Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 10:22:52 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 ... 207 »
861  Other / Meta / Re: "LordCoder" Account hacked (again sadly) on: November 08, 2015, 03:53:53 AM
Sent proofs to Theymos this time.

How did you get this set? Is it already out, because I looked online and it said it doesn't come out until August???!!!!!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.msg12275284#msg12275284

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
My account LordCoder has been hacked/lost. Please reset the email to <no> The current date is 08-Nov-2015.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
15tLFBe8tJGpoJY6oMZd3yet4pctbh26po
IBHh/ccanRCYqOvzc6j5T5f4fpJbve0KE2zErR2dE3jJNaPGYX76aDs/zmmb0TSmhXLCyVxarKOajqZCqOCkFG4=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

DO NOT DEAL WITH HIM. REPORT OR DO WHATEVER.
please redact your email address from that post, that info should be for theymos/badbear's eyes only, assuming youve already pmed them.
862  Other / Meta / Re: Having trouble posting an IMG on: November 08, 2015, 03:20:54 AM
newbies are restricted from having their images displayed in their posts.
also, it goes like this:
Code:
[img]<img url>[/img]
after you get 30 activity and become a jr member, you will be able to have your images displayed.
863  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: BitcoinStriker [Hero Member] == Tymer [Member, Scammer] (== HueSinger [Newbie]) on: November 08, 2015, 12:11:58 AM
I provided all the proof I have
you didnt really provide any sort of "proof" though Undecided
864  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: BitcoinStriker [Hero Member] == Tymer [Member, Scammer] (== HueSinger [Newbie]) on: November 07, 2015, 11:03:03 PM
My friend joined bitcoin world with me in 2013, we were both kiddys and we were curious, we played minecraft for a long time, he had got 3 accounts for us.
My friend is indeed another username who he created after his accounts Tymer, HueSinger and another one were called of scam. When this happened I started to use my own wallet and accounts, etc...
I have no affiliation to those Tymer or HueSinger accounts.
"gay" in between, etc...

PS: No immature posts here please.

"it was my friend's address."
"i used my 'friend's' private keys instead of using my own like a sensible person would."
"i have no affiliation with the person i just called my friend."
"i say "the address with gay in it" instead of referring to the 1EbEE... address, but i want everyone to be mature about this"

sounds like youre using the classic 12 year old excuse of "it's a friend's" seeing you got found out, and youre just starting to troll at this point. 2/10 for effort.
865  Other / Archival / Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns on: November 07, 2015, 07:35:36 PM
update for crypto-games.net
Code:
[tr]
[td][i][color=green]A[/color][/i][/td][td]|[/td]
[td][url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082477.0]Crypto-Games.net[/url][/td][td]|[/td]
[td]post/weekly[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.0013[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.0012[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.001[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.00075[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.00035[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]x[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]x[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]20/w[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]75/w[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]N[/td][td]|[/td]
[/tr]

only accepting 1 spot for hero and legendary members: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082477.0
also accepting 1 staff member for a special rate it seems.
866  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Campaings already cutting rates on: November 07, 2015, 06:47:59 PM
actually what hurts is greedy users who feel obligated to post trash post in order to gain as much BTC as possible. Another thing that hurts is users apparently like you who join a campaign and complain when rates are reduced but in reality they're still earning the same dollar value as before. They're just pissed cause in their minds they could have earned more.
what these entitled shits dont realize is theyre getting paid, thats right, youre getting money, for typing your thoughts garbage spam on a forum. there arent very many other places where you get paid for typing random shit, with no work experience, and you dont even have to know what the hell youre talking about. just like possum577 up there.

At the end of the day anyone who is accepted into a campaign is getting a privilege. They shouldn't expect any site owner to bow down and kiss their asses. Owners allot a certain amount of money towards advertising. Whether they look at it in fiat or btc value doesn't matter. They have the right to change rates for the good or the bad at anytime. They're just looking at trying to spend the same amount of money per week/ month period.
one of the big problems is, these people expect to be accepted into a sig campaign, as if this forum's purpose in existing is to allow sig campaigns to exist and pay out any user that comes along. its pretty clear these people who seem to be offended by the rates dropping have no sense of how the real world world; advertising is essentially paying for public exposure of your business / site. there is absolutely no reason to overpay for something, which im pretty sure these cheap ass spammers would never do, considering they nitpick over every single post to get them counted towards their pay. in addition, in the case of the ore mine campaign's  status, there is zero money to throw money into advertising when that advertising is essentially netting you little to no traffic; its a money sink for the owners. im pretty sure these spammers wouldnt like throwing their sig campaign payouts into a dice site and losing every single time in 1 roll for whatever reason. but yet they expect the campaign runners to do the same.

Now if ya wanna get really crucial and have something to bitch about why don't ya go look at the ppl of bit-x secondstrade yobit and other spampaigns and and report 90% of the posts they make. They're shitposting idiots that deserve 0pay in most cases but managers use bots(not even doing their jobs) and allow these guys to be paid
i think hes more or less spamming under the guise of pretending to care about the spamming problem. its fairly apparent to me from his recent posts that hes just posting barely on topic studd separated into as many posts as possible to just increase his post count for the bot.
867  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Do you think signature Campaigns will still continue when btc goes $800 ? on: November 07, 2015, 07:13:21 AM
Do you think signature Campaigns will still continue when btc goes  $800 ? Will the Campaigns runner will offer low price than now ?

I don't think the fiat conversion matters. All the companies that have signature campaigns deal ONLY in bitcoin. They require bitcoin be used to pay for their services and they pay signature campaign participants in bitcoin. The fiat price doesn't matter!
funny you say that, because the company youre advertising for, bit-x, is an exchange that, wait for it, not only deals with bitcoin, but fiat too. you know, because theyre an exchange. holy shit. ground breaking discovery. call the fucking news.
do feel free to take more than 3 seconds to think up of a reply before spamming next time. bitcoin doesnt rule the world right now, and weather you or these businesses like it or not, fiat currency will play a factor and impact their decision making.

now lets take a good look at that sig for the people that are incapable of reading:
holy
fucking
shit
it has dollars, euros, and british pounds. theyre *gasp* not bitcoin. who wouldve guessed.

The biggest thing that will ruin signature campaigns is if users exploit the privilege and post bullshit, non-constructive posts. Let's keep the posts of a high quality - loose lips sink sigs!
bullshit
868  Other / Meta / Re: MOD, PLEASE UNBAN BY OLD ACCOUNT on: November 07, 2015, 01:11:48 AM
Just a suggestion, you probably shouldn't continue to try and use this account as per normal without confirmation from the staff. As previously stated, it may be counted as Ban Evasion and may hinder progress on getting your account back significantly.
While your ban does seem to be a special circumstance, it's still better to be safe than sorry.
The "JonnySmithers" account or this account?
any and all accounts that you control. a ban on this forum isnt a ban on that specific account, but more or less a ban against the person.
869  Other / Meta / Re: The Discourse Paradox on: November 06, 2015, 10:24:03 PM
Personally, I think that if you make x amount of <y word posts in z amount of hours, you should be temporarily unable to make posts of less than y words until the next cycle (when z amount of hours ends). x, y and z are all up to debate, I'm not looking to give suggestions there. Whether that can be implemented now as a cooldown,
i like this idea a lot better; disallowing users to make posts that are below a certain word count, i feel, would be a tad too limiting on their ability to type out their thoughts on whatever discussion may be taking place. instead, i feel that adjusting the time required between posts (360 seconds for newbies by default, decreases as activity is accrued) based on the word counts of a user's recent post  history (not counting words included within quote brackets) might be an effective tool against spam. that value, if it were editable to an extent by moderators, could also effectively serve as a warning against people who are getting close to a ban as well.
870  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: imminent launching of ANONINVEST Sig/marketing campaign .125 WEEKLY newbie ACPT on: November 06, 2015, 09:28:18 PM
so as it stands i havent even had one person verbally commit to this campaign, i've got major issues with running a signature campaign as i believe its just uneducated people regurgitating pure rubbish and bullshit on topics and issues they know nothing about to increase post counts  so thats why a generic signature campaign is out
then why not manage or hire someone to manage the campaign to uphold the quality of posts to an extremely high standard? verviloman's campaigns are spam-free because of his quality management and post quality checks.

if I dont see genuine interest in this campaign within the next couple of days i'll just kill it off and work with mainstream freelancers
theres interest in an agreement to get paid for an activity, ie posting. what there isnt much of is interest in marketing something with a negative stigma attached to it (the word investment in the bitcoin world has a ponzi stigma associated with it), especially more so when its a contest in which they might not even get paid; payment not guaranteed for work.
871  Other / Meta / Re: New Way to cut down Sig Spam on: November 06, 2015, 06:54:55 PM
It's not a good idea. It will easily be abused by people trying to censor others. Doesn't it already happen on reddit? If a post is bad or spam report it. You're basically giving regular users the ability to moderate the forum which is never a good idea.

It doesn't really happen on reddit, i have been browsing reddit for years and the downvotes are usually right and even if they are not it takes a lot of downvotes to hide someone's comment and even after that you can still show the comment anyways, it's not like it gets deleted.

There is an ignore button already, but a reddit system is IMHO not suitable for a discussion(!) board. It removes unpopular opinions. Yes I can do the extra click and read it, but over time most - me included - will just ignore it. I dont like the idea of a hive mind deciding what is worth to be seen and what not. I rare use the ignore function for the every same reason. I can spot a post not worth reading after I read the first (half-) sentence, but that user might have an interesting post from time to time.
it wouldnt be just unpopular opinions, it might extend to the opinions that dont agree with any single member of the forum that is willing to go far enough to make sure that train of thought is silenced. account trading here is more or less allowed here on the forum; whats going to stop a single person from buying up dozens of sock puppet accounts just so they can control the way speech works in the forum if such a system were to be implemented? it'd be a lot worse than the reddit hivemind imo.

Make that a post needs -100 votes to get hidden and only high ranks accounts, do you really think someone would buy 100 accounts or more if the other post has positive just to make it hidden because he doesnt like his opinion, come on now your arguments are really the worst shit I have ever read.
given that this forum is a pretty central place to discuss all things bitcoin related, you really think theres not a sliver of a chance that people might be willing to drop a few thousand doollars to control free speech on here? come back when you can make a solid argument instead of just lashing out.
872  Economy / Services / Re: ❃❃ ▶▷ BETCOIN.ag ◁◀ ❃❃ #1 BTC Casino, Sportsbook, Poker - SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN on: November 06, 2015, 06:19:13 PM
I dont think anyone on this forum that joins these campaigns grasps the concept of money at all. If the price of something more than doubles then of course a campaign is going to lower rates or try to keep themselves from spending a million dollars a month. Its not like the owners of a site nor the campaign manager predicted the prices would rise. So its well within their rights to change the payscale.
i saw a lot of similar sentiments in the ore-mine sig campaign thread; lots of entitled children thinking the advertisers owed them a continuing campaign or something when it was clearly stated that the campaign wasnt having the desired effects, and therefore was just a money sink for the time being. people here for whatever reason think that a sig campaign is some sort of contracted job that changes to their will or something; its just something to leave on and get paid a little extra for posting. its not something that should be your sole reason for being here.

Act like adults here. Do we as managers need to add disclaimers to the campaigns saying rates are subject to change at anytime just for protection? Personally if a campaign changes rates(which we did ourselves on MD campaign) as long as they honor previous posts til the rate change with previous rate then noone should really complain.
if they can't handle how the real world works that's fine. let them live in their bubble. the people that pay out for these campaigns are running a business, not a fucking charity. if their advertising campaigns equate to throwing money out the window, they dont have any reason for continuing that advertising. these people are already getting paid to shitpost already ffs why are these fucks demanding more

Thats not how alot of you ppl view it though. Theres a ton of greedy users on here just waiting for reasons to complain. Half of you are lucky we accept you into a campaign TBH
a lot more than half. if i were in your position running the magicaldice campaign i would already have cut a fair number of people for spam. i see people who even reply to their own posts that they made in the same thread. top quality displays of stupidity.
873  Other / Meta / Re: New Way to cut down Sig Spam on: November 06, 2015, 06:09:58 PM
It's not a good idea. It will easily be abused by people trying to censor others. Doesn't it already happen on reddit? If a post is bad or spam report it. You're basically giving regular users the ability to moderate the forum which is never a good idea.

It doesn't really happen on reddit, i have been browsing reddit for years and the downvotes are usually right and even if they are not it takes a lot of downvotes to hide someone's comment and even after that you can still show the comment anyways, it's not like it gets deleted.

There is an ignore button already, but a reddit system is IMHO not suitable for a discussion(!) board. It removes unpopular opinions. Yes I can do the extra click and read it, but over time most - me included - will just ignore it. I dont like the idea of a hive mind deciding what is worth to be seen and what not. I rare use the ignore function for the every same reason. I can spot a post not worth reading after I read the first (half-) sentence, but that user might have an interesting post from time to time.
it wouldnt be just unpopular opinions, it might extend to the opinions that dont agree with any single member of the forum that is willing to go far enough to make sure that train of thought is silenced. account trading here is more or less allowed here on the forum; whats going to stop a single person from buying up dozens of sock puppet accounts just so they can control the way speech works in the forum if such a system were to be implemented? it'd be a lot worse than the reddit hivemind imo.
874  Other / Archival / Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns on: November 06, 2015, 08:56:52 AM
this campaign thing came up in the services section: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1238316.0
aside from the fact that this is really sketchy (anonymous "investment" accounts), this looks more or less to be an ad for a marketing campaign in the sense that op seems to be looking for active advertisers, rather than a traditional sig ad campaign (pay for posting).
build a team of graphic designers ,copywriters and internet marketers tell the world about
figured it would come up here eventually, thoughts on this? i personally think it shouldnt be included in the op.
875  Other / Archival / Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns on: November 05, 2015, 10:24:42 PM
small change to betcoin.ag's  campaign, post limits have been changed to 100 max, 30 min. everything else is the same.

Code:
[tr]
[td][i][color=orange]PNYC[/color][/i][/td][td]|[/td]
[td][url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1236667.0]betcoin.ag[/url][/td][td]|[/td]
[td]post/monthly[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.00135[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.0012[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.001[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.0006[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]x[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]x[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]x[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]30/m[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]100/m[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]N[/td][td]|[/td]
[/tr]
876  Economy / Services / Re: ❃❃ ▶▷ Betcoin.ag ◁◀ ❃❃ #1 BTC Casino, Sportsbook, Poker - SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN on: November 05, 2015, 07:32:31 PM


Dude, I already said that i am not seeing anything in all 4 depth and i see 1 +ve at depth 3. I asked you to PM me the scr shots because I literally cannot see any negative. Thank you.
Have a look at your untrusted feedback.

There's a reason it's called "untrusted feedback." In most cases it should not be taken seriously. Just read the description and check out who gave the -ive.
People tend to do "revenge rep" a lot, especially when you call out trolls and scammers.
that aside, his posts are generally of low quality imo. wouldnt have accepted him if i were in roslinpl's position.
877  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Young Americans shifting US towards becoming less religious nation on: November 05, 2015, 07:24:37 PM
It is simply that no evidence of a God exists.

Actually, research indicates the opposite.

A large scientific study determined that veridical perception during brain-death is a scientific fact. Consciousness and awareness appeared to occur during a three-minute period when there was no heartbeat. This is paradoxical, since the brain typically ceases functioning within 20-30 seconds of the heart stopping and doesn’t resume again until the heart has been restarted. Furthermore, the detailed recollections of visual awareness in this case were consistent with verified events.

Press release:
http://www.southampton.ac.uk/news/2014/10/07-worlds-largest-near-death-experiences-study.page#.VDa5LhaOqSo.

Perhaps atheists like YOU are simply refusing to acknowledge the scientific evidence for what it is?? This is not the first time that I have presented this evidence to you, RodeoX.

Scientific evidence supporting near-death experiences and the afterlife:
http://www.near-death.com/science/evidence.html
The phenomena of low oxygen hallucination is well known and happens to people of all faiths and no faith.  As the brain dies our perception of reality is, of course, skewed and perverted. There is nothing in this observation that is inconsistent with that process. I just don't see where the God part comes in. The first link does not mention anything about religion or an afterlife, it is about near death hallucinations.
It's just not evidence of God of any kind. Where is this God/afterlife part?
As I mentioned in my other posts in this thread, the "dying brain" and "illusory hallucination" theories are not scientific. The brain needs oxygen to create hallucinations; someone who lacks a gag reflex due to cardiac arrest will not be able to form memories, that is why NDE in the AWARE study cannot be explained by brain chemistry alone.
please do feel free to rationally explain just why those theories are not scientific. right here, all youre doing is stating a few vaguely, possibly related statements. exactly what does a gag reflex have to do with the recording/creation of new memories here? memory is controlled primarily by the hippocampus.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-near-death-experience-isnt-proof-heaven/

Quote
In an article in the Atlantic last December, Sacks explains that the reason hallucinations seem so real “is that they deploy the very same systems in the brain that actual perceptions do. When one hallucinates voices, the auditory pathways are activated; when one hallucinates a face, the fusiform face area, normally used to perceive and identify faces in the environment, is stimulated.” Sacks concludes that “the one most plausible hypothesis in Dr. Alexander's case, then, is that his NDE occurred not during his coma, but as he was surfacing from the coma and his cortex was returning to full function. It is curious that he does not allow this obvious and natural explanation, but instead insists on a supernatural one.”
878  Economy / Services / Re: Ore-Mine.org - Signature campaign - Earn 0.08 BTC for two weeks on: November 05, 2015, 07:19:04 PM

The campaign will be paused after next payment. It does not have needed advertising effect.
After 2-3 months we will try to continue our campaign and see, if it will going better.

There is your answer ladies and gentlemen. Let's respect the decision of the campaign owners as they are the one hugely hit by this increase of BTC rate.

Hugely hit by what ?! For one - it's possible that they reserved funds before the price rose, and for two - They are not affected by anything until the payout date comes.
Because by then the price could be 200 $ for all we know.
If the campaign is closing, fine, it's their choice and everyone should respect their decision, but please don't make martyrs out of them, because the're not.
people here are entitled as fuck; theres no reason for thhem to keep running the campaign if their advertising isnt attracting more traffic to their site; ie theyre wasting money as it is right now. here you have the spamposters saying "hey no i want your money you have to stay now." appalling how entitled as stupid people on this forum can be.
Hugely hit by what ?! For one - it's possible that they reserved funds before the price rose, and for two - They are not affected by anything until the payout date comes.
Because by then the price could be 200 $ for all we know.
If the campaign is closing, fine, it's their choice and everyone should respect their decision, but please don't make martyrs out of them, because the're not.
its a sensible business decision. also, dont think 'martyr' is the word you want to use there.
879  Other / Politics & Society / Re: NUCLEAR IS GREENEST TECHNOLOGY CLAIM 65 TOP BIOLOGISTS on: November 05, 2015, 07:04:07 PM
This isn't news. It's been widely known for decades that nuclear energy is very, very green. The problem with nuclear energy is not the exhaust or output, it's with the damage that could be caused if the nuclear reactor leaks (like what happened in Japan a few years back.)

If the nuclear reactor leaks it makes the area surrounding the plant toxic...that's why this source of energy isn't used as widely as it could.

I agree that nuclear plants are not 100.0000% safe. Once in a decade or two, an accident can occur (such as Fukushima) and there is a chance of human casualties occurring as a result of it. But what about the other forms of energy? Every year hundreds of thousands of people die as a result of the atmospheric pollution caused by the coal-fired thermal power plants. And for comparison, how many people have lost their lives in nuclear accidents during the past 20 years?
people in general fail to look at the bigger picture, and are instead only look at the big events related to an idea that is the determining factor for their opinion on their matter. a nice comparison: how many people doe from smoking every year? a quick google search shows its in the millions, annually. so why arent we paying more attention to that? because nothing "big" happens from smoking. theres no explosions, gunshots, whatever. just cancer. compare that to a hypothetical airplane that had an engine malfunction and crashed, resulting in the flashy death of maybe 100 people. suddenly, x manufacturer of those engines are literally the harbinger of death on earth.
880  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Young Americans shifting US towards becoming less religious nation on: November 05, 2015, 03:55:06 PM
Prepare for religious violence. The less religious people in general become, the more fanatical the religious people become.

Really if you look at Islam in particular it's already happening, any time people start openly trying to criticise them they go ballistic, Christians are more used to it but there are definitely groups out there that are already enraged at the thought of somebody daring to question their religion.
or any of their ideas / philosophies / beliefs for the matter. its not just religious people that are getting fanatical, (getting slightly off topic) people of all sorts have been just acting up lately, just look at tumblr and SJW's for a moment. lots (and i mean lots) of similarities in how those fatasses act /react to criticism of their ideas and how ISIS or any other fanatical religious nutjob group would react to similar criticisms of their beliefs. its a worldwide trend at the moment imo. also, theyre all huge hypocrites too.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 ... 207 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!