Hallo Mezzomix, Shorena und alle die helfen wollen und können,
ich wußte gar nicht daß mein Router soviel Ports hat.
ich hab ein Debugfenster bei Hilfe gefunden. den Verlauf kann ich nicht durchblättern. Nichts drin. Vieleicht wenn die letzten 12 Wochen geladen sind.
In besagter Dev Console eingegeben ohne" "addnode IP add" kommt Quadrat mit Pfeil nach rechts. und 6 unterschiedliche Blöcke siehe unten
Eingabe ist jeweils für eine IP: addnode 84.200.34.113 add Den output hab ich nie gesehen. -snip-
Wo finde ich den privaten Schlüssel.
Alle zusammen sind verschlüsselt in der wallet.dat, die kannst Du direkt aus core heraus mit Datei -> Wallet sichern an einem beliebigen Ort speichern. Wo kann ich den Extrahieren. Den allgemeinen Schlüssel brauche ich nicht, den kann jeder wissen, zum BTC übersenden.
Bitte gebt mir eine Beschreibung, wie ich an den privaten rankomme. für jede adresse. so dass ich den kopieren und verschlüsseln kann. verschlüsseln aber wie?
Die einzelnen Schlüssel sind erstmal unverschlüssel wenn Du sie extrahierst, das auch über die Konsole dumpprivkey 18WgDVuiGY4A4mB8YEmVggEfSmFUUKxDcJ nur halt mit Deinen Adressen. Vorher musst Du die wallet aber entsperren, dafür walletpassphrase Passowrd05640 60 eingeben, dann hast Du 60 Sekunden Zeit bis sie sich von alleine wieder sperrt. Wenn Du aber auf eine andere Wallet umsteigen willst ist es sicherer die neue einzurichten und an eine der neuen Adressen eine Überweisung fertig zu machen. |
|
|
|
|
#1 OP is allready evading the ban old posts
#2 more about it can be read in the unofficial FAQ
|
|
|
|
-snip-
But... you had your warning. What else to do? Civil service, cleaning the streets? What would you think is reasonable if someone does not get the warning shot?
Do you know the moderator?or you are the one banned me? Nope. I like how you fail to answer my questions. @Shogen
@shorena
The same man?
Nope, I have a single account. With the number of posts I write daily I dont have time for another account anyway. Also I remember a man relates these accounts!that's ****rena (Maybe one of the moderator of the forum)
I suspect names with the ending are somewhat common with the amount of accounts here. If I've offended you, please forgive me, I have no malice!
Not that I recal, I rarely feel offended by strangers. |
|
|
|
Just because a TX confirmed, does not mean that the miners will accept .00003 as an acceptable TX fee for that size of a TX. It is plausible (and likely) that the TX would have been confirmed without any fee attached. You should remember that a too small of a TX fee is generally treated the same as a no TX fee TX by the miners Very likely indeed as the input used was ~4 months old. |
|
|
|
Is it possible to add another section to forum such as some kind of guessing games or contest to win some bitcoins or something? can someone please make a mud games or something? thanks!
The would be in games and rounds. |
|
|
|
Maybe someone that operates a pool can shed some light on this.
A significant number of pools simply run the default bitcoind client and transaction rules. Some have their own rules claiming their rules are "anti-spam" (see the many threads about luke-jr's custom patches to the bitcoind client in the gentoo packaging, and probably any pool running his pool software does so too). Most of the alleged anti-spam selection criteria are (presumably an ideological objection) aimed at gambling sites. Not sure I missed something when I read the source (or rather the comments). The way I understand it is that the TXs get sorted by priority and added. So with now over 5k TX in queue all blocks should be close to the limit, unless there is some sort of minimal priority I missed. Currenlty 328 / 1424 TX have a priority of 0.00000000 I made a 2nd database this morning to get data for TX with and without fee. The load was to much for the server to handle [1] so I had to reboot. Thus the data after 21:00 is not significant for now. I think the message is clear anyway. The majority of TX without fee get ignored even though there is space left in the blocks. Transactions without fee queued up to over 2000 waiting 3 times in the last 24 hours. The transactions without fee might be spam though. Maybe David Rabahy can share some Excel results?  up to date pictures are on the nodes info page [2] below the connection and traffic stats. I might change the order though. [1] the white spaces in the pictures indicate that the task to update the database could not be handled within 30 seconds and was terminated. The way rrdtool works is that it handles missing values as "unknown" which are shown as blanks in the graphics. [2] http://213.165.91.169/ |
|
|
|
|
It is not possible to have a picture in your signature. Maybe you confuse it with the forums ads under the first post of a thread?
|
|
|
|
Nice work shorena! I sent you a small tip to the address in your profile. I checked out all the other stats on you full node, overall it is an awesome testament to Bitcoin's openness.
Thanks, I appreciate it. Pictures are indeed on the main page [1], but I thought I just post the picture directly. Less scrolling involved. Glad you like it. I think the long queue is mainly due to transactions without fee and miners beeing greedy. The TX in question has small (in BTC value) input/outputs, does not pay a fee and the input is not very old, which in my experience results in miners just ignoring your TX. There are plenty of TX with fees, so why should they confirm this one? I had a similar one for testing with 4 inputs and a single output of 0.0022. I didnt confirm in 8 days - by that time the inputs were 2-3 weeks old - so I had to remove it from core and "doublespend" it. I am not sure this would change with a bigger blocksize as most blocks are not full yet, even though they could be. They way the mempool currently is each block should be at the limit now, but they are not [2]. Maybe someone that operates a pool can shed some light on this. [1] http://213.165.91.169/[2] https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/block-all/1 - you can sort by pool by clicking on its name, but I have not found one that has exclusivly big blocks. |
|
|
|
Hello i m buying 3 dedicated server cpu and 1 gpu server dedicated tell me is this profitable i m new to this kindly tell me the minimum server requirement to bitcoin or litcoin
No. If you want a more lengthy and in depth answer, provide more information (prices, hardware specs). It will however not change the result as CPU and GPU mining is pretty much dead for litecoin as well as for bitcoin. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Does *anyone* have a record of the pool or waiting transactions? That's our key. When there are ~2,000 transactions in the queue waiting then we would expect a full 1MB block to be coming out next. When there are ~4,000 transactions in the queue waiting then we would expect two full 1MB blocks to be coming out next. In this state, transactions can expect to take ~20 minutes to confirm. ~6,000 waiting -> 30 minute confirmation times. And so on.
-snip-
I dont have historical data. But I just setup a rrdtool database to track the number of transactions on my full node. The stats for the last 24 hours are shown here [1], the pic is updated every 30 minutes and I will add more for 30 and 360 days once the database has enough data. As you can see from the little data thats allready there (collecting ~1 hour now) we are allready closer to 4000 transactions waiting than to 2000. The raw data is gathered every minute with the following command bitcoind getrawmempool false | wc -l and is not filtered in any way that is not inherent to bitcoind. bitcoind getrawmempool true | grep fee | grep 0.00000000 | wc -l shows that right now 2792 of 3685 TX are without fee. I might make another database to improve the stats. [1] http://213.165.91.169/pic/mempool24h.png |
|
|
|
Hallo Mezzomix, Shorena und alle die helfen wollen und können Ich habe wie schon erwähnt meinen Laptop wieder jungfreulich herstellen lassen. (reagiert wieder wie neu,eine freude damit zu arbeiten) Das erste was ich aufgespielt habe ist bitcointalk und client qt v0.9.2.1 (oder wie unter Hilfe über Qt steht "this Program uses Qt version 5.2.0.)  "QT" [1] ist nur die Oberfläche. ABER ... und schon gehen die "Probleme" los ...
Wallet.dat war nicht zu finden. Erst nach der Einstellung "versteckte Dateien sichtbar machen"
Mein Client ist 5 Jahre und in die 38 Wochen im Rückstand, obwohl ich die letzte Wallet von vor dem löschen mit der neuen getauscht habe. Alte rein, neue gelöscht.
Das hat erstmal nichts mit der wallet.dat zu tun. Bitcoin core braucht eine vollständige Kopie der Blockchain zum arbeiten. Die ist >20 GB zur Zeit. Client hat 8 Datenleitungen. (kann man die Datenleitungen erhöhen um schneller zu sein beim Blöcke laden?)
Ja die Anzahl kannst Du erhöhen wenn Du Port 8333 in Deinem Router auf den Computer leitest und ggf. die lokale Firewall entspr. einstellst. In der Regel heißt das Port Forwarding o.ä. Das hilft nur leider für das laden der Blockchain nicht, das macht der Client leider immer nur mit einem anderen Node (getpeerinfo in der dev konsole [2] und nach sync:true gucken). Es gibt zum einen einen Torrent [3] um Das zu beschleunigen, der lädt dann nämlich von divesen Quellen und bitcoin core muss die Datei (bootstrap.dat) nur noch auspacken und verifizieren. Das dauert auch ein bisschen, aber bei weitem nicht so lange. Sind dann eher einige Stunden (inkl. download) als 2-3 Tage. Der Torrent ist natürlich nicht auf dem aktuellen Stand. Für den Rest würde ich einige der folgenden Nodes per Hand hinzufügen: last updated 2014.10.10
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IP - location - owner[1]- speed - info/stats page[2] - testnet
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
84.200.34.113 - Freinsheim, DE, EU - Newar - 1000 mbit/s - yes - no
185.45.192.129 - Amsterdam, NL, EU - anon - 1000 mbit/s - /node.php[3] - yes
213.165.91.169 - Germany, EU - shorena - 100 mbit/s - yes - no
50.7.68.180 - New York, USA - Newar - 100 mbit/s - yes - no
5.9.24.81 - Germany, EU - zvs - unknown - no - no
178.79.173.71 - United Kingdom, EU - zvs - unknown - no - no
107.155.104.194 - Dalls, USA - zvs - unknown - no - no
106.185.32.195 - Japan, Asia - zvs - unknown - no - no
94.242.57.173 - Russia, Asia - zvs - unknown - no - no
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] refers to a bitcointalk.org username or anon if requested
[2] same IP, port 80 or path/port given
[3] work in progress
Dafür in besagter Dev Console "addnode IP add" eingeben und die IP mit jeweils einer aus der Liste tauschen. Nimm ruhig alle rein, da Du nicht wirklich entscheiden kannst welchen Node Dein Client zum synchronisieren benutzt. Im selben Fenster wie die Dev Console ist auch ein Netzwerkmonitor. Wenn Die Verbindung dort schlecht ist und Du nichts mehr runterlädst einfach den Client neu starten dann wird ein anderer Node zum synchronisieren gewählt und mit denen aus der Liste stehen die Chance gut das Du einen mit mindestens 100MBit/s Anbindung bekommst. An die Mitleser(!) schickt mir gerne die Daten von euren Nodes, gern auch per Mail an: shor3na@gmail.com via anonymen remailern etc. pp. Feste IP / dynip name und grob der Ort reicht mir völlig. Es sollte allerdings auch klar sein das mir mit ner ISDN Anbindung nicht geholfen ist. Da sollten schon mindestens 50 besser 100 Mbit upload(!) hinter stecken. Danke. Zeit ist Client noch 1 Jahr und 51 Monate im Rückstand (Das kann ja dauern) Für Bitcoin-Neueinsteiger ein Abschreckungsmittel!!!
Viele Grüße erst mal
Metall
Da am Anfang die Blöcke kaum Transaktionen enthielten dauert es auch immer länger je näher man dem aktuellen Stand kommt. Ist ein bisschen frustrierend. Aber ich hab vor ner Weile ein System neu aufgesetzt und das war mit torrent und den obigen nodes relativ schnell fertig. Ein paar Stunden den Torrent geladen (32 MBit/s download lässt sich problemlos Auslasten) und über Nacht/Vormittag den Rest zu Fuß. Leider ja. Aber es gibt bereits Bestrebungen das zukünftig deutlich besser zu gestalten. Wird dennoch nicht vergleichbar sein mit anderen Clients wie Electrum oder Multibit, aber dafür ist man auch nicht auf andere Angewiesen. Electrum z.B. braucht spezielle Server, Multibit andere Clients die Full nodes (wie bitcoin core) laufen haben. [1] http://qt-project.org/[2] ist unter Hilfe in einem der Fenster versteckt. Wo genau hab ich grad nicht im Kopf. [3] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=145386.0 |
|
|
|
no others way punish me?just banned permanant,
unreasonable & a little rude & no humanity ?  good luck with your newbie account  ! Its not only the account that its banned but the person behind it. So a new account (besides to question the reasons of the ban) is not allowed and to try and work around it will result in the next account beeing banned. no others way punish me?just banned permanant,
Do you think it a little rude and unreasonable or no humanity?
But... you had your warning. What else to do? Civil service, cleaning the streets? What would you think is reasonable if someone does not get the warning shot? |
|
|
|
|
I didnt notice anything special, which subforum did you have the most spam?
since we are comparing sizes: 1332 @ 95%
|
|
|
|
Please post identification information on the blockchain.
Why should they? Why do you think you need to ask for that information? |
|
|
|
now you need to pay btc tx fee 0.0001BTC per KB . The normal tx (one input ,two output ) size is about 250 byte which means 0.000025 is enough .
Where did you get that idea? As far as I am aware you are not paying per byte, but per started KB. |
|
|
|
Hi,Everybody,I am a SR member from bitcointalk forum,but now I have to creat a newbie account,to post my confusion,want a help from the community of Bitcoin! here is my old account: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=226561;sa=summaryIn sept 19th,I posted the last sevral posts with the account and then banned by a Anonymous moderator, First ban? Does it say for how long? Sorry hualehua, you are banned from posting or sending personal messages on this forum. You have been banned by a forum moderator. You may appeal here: banappeals-w6pquw43@theymos.e4ward.com: banappeals-w6pquw43@theymos.e4ward.com ,but have no a single reply in the past month. And I wanted to ask for help from the moderators on this forum:"why I am banned permanent?" also have no reply Or no a definite reply. How did you try that? So, After a long waiting and thinking about this question,I decided to post on this forum for help!
I believe in Bitcoin,And I believe I was framed.
BTW,My native langueage is Chinese,and Not good at english!sorry for my poor grammar!
Best regards!
hualehua
I just scrolled over the last few pages of your posts and they are allmost all one liners, so the reason is most likely spam. In the end only the mod that banned you can tell you. |
|
|
|
-snip-
So I guess you can create any transaction you want without syncing.
Neat, I had a way more complicated way of testing in my head. -snip- Thanks!  I will try it and will give a feedback! I know electrum uses a dedicated server for syncing but do you know approx. time it will take(address was generated this year)? Electrum syncs very fast for me, but I only every used it for LTC and I usually have a stable and fast connection, so your results might be different  Any alternative way? Is there any possible way to create a unsigned raw tx without syncing? I tried brainwallet.github.io/#tx but it can only be used for signing/re-signing and if needed, pushing though it downloads unspent tx(s) using Blockchain.info API. Can I create a raw tx using *non-synced Bitcoin-qt* if I know unspent tx(s) using createrawtransaction [{"txid":txid,"vout":n],...] {address:amount,...} ? ~~MZ~~ You could probably write your own client or script to create a TX. hmmm I might try that... |
|
|
|
|
No, it cant be calculated unless you are sure you posted in every 14 day period. AFAIK there is also no place to check your "time" value. Just keep on posting.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
