Got this earlier this morning trying to connect to blockchain.info:
That is quite normal for Blockchain.info. They have been slow for a while now and these errors sometimes pop up. Nothing to worry about  |
|
|
|
Holy crap, everybody sell now or say goodbye to your life savings
 |
|
|
|
What if these pennies end up landing in people's paper wallets?
I read that multiple deposits to paper wallets could render them unusable.
I hope I am wrong. That is pure bullshit. Why would a paper wallet become unusable because of a dust transaction that will never be confirmed? Makes no sense to me. |
|
|
|
Yes, it is over.
Stop crying about the fact that you missed the low price boat. Do something productive instead of being annoying. Anyway, I agree with traderCJ. I hope that Mt.Gox dies and that stronger, better and more flexible exchanges pop up. |
|
|
|
Possible global shutdown? No.
I agree with this. I am getting sick of this bullshit. |
|
|
|
Does anyone know any alternatives for this game?  |
|
|
|
Electrum doesn't have this problem as far as I know. So simply export your private keys, import them into Electrum and viola!
when you import a private key, does it bring your addresses with it or are they only in the old wallet file? this is the main pain with just transferring to a new wallet... changing your address on the pools etc. If you import the private keys you have exported from BitcoinQT, you will have the same addresses as you had before. The only thing that changes is the wallet software you use to control it. |
|
|
|
|
Electrum doesn't have this problem as far as I know. So simply export your private keys, import them into Electrum and viola!
|
|
|
|
This has happened before and it has stopped before. Don't panic.
Are you sure it's nothing malicious or anything to worry about? Well, someone could keep track of the Bitcoins or try and figure out to whom that address belongs, but that's about it I guess. I wouldn't worry about it. |
|
|
|
|
This has happened before and it has stopped before. Don't panic.
|
|
|
|
|
No. Piss off. We don't need that shit in Bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
BTW: Is a transaction that doesn't not match the fee requirement also considered as a non standard tx? It's not as far as I know. |
|
|
|
Improved (formatted) display of small balances would be appreciated: "Account Balance: 8.05E-6 BTC"
printf('%.8f', $bitcoinamount);There you go Carlos function btc_output($x) {
$f = sprintf('%0.8F', $x);
$f = rtrim($f,'0');
$f = rtrim($f,'.');
return $f;
}
This is what I had, just forgot to use it Hahaha. Smart move dude  |
|
|
|
|
Yeah, no. I have seen that graph so many fucking times and all of them were sure it would happen. Newsflash: It didn't.
|
|
|
|
Ik wil nu wel coins van je kopen tegen de mtgox prijzen... Same, haha. Geef maar hier, verkoop ik het daarna weer met veel winst.  |
|
|
|
1 BTC = $600.07 USD (via Mt. Gox) Waarom gebruik je Mt. Gox terwijl je zelf berichten plaatst over hoe slecht het met ze gaat/hoe slecht ze zijn. Ik raad je aan om BitcoinAverage, waarbij je Mt.Gox niet meeneemt in de berekening van het gemiddelde ( https://api.bitcoinaverage.com/no-mtgox/ticker/USD/) |
|
|
|
Improved (formatted) display of small balances would be appreciated: "Account Balance: 8.05E-6 BTC"
printf('%.8f', $bitcoinamount);There you go Carlos |
|
|
|
I could make a spaceship if I wanted to, but I don't, so I won't. Sorry.
Spaceship != script, but if you want to play it that way, sure, go ahead. Um I already have a copy of every single address which has ever been used and it is continually kept up to date. So do you, so do over a hundred thousand other people on the planet.
Nice one. Very nice one. |
|
|
|
Getting addresses isn't hard at all. I could write a Bitcoin address scraper in a few minutes, if I wanted too.
Then write it, mister 'I can do everything'. I could if I wanted to, but I don't, so I won't. Sorry. Bitcoind will get angry at you if you parse invalid addresses, so angry, it'll just simply refuse to process any of them. True. You could resolve that by simply dumping the addresses (one by one) into the Blockexplorer / blockchain.info's address checker or write up your own script for it (which would bring us back to your point). Oh well. I would use regex to get the addresses from a page and check it afterwords which some other script. But you are right and I should change my statement. I could do something like that in a few hours, depending on how much I browse on YT during the creation progress |
|
|
|
Getting addresses isn't hard at all. I could write a Bitcoin address scraper in a few minutes, if I wanted too.
A few minutes? Base 58 would take me a few minutes to implement in of it's own. Regex my friend, regex. Regex doesn't check the parity of an address to verify it's valid, does it now? Nope, but I don't care about that nor did I say that it does that  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
