Anybody have low hash rate reported from pool website? My total rig is 12.56 mh/s but my pool only reported 10.25 mh/s

Frequent hops between pools (==girino miner) -> less Diff
Less Diff -> more WU (and vise versa)

Long stay on one pool (==current version) -> more Diff
More Diff -> less WU.

I'm sorry all, I did NOT go through the thread, just sharing my info and taking if from here. I'm waaay to busy to go through all this, but will be attempt from here on.

I did NOTHING in terms of argument change, and this miner vs girino was INFERIOR in hashrate.

but... fuck girino plus his GNU-obscene 2% fee.

 Then I looked over my settings, thinking hmmm... optimized..? went from -g 1  to -g2 ... and despite the odd driver crash, everything is spot on, a slight increase in hashrate, same or even lower temps!

Second... 5x BIOS Undervolted 280x Vapor-X (think, bought it cheap off ebay). Getting 3mh/s per card. With this miner, I have a lower WU by about 80 !!!

This was my (extensively experimented) regular darkcoin kernel settings (radically different to scrypt) - also used for girino


 With this one, these settings get me barely same hashrate, slightly lower... about 700kh/s lower in total. Nothing to cry over. If I do -g 2, I have to drastically lower intensity. 19, 18 17, 16 ----crashes driver

15 is the sweet spot indeed. I have not checked for consumption and heat in the long term, but by heat signature it seems to be a little worse than girino's 2% miner (which is easily overridden)

Also, pool reports much lower rate than girino's by quite a few (2-4 mh/s). More HW error with this one as well, and its crashing frequently.
So I ask the real pro's to check my settings and suggest some tweaks, if you please! I really do think it my settings!

I know these are ONLY preliminary findings, and need time to stabilise.

Thanks in advance!

Man you guy's must enjoy the chase, I have seen gpu miners get ripped time and time again, it is starting to look like there will be no algo that cannot have a chip or system made that is optimized to mine it.

i think secret asic for x11 are mining because of darkcoin that was very profitable, they will make some profit before announcing and selling them

sry but i can't believe there is a 1 TH of gpu farm out there, must be an asic or fpga

anyway good alternative:

jackpot algo for nvidia

x13 for amd, curecoin folding for amd is also a good option, but i don't like how it stress too much the cpu

Can you make a Windows build with your x13mod kernel so I can test results on R9 290X and share configs please.

btw 2-min SICK build is pretty stout, I think this miner has an issue with the way Nicehash drops their stratum work when switching coins.  I don't use Nicehash but a lot of renters complain about that.

Hook it up with the X13 kernel mod!

Are you saying we're getting faster performance because the CL file isn't object-oriented, and instead, smashed into one straight file?  No other mods or hardcodes to darkcoin kernel?

~Youve got to be a pussy to be scared of spiders. Well unless theyre huge ones.

I have to say the Devs + friends of Darkcoin are true geniuses...They have been mining this version of SGminer since day one with their farms, while they initial released it as "only" a CPU coin, then released a GPU friendly version that mined at half the hash rate to gain even more adoption and drive the price up, and finally release the version they all have been mining on after the hard fork (even if this is the version the Devs are running on...they probably still have an even more optimized version).

My hats off to you guys

the miner give me the " it stopped working" if i don't create a bat file before launching through shortcut

this error wasn't present in the first version, the one where you fixed that part of the code

also marucoin is removed from this build

the last version is the one in the OP?

Do any of these builds have the fixes for nicehash incorporated?

I>15 = pay 2% fee and I=<15 not

ok I do that , but , this miner not mine on 2 pool same time . ^^'

Hey 5th, I know you posted a paste of the x11mod kernel before, but can you combine x11 mod with what you see different between marucoin.cl (http://pastebin.com/X97XdwU3) X13 algo and the standard darkcoin.cl?

The x11mod kernel is some 8000 lines of code the x13 kernel much much shorter, but less efficient.  I wanted to see if we could optimize 11 of the 13 algorithms for upcoming use.  X13 is basically X11 hamsi+fugue i think.  So can we just smash the hamsi+fugue portion to bottom of the 8000 lines or what.

Received, thanks!