|
Reading this thread, I can say I have had similar experiences with Kashish948 in the past. This is not an accident, he knew what he was doing, and unless he takes actions to correct this (even if he may not be legally obligated to) I would consider him a scammer. I came very close to banning him from the Infinitecoin forums over a referral scam where he conveniently used ambiguous wording in a very similar way he did here. I gave him the benefit of the doubt, but after seeing this repeated behavior of "mistakes" and ambiguous wording that always just happens to work in his favor, I am doubting that judgement.
|
|
|
|
No one is going to buy it unless you match market prices (~$17 per oz).  I concur with this. Unless it has some special collectable value, it is worth a few dollars over spot per ounce max, and even less so with larger bars like yours. You will have about as much luck selling this at this price as you would selling a $100 bill for 1 BTC. The fact that you need the money has no relevance to a buyer. |
|
|
|
(Speaking of hypocrisy, Tecshare has left at least three people negative feedback based on feelings alone. Why is he complaining if he feels others do it?)
Indeed. This specific complaint gets banded about a lot but its pretty contradictory. Two of those people left me negative trust ratings first because they did not like things I said on the forum. The one I left for Armis was because he refused to stop harassing me via my market place postings, not because of my "feelings". Theymos took the opportunity to twist it into some violation of the unwritten unspoken code of being on the default trust, and a violation of free speech, that warranted removal from the list over that one incident. Yet here Vod is doing this over and over and it is acceptable. He has done this to multiple people, some times multiple times. Every time he pretends he learned his lesson, kisses Tomatocages ass, and he lets him continue abusing the system and doing it all over again like it never happened a month or two later if not sooner. You left a false feedback. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=846683.0;allIf you leave a feedback which says "he is <anything (true) here> on my thread". It will be okay but you can't put a negative feedback unless he is lying about you in your thread.. AFAIK neutral feedback wasn't there at that time, so it is better not to leave any negative feedback unless he is lying about you in your thread. Vod put negative feedback in your(& others) trust page for lying about him and maybe for other activities like "staff selwctive enforcement" and "irrelevant comments about trust system". Constantly posts lies about me in an effort to have me removed from the default trust list. I am not protected by forum staff. Honest discussion is one thing, but he just posts BS with absolutely no basis.
Not trustworthy.
Once again, I know how you all love making this about me over and over, but please resist your uncontrolled impulses to go off topic and use character assassinations as a method to avoid the topic at hand. It is funny how willing you are to chastise me for a single incident, yet when people like Vod repeatedly violate these same standards you willfully apply to me, suddenly the standards change and are no longer important or suddenly don't apply. |
|
|
|
|
Have tons of dimes and quarter errors in stock! Pm me for details.
|
|
|
|
Thanks guys. Already put in a PM to Razick, wasn't sure if he was still active since his thread is locked.
Gyft and egifter do not sell gas cards.
It's frustrating, you would think by 2015 we would be able to buy gas with bitcoin now.
Yeah, I agree & that's what Razick thought as well when he started up his service, but surprisingly nobody really showed any interest in it and that's probably why he locked the thread after a while. He still has it as his signature though, and he's been active recently, so I'd say you probably have the greatest chance with him. Good luck and let us know how it goes. The problem is not that no one wants gas cards, but everyone is so spoiled with getting discounts on other types of gift cards they cry when there are small premiums or even when they are priced at face value, leaving nothing for the efforts of the retailer. I personally just stopped selling giftcards in general because people who aren't even interested in trading will harass you for asking face value like you are trying to get one over on some one because Gyft might have it with 10% off. |
|
|
|
Is there any chance that you'll ship to Europe? You're pretty much the only person that I've seen selling such a wide range of rare pepper seeds for BTC, considering to buy a decent quantity.
I can try, but I cant guarantee they will arrive due to varying customs regulations, so it would be at your own risk. PM me any details and we can discuss it. Thanks for your interest. Shipping just seeds, won't be a problem at all. I have shipped to and received seeds from overseas many times without any customs' problem. If it can fit in a small envelope then it's ok. Shipping pods or live plants, then that is something completely different and you will have to do a lot of paperwork. Be carefull though... Reapers, moruga scorpions etc are not fun to play with, nor for the faint hearted ones...  If your hottest thing you have ever tried is jalapenos, then forget about it. It's like comparing bbgun to atomic bomb  Yes, chances are it will get through, but I can not possibly know all the customs restrictions for every country world wide so anything international, I would advise you to check your local regulations to be sure before ordering. |
|
|
|
Is there any chance that you'll ship to Europe? You're pretty much the only person that I've seen selling such a wide range of rare pepper seeds for BTC, considering to buy a decent quantity.
I can try, but I cant guarantee they will arrive due to varying customs regulations, so it would be at your own risk. PM me any details and we can discuss it. Thanks for your interest. |
|
|
|
cop's saying the guy took his taser and shot him with it, evidence still looks pretty daming either way
I'm sure the cop would say anything to cover his ass, shooting that guy running away in the back is one of the most cowardly things I've ever seen. There's no way the cop could have felt threatened it that situation, at very most he could have fired just a warning shot. More importantly it is illegal to shoot some one in the back as they are running away in most states (if not all) because it demonstrates clearly they were not in an active attempt of attacking you (the only legal reason to shoot some one unless in defense of another life). cop's saying the guy took his taser and shot him with it, evidence still looks pretty daming either way
Even if that is the case, the cop shouldn't have shot the victim. Tasers are rarely fatal. The policemen should have chased the victim and caught him instead of just shooting him. I believe they receive training for these sort of incidents before they join the police force. One thing I don't understand is, why shoot the guy 8 god damn times. Even if he did have a taser, which he did not. I watched the video and Jamba is right the cop plants the taser on him. But seriously the guy is running away, if you did have to shoot why not leg him or shoot him once? Why unload a clip into the guy? Even if he had a taser the guy is like 25+feet and running wouldnt a single shot do the job? I used to know a former cop. You know what he told me? If you have to use your gun in self defense, make sure you empty the clip into them and they are dead. People who survive are witnesses, and witnesses send you to jail or sue you. Dead people don't. This is why when they kill people, they turn them into Swiss cheese, not just disable them. |
|
|
|
If someone in the default trust abuses the trust, they would get removed immediately.
Unless your name is Vod, or one of a handful of other buddies that get constant passes. |
|
|
|
(Speaking of hypocrisy, Tecshare has left at least three people negative feedback based on feelings alone. Why is he complaining if he feels others do it?)
Indeed. This specific complaint gets banded about a lot but its pretty contradictory. Two of those people left me negative trust ratings first because they did not like things I said on the forum. The one I left for Armis was because he refused to stop harassing me via my market place postings, not because of my "feelings". Theymos took the opportunity to twist it into some violation of the unwritten unspoken code of being on the default trust, and a violation of free speech, that warranted removal from the list over that one incident. Yet here Vod is doing this over and over and it is acceptable. He has done this to multiple people, some times multiple times. Every time he pretends he learned his lesson, kisses Tomatocages ass, and he lets him continue abusing the system and doing it all over again like it never happened a month or two later if not sooner. |
|
|
|
He has shown me evidence he is who he says he is. Am I a sock puppet too? BTW: laser engravers and CNC mills don't leave the wood grain behind when they are used to carve designs: http://imgur.com/9C8j2ob,FFRWjzP,toHOwhjNow that's something I find strange, he posted videos, but if he has further proof, why not post it? He did post it. Not only was he banned from this forum that day (he unbanned himself with an exploit), but ALL of the videos on his youtube were reported and removed for copyright infringement, including the ones showing detail work because there was music playing on the radio in the background. In short he already went out of his way to prove his innocence to a bunch of stalker idiots here just to have his accounts shut down and was tired of playing games. Use your own eyeballs/brain instead of listening to the mob of neckbeards who harassed/negged him. Again, look at the picture I linked from the coin I hold. Show me where you can find a laser engraver or CNC that leaves the wood grains behind like that as if it was hand carved. That would be a pretty neat machine. |
|
|
|
If all the owners of the pieces could provide pictures, that would be great. Joining everyone would be expensive, and buying all the coins would be immensely expensive. Both infeasible as far as I can see... If this does exist, I don't see how it can't be discovered putting pictures of all coins, from all angles, side by side.
This is bullshit, not even worth wasting time. The guy is a fraud and he even came with his puppet ukcrypto to say he's a rich and famous artist. His previous work has sold for millions... but he can't afford to buy a good lathe. He most likely doesn't even own a laser cutter, just sends the designs to someone who does. He has shown me evidence he is who he says he is. Am I a sock puppet too? BTW: laser engravers and CNC mills don't leave the wood grain behind when they are used to carve designs: http://imgur.com/9C8j2ob,FFRWjzP,toHOwhj |
|
|
|
An army that is bound to the rules the normal people give them democratically... thats whats ideal in my opionion.
Just because some armed group calls themselves a militia doesn't make them one. As far as how it works in the US, what is more democratic than an armed force literally made out of the people within the locality it is taking actions in? Those people are their family, friends, and neighbors and will be treated as such not to mention the advantage they have knowing the territory and its normal patterns. |
|
|
|
your "judgment" needs improvement which causes delay on your return to trust list.
What makes you think I seek to be on the trust list? You assume you know what I want but you are wrong. I have said repeatedly the default trust system needs to be removed. What I want is to be able to use the forum that I have contributed to for years without having rules enforced upon me that I am not also protected by. If I should be removed from the default trust for supposedly stifling free speech, why is it another user can then ACTUALLY repeatedly abuse that same system to try to intimidate me into stop talking about his abusive behavior without repercussion? Theymos outwardly says the trust system is unmoderated, and yes has taken exceptional actions to have people removed from default trust solely for the sake of protecting "free speech", yet when some one like Vod leaves people negative trust for being critical of his actions over and over it magically goes unseen. Have you every asked yourself why there is no official forum rules posted ANYWHERE on the forum? Kind of hard to follow the rules if they aren't posted anywhere right? Unfortunately though when you make rules they apply to everybody, and then those with the authority to act would not be as free to do whatever they liked either. The trust system has turned into a protectionist system. Do as I say, not as I do. This is antithetical to the core concepts of Bitcoin. Theymos has a right to do whatever he wants, but when he as an individual makes these choices about individual cases of a trust disputes, then he is in fact moderating trust regardless if he wants to be Theymos the individual or Theymos the admin. He is always both because his actions result in the same amount of force. That's quite a stretch. You'd then have to argue that making top level choices on these forums (such as subforums, hosting choices and site development) are a form of moderation. Obviously they're not, they're an extension of administrative duties separate from moderation. So, your argument is trust moderation isn't moderated because it is done as done as an administrator instead of a moderator? Is that where Vod gets his powers, he just puts on a police hat? |
|
|
|
your "judgment" needs improvement which causes delay on your return to trust list.
What makes you think I seek to be on the trust list? You assume you know what I want but you are wrong. I have said repeatedly the default trust system needs to be removed. What I want is to be able to use the forum that I have contributed to for years without having rules enforced upon me that I am not also protected by. If I should be removed from the default trust for supposedly stifling free speech, why is it another user can then ACTUALLY repeatedly abuse that same system to try to intimidate me into stop talking about his abusive behavior without repercussion? Theymos outwardly says the trust system is unmoderated, and yes has taken exceptional actions to have people removed from default trust solely for the sake of protecting "free speech", yet when some one like Vod leaves people negative trust for being critical of his actions over and over it magically goes unseen. Have you every asked yourself why there is no official forum rules posted ANYWHERE on the forum? Kind of hard to follow the rules if they aren't posted anywhere right? Unfortunately though when you make rules they apply to everybody, and then those with the authority to act would not be as free to do whatever they liked either. The trust system has turned into a protectionist system. Do as I say, not as I do. This is antithetical to the core concepts of Bitcoin. Theymos has a right to do whatever he wants, but when he as an individual makes these choices about individual cases of a trust disputes, then he is in fact moderating trust regardless if he wants to be Theymos the individual or Theymos the admin. He is always both because his actions result in the same amount of force. |
|
|
|
it is a conflict of interest. Microsoft is a major source (indirectly because he is not actually an employee of Microsoft) of Vod's income. As a result Microsoft is able to exercise undue influence on him.
There are hundreds of other people on the default trust network and none of them have given any of he MSDN key sellers negative trust. When a newbie asks for a loan without collateral, when someone scams, when an account gets hacked, among other things, multiple people will leave negative trust on an account.
I don't think Vod (or anyone for that matter) is in a position to be telling other people what they can and cannot be trading as long as all parties are clear as to what is being traded.
So people can money launder, steal, commit crime and nobody has a right to tell them anything and one should just allow criminal activities to take place? VOD is leaving a feedback may be for his own interest/benefit and I wish the other people who are on the default trust should follow the same path and try to stop these type of illegal activities from taking place on the forum. If all just keep quite, they are supporting these type of activities or are a part of it. You are missing the forest for the trees. The reason people don't like this is because Bitcoin was created explicitly to AVOID some third party dictating to others what to do with their money. Yes with this laze-fair attitude some crime will happen, but history shows prohibition just makes it worse. Also, do you think prohibiting things from the forum magically stops it from happening? Furthermore, it starts with MSDN keys, but then where does it stop? Almost all of the virtual goods we all trade with each other have some kind of clause within their terms of service prohibiting distributing them from an unauthorized outlet. If you were to enforce the TOS of every company out there THERE WOULD BE NOTHING TO TRADE. So the question isn't about people maybe getting away with something, its about which is worse, that or this pandora's box of imposition on the trading environment by a demonstrated tyrant like VOD. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
