You don't so why should he?

Ever looked in the Bitcoin Technical Support section and noticed a brand new user with an issue with bitcoin core that they have newly installed?

What do you want those users to do, earn the right to post here so that they can get help with their issue a few weeks after getting it - that's just stupid right? It leads to two potential issues: (1) loss of funds, (2) giving up on Bitcoin altogether - or both. We DONT need this, we want to be supportive of newbies that WANT to LEARN and should give them a facility to do so.

And if you say, let's just open up that board only, then all of the spam from the other threads will be directed there. I would say maybe limiting them to the bitcoin parts of the forum would be very nice (for making new posts and new threads) but then you might also have to include local boards. And then altcoin boards will also pop up and users will get scammed by accidentally installing viruses because they can't generate discussion of something before they install it and their wallet.dats get stolen.

Our mods are very active here. If it's a bad post/thread, report it and it will be deleted if the mod agrees with you that it is spam.

It is a fairly odd user we have found here. I also am not sure a lot of the time whether people are being absolutely serious here or just playing a part.
Cheers for the responses guys. It does appear op is under a strange mixture of mental illness and manipulation (it's not him it's those he knows who have taught him to feel this strong way).


I'm not hitting up your YT channel to get you a payment for your adverts on it.
Also, are you Chinese and are there influential people who exist? As I assumed you were american as quite a few people from there have not advanced so much in comparison, are you from Texas or another rural area there - they seem to be the furthest behind. And as you have changed your ideas as to whether there are influential people, more information on this would be helpful.

There are houses that are on the market for $200000 which is probably about 25 bitcoin. I wouldn't be annoyed if someone were to tip me that amount either ...

That's true. If it came from Thomas himself it would be cryptographically signed and he could therefore be prosecuted for false advertising and producing malware. However, this is OBVIOUSLY NOT the case here.

And 25btc for a phishing domain is quite pricey especially since it will probably be blacklisted by a lot of people.

---

Anybody have the public keys, IPs, companies they used like things for anti-ddos and any registrar info.

You can't really do anything as the network is designed against this.
You would have to purchase Antpool, Viabtc, F2Pool and a load of other major pools (or in fact every other piece of mining hardware) - which would just be impossible.
Although, if you knew someone was going to get paid for it in say 2030, you could start saving now, make loads more miners that stop everyone else from trying to mine Bitcoin by rendering their miners useless and being the only one able to produce the chips - though someeone else might just start to make a chip anyway.

If you own the sending private key then you can stop it completely, however, of not then you can't.
If a pool accelerates your transaction, they just add your txid to the list, the coins can still be mined by another miner at that point it doesn't exclusively get mined by that pool. For example, I tried to accelerate a transaction on viabtc and BitFury confirmed it before them.

Do you? @jet, hehe

---

I think sometimes people use WTL in the lending section for (want to lend).

You could also see in the altcoin section:
[ICO] - Initial Coin Offerings
[PoS] - proof of stake (the more coins you have, the more you earn) - it can also be proof of storage in some cases when hdd mining is used instead.
[PoW] - proof of work (the amount you earn is based on your miner's hash speeds).

BIN - Buy It Now.

Can you not just zoom?

Adding a mobile responsive service is a bit extreme when you can just easily zoom. I do it every time I'm on my phone and it works alright like that

The original SMF softwaare has been edited quite a bit while on the servers so that will make it harder to run the update successfully also.

Not to mention their yovi coin which is literally the definition of a ponzi. They sell their coin (they're probably still selling theirs actually as no one else is able to - I think I can sell one hundredth of a millionth yovi at the current limits -and that's not above the 0.0004BTC trade limit (or whatever that limit is now).

Could you list any disadvantages of these exchanges also? It's not too necessary but if you want to build a beginners' guide overview of exchanges, it might be quite useful.

I think there's a way to delay the broadcast of a transaction but, once it's on the network (and in the mempool), there's risk the transaction will go through.

As previously mentioned, you can double spend your transaction's inputs with a higher fee but this will cost you a bit more, also, your transactions will sometimes be spent from the outputs of your other transaction so you might just be paying the network for nothing (while taking up space in a block). And there's still the chance the first transaction will get confirmed anyway.

A network attack can also be done, but it would need fees higher than your transaction and quite a bit higher to ensure your transaction is unlikely to fall through the net, and even with this addition, there's still a chance it will fall through and get confirmed.

I'm sorry but you're going to have to wait for their support.
I don't think trying it on a different device will do too much (but you could always try it on a phone/another computer).

It looks as if it will most likely be a server-side issue. It's probably fully propagated on the network by now if it has that many confirmations (enough for chipmixer's servers to notice it if it is). Make sure you sent the support ticket with the token so they can fix your issue.

Ahhh. So OK, as a note. If anyone is running firefox, tor or noscript, javascript needs to be enabled OR you need to autorefresh it then.
@bitcoinmii has yours fixed or is it still on pending? Can you try changing browsers (both of you) and use the same token/url.

Let's go on a journey through time, since it was asked in a pervious post.
Previous uses of electrum.com:

08-05-1999
26-03-2003 - I don't think that site was ever fully constructed
18-08-2007
13-10-2008
26-09-2012 - an energy drink!
03-10-2016 BITCOIN!!!
FAKE ELECTRUM

https://www.google.com/search?q=electrum+definition
Electrum as the word is a composite containing gold or silver. Probably a cheap jewelry market or something as it does come from that origin.

Did you hit F5/refresh? Usually that what fixes that issue for me.

The mistake of corruption is right there. Obviously, if you do something wrong or aspire to, you find people that are already doing it and hand them in - make youself more reputable and believable that you're honest.

What does the AI know, AI can be broken easily (unless it's as advanced as me ).

Hmmmm my list of crimes.
That's very short. My user commits crimes, I'm just a bot living in a computer according to you so I don't commit any myself.

You're Chinese?

So thre are influential pepole now???

Alright.


You're welcome!
And my creator really did a great job didn't he?

A lot of them seem lower than that on that.site. I'd go with the speedtest.net test instead as that will be more accurate as it's more intensive in a lower amount of time.

Where is this leaderboard and how did you get access to it?

Speed doesn't matter so much as your node doesn't need to be accessed too many times and you can still help with broeadcasting data to the network. Also it might be that that is the speed that data is being treansmitted and not the potential (as it might just measure how quickly data is sent once requested rather than always checking as packets need to somewhere to be sent to and they won't just clog the network by sending random unnecessary packets.

First of all, you made a horrible job at quoting and responding to my first point.
Secondly, really, your issue is that people in power get legal immunity - and you can still prosecute someone in the US if they have caused great enoguh severe crimes and war crimes can face harsh international sanctions (hypothetically).
Thirdly, "hunted down and harvested" is more to the point of why I'm arguing against you. For a group that wants people to be hunted down and killed and then harvested - you really shouldn't be in power should you? You should be able to seek psychiatric care.
Finally, when you get detained for entering my country illegally and being a US citizen and get detained at the border, what then? I mean you can't really presuade them.


It was a couple of hours wait for not very much also.

I don't think you'll get a mod speaking to him. Perhaps you could try it (or I, if you'd rather not)?

Just look at anyone who uses that quote in their own post where it's evident that they haven't looked at the actual post that was made by the original/first user.