[P]ool management [G]PU management ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0: 33.0C 1287RPM | 0.000/ 0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.0/m I: 0
GPU 1: 32.0C 1298RPM | 0.000/ 0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.0/m I: 0
GPU 2: 41.0C 1598RPM | 0.000/ 0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.0/m I: 0
GPU 3: 33.0C 1604RPM | 0.000/ 0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.0/m I: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2014-12-10 20:42:45] Started cgminer 3.7.5
[2014-12-10 20:42:46] Probing for an alive pool
[2014-12-10 20:42:46] Network diff set to 0
[2014-12-10 20:42:50] Waiting for work from Pool 0
type in console getwork [P]ool management [G]PU management ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0: 59.0C 2017RPM | 36.61K/44.27Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.8/m I:-10
GPU 1: 65.0C 1950RPM | 36.42K/43.94Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.0/m I:-10
GPU 2: 50.0C 2034RPM | 36.41K/43.94Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.0/m I:-10
GPU 3: 59.0C 2101RPM | 36.41K/43.94Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:1 WU:0.0/m I:-10
GPU 4: 55.0C 2052RPM | 36.45K/43.94Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:1 WU:0.0/m I:-10
GPU 5: 60.0C 2129RPM | 36.61K/44.27Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.0/m I:-10
alway HW,what's wrong?
You can only run 1 gpu with the miner for now. Any other gpu's on the same rig or secondary rig will HW error. It is a known issue. Unless someone found a fix and hasn't said anything. So run 1 gpu (gpu 0) and use the others to mine something else until the fix for the miner is updated from the dev. EDIT: Also the correct number of blocks found and rejected does not show correctly on the miner either. Also known issue. thx,Really let me feel frustrated. Dev,plz don't release a buggy coin when it's not ready,okay? Just my opinion but I like the idea of only 1 gpu for now. It gives everyone a fair chance to mine some coins. Big farms can't come in and over take the coins. I feel this coin has some potential and we are all on the same level of playing field for now. Just pick your best card you have and try and mine. You'll get some blocks. Just give it time. |
|
|
|
[P]ool management [G]PU management ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0: 33.0C 1287RPM | 0.000/ 0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.0/m I: 0
GPU 1: 32.0C 1298RPM | 0.000/ 0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.0/m I: 0
GPU 2: 41.0C 1598RPM | 0.000/ 0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.0/m I: 0
GPU 3: 33.0C 1604RPM | 0.000/ 0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.0/m I: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2014-12-10 20:42:45] Started cgminer 3.7.5
[2014-12-10 20:42:46] Probing for an alive pool
[2014-12-10 20:42:46] Network diff set to 0
[2014-12-10 20:42:50] Waiting for work from Pool 0
type in console getwork [P]ool management [G]PU management ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0: 59.0C 2017RPM | 36.61K/44.27Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.8/m I:-10
GPU 1: 65.0C 1950RPM | 36.42K/43.94Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.0/m I:-10
GPU 2: 50.0C 2034RPM | 36.41K/43.94Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.0/m I:-10
GPU 3: 59.0C 2101RPM | 36.41K/43.94Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:1 WU:0.0/m I:-10
GPU 4: 55.0C 2052RPM | 36.45K/43.94Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:1 WU:0.0/m I:-10
GPU 5: 60.0C 2129RPM | 36.61K/44.27Kh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.0/m I:-10
alway HW,what's wrong?
You can only run 1 gpu with the miner for now. Any other gpu's on the same rig or secondary rig will HW error. It is a known issue. Unless someone found a fix and hasn't said anything. So run 1 gpu (gpu 0) and use the others to mine something else until the fix for the miner is updated from the dev. EDIT: Also the correct number of blocks found and rejected does not show correctly on the miner either. Also known issue. |
|
|
|
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
cgminer.exe --kryptohash -o 127.0.0.1:38912 -u user -p x --shaders 2560 --shaders-mul 8
i get only 41khs with my r9 290 hawai... ? any ideas why ?
updated my drivers to last version now gpu0 140khs gpu1 100 gpu2 100 gpu3 100 hw 1 gpu4 100 You'll probably have gpu 1,2,3 and 4 HW also. If not count yourself lucky. We all have only been able to get 1 gpu to mine. Dev is working on a fix for that. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the info guys.
Any clue how many coins have been mined so far?
That I can't answer. I am not connected with any wallet to the network for now. |
|
|
|
Is there any exchange we could buy some coins?  I'm waiting for win compile, so I can mine a bit. The exchange was Lazy Coin but not sure if I would trust it yet. Not sure if they have been keeping up with the wallet updates. |
|
|
|
Hi wr104, can you give me an ETA regarding the wallet .8 wallet update?
Hi Chris, I apologize for the delay. I'm still dealing with some issues with the Diff algo. I hope I can have it released within the next 2 - 3 hours. Do you have a compiled 0.3.7 for Windows in the meantime? |
|
|
|
Wallet version 0.3.8 for Windows and Linux will be available soon.
Waiting for 0.3.8 as I can not compile 0.3.7 |
|
|
|
Guys, I think I made a mistake and pushed the wrong binary.
I apologize. I've been working non-stop to get this Diff algorithm issue resolved and I ended up making another mistake.
It is nothing really bad but, we better have this sorted out in the Wallet before the next retarget.
So should we not be mining or should we? |
|
|
|
I'd say this is accurate. Somebody has to do it...  I guess to balance Vic out I'll have to be the compassionate one around here  . I don't speak much on these matters but it is refreshing that this happens. I know that this is a a challenge for all but some people old or new investors might be turned off by the tone in this thread. Speaking for myself, I know I am. Doesn't feel like the community that started off. With the old thread no locked and this one moderated doesn't feel like the voices are being heard like in the past. Everyone might not always agree but from the dev point you are the face and voice of this coin and the voice sounds like take it or leave it, this is my thing and I'll do it my way wether you like it or not. I'm not a big holder but I still hold. Been here since the beginning. |
|
|
|
Can you please tell me in layman terms what I have to do so I can start the wallet normally?
(like connect to others and start mining with my GPUs)
(I got how to start mining - I need the wallet instructions...)
As of right now you can only mine with 1 gpu. So when the new wallet is released pick your best card you have and use it. So one GPU per computer? Can I connect from two computers to the wallet? Is the one GPU temporary thing or is it by design? I have tried to connect 2 gpus on the same computer to one wallet and I have tried to connect multiple gpus from different computers to the same wallet. You will be wasting your time. They will connect but all you get are HW errors so they do not hash to the wallet. Probably more of a design flaw. It is a bug in the miner. The dev has said he will get that fixed once the wallet issues are taken care of. He has a second card arriving to him and then he will address that issue. You will be fine for now picking the best card you have until then. Keep up the faith with the coin and the dev. He has been there addressing any issues that has popped up. |
|
|
|
Can you please tell me in layman terms what I have to do so I can start the wallet normally?
(like connect to others and start mining with my GPUs)
(I got how to start mining - I need the wallet instructions...)
As of right now you can only mine with 1 gpu. So when the new wallet is released pick your best card you have and use it. |
|
|
|
Why marketcap so high? Does 1 group hold all the coins?
Actually, it's very low.  $50,000 is very low? Consider this scenario: Mr Spread commits to implementing Masternodes for Spread. Within a month or two there are 500 Masternodes requiring 1000 SPR to run, each costing $0.16/day to run and earning 8.64 SPR/day assuming a 50-50 block reward split between miners and MNs. At a SRP price of 0.001 BTC which would not be at all unreasonable should this happen, that's over $3/day profit per MN, and an annual return of over 300%. Remember, that's half a million SPR taken off the market. Just an example obviously, but you get the idea... Masternodes are both useful and profitable. There's a reason the price has risen significantly merely on the possibility that this will happen. A confirmed roadmap would see the price rise even more significantly. Remember, there are plenty of people who shy away from Darkcoin just because of the name, or because they think they have missed the boat, both of which are daft IMO but it is what it is. And there are even more people who shy away from PoW altogether because nobody in their right minds is going to trust a vulnerable handful of parasitic pool operators with the blockchain, and thus their money. The market cap of Spread could be $sixfigures pretty soon. If I had Mr Spread's skillset - well, you know what I'd be doing. Once again, well said. .001 is absolutely possible within a short time if masternodes are implemented. I can guarantee some Darkcoin holders also investing in Spreadcoin since they understand the monetary value of masternodes and have operating them down to an art. So you are suggesting that a Spreadnode if Mr. Spread decided to go that way would cost 1000 SpreadCoin to own one or have one or whatever you do with them? I'm really not too familiar with what these node thingys are? First, I would strongly suggest keeping them named Masternodes. I would also suggest that they require 1000 Spreadcoin to "operate". "Cost" 1000 Spreadcoin isn't a good way to put it, because you don't spend the 1000 SPR, you simply make them connected to the masternode. You can spend them anytime, but as soon as you do, the masternode becomes inactive. It's quite rare to see people disable/spend a masternode once it's setup, so what that means, is that for every masternode there is, 1000 coins are out of circulation. There are over 1300 Darkcoin masternodes which means 1,300,000 DRK are out of circulation! Truly amazing. Masternodes are decentralized, trustless mixers for the anonymous side of Darkcoin. BUT, they are also going to have additional functionality built on top of them. "InstantX" which allows for near-instant transactions instead of having to wait for coin confirmations is one such feature that is already being developed. They are an amazing technology. A technology that is highly profitable for anyone running one. It costs over $2,300 to setup a Darkcoin masternode at present. However, if Mr. Spread allows them for SPR, at present, it would cost less than $50.00 to setup The thing is, if what happens to SPR is anything like what happened to DRK when masternodes were implemented, that $50.00 to setup will quickly become a thing of the past. If you look back in the DRK thread, you can find me donating 1,000 DRK to someone. It's laughable now and I hope the same becomes true of SPR. MyFarm question for you. Does the miners have the ability to set up a Masternode? And if so at 1,000 Spread can a miner have more than one Masternode. I understand now that you just explained it. Anyone can setup a masternode if you have 1000 coins (or whatever rate a developer sets them at). A miner can just mine, a miner can mine AND have a masternode, and someone who doesn't mine can have a masternode. If you have 2000 coins, you can have two masternodes. If you have 10,000 coins, you can have 10 if you want. If you plan to hold onto a coin that allows masternodes, it makes a LOT of sense to setup a masternode since they're so profitable. Why not earn additional coins AND make the network more secure? Thanks. Will follow this more closely if the dev decides to add them. I was way to late too get into Dark but feel I am still in at the right time for Spread. |
|
|
|
Why marketcap so high? Does 1 group hold all the coins?
Actually, it's very low. $50,000 is very low? Consider this scenario: Mr Spread commits to implementing Masternodes for Spread. Within a month or two there are 500 Masternodes requiring 1000 SPR to run, each costing $0.16/day to run and earning 8.64 SPR/day assuming a 50-50 block reward split between miners and MNs. At a SRP price of 0.001 BTC which would not be at all unreasonable should this happen, that's over $3/day profit per MN, and an annual return of over 300%. Remember, that's half a million SPR taken off the market. Just an example obviously, but you get the idea... Masternodes are both useful and profitable. There's a reason the price has risen significantly merely on the possibility that this will happen. A confirmed roadmap would see the price rise even more significantly. Remember, there are plenty of people who shy away from Darkcoin just because of the name, or because they think they have missed the boat, both of which are daft IMO but it is what it is. And there are even more people who shy away from PoW altogether because nobody in their right minds is going to trust a vulnerable handful of parasitic pool operators with the blockchain, and thus their money. The market cap of Spread could be $sixfigures pretty soon. If I had Mr Spread's skillset - well, you know what I'd be doing. Once again, well said. .001 is absolutely possible within a short time if masternodes are implemented. I can guarantee some Darkcoin holders also investing in Spreadcoin since they understand the monetary value of masternodes and have operating them down to an art. So you are suggesting that a Spreadnode if Mr. Spread decided to go that way would cost 1000 SpreadCoin to own one or have one or whatever you do with them? I'm really not too familiar with what these node thingys are? First, I would strongly suggest keeping them named Masternodes. I would also suggest that they require 1000 Spreadcoin to "operate". "Cost" 1000 Spreadcoin isn't a good way to put it, because you don't spend the 1000 SPR, you simply make them connected to the masternode. You can spend them anytime, but as soon as you do, the masternode becomes inactive. It's quite rare to see people disable/spend a masternode once it's setup, so what that means, is that for every masternode there is, 1000 coins are out of circulation. There are over 1300 Darkcoin masternodes which means 1,300,000 DRK are out of circulation! Truly amazing. Masternodes are decentralized, trustless mixers for the anonymous side of Darkcoin. BUT, they are also going to have additional functionality built on top of them. "InstantX" which allows for near-instant transactions instead of having to wait for coin confirmations is one such feature that is already being developed. They are an amazing technology. A technology that is highly profitable for anyone running one. It costs over $2,300 to setup a Darkcoin masternode at present. However, if Mr. Spread allows them for SPR, at present, it would cost less than $50.00 to setup The thing is, if what happens to SPR is anything like what happened to DRK when masternodes were implemented, that $50.00 to setup will quickly become a thing of the past. If you look back in the DRK thread, you can find me donating 1,000 DRK to someone. It's laughable now and I hope the same becomes true of SPR. MyFarm question for you. Does the miners have the ability to set up a Masternode? And if so at 1,000 Spread can a miner have more than one Masternode. I understand now that you just explained it. |
|
|
|
Very beautiful logo , I'm late
Plenty of time. |
|
|
|
First article for now: http://cryptomining-blog.com/And I think the dev deserves every bit of the pre mine for his efforts. It actually is not that huge compared to what you can mine when everything is running smooth. Give him time he has been on this every step of the way. |
|
|
|
There seems to be another problem with the Diff algo.
I think I'm done with this algo. I'm going to dump it and replace it with something known to work
You mean the difficulty algo? Not the hashing algo, hopefully? |
|
|
|
Assuming that there won't be anymore unpleasant surprises with the Diff algo, I can now begin working on fixing cgminer-khc.
Have you looked at the sgminer since there have been more improvements to it? The latest sgminer 5.0.1 looks very interesting. I like the fact that VS2013 can be used which for me is a big plus since it is what I use for debugging. I'm going to check how hard it would be to add my KSHAKE320 PoW algo into sgminer. Awesome. I hope it saves you time and energy. |
|
|
|
Assuming that there won't be anymore unpleasant surprises with the Diff algo, I can now begin working on fixing cgminer-khc.
Have you looked at the sgminer since there have been more improvements to it? |
|
|
|
|
You have to ignore the read out in cgminer since this coin is coded different.
When you find one and it is accepted then it will show accepted in cgminer.
Been discussed a few pages back.
|
|
|
|
|
And we're off.
EDIT: Just found a block
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
