average in (?) To hear him talk about bitcoin on the Joe Rogan Experience, it sounds like he is really going all in on BTC and Twitter. It will be phenomenally cool if they actually add the LN tipping button right into Twitter. Of course that would require that all participants are already connected to the LN. It was a big headache six months ago, a small headache now, and hopefully not one at all six months from now. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fcard_img%2F1097800410725789696%2Fo9yEdatj%3Fformat%3Djpg%26name%3D600x314&t=664&c=kib6Fj-wDnBYgA) Theymos probably won't do the same for the forum, being stuck between not wanting to rely on a 3rd party service and acknowledging that both parties need to be online when conducting a LN transaction... That's a shame though cuz I think it would encourage people to learn how to use Lightning. LN is probably unsuitable for tips since the recipient has to be online. That's why these LN tipbots all hold your money, which I'm not a fan of. If you're using LN through a trusted third party, then you're better off not using it at all.
|
|
|
From MICA team,
MICA project is real and do not aim to any kind of scam, we already clarified the issue but may be some try to win more trust points on bitcointalk without detailed check, it is hard work to call an ico to be finally scam because every project surly had hard effort by its team. We must differentiate between mistakes may be done by writer or any other mistalk and between scam. Scam projects do not have real team identity and unique idea.
For all those reasons and because we as a team actually paid great effort for this project and believe it its success, we will continue campaign through MICA Telegram, all previous participants will be rewarded their bounties and also can join through the new one on telegram (will be announced on Telegram announcement channel). if you choose to support us, you are welcome
MICA presale will start as planned and the project will be directed only for success, you can now join presale registration list before presale start.
No thanks. If I were investing in ICOs (I don't), I would immediately move on to another one that didn't plagiarize their white paper. I pulled up a random paragraph and sure enough, it was also plagiarized. From your white paper: The cryptocurrency ecosystem keeps evolving and its areas of applications are growing rapidly, there are a lot of areas and sectors which digital currency is being implemented and the areas of application keep growing daily. From another ICO white paper: The cryptocurrency ecosystem keeps evolving and its areas of applications are growing rapidly. There are a lot of areas and sectors which digital currency is being implemented and the areas of application keep growing daily.
By the way, detecting plagiarism isn't necessarily deserving of positive trust points, but offering an ICO with a plagiarized white paper is deserving of negative ones.
|
|
|
SpaceGold is a decentralised platform that records users who have purchased streams of gold that are produced off world in space from asteroids using the Blockchain (Ethereum). Users may take physical delivery of gold or trade their SpaceGold tokens to others using our platform. Each SpaceGold token gives the holder the right to a stream of 240 milligrams of physical gold mined and refined in space.
OK, so zero. There's zero gold that's been "mined and refined in space." ZERO. Therefore, you should have produced zero tokens. Physical gold is returned to Earth on a regular basis from space.
No, its not. As a matter of fact its NEVER happened. Some of earth's gold may have come here from meteorites. That's not what you're talking about, however. Funds received will be invested in companies that extract gold from a comet or asteroid and return it to Earth and who agree to SpaceGold’s terms. Companies that qualify to support SpaceGold’s streaming contracts are; - 1. Deep Space Industries, Inc.
2. Planetary Resources, Inc. 3. Moon Express 4. iSpace Asteroid Mining Corporation 5. Shackleton Energy Company 6. Kleos Space S.A. 7. TransAstra Corporation 8. SpaceFab.US 9. National Aeronautics and Space Administration 10. MokAerospace (Boeing, Rocketdyne & SpaceX)
OK but so far you have no contracts with ANY of these highly-experimental companies, none of which have brought back a single gram of gold, and aren't expected to for many years. This project seems like an outright fraud. I'm giving you one chance to refute the plagiarism claims above or any of the claims made in this post before tagging you as a scammer.
|
|
|
|