|
I simply use this guideline:
if a user sends me a message once for this reason I ignore him, I do not think it's right to tag him for a request for a point in a moment of "despair", if instead, the person turns out to be has a constant behavior I report him asking for a DT tag.
|
|
|
|
~ I estimate a 2 digit percentage of this to be Merit abuse. But those came from the 600k sMerit airdrop. If you find a Merit source making very bad choices, he may be removed as a source once reported. Back on days when I was looking at a weekly transaction (around May) the estimate amount of merit abused was around 30%, considering the merit sold, bought and exchanged. I can also assume now the merit abused is lower than May, I think a 10% is the optimistic value. |
|
|
|
Thread has been deleted, I was just going to report for promoting referral link but thread is disappear. That means post has been reported by someone and it has got delete.
The user has been nuked, I've tagged him but now I guess it doesn't matter. https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=LIMA001Here we can see  Closing the thread. |
|
|
|
It just is what it is. If I was just out to get merits I'd make tons and tons of posts that most sources would agree with, but I don't because I don't care that much to not just chill and be me.
That is, a good merit source, in my opinion, should merit a post even if he don't agree with, acknowledging the effort from users. For the rest I agree on the most are you saying here, some posts are over merited for no reason and others are under merited only because you are not on the "good poster" for the source. We maybe also talk about the reduction of required merit for legendary rank since if someone is lucky to hit legendary around 750-800 activity why he should wait till 1k merit? Maybe having a rank that require merit=activity after hero rank is the way to go. And for last point, some legendary accounts really don't deserve their rank, they shit spam on the forum while other people with lower rank post better than them and they are still stucked on lowers ranks. |
|
|
|
People would be able to make 0 posts in a week and 100 posts in the following week and receive 2 full weeks of payment instead of one  Doesn't look like spam if someone is posting 100 posts only to get paid for the bounty? To me is "clever" way to spam in my opinion, but whatever. |
|
|
|
|
Btctalk name ✅ coinlocket$
Rank ✅ Sr. Member
BTC Wallet Address ✅ 12XUa8iczkvz2mdu4yBRDDeUB9nBfGFBaj
Wear Appropriate Signature ✅ If accepted
Wear Personal Text: Make winning bets on sports with Sportsbet.io! ✅ If accepted
Wear Avatar: ✅ If accepted
|
|
|
|
I'm surprised you didn't react when I posted them on your thread I've reported over 500 accounts so far, hard to remember everything  |
|
|
|
Almost 1 year later Better than nothing I guess. |
|
|
|
|
So now that one of his accounts his banned, he can't post with other accounts?
Is this ban evasion?
|
|
|
|
|
Till we have some restrictions, you can do nothing except to report to mods.
|
|
|
|
It’s amazing just how lazy people can be. I mean those plagiarized posts could be freshly created from the top of the head in under a minute (ok, two tops), but why think if you can simply copy the content from somewhere else
Easy answer, often they have dozens of accounts to join more signatures possible. Copy paste is the faster way. |
|
|
|
Most likely a scam  |
|
|
|
|
I think it will be more effective if we can have a % value.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
