My problem basically lies in the lack of experience with Ethereum under stress conditions. As Bitcoin network is getting crowded (now and then, I know), I expect Ethereum network follow the same trend, exactly because some people will switch to Ethereum to solve their problems.

The thing that made me worry was the fact I am quite low on gas because of last month incident and now the fees are a bit higher than my actual gas (of course, I will handle this in the near future).

However, different platforms handle different the problem:
* some make the trade when the money arrives, just the rate may be different because of the market conditions
* some may reject the trade / send the money back
* some have it unhandled

Since I didn't find anything written, I thought I ask, so it'll be in the benefit of everybody.

And the conclusion is, as @libert19 wrote, to make sure an e-mail address is written, so extra headaches are avoided 

I don't see it a way to "betray" Bitcoin, nor weakening it.


I think I am neither too strict, neither too lax in the privacy matters. And I see now, here is where the difference of opinion comes from.


Touché. Here you are right. (iou +1 sM) (edit: handled)


Maybe indeed Bitcoin is way bigger than I was thinking (still much smaller than deserved) and I was worrying for nothing.

Somehow people seem to understand that I am against anonymity in Bitcoin. I'm not.
But I have a feeling that the anonymity features seem to be somewhat delayed and put away.
I guess that the "idea" to not make more enemies for Bitcoin was unfortunate. Somehow people seem to forget that there are still mixers around.


True. And that's why mixers are great to have.

I soooo hate Bart today...

What's to be expected if one tries to buy/sell on your marketplace and sends coins/tokens, but they don't get the required confirmations (or don't get any confirmations) in the required time frame?

That's not really unexpected. They keep all those "worlds" separated.


Quite shame indeed, since it's in their best interest. Maybe you propose them add such notifications (if they don't think that far). Or did you stop all their notifications?! (asking just in case).


Please let us know how it went. Also read up: you need this only if you pay a lot in USD, else EUR/GBP cards should be cheaper.

I can admire how inventive are the Dash promoters.
Of course, there are probably some bits here and there favoring their calculation, which I will not bother reading, however, since most stores don't accept neither Dash nor LN transaction, it doesn't matter at all, isn't it?


PS. Not that I am a fan of Ripple and Co, but why didn't you add proper competition there (XRP, maybe WAVES, maybe others too) which are also fast and very fast (and also not accepted anywhere)?

What a wonderful morning
Observing that the market has rendered the poll worthless 

The idea is interesting, some other posts/ideas are also interesting and I think that the best way to do it would be to simply allow the original poster of a thread add an extra post as post #2.
This would allow him quote other posts there, reorganize and so on (and also use this feature as many times he wants). And will make people not need those "reserved" posts right after the first one "just in case".

Of course, the original poster may have to do reorganize/tidy up work now and then, but keeping things nice do require some work after all.

I'm not sure if the anonymity is wanted anymore. There are exchanges that were delisting anonymous coins because of government rules, so more anonymity could make more enemies also to Bitcoin, which is not a great step forward now.
Maybe at the point Bitcoin adoption is world wide and Bitcoin is "too big to fall" (I wanted so much to add this), then these ideas will get out of the shelves and get a real (real-real) thought and also implemented into the real thing.

Yup, many simply cannot comprehend how various can be the areas addiction can strike.

While many tell urban stories like "if Mr X would have been stopped smoking, now he would have a house", while many still think Bitcoin is some sort of "Monopoly money", it's nice to actually see somebody converted from addiction to actual investment (although "conversion" is incorrect term, since he's still feeding his addiction).

There is (also) a problem: various services need "fast" transactions, the most wide spread may be the withdrawal from exchanges (customer trust, lack of options in the software like "I'm not in a hurry, but let me have the extra $), but also certain payments need confirmations.. faster than one week.

Yes, certain transactions can be done with low and very low priority. But in order to have something "commercially available" I'm afraid that many of those complaining are right and something has to be done and I'm not as enthusiastic about LN like I was one year ago (mostly because I had unrealistic expectations it'll get live/out-of-beta/used with the speed SegWit got adopted).

So it's not only about "people readjust their expectations" imho, it's more about how the service providers will adjust to the new reality.

You are late. Right now 1 sat/vbyte is good again.
And you should read more. The fee is completely unrelated to the quantity or value of the coins sent.

Exactly. https://mempool.space/ gives an even better overview. Most of the blocks from the last 12 hours were not filled completely.
Even myself I made a low prio transaction yesterday with 1 sat/vbyte and went through in less than 20 minutes.

Actually it's not the first pump that maybe started with a fake dump (or got triggered by a real dump?)

Well, this works only if one passes KYC, so the government knows about his funds. And this leads sooner or later to some taxes (especially when they will sell crypto).
Nothing unusual, in theory at least, since people are supposed to pay taxes on the income from their investments (in some countries may be even for their possessions, but I don't know how is it in China).

1. How to solve? Add fake ratings? Is that the best solution?
2. The Google play ratings worth nothing. One late example is the apps used by teachers for online courses getting bad reviews from the kids for the sole purpose to avoid making the classes. Gmail addresses are for free, remember?
3. Although Ledger and Trezor wallets are good, at least the Ledger application... has some room for improvement (I don't know about Trezor). But that's not a problem since there are enough good established wallets that work fine with both Trezor and Ledger hardware.

I didn't read those reviews since I only use Ledger Live for installing apps and updates. The reviews about the apps may be legit, but I don't think that 1* reflects reality, hence my point 1.
Again, the actual hardware wallet is good.

I don't know. My guess was Asset Detail, on the same page, since it has

"depositTip": "Delisted, Deposit Suspended" //reason

You can see a couple of posts earlier.

But it's just a guess. Some input from these guys is needed if we want to get somewhere.

Am corectat inainte sa postezi 
E sambata, nu mi-am baut cafeaua, iarta-ma

(I'll keep it Romanian here, sorry @fillippone)
Eventual o sa stim mai multe dupa 15 iunie, dupa ce se deschid mall-urile. Ca pe langa ca sunt putine BTM-uri in tara, mai sunt si majoritatea in mall-uri.


Edit: sau s-au deschis si nu stiu eu?!