Re-Post from dooglus, via IRC #clams: <@dooglus> running clamd -externalip=a.b.c.d with your actual external IP address seems to fix the problem
So, if anyone is having connectivity problems with 1.4.5, a possible work around would involve running the client with the -externalip=yourIP flag. Interesting, thank you.. I will try that |
|
|
|
Hmmm. Now I can see there's nothing listening on port 31174, so it won't accept inbound connections. I guess the client must be partially crashed. This may also explain why it hasn't staked for nearly 2 weeks.
Check the clam.conf and/or command-line options. If you specify "connect=" anywhere, it will only connect to that/those specific peers, and won't listen for incoming connections. It sounds like that's what you may have done. Dooglus, would there be some way that I could reject all the 1.4.4 clients? |
|
|
|
Why are there so many peers with 1.4.4 still ?!!!!  |
|
|
|
So the question remains... why do I only have a single peer? edit: Just started the same version on another dedicated server, 5 8 connnections so far. I started up 1.4.5 again, I'm showing only one peer with inbound = true. & only 4 connections. Edit: now 7 connections, with 3 inbound true peers. |
|
|
|
So perhaps v1.4.5 clients are somehow failing to advertise themselves properly?
12 hours later, I still see no inbound connections even though if a peer tried to connect it would be accepted.
So this could be the problem I'm experiencing? I reverted back to 1.4.3 and seems like getpeerinfo peers are all still false but I do notice I have full / more connections! Maybe staking on 1.4.3 will be better for me?, I'll wait and see what happens.. I turned on port forwarding for my 1.4.3 client, still the same results.. inbounds are false in getpeerinfo. And still no stakes - but I realize might take awhile yet. I'm assuming the same for when I was running 1.4.5 , although I could try that again too. I'll wait to see if there is any fix from devs. |
|
|
|
So perhaps v1.4.5 clients are somehow failing to advertise themselves properly?
12 hours later, I still see no inbound connections even though if a peer tried to connect it would be accepted.
So this could be the problem I'm experiencing? I reverted back to 1.4.3 and seems like getpeerinfo peers are all still false but I do notice I have full / more connections! Maybe staking on 1.4.3 will be better for me?, I'll wait and see what happens.. |
|
|
|
An issue was reported recently concerning a lack of connections in v1.4.5: https://github.com/nochowderforyou/clams/issues/137Is anyone running v1.4.5 and actually getting incoming connections? Running "getpeerinfo" in the debug console will show you "inbound" for each peer. Is it "true" for anyone? Hey, mine all show false ! How do I fix? Thanks Is it now mandatory to have to use UPnP or port forwarding??? I didn't have to do this in previous versions! |
|
|
|
An issue was reported recently concerning a lack of connections in v1.4.5: https://github.com/nochowderforyou/clams/issues/137Is anyone running v1.4.5 and actually getting incoming connections? Running "getpeerinfo" in the debug console will show you "inbound" for each peer. Is it "true" for anyone? Hey, mine all show false ! How do I fix? Thanks |
|
|
|
I installed the new win64 version and 5 of my staked clams disappeared. Here is the story: My wallet, ver 1.4.4, started to stake several times in an hour but after 2 confirmations the staked clam would show conflicted. Five of the staked clams held on for 9,12,15,16,18 confirmations. I installed new wallet and those five now show conflicted (22 total now show conflicted). So far new wallet has not staked and shows 10 days to next stake. I have 35 clams in wallet how often should they stake? I was getting one clam per week but the last two weeks nothing, other than the 22 conflicted. Just out of curiosity, what was the issue in this case? Edit: never mind.. probably because of version 1.4.4 ? |
|
|
|
I don't know.. wallet is unlocked, icon says its staking.
Just seems strange.
Have you been seeing orphan blocks, or just nothing at all? If you PM me your IP address, I'll check my logs and see if I notice anything weird relating to your peer. I expect you will have connected to at least one of my peers recently. Nothing at all.. no orphaned blocks either. I'll try to send a pm soon! |
|
|
|
Is something wrong with the staking? Because I haven't been getting any clams either.. I used to get around 1 per day, and have a somewhat good amount set for staking. Haven't been getting anything for the last week.. which seems very unusual. My time is sync'd, and block numbers seem fine too!
Or, is it just because tons more people are staking??
I estimate that each 360 CLAMs in your wallet should stake about once per day on average at the moment. This is based on a single datapoint (JD has 360k CLAMs and stakes 1k times per day). More datapoints from other large stakers would be appreciated. There's another ~100k CLAMs staking outside of JD (since 400 blocks per day are being staked outside of JD) so I guess there are other big stakers out there. Well for the set amount I have (actually above 360) I haven't seen anything for days. Time is sync'd, block number same as block number at http://khashier.com/Plus, the amounts that I have set up total above 360 and are split up in different addresses, so I'm not waiting for any maturing. I don't know.. wallet is unlocked, icon says its staking. Just seems strange. |
|
|
|
I installed the new win64 version and 5 of my staked clams disappeared. Here is the story: My wallet, ver 1.4.4, started to stake several times in an hour but after 2 confirmations the staked clam would show conflicted. Five of the staked clams held on for 9,12,15,16,18 confirmations. I installed new wallet and those five now show conflicted (22 total now show conflicted). So far new wallet has not staked and shows 10 days to next stake. I have 35 clams in wallet how often should they stake? I was getting one clam per week but the last two weeks nothing, other than the 22 conflicted. Is something wrong with the staking? Because I haven't been getting any clams either.. I used to get around 1 per day, and have a somewhat good amount set for staking. Haven't been getting anything for the last week.. which seems very unusual. My time is sync'd, and block numbers seem fine too! Or, is it just because tons more people are staking?? |
|
|
|
I'm glad to add this coin as one of many coins in my investing portfolio! Thanks for the work you do on this coin  |
|
|
|
I'm glad to add this coin as one of many coins in my investing portfolio! Thanks for the work you do on this coin |
|
|
|
^^The issue with what you said, is that it is not a "prediction" that Ryan is doing, his "last name" is Pumper dude...
Ok....call it pump, call it prediction, call it how you like more, but don't understand where the problem is..... Why you don't try to jump on board the trend and make some profit instead to scream at scandal because he can be a market-manipulator? Until now i haven't see anyone complaining about some losses following the group...so really i'm missing the point here.... Because in the end he will start dumping on - YOU - (if you're not one of his shill accounts). Its how all pump and dump groups end up eventually.. the altcoin scene has seen it happen over and over now. Its nothing new anymore.. |
|
|
|
BayAreaCoins:
I'm a bit confused. Admittedly, I haven't followed the coinbase exchange announcement snafu very closely. How did they cause you to lose $220k?
People feel they used news to manipulate price. If there is evidence, there probably is somewhat of a good case. Looking at the law firm, it looks like they've handled these type of things before. I hope to see them get something. But sometimes with class action lawsuits (if that's what they're doing) - by the time they split it all up, I don't think you see much. I guess it depends on a total amount to be distributed. |
|
|
|
  RYANFUCKTARD WANTS YOU TO SIGN UP !!! |
|
|
|
|
Wow I see the idiots are hyping for people to sign up again.
What a bunch of retarded fucks!
You guys have the mind of a gnat. Nothing but shit for brains.
Little scamming retards, probably still sit around sucking on their mother's tits
God you guys are dumb.
|
|
|
|
|
On a serious note, he does have a case if it can be proven they fabricated some of news.
(I don't know if the meme type of crap on their site counts for anything though)
I'm guessing some type of settlement will come out of it, unless coinbase wants to fight it hard.
Will be interesting to see...
|
|
|
|
I hope charlie lee is reading this thread and the other one and sharing with his co workers BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
So what.. coinbase may settle something out of sympathy and having had a good laugh. In that case op still will have at least got something, fulfilling his need for righteousness. (That's how you fuckin troll.. bitches  ) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
