Bitcoin Forum
June 25, 2024, 10:12:08 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 ... 299 »
901  Economy / Economics / Re: Youtuber Crushes 1 Kilo Gold Bar Worth $40k, Hilarity Ensues on: December 05, 2016, 10:36:09 PM
This youtuber needs professional help. He must be punished for this
Punished for what?

Idiot.
902  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Few basic random questions about bitcoin on: December 03, 2016, 01:03:53 AM
You are correct that there is a  0.032% chance that a 20% miner will solve 5 blocks in a row.  In doing so they were pretty lucky and made a lot of BTC for their efforts.

So your next question would need a bit more detail.  Given that they just made about $50,000 please explain what they would do to "cheat" that would make economic sense.  In order to make economic sense they would have to be able to make way more that $50,000 by cheating.
903  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Is it illegal for me to sell my Bitcoins? on: December 02, 2016, 07:31:29 PM
All you signature spammers sure post a lot but never say anything or contribute in any way to the threads.

At least read the fucking thread before you post.

Idiots like you are ruining this forum.

BAN ALL SIGNATURE CAMPAIGNS !!!!!
904  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: How to mine bitcoins using webhosting? on: November 28, 2016, 10:08:36 PM
consider running one or more full Bitcoin nodes.  The more the merrier.
50GB Disk Space is not enough to run a full node. I think alamin99 has shared hosting.
I read 50GB of accelerated disk space (SSD?) but reading between the lines I assumed more "slower" disk space.  Could be wrong.  If he really only had 50 GB of disk space then he should not run a full node.
905  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: I want to buy 4 BTC on: November 28, 2016, 10:05:44 PM
Let's see:  noob, first post ever, PayPal, WU, interesting...
906  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: How to mine bitcoins using webhosting? on: November 28, 2016, 10:01:12 PM
You won't get paid for it but if you really want to help the Bitcoin network and you have unlimited bandwidth and disk space then please consider running one or more full Bitcoin nodes.  The more the merrier.  Like I said, it does not pay, but it will help distribute the network.

I run a full node on my Linux machine all the time in order to support the network.

A side benefit of running a full node is that you get to "vote" on the future technical direction of the network by selecting which version of the full node you want to run.
907  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Do we need to pay tax from Bitcoins earnings? on: November 28, 2016, 09:46:12 PM
If you are in the US then the IRS has ruled that Bitcoins are to be treated like stock.  So if you buy Bitcoins/stock at $500 per Bitcoin/share there is no taxable event.

Holding your Bitcoin/stock is not a taxable event.

If you sell your Bitcoin/stock at a profit, let's say $1000 per Bitcoin/share then you have a capital gain of $500 per Bitcoin/share and you owe capital gains tax on the gain.

If you sell your Bitcoin/stock at a loss, let's say $400 per Bitcoin/share then you have a $100 capital loss per Bitcoin/share which can be used to offset gains elsewhere on your US tax return.

The tricky part is when you use your Bitcoins to buy something, let's say Girl Scout cookies.  You owe a capital gains tax on the Bitcoins you use to buy the cookies if you have a gain on those Bitcoins at the time you buy the cookies.  If you have a loss on the Bitcoins at the time you buy the cookies then you have a capital loss you can write off on your tax return.

So you have to track the date when you spend your Bitcoins also.  I use the average price that day as the price at the time I spend them.  I use Quicken to track my purchases, sales and use of all my Bitcoins.

Pain in the ass, yes but the regulations are pretty clear.
908  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: What's the chance that two miners find a block at the same time? on: November 28, 2016, 01:22:02 PM
This has sparkled me a new question: what will happen if Bitcoin changes its incentive to not the only awarding the first miner, but top N miners who broadcast their blocks, each gets a share according to their chronologoical order? Like 1st gets 50%, 2nd gets 25%, 3rd gets 12.5%, etc
The Bitcoin protocol is almost impossible to change, so the quick answer to your question is that this will never change.

If you could change the protocol a better change would be to reward full nodes for operating on the network.  Currently people (like me) that operate full nodes get no compensation at all so the number of full nodes operating continues to shrink.

But, like I said the Bitcoin protocol is almost impossible to change since pretty much everyone has to agree to any change.

A longer answer is that the miners consider orphaned blocks part of their "cost of doing business".  Every miner gets a percentage of the orphaned blocks so the pain is spread out among the miners.  Orphaned blocks are just a fact of life for the miners.  I do not want to get into all this but the orphaned block rate figures into the whole controversy related to raising the block size.

Raising the block size is an example of a change to the protocol that has been proposed and debated for months and months in hundreds of threads here on this forum and there is still no consensus on how to move forward on this one single change to the protocol.

By design changing the protocol is very very hard to do.
909  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: What's the chance that two miners find a block at the same time? on: November 28, 2016, 12:04:55 PM
If you mean "at the same time" that two miners present possible solutions for the current block then this happens all the time and causes one of the blocks to become an "orphaned block".  The miner that mines the block containing the most work automatically wins and the miner who mined the block with less work gets the shaft (no reward).

Statistic here:

https://blockchain.info/charts/n-orphaned-blocks

I found a real cool view of this phenomenon:

https://blockchain.info/orphaned-blocks


910  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Strange missing BTC balance from Bitcoin Core version v0.13.0 (64-bit) on: November 27, 2016, 09:28:34 PM
Can you find the change address in your wallet?

Has the change been returned to your wallet now? (The transaction now has 6 confirms)

If so then your last transaction should get retried.

I expect your last transaction needed to wait for your change to be returned to you.
911  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: "Peerless Monetary Framework" as competitor to Bitcoin? on: November 20, 2016, 02:09:26 PM
I ran across a newly proposed cryptocurrency that promises to dispense with the blockchain and peer-to-peer network. It's called "Peerless" (very subtle). Have a look at http://www.peerless.money, though this URL forwards to an educational site (strange). But it's a monster white paper, and it promises digital cash that's completely secure, anonymous, and decentralized. Is this a serious competitor to Bitcoin?
So far, I have found nothing of technical merit in this paper.

Bill Dembski is obviously a sharp guy and knows a lot about a lot of things.

The proposed system has a huge double-spend problem and relies heavily on trusted third parties.
912  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: "Peerless Monetary Framework" as competitor to Bitcoin? on: November 19, 2016, 11:44:31 PM
What is your connection to this? 

the "whitepaper" is 90% rant.. i gave up reading about all the flaws of other systems and then a sudden injection of what this "peerless"  thing meant to do.

i think its more of a brownpaper Cheesy than a whitepaper. definitely needs a major re-write
I also gave up reading through the brown paper.  I may try again later.
913  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: "Peerless Monetary Framework" as competitor to Bitcoin? on: November 19, 2016, 10:35:09 PM
What is your connection to this? 
914  Other / Off-topic / Re: math/hash function question on: November 18, 2016, 12:12:33 PM
It was just an aside.  Either concatenation or xor will work for what you are trying to do.  It is just that when used for security related purposes the hash function is designed to work with the concatenation of values.  You are not using the hash function for a security related purpose here so either way.
915  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Banks offering bitcoin exchange option on: November 18, 2016, 12:51:31 AM
See this thread:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1674008.0

Lock this redundant thread.
916  Other / Off-topic / Re: math/hash function question on: November 17, 2016, 07:54:06 PM
Just an aside this might be slightly better as it gets rid of any inter-dependencies that might be introduced by the XOR operation.

  H(H(A) concatenated to H(B)) % 2

917  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [POLL] Would you open a Bitcoin account at your local bank? on: November 17, 2016, 02:36:16 PM
The danger is not for you personally.  You know the difference between a Bitcoin and a Bitcoin note.  The danger is for all those people who will accept and use Bitcoin notes and believe them to be "as good as" Bitcoins or basically a safer government backed and controlled version of Bitcoins.  The danger is that, once again, the general public will fall for the same old central bank scam and Bitcoin notes become "Bitcoins" in the public mind.  Just like Federal Reserve notes have become "dollars" in the public mind.

Go ahead and put your Bitcoins in the bank for the illusions they peddle.  You are informed.  You know they are no longer yours and you are accepting the banks IOU and word they will give them back when you come to demand them back.  You are willing to take the risk.  There is nothing wrong with that.

My concern is on a larger scale.  My concern is for the concept and good name of Bitcoin.
918  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [POLL] Would you open a Bitcoin account at your local bank? on: November 17, 2016, 02:09:14 PM
Bitcoin is like gold, not like fiat. While the banks have gold in their vaults (or not, who knows?), they create fiat from it, not gold.

That is exactly my point! 

Bitcoin is like "digital gold".  Bitcoin == gold.  Bitcoin notes == Federal Reserve Notes == "dollars".

The current fiat garbage we use was originally backed by gold/silver.  At one time one dollar was defined as equal to  exactly 1/35th of an ounce of gold.  You could go to any bank and turn in 35 "dollars" = technically "Federal Reserve Notes"  = gold notes = paper IOUs from the Federal Reserve that substitutes for something real = gold substitutes, for one ounce of real gold.  The banks had no choice.  You can see this from the original obligation printed right on the notes:

Quote
This note is receivable by all national and member banks and Federal Reserve Banks and for all taxes, customs and other public dues. It is redeemable in gold on demand at the Treasury Department of the United States in the city of Washington, District of Columbia or in gold or lawful money at any Federal Reserve Bank.

The term lawful money is very interesting, check out the history of that term some time. 

Eventually there were so many Federal Reserve Notes in circulation that the amount of actual gold held in reserve "backing" all the notes was a total joke.  At that point the we just stopped backing the FRNs and we ended up with what we have today, currency by fiat, the value of which is controlled and devalued on purpose by the Federal Reserve system.

Just look at the current obligation written on you Federal Reserve notes.  Very different from their original obligation wouldn't you agree?

Quote
This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private

It is inevitable that this will happen again as history always repeats itself until people learn from it.

Check out the deterioration of the obligation clause over time here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Note
919  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [POLL] Would you open a Bitcoin account at your local bank? on: November 17, 2016, 04:53:57 AM
If you deposit your hard earned Bitcoins into a Bank you have lent your Bitcoins to a third party.

You somehow ignore that people already do that. Poloniex and other exchanges allow you to send your Bitcoin there and lend it, hoping that you'll get your money back and some extra.
I do not ignore the fact that people can and do lend their Bitcoins to exchanges, Poloniex, strangers, friends, family, etc.  In fact I have Bitcoins on account at exchanges and do on occasion lend them out to margin traders.  You are correct that people can and do lend Bitcoins and there is actually nothing wrong with that.  My issue is with deposit accounts at Banks, specifically government/centrally controlled banks.

The difference would be that banks are (unfortunately) privileged by the governments and (fortunately) the chance they'll steal your money would be smaller than at other businesses (exchanges).
Might be true until the whole fiat currency house of cards begins to crumble.  Then we will see how safe your funds are from confiscation, increased fees and across the board deposit "taxes".

Then the fact somebody keeps an amount of Bitcoin at a business (in this case a bank) doesn't exclude the fact the same person keeps some in cold storage, some on local wallet, some at exchanges/trading and so on. People that want to earn money will try to make them work.
Sure.

While you are right that keeping money on another businesses is wrong, you forgot that this already happens. The difference is that they are not called infamously "banks".
Lending in and of itself is not wrong.  People need to realize that is what they are doing, that is all.  They need to know the difference between possessing Bitcoins and lending them.  Most people do not realize the difference until they loose their Bitcoins in a exchange or business collapse.  This is one of the beautiful things about Bitcoins.  It teaches very valuable lessons.

While you are right that working with "promise to pay", you didn't think that bigger exchanges can already do that. Do you really think that all of them are nice an keep all the money in cold storage instead of "make the money work" for them?
I do not think you understood what I said.  The danger here is not the lending of Bitcoins.  The danger here is the banks creating money out of thin air based on Bitcoins.  If Bitcoin deposits become common place then the next step is to create Bitcoin checks and then Bitcoin notes.  Once these Bitcoin notes are generally accepted as payment the banks are once again totally in charge, can inflate, can deflate, can control the value of these Bitcoin notes.  There can be as many Bitcoin notes as they want.  All "backed" by the pool of actual Bitcoins. The actual pool of 21 million real Bitcoins will eventually "back" a huge number of Bitcoin notes.  Once these Bitcoin notes are generally accepted as money then, for the "good of the system", the value of these Bitcoin notes will be separated from the value of the actual Bitcoins and the value of them can be controlled by a central Bitcoin Bank.

Does this sound familiar to you?

 
So I find your logic flawed. All the problems you stated, while real, already happen even without the banks getting a share of it.
But I will not call you names.
I will not call you names either.  I call the people who glibly and blindly and ignorantly say "sure, there is no harm in giving my Bitcoins to the banking system and accepting Bitcoin notes instead" sheep because that is what they are.  You obviously are a thinking person, not a signature spamming parasite on this forum.

Finally, did you miss this part of my statement:

Quote
it is inevitable that Bitcoin substitutes (bitcoin IOUs) will eventually be used for and accepted as payment and that the banking system will recreate a fractional reserve banking system using Bitcoins.  This is because most people do not understand the first thing about money, what it is, where it comes from and what purpose it serves

The difference this time around is that those of us who choose not to participate in the bankers schemes will not have to participate.  Once Bitcoin substitute notes are generally accepted (basically just another form or paper currency controlled by the government, central bank, and selfish corporate interests) those of us who choose not to participate can always trade them in for real Bitcoins at whatever the Bitcoin note to real Bitcoin exchange rate happens to be.
920  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2016-11-11] One Percent of US, Chinese Digital Shoppers Pay Online With Bitcoin on: November 12, 2016, 11:32:39 AM
There is no way that 1% use Bitcoin because less than 1% of online shoppers even know Bitcoin exists.  This number is total bullshit.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 ... 299 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!