When is the project to be launched? is there an approximate date for this?
Well, if you look at the road map, then the beta version of the first revision of the DML protocol is planned in July-August 2018 Can we say that it will be an open and accessible beta version for everyone? Or will it be some kind of closed test? I do not think that it will be a closed test of the system. Because all the closed tests do not make sense to publicly disclose. Most likely it will be public access to the platform, and all the closed tests will not be covered in the road map. |
|
|
|
When is the project to be launched? is there an approximate date for this?
Well, if you look at the road map, then the beta version of the first revision of the DML protocol is planned in July-August 2018 |
|
|
|
My opinion is that large traders will not go to those marketplaces where they trade for more than one year. The level of trust in the new platform will always be lower
My opinion is that large traders will not go to those marketplaces where they trade for more than one year. The level of trust in the new platform will always be lower If you had a huge amount of money in cryptocurrency, would you trust them with an absolutely new platform that has not proved itself yet? Your arguments are absolutely not reasoned, you, as the miser continues to grumble, and to prove that all new projects including this one no future and the developers are not able to implement it. I do not argue how to assure us the developers of the project will be really innovative in the field of cryptocurrency trading and has many advantages. I just wanted to say that no big traders will jump from Bittrex or Kraken to LocalCoinSwap. |
|
|
|
My opinion is that large traders will not go to those marketplaces where they trade for more than one year. The level of trust in the new platform will always be lower
My opinion is that large traders will not go to those marketplaces where they trade for more than one year. The level of trust in the new platform will always be lower If you had a huge amount of money in cryptocurrency, would you trust them with an absolutely new platform that has not proved itself yet? |
|
|
|
|
My opinion is that large traders will not go to those marketplaces where they trade for more than one year. The level of trust in the new platform will always be lower
|
|
|
|
Do I understand correctly. every month on the 18th a document or report will be published that will contain some kind of information, right? What kind of information is this?
Well, because EPS tokens can freely move between different ethereum addresses. That's why the report will be formed. which will take into account all these changes. Well, as I understand it will work this way. Thanks for the info. But I still do not fully understand why this is needed.  |
|
|
|
|
Do I understand correctly. every month on the 18th a document or report will be published that will contain some kind of information, right? What kind of information is this?
|
|
|
|
I would like to ask. Does this project have no competition? After all, there are many similar services and platforms on the market. What exactly is this platform different from the others?
There is always competition, it's true. But if the project offers better conditions than competitors, then this project wins. Everything is simple  So what are the advantages that Ufoodo can boast to its competitors? |
|
|
|
|
I would like to ask. Does this project have no competition? After all, there are many similar services and platforms on the market. What exactly is this platform different from the others?
|
|
|
|
|
I have a question about using bot. Will the users be able to begin use the bot when they want? Will it be somehow limited?
|
|
|
|
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
Of course. This is even written in white paper. Hmm...  And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option? Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes. But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system? Actually it does not work that way. You understand, after every change you make it is separated into a separate branch for development. These are the features of the work of such repositories as githab. So on the stability of the system this will not have any effect. In this case, I fully support such a decision. Some users really can greatly improve this product I believe. I hope that this will also be encouraged by the system in the form of additional tokens, as far as I know, so it will be. By the way, I did not think about it at once. Yes, such work should be encouraged, otherwise what's the point of doing this. For the sake of enthusiasm? Somehow it looks dubious. So the promotion in the form of tokens looks very nice! |
|
|
|
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
Of course. This is even written in white paper. Hmm... And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option? Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes. But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system? Actually it does not work that way. You understand, after every change you make it is separated into a separate branch for development. These are the features of the work of such repositories as githab. So on the stability of the system this will not have any effect. In this case, I fully support such a decision. Some users really can greatly improve this product I believe. |
|
|
|
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
Of course. This is even written in white paper. Hmm... And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option? Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes. But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system? |
|
|
|
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
Of course. This is even written in white paper. Hmm... And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option? |
|
|
|
|
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
|
|
|
|
I looked at the road map and it turns out that today the pre-ICO phase is starting right?
How can I become a part of this project?
Yes, that's right, today it starts. Well, first, try to go to the website and register. I think further you will have an opportunity to invest in this project. I wanted to do this, but for some reason I can not get a hold of it. I click on it and nothing happens. So it should be? |
|
|
|
|
I understand that within the framework of this system it will be possible to store diplomas and certificates of education. And it will have value within this system. And we can say that this will be reliable information, but how exactly can this credence be confirmed?
|
|
|
|
|
I looked at the road map and it turns out that today the pre-ICO phase is starting right?
How can I become a part of this project?
|
|
|
|
|
Я тут узнал, что Дисциплина использует PoS консенсус алгоритм ouroboros. Тот же самый, что используется в карнадо. Немного прочитал про это и оказывается это первый алгоритм надёжность которого доказали учёные, по этой теме написаны даже научные работы и статьи. Вот это реально круто, я считаю!
|
|
|
|
|
And actually,I think that at least worth a try.Nothing to lose for sure. A lot of pluses. Starting from the fact that this whole area is now developing and you need to try it,look for,teach and ending with just free tokens !
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
