An almost shocking result as, given the poor (on average) performance of Hertha away, Hamburg looked like the clear favourite. I can imagine the degree of disappointment for the Hamburg fans. I hope next year Hamburg will take a higher place and go directly to the Bundesliga will save them from such experiences.

I think it happens from time to time to everyone who plays games, especially competitive games. This is not unusual, and assuming you have lost an important game (or a large sum of money), you will think about it and possibly sleep badly. Although, for example, after something important, I first of all get tired and sleep with great enthusiasm 

Yes, taking into account the game at home, Saint Etienne is becoming an obvious favorite, although everything is possible in such confrontations. By the way, does anyone know in these games the away goal rule has also been canceled or are the old ones still in effect and in this case the advantage of Saint Etienne is even more significant?

When I hear such stories, I always first of all wonder where people get money for such an active gambler life - after all, it is easy to assume that most likely he, like the rest of 99.99 gamblers, is losing money on distance.


I am sure that if a person gambles all night long instead of a healthy sleep, then his immune system will experience big problems over time. As for incurability, this is a different matter - it is one thing to have a chronic disease and another to endure it in the acute phase.

Хороший вопрос!   главное актуальный https://twitter.com/a4toslu4ilos
Если бы я не видел вашу позицию по одному вопросу, то подумал что это такой рофл, но так даже смешнее


Тем не менее вернемся к эфиру.
В этом треде уже дали ссылку


на разработчика который пишет что:

1. Существующая система аттестации нод должна быть пересмотрена в надежде получить большую стабильность.
2. Оптимизм других разрабов и Виталика относительно стабильности пос > пов был необоснован.
3. То что произошло (реорганизация на глубину в 7 блоков) не наблюдалось уже несколько лет.
4. До сих по не ясно что послужило причиной произошедшего - атака или несостоятельность сети.


Вот это особенно смешно. Т.е. проект пока еще не превратился в LUNA поэтому ставим плюсик 

Я не разработчик, а скорее потребитель (гораздо более ценный товарищ   ) и могу выражаться недипломатично, как вижу эти пункты я:

1. Ребята работают просто охуеть - дайте им еще пару лет и они их... просрут.
2. Тушили хорошо - сгорело всё. Разрабатывали хорошо - получилось хуета.
3. Кто-то сильно облажался.
4. Риски в проекте космически запредельные.
+ лично от меня
5. Господи, не дай им сломать хотя бы то что худо-бедно работает - отсрочь эфировский пос.
6. Эфир2 это не мировой компьтер а мировая лотерейка (и шансы плохенькие).
7. Капитализация к ценности проекта абсолютно неадекватна, это буквально венчур который вошел в стадию пузыря до выхода на рынок и может лопнуть в любой момент.

Хм... а че так можно было?!
Т.е. скамим холдеров токена, оставляем их со сгоревшими фантиками -> создаем форк который имеет старый тикер. Т.е. формально если смогут поддерживать цену, а почему бы и не смочь если реальные холдеры (старые) получают 3% от капы и не смогу слить проект в пол, то на графике LUNA/UST к баксу коллапса то и не будет никакого? И как бы ничего и не произошло получается?
Это что всерьез пытаются провернуть или я что-то не так понял?

Неожиданно 


Разрабам повезло что сейчас эта хрень (в подробности технические не вдавался) произошла, а не после перехода, представляю в какой ад крипторынок полетит если эфир2 после запуска спустя недельку навернется 
Хотя нее, не представляю - думаю бесконечно будут откладывать.

In my opinion, such a bet is incredibly bad, since SKT1 is overvalued (IMHO, of course) and making a big bet for the sake of 18% profit is very unreasonable. I think that it is logical to bet on the outcomes of separate maps and, in case of loss, increase the bet. This is for SKT1 win strategy, it's hard to believe that they will lose 3-0.

I would swap Brazil and France, although for Brazil even 15% is a lot. In general, this rating is nonsense in terms of verifiability and rather reflects the amount of money that bettors are willing to bet on these teams. If we held 100 such tournaments at the same time, then we could check how accurate the bookmakers are, but now we are all just expressing our subjective opinion.

It looks like you live in some kind of fictional world very far from reality 
Real behaved selfishly?  This is a new level of whataboutism. Real did not want to get him for free - they also offered him a huge signing bonus and a big salary. But Real respects the FFP, and PSG does not.

And Mbappe has undoubtedly lost his reputation (if he had one) - how else to explain these streams of hatred towards him (which come not only from Spain) and the streams of apologies that he makes right and left? 


This is one of the technical points that will not necessarily be implemented. You look at the details and not the overall concept. Business will always manage things better than the bastard officials. European football is a never ending example of this.

Yes, but it may not be an easy task in all conditions. But if we compare seasons, this one was probably one of the most convenient for underdogs - Juventus spent half of the season in an undeniable crisis, while other leaders were unstable and changed at the top like in a kaleidoscope. Milan turned out to be the luckiest of all, and Ibrahimovic certainly has a partial merit in this.

In most championships, winning the Champions League outweighs any other achievement, and only sometimes winning the national championship is a more serious achievement. So if Liverpool win the Champions League they will surpass City (for whom this remains an unattainable dream). If not, then this season will not be considered successful, because the titles won are much less prestigious.

I wonder how the fact that Barcelona was able to beat the average shows that they are able to compete with Real Madrid? After the arrival of Xavi, the distance between the clubs remained practically unchanged (this despite the fact that Real Madrid won La Liga a few rounds before the finish line and had no motivation to win in every game).

All this talk about negative football is complete nonsense. Even Atlético fans are happy with titles if negative football gives them. And by the way, I would not say that all Mourinho's teams played according to the same scheme - he proceeds from the possibilities that he has. Obviously, Roma cannot play like Real Madrid, which he also coached and who won the title from Guardiola's Barcelona.

I wonder if casino advertising becomes easier on social media will this lead to casinos reducing their presence here? On the one hand, this would be logical, but on the other hand, it is difficult for me to imagine a place where there would be a more loyal community to cryptocurrencies than here. And it's really hard to imagine that regulators will make it easier for casinos to advertise.

Bivol was also an obvious outsider, but he declassed Canello, so bookmakers' quotes can hardly be considered as the ultimate truth. I consider Canello the favorite in the upcoming fight, but only because GGG has already grown old, Canello's previous victories were, let's say, controversial, so many have been waiting for this third fight for a long time. It is unfortunate that it will happen when both boxers have already left the "long" distance.

1-0, 35', Huddersfield Town

Sportsbet username: KTChampions

a) 8 b) 1:35

a) 8 b) 1:35

I am very glad that Roma won (and my bet won). Mourinho has won all five finals he has competed in. The last title for the Italian team was also won with Mourinho (2010 Inter). Interesting Facts. Mourinho makes the result, that's a fact 
I see that the older he gets, the more sentimental he behaves, I hope he has many victories ahead and reasons to rejoice with tears in his eyes 

Players do not have endless money (and sometimes they change their entertainment, for example, by going to other areas), so any casino, new or old, is always interested in attracting new players. Obviously, casinos with a history and reputation have an advantage over new projects, but in the end, everyone has to compete very hard and provide gamblers with the best service, since the choice is really large.