You came here thinking that it would be easy to get rich [1] and now that you understand you would have to work for it you blame bitcoin. If you have problems its noone elses fault, get your act together and pan them out [2].


[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=894940.0
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1LHMG__bws

Meh, why is your accuracy important for you if you dont report?

A++ paid sig, one-liners, shows interest in bought accounts, member ranks and unrestricted number of posts would report again.

On the other hand the person is probably limited by the ability to express themself in english. I doubt its on purpose, its more likely that this is just the way the person posts, with or without paid signature. This is the post [1] they joined a campaign.


[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=877550.msg9716755#msg9716755

Work for 8 hours every day, get paid 8$. Alternativly work less for more money and/or get paid directly in bitcoin.

Trustratings are not moderated. You can keep your account and do whatever you want, but the rating will most likely stay. If you want to trade here, create a new account. If you just want to post and read here this should not be an issue.

Es gibt eine kleine Gebühr [1] die Du zahlen musst, ähnlich wie hier im Forum falls bei der IP "evil points" angesammelt wurden. Alternative hier im Forum [2][3] um Freischaltung bitten.


[1] https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Special:CryptoPayment
[2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=168.0
[3] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=733978.0

Well, technically a Trezor could be infected like any other computer, it has a CPU [1] so it can be programmed to do different things. BUT(!) its way easier to find a loophole in a complex machine than it is in a slim machine. Its easier to make a mistakes if you write several million lines of code (modern OS) than it is if you write a few tousand lines of code. I am not sure how many lines of code Trezor actually needs to work, but its a different dimension than an operationsystem. The other things is that its more likely for someone to write malware for a broadly used OS than it is for special purpose hardware. If you have to infect a few million machines to find a single trezor, dont bother, see what the few million machines have to offer. Thats why there are so many viruses for Windows and so little for the other systems.
So as everything technical its not 100% safe, but better than the HD. The harddrive can be read as soon as the system its plugged into is under control. Trazor has to be broken seperately. Like a safe behind a metal door vs. a desk behind a metal door (HDD).


Yep, just keep it in the default setting and you are fine.


Thats why I like Electrum so much. Armory would require constant new backups. I recently installed mSIGNA its slim but needs a local (or remote) bitcoin core to work with, supports multi sig and all the nice stuff. The userinterface is a bit complex though. *sigh* by the time I found my perfect wallet there will be 10 more to test.


Yes, its usually on a DVD (safer because it cant be modified) or USB (more convienient as it allows to store extra data) and is booted into your memory. Thus it does not access your HD because its not actually installed. As long as you trust the hardware you could use it on any machine, even an infected one. The only problem I currently see is that you have to get electrum once you booted tails, but that might change with the next version [2] of tails.


[1] http://doc.satoshilabs.com/trezor-faq/overview.html
[2] https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6739

Im sorry if this is a stupid thing to suggest (I have never written PHP), but might this be a problem of (non-)escaped chars?

And this [1] is probably redundant info, but it took me a while to find when I wrote a ruby script, so maybe you didnt know about it.

[1] https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/API_reference_%28JSON-RPC%29#PHP

In that case: contact their support. What else could you do? You are depending that someone else is doing a good job. If they make mistakes its your problem as well as theirs. Id rather make my own mistakes and have only myself to blame [2].

At least make sure you can access your private keys when their webserver is down. It might also be possible that you are effected by the problem [1] they had lately. In this case your coins might be gone allready.


[1] http://blog.blockchain.com/2014/12/08/blockchain-info-security-disclosure/
[2] sorry if this sounds harsh, but I see no reason to sugarcote this

So hier wie versprochen die Daten für PBMining.

Besitze zur Zeit 5,6 GHash/s
Auszahlung KW 48 - 0,000 420 78
Auszahlung KW 49 - 0,000 394 17
Auszahlung KW 50 - 0,000 022 40

KW 50 ist lt. HP und wurde noch nicht überwiesen. Wird vermutlich aufgrund des geringen Betrags auch nicht gemacht. (Edit) Keine Auszahlung erhalten (15.12.2014). Da ich für die GH/s nichts gezahlt habe bin ich 0,018 BTC im Plus (nach ca. 6 Monaten)

-----------

Daten zu hashie.co (je per GH/s und in BTC)

07.12. - 0,000 007 24
08.12. - 0,000 007 40
09.12. - 0,000 007 05
10.12. - 0,000 007 02
11.12. - 0,000 006 77
12.12. - 0,000 006 76
13.12. - 0,000 007 06
14.12. - 0,000 006 83

ROI in 59 Tagen bei Auszahlung wie Median der letzten 8 Tage

Aktueller Preis (pro GH/s): 0,0012 BTC bei 0,001551 USD Gebühren pro Tag

Try 0.9.2.1 I had problems with 0.9.3 for 64 bit windows versions (different) as well. Reverting to a slightly older version fixed it.

#1 dont post information that make it easier to overtake your wallet.


#2 considering the amount of fuckups bc.i has provided, stay away from them!

Seconds, try a different server.


I dont know for sure, but I suspect in memory.


 

Which wallet software/serivce do you use?


Depends on the wallet software/service you use.


Did you just create a TX[1]?

[1] https://blockchain.info/tx/721e3da7f94025ca0da8c5d758696887a5fdf2d595d43189906016df0e96abdb?show_adv=true

No, because I do not understand my posting here as work. Id post as much anyway. I could just work 3 hours more each day instead and earn way more money, at minimum wage. Thus anyone thats actually doing a cost/benefit analysis and comes to the conclusion: "Ill game the signature campaign for the money"... well how do I put that nicely? I guess I cant: its just plain stupid.


... I see you do the "pull percentages out of my behind" now. Badbear confirmed a ban right here. What makes you think its the only case out of 100?
In your opinion/experience the chances are slim. In my experience I just report them. I wont start to pull numbers from anywhere as I dont keep track of how many posts I report for spam (~1800 total currently, but they are not all related to spam) and how many result in bans. I feel the staff does a very good job with this, those running the campaigns do less, but they start to act. Just see the response time in this thread. OP is from 13.12.2014 - 1233, badbears response from 1414 the same day.


So? He is advertising, he will earn money off of it and probably way more than anyone running for a signature campaign. You claim he left because of spam caused by signature campaigns. I ask: can you confirm that in any way.



Again: what makes you think the reason behind the absense is spam cause by signature campaigns. People leave for all kinds of reasons, I wonder why you can speak for them.



I think this discussion leads nowhere. Lets just agree to disagree. If you want to do something against spam, report it via the report link or create posts like these.

Ick freu mir.

And to think that he even did it himself.

Ich wüsste auch nichts was man prüfen könnte. Lt. deren ebay account [1] sind die irgendwo in Kanada. Es gibt aber keine Anschrift oder Kontaktinformationen außer über die HP bzw. Mails mit der selben Domain. Deren Account [2] hier kriegt massiv negatives Feedback. Der reguläre Thread [3] wurde geschlossen und ein neuer [4] eröffnet. Ich kann der Argumentationskette dort "Facebook Account bekannt -> überzogene Forderungen -> geringere Auszahlungen" aber nicht folgen. Selbst wenn es Forderungen an die gäbe sollte das ja nichts mit dem Mining zu tun haben.


[1] http://www.ebay.com/usr/pbmining
[2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=195208
[3] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=418183.0
[4] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=887871.0

If you dont mind, Id like to explain the reason for this even though you allready regained access. This will happen again and I think its important that you understand it.

Its basically this:


Bitcoin works very similar to cash in a sense that you have bills that are not divisible. In your case you had a 0.715 354 32 BTC bill, among others. Every input you receive is a single bill and if you want to spend parts of it you will get change [1]. Some wallets allow you to spend "unconfirmed change", Multibit does not by default. Thus your 0.715... BTC are esentially gone until the transaction gets its first confirmation. If you take the TX-Id and watch it with a blockchain explorer you will see that there are two outputs. One for the person receiving your coins and one for your change. Until the change is confirmed multibit treats it as it would any other unconfirmed transactions and acts like it has no control over it.

[1] this is done durring the TX, its not like the other person is actually returning anything to you. Another picture is to imagine lumps of gold. Your 0.715... BTC lump of gold has to be melted down in order to be spend partially.

Davon hab ich auch im englischen Bereich gelesen, hab es mir aber bis jetzt noch nicht angesehen. Die Auszahlungen sollen drastisch runter gegangen sein die letzten 1-2 Wochen. Es wurde auch schon länger spekuliert ob es sich bei PBMining nicht um einen raffinierten Ponzi handelt. Ich hab da ohnehin nur ein paar GHash/s die mir geschenkt wurden.

I actually feel I have to post better quality most of the time I advertise for someone. I think longer before I post and I sometimes dont even post a lenthy one I allready wrote. I agree that there are others out there and I dont want to say that everyone should feel the same. I actually think I should not care about the signature and post like I would without it.
If someone running a campaign actually thinks spam is their friend, they have understood nothing about advertising. Its easy to get an army of idiots posting bullshit noone cares about. Its hard work to root these idiots out and only keep worthy posters. The overal quality of posts for a certain campaign says a lot of their quality of service. If they do not care enough about their image, why should they care about their customers? Advertisement is long beyond the same old "be in their heads".
Stunna got that a while back when he first restructured and later (effectivly)[1] canceled the PrimeDice campaign. I think it could have been done earlier, but thats easy to say in hindsight. You shouldnt wait for the "DannyHamilton is ignoring PD signature wearers by default" warning signs.



Yes, get booted out of the campaign and possible banned for spam and sometimes even made look silly. If someone is posting bullshit, reply and show those who do now know any better that its bullshit.


First of all do you have anything that can back your claim for the reason they left?
JoelKatz was last active yesterday [2] and DeathAndTaxes [3] has a signature in the fashion a campaign would. I suspect you just pull reputable people out of your behind to back your argument.

Dont judge a post by its signature. Its a nice way for people without much money to get some coins, to learn about bitcoin without investing to much without begging for them. There should - probably - be more pressure on those running the campaign. I dont know how with the given set of rules, besides continue to report those that spam. Mabye if 5 of your campaigners get banned you also get banned?

Yes there will be those that try to bent the rules but frankly: there will allways, no matter which rules. Its your job as the person in charge to detect that. Talk to borderline cases, tell them you dont like what you see and if they cant improve, its their last turn. Keep turns short and max posts per turn low. The campaigns adapt. A year ago anyone with the needed rank could have earned 2.4 BTC from Stunna in a month. No (or unreachable high) limit campaigns are dead. Why is that if the incentive is all wrong? Why is that if those running the campaigns could care less if their campaigners get banned? Its because spam is not your friend, never.


[1] AFAIK hilariousandco and mprep are still running for Stunna.
[2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=27870
[3] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=41048