Don't forget it can be also used by criminals to lure other's by setting themselves in the app that they want to trade.
Just imagine them waiting for targets to show up 

It depends on many things:
1. do you want to keep those altcoins or just mine and sell for something else?
2. do you solo mine or use a pool? - If you solo mine you need each different wallet afaik.
3. if you mine in a pool, check if the pool doesn't keep the money for you until you want to withdraw
4. also if you mine in a pool, maybe you want to use a multi-pool that auto-exchanges your earnings into a coin you want.

I clearly don't want a derailed shitfork I am aware that the perfect balance is difficult to find, hence my wording with maybe.
Also I know how difficult is any change to get accepted, so I don't expect ... anything. The devs did a great job so far keeping the right balance and so far I trust them.
Still, I think it never hurts to give them ideas now and then. They have a better overview and they can make their decision.

It's not 10 minutes, hence it's better to tell by number of blocks, especially if you talk about devs.


Maybe. I don't deny it. And also maybe it should be changed to be based on something else than number of blocks, to cover any case of sudden huge leave of the miners (although, debatable, the chance for that is small).

Google play reviews are mostly useless. As already said, there was a new release on Android a couple of days ago. Only the iOS/iPhone version is no longer supported.
If you want to get better overview of the situation you better check their GitHub ( https://github.com/mycelium-com/wallet-android ) or their home page ( https://wallet.mycelium.com/index.html )

I'm not sure I understand what you mean.

Let's say I'd choose the seller you propose: I don't live in US of A so I may pay more for shipping, then local VAT and other fees for out-of-EU item than for the actual gold. Then selling it back for Bitcoin is basically out of question, so it would be many more steps (and fees) and getting back to Bitcoin.

So.. what makes that website good for me?
And why holding stable coins is "throwing your money away"?

Difficulty adjustment happens every 2016 blocks, it's not at 2 weeks and if the things will continue like now it may very well take more than 2 weeks this time.

And every time there are big fluctuations in the price the mempool gets more crowded. Still nobody seems to blame the arbitrage bots.

I think that there may be coming more such waves. However, indeed, that 15k+ sounds more than reasonable.

Both https://www.binance.com/assetWithdraw/getAllAsset.html and https://api.binance.com/api/v1/exchangeInfo worked when I called in my browser.
So instead of bumping a 2 years old thread, please start another one with much more info, explaining in more words your actual problem, maybe add some code too, so people can actually help you.

Gold is not weird at all. I was thinking of buying gold in November-December 2017 and I am sad I didn't do that, just I didn't find a good way to do it (shipping, customs, ... possible headaches).
But now it's much easier for crypto lovers because since then there started to grow quite some interesting gold backed stable coins, which can be much easier for us to handle.
But I won't say more, since this is not the best place to discuss altcoins.

It's not like that. At least not directly.
The government should give good and equitable laws and should allow law enforcement organizations work properly (without giving them too much or not enough power).
Based on this people should learn to be smart and take care of themselves.

If people learn enough and gets smart enough, they'll see that perfect laws and perfect balance is impossible to achieve, especially in the current type of democracies where the government's top goal is to .. get elected next time. (I won't even talk about non-democratic countries, there's much worse there.)

The hate actions are caused by lack of knowledge, lack of culture and heavy misinformation and manipulation. If people would use their brains more they would see through all this and would ignore / block such tweets / posts. Banning based on race would do more bad than good. Freezing (stealing!) others' money is a theft unless they are found guilty and the judge allows that operation.
Ban based on IQ could be more appropriate (joke aside!), but unpractical, not comprehensive enough and still unfair and people that find easier to destroy or kill instead of reading one more book you can always find in your country too, no matter which one is that.

You should read more before using big words like these. A lot more. (Unless you are trolling, of course.)
Also you should try to see the reality under the nice words. And keep in mind that not everybody who can write on the internet is to be trusted.

Then you may be able to see the mistake under the "better coins" idea and also under "the logic behind the bitcoin as the future currency is rigged and makes no sense at all" (I wonder where you get them from.)

Indeed, interesting idea, but quite bad implementation - I think that maybe it just cannot be done right with only 2 dimensions.

I don't agree on the stable coins idea though. Afaik most stable coins are acting as tokens on various platforms, so they should not get a different "root", most should just stay with the rest of the tokens.

Brave is more than great if you use it on only one device, preferably laptop/computer.

I have to use it on 2-3 different computers and the smartphone. And then the problems start: temporarily there's no sync for the browse history and bookmarks, 3rd party password managers don't work good on many smartphones (including mine), .. and all this is a show stopper.

The rewards are extremely low, I don't believe it worth to pick your browser / extensions based on that.

That's correct. I actually expect we'll also have the days when we'll say "The good old time when a bitcoin cost $20k" (!).
Still, OP asked if that will happen. No event in the future has 100% probability, hence that answer of mine.
If he would have asked "do you expect..." or "is there a good chance....", then the answer would have been ... the speculations  


Edit: and I never trusted/believed the junkie dreams of Nostradamus.

The answer to the topic title is "could be, but nobody knows for sure"


Because, you know, time travel and crystal balls don't actually exist, so nobody knows what future holds.

OP, I think that this should be added in a way or another, but with big fonts and colors, to the first post.
Since bitcoin . com keeps advertising that their altcoin is the true Bitcoin, newbies will keep getting fooled and many of them will also send those to Bitcoin addresses.
(Though unfortunately in many cases they also come here only after making the mistake.)

And it could have been accused of stealing, since exploiting bugs to get money is some sort of stealing, after all.
Also the probability to withdraw all is not that big unless OP caught all the onwer(s)/admin(s) away for all that time. And big amount withdrawals are usually verified by a human.

I think that it was pretty much reasonable. Abusing bugs is usually not allowed. It's common sense.
I don't know though if it's covered by ToS and how is it covered by law.

Actually the war has started more than a year ago. See here.
Since then Ledger releases now and then notes about certain vulnerabilities of Trezor.

However, it was discussed and turned on all sides, and the proper result is that there's nothing to worry about the hardware wallets as long as others don't have physical access to them. With physical access on the other hand, there are a lot of possible problems.