<…>
Not in too many (but it does somehow add up to 71 pretty worthless tokens), but enough to find out that it’s rather meaningless. When I first joined the forum, my crypto baggage was down to some brief encounters with information on crypto, and some complementary assets such as a certain degree of maturity in life, besides a very low usage and affinity to social networks. Taking place in a few bounties and some airdrops seemed like a thing to do, due to the hype (there goes the outlined maturity down the drain), but it became ever so boring after a short period of time, and thus I soon gave up on them as they seemed nonsense. They seemed to keep rolling-in months later, and I’ve never given them any thought. Going over the list, I recall two or three tops. The rest is a wonder when I did anything to get them. Some people prefer to delete this kind of post after some time. I prefer to essentially keep them (how else could I mock them?), not in an attempt to exemplify (well ,maybe a bit), but because it conforms part of my history here on the forum. All this was all rather experimental to me, due to my lack of attraction towards social networks (of course, this forum does have some connotations that make it differ from conventional social networks). Most people here have toyed with bounties and airdrops. It’s down to each one to recognize when those are pretty futile ways to spend one’s time (and privacy on some occasions), and move on to doing something more productive with their time … |
|
|
|
<…>
Si te lo vende un particular (y no una promotora), es posible que el vendedor te pida una parte del valor en "B", escriturando el piso por un valor inferior al valor de venta. Aquí, nuevamente acudiendo al terreno de las posibilidades hipotéticas, podría ser que al vendedor le pudiese interesar una parte del "B" en Bitcoin. No es fácil que sea así, pero tampoco descartable, y te ahorrarías una convertirlo a FIAT entre otras cosas. Es factible, aunque no probable hoy por hoy … |
|
|
|
<…>
No son pocas veces que en mi entorno oigo "esto del Bitcoin es un timo que enriquece sobre todo a unos en base a la inmensa mayoría". Esta opinión no es banal, dado que forma parte del sentir de una elevada parte de la población, y por ende, el sentimiento forma también parte del valor de Bitcoin, al igual que el factor de comprensión cultural. Quizás comentar adicionalmente que el número de usuarios podría tener dos vertientes (por otro lado difíciles de tangibilizar numéricamente): usuarios operativos y usuarios especulativos. Un apunte más sería la regularización, que es otro factor que no es sencillo de concretar en un valor numérico de indicador. Pongamos por extremo un idílico paraíso de Bitcoin, donde el estado lo ampara (no adopta), los impuestos son comedidos (o nulos), las reglas de declaración sencillas y claras y demás. Esto, potencialmente le da más valor que un entorno más restrictivo, o de carga impositiva. Tampoco es que este factor sea un factor aislado de los demás: El número de usuarios y TXs pueden tener cierta correlación con el factor regularización (sería lógico), pero si no es redundante precisamente por una alta correlación, podría ser una variable más a ponderar. Si le damos a la cabeza, seguro que surgen más factores de interés, algunos con tangibilización sencilla en números, y otros de carácter más cualitativo, y por ende, más complejos de modelizar. |
|
|
|
<...>
Ciao, ho appena aggiornato i dati in sospeso che avevo lasciato fuori nell'aggiornamento di ieri, che erano i dati per la scheda Evoluzione conteggio post. In questi giorni sono un po 'più ingombranti del solito, quindi se ti capita di riscontrare errori, per favore fatemelo sapere. Saluti. |
|
|
|
He procedido a actualizar los listados mostrados en los primeros posts, con la relación de todos los meritados en nuestro foro local, con datos a 03/07/2020. El total de sMéritos otorgados en nuestro foro local es de 6.481, acorde a la siguiente distribución: año mes nMerits
2020 7 61 (mes parcial)
2020 6 175
2020 5 420
2020 4 200
2020 3 209
2020 2 301
2020 1 292
2019 12 265
2019 11 208
2019 10 147
2019 9 194
2019 8 147
2019 7 237
2019 6 252
2019 5 147
2019 4 150
2019 3 213
2019 2 160
2019 1 192
2018 12 172
2018 11 217
2018 10 235
2018 9 359
2018 8 140
2018 7 281
2018 6 127
2018 5 170
2018 4 161
2018 3 146
2018 2 279
2018 1 224
Mayo fue una excepción, volviendo a la tónica habitual (algo más baja) en Junio. |
|
|
|
Some are appalling. I mean, where would we categorize guys like this one?: Proof of Authentication
Telegram :@ddmr_1
Regards
#proof of join telegram
bitcointalk username : DdmrDdmr
telegram username : @ddmr_1
spreadsheet number : 570
ETH address : 0xa87dd2418c29a99D0DCA894Cd21449Ac46aB1c9B
Telegram Username: @ddmr_1
ETH Address: 0xa87dd2418c29a99D0DCA894Cd21449Ac46aB1c9B
Check-out the amount of shitcoins in the ETH address! I mean, what can we expect from this individual on this forum really? A Legendary-to-be? Come on ... Edit: There's a tiny twist to the examples above, just in case it slips a quick reader. |
|
|
|
Update 03/07/2020:The dashboard gives you access to anyone’s complete merit history in the TX tab, surpassing the 120 day limit. Link: BitcoinTalk Merit Dashboard. Updated the Merit Dashboard to reflect the most recent sMerit available data: Total sMerit: 700.323 Total Txs: 369.292 From Users: 22.277 To Users: 34.724 minDate: 2018-01-24 22:12:21 maxDate: 2020-07-03 02:49:37 Aggregate awarded sMerit for the last complete week (22/06/2020 .. 28/06/2020) is 4.533 which is up 9,36% from the previous week. In addition, there are 3 more Legendary and 1 more Hero members this week: LUCKMCFLY -> Legendary from Full Member during Merit System kick-off. madnessteat -> Legendary from Old Era Newbie during Merit System kick-off. Plutosky -> Legendary from Member during Merit System kick-off. yazher -> Hero Member from Old Era Newbie during Merit System kick-off. Note:
Copper Members and non-native ranks (staff, etc) are displayed as real (regular) ranks.Note:
I will be somewhat irregular updating the Merit Dashboard over the next 2-4 weeks.Pending:
Updating Post Count Evolution (I'll probably finish doing it tonight).[/s]
|
|
|
|
|
Data actualizados a 03/07/2020
Actualizadas las listas en el OP, a fin de reflejar los miembros del foro que cualifican con los criterios reflejados en el OP.
Actualmente, en las citadas listas tenemos con <= 20% méritos para escalar de rango (la Actividad puede o no haberse logrado):
- 1 Hero Members (en camino hacia Legendary)
- 2 Sr. Member (en camino hacia Hero)
- 2 Full Members (en camino hacia Sr. Member)
- 2 Members (en camino hacia Full Member)
- 2 Jr. Members (en camino hacia Member)
Mira que es escueta la lista en nuestro foro local …
|
|
|
|
Data as of 03/07/2020Updated the lists in the OP (and subsequent post) to reflect the forum members that still qualify in each of those lists. Currently, on those lists there are, lacking <= 20% merits to rank-up (activity may not be met though): - 43 Heroes (on their way to Legendries) - 47 Sr. Members (on their way to Heroes) - 45 Full Members (on their way to Sr. Members) - 46 Members (on their way to Full Members) - 198 Jr. Members (on their way to Members) Added this week (15): user_id name Status posts activity activity_Met merit rank ProbableInitialRank trust url
68364 Hydrogen Active 3120 1484 Y* 802 Hero Member Hero Member =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=68364
1276008 Rengga Jati Active 1286 574 Y 402 Sr. Member Member =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1276008
811213 polymerbit Active 432 432 N 401 Sr. Member Full Member =+12 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=811213
2724574 FP91G Active 240 238 N 217 Full Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2724574
1593137 famososMuertos Active 422 336 Y 207 Full Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1593137
241548 Rizzrack Active 193 193 N 200 Full Member New Era Newbie =+1 / =1 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=241548
2787299 Apocalipsa Active 80 80 N 91 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2787299
1701092 Husires Active 121 121 Y 82 Member Old Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1701092
2476450 vaultman Active 193 193 Y 82 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2476450
2427207 Indymoney Active 1735 630 Y 82 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2427207
2632934 Krubster Active 67 67 N 82 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2632934
2775483 BlackHatCoiner Active 437 112 N 80 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2775483
2701871 iGO_Tech Active 115 112 Y 8 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2701871
2804044 Blank-Head Active 36 36 N 8 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2804044
1077104 youmadbro Active 119 119 Y 8 Jr. Member Old Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1077104
(*) this week (5): user_id name Status posts activity activity_Met merit rank ProbableInitialRank trust url
1153977 LUCKMCFLY Active 5329 1008 - 1004 Legendary Full Member =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1153977
1210969 JSRAW Active 3496 756 N 1020 Hero Member New Era Newbie =+1 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1210969
1069571 yazher Active 2183 784 Y* 504 Hero Member Old Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1069571
2646989 Gangster-Hamster Active 1496 378 N 253 Sr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2646989
2796662 Lillominato89 Active 105 84 N 108 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2796662
1388976 kbc Active 149 149 Y 11 Member Old Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1388976
(*) Due to enough merits for the next rank, or being banned.
|
|
|
|
<...>
I’ve encountered that a few times when publishing some sql code here. Normally it was only down to one command (not always the same one), so what I did was apply a dicothomic approach (*) to locate the command that was making the error appear. I then substituted the command for a "sweet command" (i.e. "order by" for "ordenar by"), and put a note at the foot of the post to indicate the necessary swap to the code to be correct. Nevertheless, if the code is long, and there are multiple key words that cause the issue, it may be a bit cumbersome with the above approach. (*) i.e. publish half of the code, and see it it displays properly, if not, publish a quarter of the code, and see if it displays, and so forth. That allows you to delimit the problematic commands by applying a dichotomic approach. for (const game of existingGames) {
const wager = game.game.wager / 100000000;
html += "<div>Game between " + game.game.players[1] + " and " + game.game.players[2] + " for " + wager + runtime.globalVars.Symbol + " (<a href='#' onclickityclick='parent.postMessage(\"" + game.address + "\", \"*\"); return false'>Watch</a>)</div>";
}for (const game of ourGames) {
const wager = game.game.wager / 100000000;
html += "<div>Game between " + (game.game.players[1] === runtime.globalVars.ValidatedAddress ? "you" : game.game.players[1]) + " and " + (game.game.players[2] === runtime.globalVars.ValidatedAddress ? "you" : game.game.players[2]) + " for " + wager + runtime.globalVars.Symbol + " (<a href='#' onclickityclick='parent.postMessage(\"" + game.address + "\", \"*\"); return false'>Watch</a>)</div>";
}
Replace "onclick" for "onclickityclick" or whatever, and explain the necesary change outside the code area ... |
|
|
|
|
He procedido a actualizar los resultados de todos los miembros del foro que había incluido en los posts del OP, con datos a fecha del 03/07/2020.
He incluido a @d5000, quien es de los miembros más activos en nuestro foro local y que no había incluido en las actualizaciones precedentes (es un perfil muy heterogéneo en términos de los top 10 hilos meritados cuanto menos).
|
|
|
|
He procedido a actualizar el listado de los top 100 hilos meritados en nuestro foro local, así como el documento Google Sheet con la relación completa de todos los hilos meritados en nuestro foro local, y los top 50 hilos meritados en los últimos 60 dias. Datos a 03/07/2020. Mi idea es ir refrescándolo cada mes aproximdamente. En total se han otorgado en nuestro foro local: * Número de Méritos: 6.481 * Número de Enviadores distintos: 174 * Número de Receptores distintos: 414 * Número de Hilos Meritados: 1.440 * Número de Posts Meritados: 3.404 La información tambien se puede consultar aquí (actualización semanal): https://public.tableau.com/shared/HDG4DZP3W?:display_count=y&:origin=viz_share_link |
|
|
|
<…>
No he entendido bien lo que preguntas (y ya van dos post seguidos hoy – será que estoy espeso). Ejercer de programador sin desvelar tu persona es factible tal y como indica @Seoincorporation, jugando con cuentas creadas ad-hoc, móviles limpios y vpns como base. Nobstante, no es habitual que la gente que se dedique a la programación se esconda demasiado, y suelen construir su reputación y cartera de manera transparente. Claro que dependerá de a qué te dedicas: si uno se dedica a programar para la darknet, probablemente busque no dejar traza de su actividad ni persona, y su reputación se entiende que se crea al amparo de un pseudónimo. |
|
|
|
<…>
Tampoco veo claro si te refieres a: - Todas las direcciones con cuanto menos una TX de entrada o salida. - Si contemplas las direcciones con TXs, pero con saldo cero actualmente. - El objetivo conceptual (lo que puede llevar a determinar, teniendo presente que un gasto podría generar una TX de salida hacia el destino y una nueva dirección para el cambio – esta última por tanto tendría TX de entrada pero no de salida, aunque proviene de una TX de salida precedente). Sea como fuere, el archivo sería brutalillo… |
|
|
|
<...>
Cheers… Si me dicen hace un par de años que voy a unirme a un foro, y crear 5K posts, no me lo creería ni por asomo. No me gustan apenas las redes sociales, aunque un foro es algo distinto, pre-RRSS en masa, y quizás tenga ese punto de antaño asociado. Sirva este post pues como mi post 5K en el foro (si no borro o me borran alguno, lo cual originaría un doublé-spend técnico del post número 5k posteriormente). |
|
|
|
There’s close to no information around on the displayed error, so it does seem that contacting support should be the first option ( https://support.trustwallet.com/hc/en-us/requests/new). There’s a wee entry here on what to do if you cannot see your funds, which is not exactly the same, but perhaps what's listed under step 4 may help to resolve the issue (at least, they seem to point to following the procedure in multiple problematic scenarios). Following the link on step 4 there’s further detail, and it verses on how to deal with the recovery phrase (at which point you likely move on to a better wallet). As usual, tread with care in all this (I'd contact support as the first option though): https://community.trustwallet.com/t/my-crypto-is-missing-what-should-i-do/1450 |
|
|
|
Ledger has indeed already come-up with a solution, and Ledger Live 2.7.0 is available for download (from Ledger Live itself): We’ve implemented a message in Ledger Live to appear near your balance whenever you have any incoming unconfirmed transactions. This way, you’ll be informed whenever there’s a transaction waiting to be confirmed still. Aside from this UX enhancement, we also fine-tuned the UX relating to RBF-cancelled transactions. While creating a Bitcoin transaction, Ledger Live will now no longer let unconfirmed transactions be used for new transactions by default. This will ensure that you won’t be facing any difficulties with the “Send Max” feature – even if any pending incoming transactions are cancelled. This setting can be changed if desired.
https://www.ledger.com/trickery-is-not-a-vulnerabilityIt does seem like something that could have been foreseen and handled proactively and not reactively (I mean highlinghting received unconfirmed TXs a tad). |
|
|
|
<…>
Besides the references provided on this (and 100 similar threads), one can always resort to observing what type of posts are being merited, and derive a general idea from that observation (see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=recent for example). The idea is not to copy anyone’s style, but rather to get a feeling of what is actually being merited on the forum, and from there, abstract an idea lead by example. |
|
|
|
Recently my friend received a permanent ban on his main account <…>
"Main account", meaning that he runs other accounts too. A friendly gesture would be to inform your friend that the ban applies not just to his main account, but rather to all his accounts (past, present and future), except for the account he may use to create a ban appeal here, on Meta. <…> Also, doesn't it make sense for people to have a chance to correct their errors?
Some people do get a chance, based on their net contribution to the forum (or so): [ BAN APPEAL]UPDATE: Total table + Ban status (Need feedback from Global mods), - not up-to-date. <...>
No transfer of anything. Simply use this thread to lay out your arguments to oppose the ban, or why it's wrong. Perhaps start by providing the id of the banned account. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
