We all know about pirateat40 aka Trendon Shavers.
|
|
|
puting 60mh x13 on pool but pool only shows half of it like 30 mh what is going on ...x13 mod steals hash??? i think x13 need more optimization in kernel part Please, people, you have to understand that the pools display hashrate relative to the shares you send per X amount of time. It's called variance, it always varies.
|
|
|
Girino, do you have a windows version with temps and no hidden pool, so we can use failovers posted yet? I know others like Lasybear have done that, but I would rather use your version if it is open source, verified no hidden pools or malware, and you could post an address for donations.
Jimlite, girino has released the source code, but I do not know why you wouldn't use lasybear's version, they are identical, I mean it's based off girino's source code.
|
|
|
I've just checked the mail archive at metzdowd.com ( http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/). The timestamps there are the same as the ones shown in the mit.edu archive. Looks like the mail-archive.com timestamps are bogus. Just forget it. These timestamps don't prove anything, as they are not the times from original mails. Of course this does not prove the opposite either, but I don't think that the search for truth works by conjuring up arbitrary assertions and then asking for negative proof. Onkel Paul Perhaps you are Satoshi since you are very much against us making progress on his identity.
|
|
|
You probably have heard about the Folding At Home program from Stanford University once. It is a program where you can let computer calculate protein folding to research new medicine for diseases. What does this have to do with Bit/Altcoin? There is a new coin that combines the bitcoin protocol with the FAH program to reward people for their computing power they give to the program. This new program turns those wasted hashes and power consumption into something that benefits us all! Great, and why do I care?Profit! The FAH 'algorithm' has been sitting on the top of the profitability charts for more then a week. As an added bonus, the power usage and heat generation are less than 50% of scrypt! Even Nvidia users are welcome with an efficiency of over 50% of AMD, and a continues development to even that playground. How does it work?You install the folding software, choose a nickname and register at the pool. For more detailed information check the Curecoin topic. Show me the proof!You can find the calculator at CoinTweak.com or check the profitability overview to compare it to other coins. Some general results: R9 280x = 120-140k PPD R9 290x = 150-170k PPD GTX 670 = 65-75k PPD Highest profitability, lowest power consumption and making the world a healthier place possibly saving your wife or kids in the future. Why wouldn't you start Folding for Curecoin? Just to correct you. It doesn't combine the bitcoin protocol with FAH, it's centralized in that standford send you curecoins based on your WU, curecoin is altogether just an altcoin based on SHA256.
|
|
|
OR... the two parties discussed this privately before agreeing to post the question and answer publicly. If James was anything but certain about the validity of his concern, discussing it privately removes the possibility of publicly looking like an idiot.
OR... the timestamps are updated when an edit is made.
I am more interested in the fact about Gaving being the founder/CTO of Wasabi Systems Inc
|
|
|
can you add an XC address I used your mod on my small farm of 18 290r9 non x and my god hashrates jumped from around 2.3-2.5 at intensity 20 and stock gpu settings to 3.35- 3.7 ! my boxes are now pushing in around 75mhz vs the 50 I used to average ! and the temps have not gone up barely at all you guys do great work I will send around 10xc once you get an address or if not I can sell some for dark. here is my conf { "pools" : [
{ "name" : "Super2", "url" : "stratum+tcp://uswest1.cryptoalts.com:5555", "user" : "4354354354354354", "pass" : "5435435435435", "pool-priority" : "0"
}
], "kernel" : "x11mod", "api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1", "api-listen" : true, "expiry" : "120", "failover-only" : true, "kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin", "log" : "5", "queue" : "1", "scan-time" : "60", "auto-fan" : true, "gpu-threads" : "1", "gpu-engine" : "970,975", "gpu-fan" : "0-85,0-85", "gpu-memclock" : "1450,1450", "gpu-memdiff" : "0,0", "gpu-powertune" : "18,18", "intensity" : "18,18", "temp-target" : "71,71", "temp-overheat" : "81,81", "temp-cutoff" : "82,82", "temp-hysteresis" : "3", "vectors" : "1,1", "worksize" : "512,512", "lookup-gap" : "2,2", "thread-concurrency" : "27000,27000" }
Here is my XC address XBS2PMyAN8sakQaD4P1UWssDD71gmKA39K, but remember to split the tips between lasybear,me,and Elun
|
|
|
Please try this version https://www.dropbox.com/s/0bjpeub3e2obfdl/sph-sgminerx11v2.zipFixed share difficulty being displayed as negative or simply as 0.000. Fixed pool difficulty being displayed as 0.000, pool name is also displayed now. "Fixed" global counters. Their purpose was apparently different, but I changed them to display global i.e total accepted,rejected and HW error of all devices combined. You forgot a couple .dll files, but this version seems to work great for me. Using same config I used with the 2% fee miner the hash rate is maybe 0.020mh/s less (not a big deal). The missing DLL should be added now. And pool name appearing on every share is also fixed(but needs someone to test). The same link posted above is still valid, contains the updated version.
|
|
|
I just got up and running on Lubuntu 14.04 using the AMD 14.4 drivers today. Running a single powercolor reference R9 290x and getting 3.5Mh/s at I 19 --no other options set.
This sgminer software needs work...
The Accepted, Rejected and Hardware counters at the top of the screen never increment (A: R: HW:). The pool connection never indicates what the miner is actually connected to ie (Connected to Pool 0)
With all the fuss over stolen hashrate, using this algorithm, this piece of software needs some work.
I'd love to see a ckolivas version of an X11 miner.
Ckolivas, I will tell you, is a douche, a very big one. He no longer supports OpenCL(since like 3.7.2) and will refuse to add it, he despises anything other than SHA256 and this is further reinforced by the fact he removed scrypt. Sorry if I sound harsh, but I know him from like when he first wrote cgminer and...his character is just awful, kano is his protege. No harm done, there are lots of "personalities" out there, and I wasn't happy when he dropped support for scrypt myself. With that said, his software put mining on the map for many many people and there have been countless variants based on his work. For that he gets a bunch of respect from me --despite his dropping support for scrypt. If you can tweak the above issues (seeing the active pool and incrementing the counters properly), I'll happily send a donation. Please try this version https://www.dropbox.com/s/0bjpeub3e2obfdl/sph-sgminerx11v2.zipFixed share difficulty being displayed as negative or simply as 0.000. Fixed pool difficulty being displayed as 0.000, pool name is also displayed now. "Fixed" global counters. Their purpose was apparently different, but I changed them to display global i.e total accepted,rejected and HW error of all devices combined.
|
|
|
Is there any fee or charge attached to this?
None whatsoever. This is the whole point, the only thing is an optional manual donation to the people who made this fork possible without the 2% fee.
|
|
|
I just got up and running on Lubuntu 14.04 using the AMD 14.4 drivers today. Running a single powercolor reference R9 290x and getting 3.5Mh/s at I 19 --no other options set.
This sgminer software needs work...
The Accepted, Rejected and Hardware counters at the top of the screen never increment (A: R: HW:). The pool connection never indicates what the miner is actually connected to ie (Connected to Pool 0)
With all the fuss over stolen hashrate, using this algorithm, this piece of software needs some work.
I'd love to see a ckolivas version of an X11 miner.
Ckolivas, I will tell you, is a douche, a very big one. He no longer supports OpenCL(since like 3.7.2) and will refuse to add it, he despises anything other than SHA256 and this is further reinforced by the fact he removed scrypt. Sorry if I sound harsh, but I know him from like when he first wrote cgminer and...his character is just awful, kano is his protege.
|
|
|
Seems that this version is not optimised for HD58** and HD59** series. I have 4 gpu rig that has 5300Mh/s with regular miner but with this version instead to get more Mh/s i got just half of that, about 2000 Mh/s. Changed everything in config file, tried with just a bat file, but no success. Anyone has a clue ?
drivers v13.2 haven't tried with 14.4 yet, it will make a difference ?
Yes, you need to use -k x11mod, not darkcoin as the kernel.
|
|
|
If like me you rent your rig on Nicehash, you might want to try my fork of the Nicehash sph-sgminer which supports the both the x11mod kernel and the proper Nicehash idle pool behaviour. It basically just pulls in the the lasybear code into bitbandi's repository. This will only be useful for a couple of days because all of this will soon be incorporated in the main sgminer codebase. https://github.com/t0mpr1c3/sph-sgminerIn this case, windows binaries https://www.dropbox.com/s/twgpm0qtibm09kz/nicehash.rar
|
|
|
AMD have now released the official version. Still can't get it to mine X11 though. It gives readings of 4mh + for my 280x's but only HW errors Anyone know why? We would have to wait for more users to test, but if it happens to everybody then AMD have screwed up their OpenCL implementation.
|
|
|
it's possible to optimize the jackpoint algo for amd? there is too much difference between nvidia and amd there(2MH/ vs 4MH/s)
In the past this was because AMD was much more efficient with integer operations whereas Nvidia excelled at Floating point stuff.
|
|
|
Shouldn't cgminer have a special switch to basically select which USB devices you want? E.g --usb switch. Advanced USB options:
The --usb option can restrict how many USB devices are found:
--usb 1:2,1:3,1:4,1:* or --usb BAS:1,BFL:1,MMQ:0,ICA:0,KLN:0 or --usb :10
You can only use one of the above 3
The first version --usb 1:2,1:3,1:4,1:* allows you to select which devices to mine on with a list of USB bus_number:device_address All other USB devices will be ignored Hotplug will also only look at the devices matching the list specified and find nothing new if they are all in use You can specify just the USB bus_number to find all devices like 1:* which means any devices on USB bus_number 1 This is useful if you unplug a device then plug it back in the same port, it usually reappears with the same bus_number but a different device_address
You can see the list of all USB devices on linux with 'sudo lsusb' under unix Cgminer will list the recognised USB devices with the '-n' option or the '--usb-dump 0' option The '--usb-dump N' option with a value of N greater than 0 will dump a lot of details about each recognised USB device If you wish to see all USB devices, include the --usb-list-all option
|
|
|
I think it's time for girino to release his source code as promised.
I'm more interested in an explanation why it's so much faster! Your crack and Lasybear's work are "sufficient" enough to copy what he has done, but CL-code itself is 100% identical and doesn't explain the speed boost..... Only thing different is the way CL-functions are called, and the use of an additional memory-block (plus pointers instead of arrays). Still like to learn what Girino's breakthrough was and his line of thought archiving this (this knowledge, our community can use for further improvements). If you go back to page 10 or 11-12 he answered me how he achieved the boost. Honestly I myself am not sure since OpenCL and heterogeneous computing is not my strong side, especially parallelization .
|
|
|
It is impossible. The chips have a hardware implementation of the scrypt algo, it would be physically impossible to mine x11 as there must be a whole R&D in x11 itself costing a lot of money.
|
|
|
Great! Getting 3.1 MHash/s each with 4* Sapphire Radeon 7970 on GA-990FXA-UD5 OS: Win 7 driver: Catalyst 14.4 settings: --kernel x11mod -w 256 -I 15 -g 2 --gpu-memclock 1500 --gpu-engine 1080 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 voltage: 1.13 pulls 760W at the wall. Only problem: I had to upgrade to Catalyst 14.4, since it did not work with the modified 13.1 I used to run 5 GPUs under Win7. So only 4 GPUs are detected now. Fifth one shows up with 'error 43' in system manager. Is there any way to run 5 GPUs with this x11 miner on WIN7? Suggested driver Version? Thanks a ton!I would like a link to this modified driver see if I can find what was changed between the original and the modified one.
|
|
|
I think it's time for girino to release his source code as promised.
|
|
|
|