After all these years it's still funny how the shills pretend that any new nonsense the team comes up with is part of the vision, as if they knew it all along. Like when their spiritual leader (rumor has it - going to prison in October) back in the day was touting "world's most advanced miner" and everyone was "yay, mining", and then he was like "mining sucks, staking is the new thing" and everyone was "yay, staking", and then it turned out it was a lie and everyone was still "yay" on some new bullshit... no monthly games, broken API, thrice broken blockchain, but "yay, the vision".
@suchmoon It nice to hear you chatting about and promoting the Ionomy Vision... You should add these new concepts to your Bitcointalk ION FAQ (The unbiased version)!!! |
|
|
|
Don't know what this is but given the team's MO it's probably some new way to extract more money from paycoiners:  It should be a fucking game, but I don't think we'll actually see another game from Ionomy Studios. I think they already pivoted away from the gaming aspect and now it's all about MN profit. No talk of games for the past several months. This really isn't a gaming coin, it s a "get old XPY holders whole again" coin. Whole again at any cost. This is simply hype and those fools will buy, but, buy just because they put a few words with a countdown timer. @BCT Trolls - It is not hype, This is the Ionomy Vision rolling in hard via an I onomy Storm!!! https://ionomy.com/ |
|
|
|
I wonder why the attacker didn't spread this out better to disguise it?
He/she did move the coins around initially so it wasn't immediately obvious that one masternode is staking significantly above average... but the last address didn't move and ballooned from 20k to ~60k in one day. My guess is that the attacker managed to move some coins to Bittrex before the wallet was disabled and after that it was just a game, no serious attempt to hide. It's becomes an interesting game when the attacker learns about the update and roll back, , justice will be served! |
|
|
|
ETH did it twice
ION did it (fucked up a shitcoin clone) twice too, so? Two wrongs don't make it right. And even though I'm not a big fan of ETH I think it's safe to say that they have a much better understanding of what's going on and much better communication too - misguided as it may be at times - with their rather complex product than ionomy can ever do with their cheap shitcoin clones. So apples and oranges, or rather apples and deer droppings. But hey, if that makes yours bags feel less heavy - have at it. So no announcement "this evening" (i.e. yesterday). New excuse:   https://news.ionomy.com/ |
|
|
|
there is no excuse for that "Friday night announcement" nonsense but that's been their MO since forever.
@suchmoon I think you been huffing to much Garza Vision. How many Ionomy announcements have been done on Friday in the last 3 months? You would know if you were really in tune with what's been going on in the Ionomy world... https://news.ionomy.com/I'd like to say "you're missing the point" but you'd miss it even if I spell it out in crayons for you. Enjoy the magic coin shitting nodes, Sharkie. I'm sure the "team" will announce something, if not today then perhaps some other day. I mean, it took them a year to release an incomplete game so what's a week or two to fix a broken coin. It's not even a crypto project, amirite? 19k blocks, 300k+ coins yesterday (Friday). That's 15 TIMES the usual. It appears to be maxed out at this rate. @suchmoon The team has not done the defect announcement and the Friday went by  thats bad you realise right? funny thing is had suchmoon not posted about it i doubt huey would even know about it lol. dev indeed  . wasnt security their primary focus??? The WildShark and Team extends a THANKS to Suchmoon for being a member of the Tiger Team for providing information on this latest defect! |
|
|
|
there is no excuse for that "Friday night announcement" nonsense but that's been their MO since forever.
@suchmoon I think you been huffing to much Garza Vision. How many Ionomy announcements have been done on Friday in the last 3 months? You would know if you were really in tune with what's been going on in the Ionomy world... https://news.ionomy.com/I'd like to say "you're missing the point" but you'd miss it even if I spell it out in crayons for you. Enjoy the magic coin shitting nodes, Sharkie. I'm sure the "team" will announce something, if not today then perhaps some other day. I mean, it took them a year to release an incomplete game so what's a week or two to fix a broken coin. It's not even a crypto project, amirite? 19k blocks, 300k+ coins yesterday (Friday). That's 15 TIMES the usual. It appears to be maxed out at this rate. @suchmoon The team has not done the defect announcement and the Friday went by |
|
|
|
there is no excuse for that "Friday night announcement" nonsense but that's been their MO since forever.
@suchmoon I think you been huffing to much Garza Vision. How many Ionomy announcements have been done on Friday in the last 3 months? You would know if you were really in tune with what's been going on in the Ionomy world... https://news.ionomy.com/ |
|
|
|
Why don't you ask and report back. This "go ask on slack" meme is getting old. Nobody's saying shit there:  @suchmoon You could always ask the team on Ionomy Slack "what the details of this defect are from a "unbiased" source?" Is it a bug or an attack or the team setting the stage for a big pump or scheduled upgrade of the wallet that has been moved forward I have confidence in Huey that the team will get a handle on this defect and implement a solution ASAP when all the facts are in... Huey has implemented a News Blackout and the team will release information about when the defect is announced... |
|
|
|
I thought it's a bug until I saw that address that defies my (admittedly limited) knowledge of probability. It looks like they - whoever that is - don't even hide anymore: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ion/address.dws?iWyAM4KwHun9xDSnWa2qT7Lapr1CxLwHLL.htm140% staked in ~12 hours or so. 28k coins from a single masternode. The average for a typical masternode would be is ~300 coins during the same period, or ~30 coins on a normal day. Difficulty has completed flatlined now. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ion/#@diff 11k blocks, 1400 orphans, 200k new coins in just over 14 hours today. Usual numbers are 1240, 50, 21k per 24 hours. @suchmoon You could always ask the team on Ionomy Slack "what the details of this defect are from a "unbiased" source?" Is it a bug or an attack or the team setting the stage for a big pump or scheduled upgrade of the wallet that has been moved forward I have confidence in Huey that the team will get a handle on this defect and implement a solution ASAP when all the facts are in... |
|
|
|
o noes bitcoin is down a fair chunk. @wildshark does that mean ion lost a lot of value since exchanges use usd or is ion now being rated by satoshi until btc rises again? @korvas maybe you can chime in too since you insist on using usd too.
@o0o0 I'm having a hard time with figuring out what question you ask me. The Bitcoin coin being down effects the satoshi rate for all alt coins (ION coin) that are being valued at the Bittrex exchange. At the Coinbase exchange the Bitcoin is being valued with dollars... This will change when BTC balloon bursts, the exchanges will support use of ETH for the value to compare. Coinbase exchange all ready supports the market with ETH/USD trading. See the chart below for the Bitcoin down a fair chunk. Current snapshot of History of ION Market  All I see is heavy ION volume over last month... signs of a healthy market Current snapshot of Brittrex exchange  |
|
|
|
haha I like how the monthly income is $1, shows good coding
are we gonna have a comp to see how many blocks a day it ends up maxing out at or % above normal
The winner can be awarded in PayCoin that hasn't been burned... Just like the Graza Vision |
|
|
|
^^^ Fucking account farmers, it's like a roach infestation here  Anyway, the gawsome ION blockchain keeps pooping coins like it's 2014 all over again. 3600+ blocks today (3 times the usual) and still 4+ hours to go. Maybe it's time to start taking bets on hardfork vs rebase the large flow of coins continue to move to Masternodes (Shark Nodes) and ION Wallet owners (noted from my ION wallets)   |
|
|
|
I have noticed a increase in dollars from my ION profits to see the accelerating blockchain defect. Here is some more info from Ionomy Slack on the defect:
The difficulty re-targeting looks off. Difficulty is spiking way lower than what I would assume would be a good design choice. @mrcoins can you collect data for us. In particular the entire getmininginfo output every min along with whatever else you are collecting. I also need the time of your sample. (Ideally I would want to plot the block number vs duration of each block vs the difficulty of that block vs time)
I have seen a graph similar to this on another coin. While the integrity of the blockchain is not an issue, the consistency does change outside perception. If this is the same re-targeting issue, the oscillations will become greater as time goes on. The increase in total blocks per day is not a symptom that I saw on the other chain, but it could be related to how the re-targeting is calculated. The mathematical reason for the issue is that the up and down adjustments are done with the same set of data. While this seems logical, you create a resonance issue under some circumstances. It is possible that we are seeing that resonance now. The data will help show if it is this or something else.
I have yet to see an original coin that has it right on the first try. Almost all coins have resonance, even BTC. It is just masked by either long duration between adjustments, or by people not seeing or caring. ("oh that was a couple of lucky blocks") It does not matter much because in the long run and it does not impact the integrity of the blockchain.
What a load of bullshit. ION is now shitting out nearly twice as many coins as it used to and the block times appear to be still accelerating. Show me when BTC had difficulty drop to nearly zero. That's not the same as "a couple lucky blocks", it looks like a bug or an exploit in difficulty adjustment. This matters very much (well, except to paycoiners of course) in the long run or the short run or the medium-length run. @suchmoon Here is more info coming out of Ionomy Slack on the defect: The block reduction is always going to be an estimate based on average block times. The block reduction takes place at an absolute block number... so we are currently in a time warp situation, the inflation cut will happen sooner as that specific block number will arrive sooner if the timing is shorter than estimated I would not envisage this increased block rate to be at this rate for very long. We've been running 10% under for 4 months, so we'd need to run at +40% for a month just to be "even" |
|
|
|
With the Cake announcement, it seems to have caused the ION blockchain to start accelerating the block rewards...
Great, more inflation is just what it needed. Let's hope it's not some kind of a bug in difficulty adjustment, we would laugh ourselves to death if they need another hardfork/rebase. And how is that related to Cake? This difficulty re-targeting defect started happening about the time of news of the partnering with cake Ionomy announcement... super charged the ION blockchain to produce more income  It also started happening around the time of me having a very nice bottle of Valserrano... I think that had a much better chance of affecting the ION blockchain than some random announcement It looks quite thoroughly fucked: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ion/#@inflation Slackers must be excited. Moar coins! it seems to have caused the ION blockchain to start accelerating the block rewards...  @Suchmoon I have noticed a increase in dollars from my ION profits to see the accelerating blockchain defect. Here is some more info from Ionomy Slack on the defect: The difficulty re-targeting looks off. Difficulty is spiking way lower than what I would assume would be a good design choice. @mrcoins can you collect data for us. In particular the entire getmininginfo output every min along with whatever else you are collecting. I also need the time of your sample. (Ideally I would want to plot the block number vs duration of each block vs the difficulty of that block vs time) I have seen a graph similar to this on another coin. While the integrity of the blockchain is not an issue, the consistency does change outside perception. If this is the same re-targeting issue, the oscillations will become greater as time goes on. The increase in total blocks per day is not a symptom that I saw on the other chain, but it could be related to how the re-targeting is calculated. The mathematical reason for the issue is that the up and down adjustments are done with the same set of data. While this seems logical, you create a resonance issue under some circumstances. It is possible that we are seeing that resonance now. The data will help show if it is this or something else. I have yet to see an original coin that has it right on the first try. Almost all coins have resonance, even BTC. It is just masked by either long duration between adjustments, or by people not seeing or caring. ("oh that was a couple of lucky blocks") It does not matter much because in the long run and it does not impact the integrity of the blockchain. |
|
|
|
With the Cake announcement, it seems to have caused the ION blockchain to start accelerating the block rewards...
Great, more inflation is just what it needed. Let's hope it's not some kind of a bug in difficulty adjustment, we would laugh ourselves to death if they need another hardfork/rebase. And how is that related to Cake? This difficulty re-targeting defect started happening about the time of news of the partnering with cake Ionomy announcement... super charged the ION blockchain to produce more income |
|
|
|
With the Cake announcement, it seems to have caused the ION blockchain to start accelerating the block rewards... |
|
|
|
How many non-paycoiner users/slackers does ionomy have? Or is that also a secret?
I don't think the Ionomy LTD keeps stats for the number of paycoin users using Ionomy. Being that the team does not get the info, it must be secret... |
|
|
|
And an embarrassment of a whale, but a whale none the less. Even though you paid to be called a whale. And apparently Ionomy whale = shill.
There are 8 Ionomy LTD Whales(defined by ownership of 5000 Atoms) and only two of us choose to educate and promote Ionomy Vision to the BCT users.. |
|
|
|
I believe you to be wrong Detective CB, Ionomy LTD Cards are changeable skins for Ionomy LTD staker. Did Garza Vision support changeable skins or POS stakers?
Yes, Sharkie, hashstakers (like their predecessors - hashlets) and skins were at the core of Garza's scam. And you shouldn't call them POS unless you mean something other than Proof-of-Stake. "Stakers" don't stake anything on the blockchain. I agree with you on both your points... Hashlets were Garza scam that was not on blockchain and Ionomy LTD stakers don't use the ION blockchain to make the daily ION stake payout. ION rewards for Ionomy LTD hosted Masternodes, Investor Masternodes and Wallet staking are coming from POS 3.0 ION blockchain.
More work is currently being done by the team to implement the Ionomy Vision... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
