Yeah this is pretty bad. This is only based on smaller exchanges, imagine what will happen when the larger ones make their announcements
sub 400
|
|
|
440 down this is the end
|
|
|
buy now b4 it crashes down to 0?
<- depressed.
|
|
|
4K coins dumped in 15min
panic much?
|
|
|
Not hard thing to do when same "rumor" is going on for 4 months. and at one point the central bank of china says the rumors are false..... they lied...
|
|
|
OP, sounds like you recently unload a large sum of bitcoin, do you understand that you were able to do that because you are dead wrong?
congarufuckinglation.
|
|
|
Guys did you read what Pieter Wuille Bitcoin dev wrote ? I have no intention to make any fud but Bitcoin generation maybe not limited to 21 million as sopposed to be, they still dont know how the client will behave when they reach the last Block reward, and they think it will start over from 50 BTC.... https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0042.mediawikiAlthough it is widely believed that Satoshi was an inflation-hating goldbug he never said this, and in fact programmed Bitcoin's money supply to grow indefinitely, forever. He modeled the monetary supply as 4 gold mines being discovered per mibillenium (1024 years), with equal intervals between them, each one being depleted over the course of 140 years.
This poses obvious problems, however. Prominent among them is the discussion on what to call 1 billion Bitcoin, which symbol color to use for it, and when wallet clients should switch to it by default.
To combat this, this document proposes a controversial change: making Bitcoin's monetary supply finite.
Details
As is well known, Satoshi was a master programmer whose knowledge of C++ was surpassed only by his knowledge of Japanese culture. The code below:
int64_t nSubsidy = 50 * COIN; // Subsidy is cut in half every 210,000 blocks // which will occur approximately every 4 years. nSubsidy >>= (nHeight / 210000); is carefully written to rely on undefined behaviour in the C++ specification - perhaps so it can be hardware accelerated in future.
The block number is divided by 210000 (the "apparent" subsidy halving interval in blocks), and the result is used as input for a binary shift, applied to the original payout (50 BTC), expressed in base units. Thanks to the new-goldmine interval being exactly 64 times the halving interval, and 64 being the size in bits of the currency datatype, the cycle repeats itself every 64 halvings on all currently supported platforms.
Despite the nice showoff of underhanded programming skills - we want Bitcoin to be well-specified. Otherwise, we're clearly in for a bumpy ride MOTHER OF ALL FUD! HOLY SHIT! WE MIGHT SEE 0.0001$ shame on you mmitech for spreading fud if this isn't completely made up FUD, at most this is a bug, one the dev caught 32 years b4 it would become a problem, devs will fix it and you will upgrade fonzie go take a chill pill. come on for god sake, it is screaming Aprils fool, so all of you can fool around and I cant ?
|
|
|
Guys did you read what Pieter Wuille Bitcoin dev wrote ? I have no intention to make any fud but Bitcoin generation maybe not limited to 21 million as sopposed to be, they still dont know how the client will behave when they reach the last Block reward, and they think it will start over from 50 BTC.... https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0042.mediawikiAlthough it is widely believed that Satoshi was an inflation-hating goldbug he never said this, and in fact programmed Bitcoin's money supply to grow indefinitely, forever. He modeled the monetary supply as 4 gold mines being discovered per mibillenium (1024 years), with equal intervals between them, each one being depleted over the course of 140 years.
This poses obvious problems, however. Prominent among them is the discussion on what to call 1 billion Bitcoin, which symbol color to use for it, and when wallet clients should switch to it by default.
To combat this, this document proposes a controversial change: making Bitcoin's monetary supply finite.
Details
As is well known, Satoshi was a master programmer whose knowledge of C++ was surpassed only by his knowledge of Japanese culture. The code below:
int64_t nSubsidy = 50 * COIN; // Subsidy is cut in half every 210,000 blocks // which will occur approximately every 4 years. nSubsidy >>= (nHeight / 210000); is carefully written to rely on undefined behaviour in the C++ specification - perhaps so it can be hardware accelerated in future.
The block number is divided by 210000 (the "apparent" subsidy halving interval in blocks), and the result is used as input for a binary shift, applied to the original payout (50 BTC), expressed in base units. Thanks to the new-goldmine interval being exactly 64 times the halving interval, and 64 being the size in bits of the currency datatype, the cycle repeats itself every 64 halvings on all currently supported platforms.
Despite the nice showoff of underhanded programming skills - we want Bitcoin to be well-specified. Otherwise, we're clearly in for a bumpy ride MOTHER OF ALL FUD! HOLY SHIT! WE MIGHT SEE 0.0001$ shame on you mmitech for spreading fud if this isn't completely made up FUD, at most this is a bug, one the dev caught 32 years b4 it would become a problem, devs will fix it and you will upgrade fonzie go take a chill pill. wait is this an april fools joke? lmao
|
|
|
Guys did you read what Pieter Wuille Bitcoin dev wrote ? I have no intention to make any fud but Bitcoin generation maybe not limited to 21 million as sopposed to be, they still dont know how the client will behave when they reach the last Block reward, and they think it will start over from 50 BTC.... https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0042.mediawikiAlthough it is widely believed that Satoshi was an inflation-hating goldbug he never said this, and in fact programmed Bitcoin's money supply to grow indefinitely, forever. He modeled the monetary supply as 4 gold mines being discovered per mibillenium (1024 years), with equal intervals between them, each one being depleted over the course of 140 years.
This poses obvious problems, however. Prominent among them is the discussion on what to call 1 billion Bitcoin, which symbol color to use for it, and when wallet clients should switch to it by default.
To combat this, this document proposes a controversial change: making Bitcoin's monetary supply finite.
Details
As is well known, Satoshi was a master programmer whose knowledge of C++ was surpassed only by his knowledge of Japanese culture. The code below:
int64_t nSubsidy = 50 * COIN; // Subsidy is cut in half every 210,000 blocks // which will occur approximately every 4 years. nSubsidy >>= (nHeight / 210000); is carefully written to rely on undefined behaviour in the C++ specification - perhaps so it can be hardware accelerated in future.
The block number is divided by 210000 (the "apparent" subsidy halving interval in blocks), and the result is used as input for a binary shift, applied to the original payout (50 BTC), expressed in base units. Thanks to the new-goldmine interval being exactly 64 times the halving interval, and 64 being the size in bits of the currency datatype, the cycle repeats itself every 64 halvings on all currently supported platforms.
Despite the nice showoff of underhanded programming skills - we want Bitcoin to be well-specified. Otherwise, we're clearly in for a bumpy ride MOTHER OF ALL FUD! HOLY SHIT! WE MIGHT SEE 0.0001$ shame on you mmitech for spreading fud if this isn't completely made up FUD, at most this is a bug, one the dev caught 32 years b4 it would become a problem, devs will fix it and you will upgrade fonzie go take a chill pill.
|
|
|
Guys did you read what Pieter Wuille Bitcoin dev wrote ? I have no intention to make any fud but Bitcoin generation maybe not limited to 21 million as sopposed to be, they still dont know how the client will behave when they reach the last Block reward, and they think it will start over from 50 BTC.... https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0042.mediawikiAlthough it is widely believed that Satoshi was an inflation-hating goldbug he never said this, and in fact programmed Bitcoin's money supply to grow indefinitely, forever. He modeled the monetary supply as 4 gold mines being discovered per mibillenium (1024 years), with equal intervals between them, each one being depleted over the course of 140 years.
This poses obvious problems, however. Prominent among them is the discussion on what to call 1 billion Bitcoin, which symbol color to use for it, and when wallet clients should switch to it by default.
To combat this, this document proposes a controversial change: making Bitcoin's monetary supply finite.
Details
As is well known, Satoshi was a master programmer whose knowledge of C++ was surpassed only by his knowledge of Japanese culture. The code below:
int64_t nSubsidy = 50 * COIN; // Subsidy is cut in half every 210,000 blocks // which will occur approximately every 4 years. nSubsidy >>= (nHeight / 210000); is carefully written to rely on undefined behaviour in the C++ specification - perhaps so it can be hardware accelerated in future.
The block number is divided by 210000 (the "apparent" subsidy halving interval in blocks), and the result is used as input for a binary shift, applied to the original payout (50 BTC), expressed in base units. Thanks to the new-goldmine interval being exactly 64 times the halving interval, and 64 being the size in bits of the currency datatype, the cycle repeats itself every 64 halvings on all currently supported platforms.
Despite the nice showoff of underhanded programming skills - we want Bitcoin to be well-specified. Otherwise, we're clearly in for a bumpy ride ya and the Y2K bug will crash the planet.
|
|
|
huge dump on stamp
huge being 100 in half hour? being 500+ in 5 minutes 500 is not huge, but it was more like 300 or something. in the last 15mins 410BTC was traded on stamps. most of it came in the last 10 mins and it was a flat out DUMP with no shame.
|
|
|
Great news everyone! Bitcoin NOT banned in China! BREAKING NEWS: Bobby Lee Confirms Bitcoin China Ban hmmm.... interesting.
|
|
|
So considering all that’s going on, when do you think is a good time to put in a large purchase at coin base?
not now, china is about to ban bitcoin for the 3rd time, its not getting old. nope!
|
|
|
Until now chinese money is actually IN the game and holdin the market up, if this money is officially leavin the market it will not be comparable to the MtGox crash. MtGox took all the coins with them and decreased the ask supply. If China bans Bitcoin those coins will be for sale on western exchanges.
but didnt you say chinese would get hung for using bitcoin? why would they risk being hung for a few US dollars?
|
|
|
the epic 12 year bull run has began?
|
|
|
its kinda like trying to get your mom to buy a 28.8K modem and connect to an IRC so you can chat in 1995, she thinks its cool that your having fun, but she'll stick to the phone. no amount of you telling her how gr8 the internet is and what its massive potential is, is going to get her to connect to an IRC chat room. 10 years later your mom is sharing her vacations pictures on Facebook, and recently started to "Tweet".
you saw what most don't and you wanted it right away, when they see what they want to see, it they'll get it too, end of story.
dose that make sense? lol
|
|
|
btc-e being pumped
You call that a pump? its not a dump
|
|
|
|