Why? And more importantly...why?!

No. The only troll post here is the OP's, intentional or not.

Seriously, stop using the "services" of known thieves. You're doing a disservice to more than yourself alone.

Stop being retarded already.

What, again with this?



Certainly play pretend exchanges don't (gasp) have the funds or the wherewithal to approach this thing. That doesn't mean the actual problem is about money, which the actual exchange certainly has, along with the wherewithal to address the true problem.

Of course it's up to the investor to make decisions. But about securities. Securities, not the half-baked fantasies of people with nothing to offer gluing plumage to themselves in an effort to look like fine birds.

Kickstarter is not securities. School fundraisers are not securities. Hopeful people whose qualifications consist of "passion" are not securities issuers. So long as the twain are mod-podged into meeting, "underestimations" will be made, "unfortunate" "winding downs" will be had, and plenty of noobs will imagine it's "because government".

Again:

Yes.

You don't read too well, do you.

Seeing if you can milk a quick buck out of a scammer is a really shitty move.

WoT would be a better first step.

Guess what, waiting a few weeks and coming back with more scammy IM bullshit still doesn't work.

Here you go.

I gotta requote this just for rubbing it in.

You've got a whole lot of reading to do before you're advancing anything. As a whole or in parts.

Yeah, month-old noobs get butthurt at me all the time. As if it's my fault.

Yeah yeah, see here.

There is no "instead".

I suppose you're one of those that'd be better served by justdice investment.

Many people saying something is not necessarily an indication that the something has any value. What matters is who's saying it and what's actually being said. Try reading a second pass, this time "noticing" who's talking and the sense (or lack thereof) of the content.

Here's a handy starting point:



It's not my exchange, and a handful of agitated forumites doesn't at all render something "unpopular". Why do you imagine you can fail to read to such an extent and yet also have the wherewithal or experience to tell me what's what?

Anyhow, it's been said time and again: the bullshit non-exchanges based on making things overly simplistic and shiny for the sake of coddling the clueless fail. Every time. People like to imagine it's because of the Boogeyman. It's not. It's squarely because some people imagine that securities is about being nice to those who have no business investing in the first place so as to feel cozy about being accepted into the circle jerk. This attitude isn't ever going to be a feature of an actual exchange, anywhere.

And again, Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency. Eschewing cryptography tools that build good security and actually function as they should because learning is too hard will always and forever be the attitude of those who do not belong in BTC finance.