Data as of 01/05/2020Updated the lists in the OP (and subsequent post) to reflect the forum members that still qualify in each of those lists. Currently, on those lists there are, lacking <= 20% merits to rank-up (activity may not be met though): - 44 Heroes (on their way to Legendries) - 40 Sr. Members (on their way to Heroes) - 43 Full Members (on their way to Sr. Members) - 37 Members (on their way to Full Members) - 202 Jr. Members on their way to Members) Added this week (10): user_id name Status posts activity activity_Met merit rank ProbableInitialRank trust url
1925869 Tytanowy Janusz Active 1883 728 N 802 Hero Member Old Era Newbie =+1 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1925869
1073690 andy_pelevin Active 1286 980 Y 209 Full Member Full Member =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1073690
2772969 blue Snow Active 134 70 N 93 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2772969
2423580 CristianOff Active 420 420 Y 85 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2423580
2709246 BIT-BENDER Active 181 126 Y 81 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =1 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2709246
1755161 Seph213 Active 37 37 N 9 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1755161
2689982 vachevskij Active 154 154 Y 8 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2689982
2556617 derBowler Active 136 136 Y 8 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2556617
2675975 Neoterix Active 41 41 N 8 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2675975
1416455 MikeJ_NpC Active 32 32 N 8 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1416455
(*) this week (9): user_id name Status posts activity activity_Met merit rank ProbableInitialRank trust url
1164368 GreatArkansas Active 2760 840 Y* 1000 Hero Member Full Member =+3 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1164368
1289002 Maus0728 Active 574 532 N 502 Hero Member Member =+1 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1289002
1024933 RaltcoinsB Active 1342 658 Y 254 Sr. Member Full Member =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1024933
1573369 casperBGD Active 1010 742 Y 102 Full Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1573369
2505788 ChefImGartenPavillion Active 401 401 Y 100 Full Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2505788
2756407 Captainowl Active 227 98 N 101 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2756407
1937811 Aircryptico Active 83 83 N 18 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1937811
1456131 sergw Active 148 148 Y 10 Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1456131
2383571 Lavrentiic Active 30 30 N 10 Jr. Member New Era Newbie =+0 / =0 / -0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2383571
(*) Due to enough merits for the next rank, or being banned.
|
|
|
|
Update 01/05/2020:The dashboard gives you access to anyone’s complete merit history in the TX tab, surpassing the 120 day limit. Link: BitcoinTalk Merit Dashboard. Updated the Merit Dashboard to reflect the most recent sMerit available data: Total sMerit: 655.978 Total Txs: 342.659 From Users: 22.029 To Users: 33.918 minDate: 2018-01-24 22:12:21 maxDate: 2020-05-01 02:51:51 Aggregate awarded sMerit for the last complete week (20/04/2020 .. 26/04/2020) is 4.744 which is down 8,80% from the previous week. In addition, there are 1 more Legendary and 1 more Hero members this week: Veleor -> Legendary from Full Member during Merit System kick-off. Maus0728 -> Hero from Member during Merit System kick-off. Note: Copper Members and non-native ranks (staff, etc) are displayed as real (regular) ranks.
|
|
|
|
<…>
The OP kind of reminds me of one of those HR questions that nobody answers with sincerity, although on a professional ground it is easier to envision one’s hopes for himself five years down the road (at least, at certaing ages, whilst one is still hungry for climbing the ropes, and before finding that it’s pretty much more like a game of snakes and ladders). In the crypto context, I figure that, for the most, it is a lateral hobby and not a main driver in live (with obvious exceptions), and as such, setting roadmaps to obtain knowledge (as opposed to a financial gain) is pretty much far from what the average Joe will do. It’s likely more of an exploratory ground, where one will go at his own pace and time, bearing to the fact that live goes on and, as such, will command the main thrive and needs, leaving leisure to be what it is, with no real need for goals and roadmaps. In retrospect, going back 2,5 years (to become a virtual Newbie), I recall hearing the buzz and fuzz on the media, and exploring (a very small portion of) just what all this was about. No compass to wade the uncharted muddy waters. No plans (some halfwit hopes though). |
|
|
|
Quizás, en el apartado de aspectos del foro, hablaría algo acerca de las reglas no escritas del foro, comprendidas en parte por el segundo nivel de vigilancia (implementado a través del Sistema de Confianza), y las reglas del fairplay (relativo a la tenencia de múltiples cuentas, el meritaje entre ellas, el comprar/crear cuentas y usarlas tras ser baneado en el foro, etc.). |
|
|
|
|
De alguna manera, el patrón se ha ido repitiendo, pero quizás la perspectiva es muy alta. Repetir un salto porcentual en el tiempo, como ha sucedido en los halvings pasados es más factible a valores absolutos de valor comedidos. El salto que ahora va dibujándose en los distintos charts juegan con saltos porcentual similares, pero con valores absolutos del 100K hacia arriba por unidad de BTC. Digamos que ahora, adicionalmente hay que franquear una barrera mental, que supone pasar de pensar de BTCs como unidades enteras a SATs como fracción. Para el inversor puro y duro probablemente sea irrelevante, pero para los nuevos entrantes quizás tenga un cierto peso.
Adicionalmente, la cobertura mediática del ATH y el posterior descalabro de precio está más en la retina de la gente, siendo un factor que puede tener mayor peso que en ocasiones anteriores de cara a la integración de nuevos inversores que empujen las cifras del valor del BTC a los niveles proyectados.
We'll see ...
|
|
|
|
<…>
Merit Sources are not confined to a specific board, so any board may be merited as a result of their forum surfing interests/habits. Local boards are pretty heterogeneous: - A few have a large amount of awarded sMerits, but also many posters. - Others have a reasonable amount of sMerits for the amount of posters, and the better posters are normally spotted there. - About half of the local boards are pretty inactive, and lack a Merit Source acting there. Normally if a board (any) is considered undermerited, the best way to draw attention to it would be to report some details specifics in a thread (such as this one). By specifics I mean something in the line of: a) Providing some numbers on the number of posts (quantitative). b) Providing some numbers on the number of merits awarded there (quantitative). c) Providing a "lengthly" list of posts that are unmerited/undermerited there (subjective quality). The former two can be derived in multiple ways (for example using the Merit Dashboard). The latter requires more time to compile, but with the above you can make a concrete case that draws attention to the situation with specifics. |
|
|
|
They are not illegal, but you also have to make sure that the one you are interested in is legit. After all, they are going to trade on your behalf and use an exchange API to access your account, so you need to assess pretty well the reputation of the trading bot, and consider just how much you are willing to let it manage (that is to say, the amount you can expose). It would be nice if others with hands-on experience could bear their testimony here. Unfortunately, I am not in that situation, but a couple of years ago I did take some time to look into them. Bearing no relation to it whatsoever, and without intending to vouch for it, I did find it interesting to read through a thread here on the forum at the time: [GUNBOT] Trading Bot with 136 exchanges available. Even if you are not interested in that particular software, reading through the thread and the wiki is pretty interesting, and let’s you get a view on what this sort of software can do (you’ll also need to figure out what it can’t and the associated risks). Just don’t assume that it’s plug and play, click, and get rich. The algoritms need to be selected and parametrized according to your needs, and sudden market sways may not be played well if parameters are not thought through. |
|
|
|
<…>
El Ledger Nano S no viene con ninguna de fábrica, sino que la genera aleatoriamente en el momento de inicializar el dispositivo por primera vez (o las veces sucesivas que lo resetees). Por tanto, cada reseteo genera una nueva. Una consideración adicional: Es muy importante poner a buen recaudo el mnemotécnico de 24 palabras. Hay gente que lo deja "a mano", lo que diezmada mucho la gracia del dispositivo en sí (con la tarjeta cumplimentada, cualquiera puede crear una wallet y mover los fondos). |
|
|
|
|
I think I’ve only been hit one or twice trying to ask for merits in a subtle way (as opposed to being direct). Obviously I read through and ignored these messages, but these sort of actions will likely have the opposite effect, and get the person added to an ignore list (or even reported for unsolicited PMs, although a single stray non-batched message may not qualify as spam).
Ignoring messages from Newbies probably goes a long way in reducing messages of the kind (although it does not apply to Newbie Copper Members, who can bypass this setting).
On the whole, anyone who PMs(*) others asking for merits is not really going to make it that far up the ranking ladder.
(*)Some exceptions may apply (i.e. some people may ask to be PMd by someone, in order to be reminded of a sort of merit commited"debt").
|
|
|
|
<…>
Revisa bien el envoltorio y compara con fotos del producto en su caja para tener un primer punto de contraste. Lo habitual en todo caso es que, de estar manipulado el dispositivo, sea con el truco de la frase mnemotécnica ya escrita. Dispositivos físicamente manipulados es algo muy residual, y más bien experimental que no algo que encontremos en la práctica. Sigue los pasos indicados en los links del post anterior y no debe haber problema alguno (entendiendo que no lo estás usando ya, y que por tanto no estás protegiendo tus activos con el mismo en estos momentos). |
|
|
|
<…>
Date_l seems to be wrong, as it is not indicating the campaign exit date (or last Friday’s date/ or null), but rather a week after date_f (campaign participant aprox. first date). Additionally, the format in the spaced code is difficult to work with. Ideally a simple csv with the data would go a long way (or google spread sheet or single space between columns in a code block). Edit: <…>
Without the proper participation end date per profile, Im' afraid we can’t really derive a consistent set of information to compare the before/during/after merit intervals. If at some point you still want to pursue this data, I’ll need the real end date. |
|
|
|
Veremos no obstante cómo va todo en los próximos meses. Sin que sea específico de derivados, sí que puede causar un impacto si las noticias como la siguiente se cristalizan: El coronavirus arrasa el paraíso suizo de las criptomonedas: este es su plan de rescate. En él cita que el 90% de las empresas de la criptoindustria cree que irán a la bancarrota este año si no se les injecta ayudas (el artículo se focaliza en las ubicadas en Zug – Suiza). Es un factora a ponderar a la hora de invertir (y dónde) … |
|
|
|
<…> For the retrospective stats (as you requested), I guess DdmrDdmr can help. It is a complicated request.  I’m a bit short of time now, but if you provide me with a list of participants, I can do it pretty easily. I would need something like: [AccountDateRegistered], [userId] and/or [username] , CMJoinDate, CMEndDate
CMJoinDate would be the date when the participant joined the campaign. CMEndDate would be the date when the participant exited the campaign (or blank). Of course, that would only lead to the display of (Merit) numbers for the periods before/during/after (when applicable), but for comparison reasons, we’d need to compare to something like posts or days (/week/month). Posts is not easy to derive for the three potential periods of time (before/during/after), so the next best would be days (or a cumulative time period). For that, we’d also need the [Date Registered dd/mm/yyyy] field. The above would allow for the derivation of merit/day(or week or month) for all participants, before, during and after joining the campaign (when applicable). <...>
Ok, my offer still stands for whenever (subject to getting a list as described above). |
|
|
|
It’s been on the table to discuss a couple of times. Last I recall was on this thread: Most time online list, is it a bug? . To me it looked like bot accounts that are active 24/7 (using multiple simultaneous access). |
|
|
|
<…> 2. One of the downsides of crypto is that a corrupt politician can loot money and transfer the money to his bitcoin wallet and it'll become anonymous. So, it can be employed for money laundering without trace.
It’s not that simple, and he’d still need to know pretty well the ropes to be sure that it could not, at any point, be linked back to it. Even so, millions and millions worth have been stolen and moved around by corrupt governors so far, without leaving a trace, through fiat and gold, using diplotatic bags or whatnot, so it’s not like a (traceable and semi-anonymous) blockchain based solution would necessarily deem a better solution for them. |
|
|
|
<...>But what with an iPhone? I don't use it but I think that people who have an iPhone can't install apps from any source other than the AppStore.
There are alternative sites from which you can download apps on IOs if you jailbreak the device (which I would not do). Sites like GetJar, Appland, and before Cydia (now closed I believe) give you access to a range of alternatives Apps. Nevertheless, I personally find that the IOs app ecosystem (*) is less deceived than the Android one, and therefore would not venture to opening any risky doors for an app of any kind. (*) Late email vulnerability is another issue altogether. |
|
|
|
<…>
Yo ya he visto varios casos esta mañana que incumplen la letra pequeña, con los dos progenitores paseando con los niños. Claro que es habitual en la sociedad que la madre tilde al padre de ser un niño más, y a eso se deben acoger. La intención es que, si todo va bien, para el fin de semana que viene podamos salir "todos" a pasear, siendo ese "todos" relativos a los que conviven juntos, y la letra pequeña algo pendiente de definir y redefinir a lo largo de la semana. Y luego a rezar (o alternativas más técnicas) ... |
|
|
|
|
La relación entre el lenguaje coloquial y el matemático: "Hasta 14": ¿<=14 o < 14?
Estoy habituado a preguntar siempre por el alcance del término "hasta", pues no siempre está claro si incluye o no el límite superior como valor aceptable del rango. De hecho, tengo automatizado el hábito de indagar al respecto, probablemente por deformación profesional. Y es que, coloquialmente, es habitual pensar que el término "hasta" abarca el límite superior referenciado, pero no es infrecuente que no se considere.
Claro que si vamos tirando de un hilo tan básico, llegas a plantearte el absurdo del cambio de criterio (político) constante tras el lanzamiento de la oferta de la semana hace algunos días por adelantado, dejando a la libre imaginación de cada cual cristalizar la implementación potencial detrás del "niños a la calle". Es lo que se llama chutar la pelota para adelante, sin ver muy claro hacia dónde se dirige. Es lo que hay, cuando no hay consenso científico, y urgencias políticas …
|
|
|
|
|
Con el paso de las horas, el problema base se ha ido simplificando mucho a golpe de resoluciones parciales. No obstante, me pregunto cómo lo abordarías en el escenario inicial de las 18! combinaciones.
Es decir, fuera del plano teórico (que lo tengo claro), en la práctica cómo habríais abordado la cuestión (desarrollo propio, herramientas tipo Brainflayer o similares, etc.), y qué expectativas de máquina se precisaría para dar con algo en algún momento de nuestra vida.
Es posible que el volumen de las 18! combinaciones no sea algo que sea factible abordar en la práctica con expectativas realistas, por lo que quedaría la cuestión de qué volumen es abordable, y en qué condiciones (de máquina, etc.). Las respuestas pueden quedar desiertas …
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
