Name: Decoded
Post count: 730
Rank: Full Member
Bitcoin Address: 1M92zFzjYWgoaP61P3d3z6m1VdoW9SsSmL
I understand if I post in uncounted forums, I won't be paid for those posts.
All denied and decoded denied for the second time. I hope your not posting here just to get paid lol Any reason? If it's my posts, can you give me some guidelines, (l ike how many characters I need to post, etc) so I can try and get into the campaign? ;~; [/quote] well there's your first problem; it's clear you're posting solely for pay, and actively thinking about making your posts just 'constructive' enough to qualify for pay. |
|
|
|
It's weird that some people received payment while some did not. I thought many did not receive their payment along with me.
its possible that the people that havent received their payments are still being screened by marco. just my thought. |
|
|
|
i dont even know why people seem so eager to escrow other than to pull off a scam, escrowing deals seems more of a hassle; if something goes wrong with the deal its your responsibility to resolve the issues, and if you mess up somewhere its up to you to reimburse the parties affected.
Imagine someone doing escrow 10 times successfully. People on 11th time will go to him escrow is the fastest way to earn trust imo than just trading and posting around board escrowing shouldnt be seen as a way to earn trust. anyone who goes in with that mindset, imo, is sketchy at best. escrow is something offered as a protective service for other forum members because you are deemed trustworthy by the majority to be trusted with a sum of money. in short, its the other way around; you escrow because you are trusted (and willing to offer your time), not escrow to gain trust. Do you really think people see escrowing as a way of gaining trust? They just say that to hide their real intentions, anyone who knows how an escrow works will understand that you need to be trusted in order to be one. Do they really think anyone would use their ''escrowing service'' to scam them? You have to be pretty naive to think so. at the very least, i think a small portion of people who try to offer these services do. and by that, i mean a very small portion. i have no doubt the majority "offer" these services with the intent to scam, but people exist that are naive enough to believe they can be trusted. |
|
|
|
i dont even know why people seem so eager to escrow other than to pull off a scam, escrowing deals seems more of a hassle; if something goes wrong with the deal its your responsibility to resolve the issues, and if you mess up somewhere its up to you to reimburse the parties affected.
Imagine someone doing escrow 10 times successfully. People on 11th time will go to him escrow is the fastest way to earn trust imo than just trading and posting around board escrowing shouldnt be seen as a way to earn trust. anyone who goes in with that mindset, imo, is sketchy at best. escrow is something offered as a protective service for other forum members because you are deemed trustworthy by the majority to be trusted with a sum of money. in short, its the other way around; you escrow because you are trusted (and willing to offer your time), not escrow to gain trust. |
|
|
|
It is not illegal to buy or sell accounts but it does not matter, the point is that he was scamming on his alt account and now he is complaining that he got negative trust on this other account which now makes no sense.
isn't it always against rules to buy/sell/trade forum accounts? It isn't on this forum, though I find it extremely sketchy. that's odd. people will only have to invest some time and they are good to go. they can even become hero, get positive trust and scam escrow You need more than a year for a hero account and you wont be able to escrow even if you have one, people buy accounts mostly for signature campaigns or because they got negative trust on their other accounts like OP did. i dont even know why people seem so eager to escrow other than to pull off a scam, escrowing deals seems more of a hassle; if something goes wrong with the deal its your responsibility to resolve the issues, and if you mess up somewhere its up to you to reimburse the parties affected. |
|
|
|
|
hey marco, any chance of me being enrolled in the campaign after youre done filtering out the spammers? thanks.
if it were possible for me to be considered for pay in the politics and society board as well that'd be fantastic.
|
|
|
|
You have to see a shooting star during a red, full moon, then you become moderator.
Not quite. On the second blood moon during your stay here, you either turn into a weremod or you don't. If you do turn you are deemed as worthy. you also have to offer up a sacrifice of a baby goat to the one true god theymos while pouring a rather expensive bottle of wine on the shrine a la' badbear  |
|
|
|
This page about what they posted to her over and over again is sick. I don't even know what to say. They act like she's hurting people and it's the end of the world, when they're the ones hurting her. im going to sleep forever thats just fucking depressing to hear from anyone. |
|
|
|
|
this is my take on user ranks; i feel 15 separate ranks would likely get confusing for users, so i simplified it a bit by adding levels here and there rather than 15 distinct identifiers.
1 newbie
2 trickster I
3 trickster II
4 trickster III
5 ace I
6 ace II
7 ace III
8 the joker I
9 the joker II
10 the joker III
11 high roller I
12 high roller II
13 addict
14 shark
15 VIP
|
|
|
|
Since you mentioned your not new then why don't you use your main account instead for reporting, therefore you could decrease the time interval between each of your reports since it's all related to the rank your in and also to the case you mentioned that's right since he haven't deleted his last bump from 2 days prior to the other bump but I also notice that it's from 2014 and why report just now plus his not on any sig campaigns so maybe that's also a reason why no one either deleted or no one noticed at all
maybe his main account is banned  |
|
|
|
I was told the loan was finally repaid, can you confirm this?
yup, just forgot to update this, I left feedback on gifted's profile with the txid. |
|
|
|
They don't even debate, they just make their talking points and when they're questioned they start making wild accusations and try to harass or stalk the people who criticise them, by the way, if you guys have heard of Thunderf00t this guy is a regular critic of the authoritarian feminists and they tried to stalk him and get him fired RL, however the plan backfired, rather hilariously. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o81ig9xOKvsI know some people questioned my involvement when talking about these issues before, normally I don't get involved, but these people are genuine lunatics and hypocrites, they are also trying to invade the games industry, which makes this personal for me in particular so I'm more than happy to take the fight to them if necessary. I think it's important we keep an eye on these people especially the stalkers because they're actively trying to censor and control the internet at large. theyre trying to invade a lot more than just the games industry imo, these lunatics recently got to speak at a UN conference iirc. in addition, not only do these people go off on every seemingly innocuous statement, they push the issue as far as possible; they dont stop at disagreeing with you, they ensure your life is destroyed to its fullest extent if you so much as disagree with whatever ideology they try to shove down your throat at the time. Their ultimate goal: kill free speech. That is why they NEVER comment on the abuse on women in some countries, because they agree with those countries. You never hear of anonymous taking over those countries' servers, facebook page, doxxing abusers, etc.. Why is that?
imo its worse, they want to ensure free speech goes one way, and ensure that drastic, negative consequences await anyone who opposes their arbitrary interpretation of free speech. |
|
|
|
I try to offer to Mitchell something for respect
Hi refused but also give me another negative
that's called bribery. that's a bad thing in case you didnt know. |
|
|
|
|
that's roughly 20 cents an hour for work youre asking. good luck with that.
|
|
|
|
|
ill be leaving the campaign for now.
|
|
|
|
I was just waiting for someone to come out and try to act 'smart' by being supportive of such a war. While one can't deny that nuclear tests do not have any effect at all, they're pretty much safe (as you've said it: controlled detonations). This is much different from a nuke attack. There are many factors that we have to consider. We can really assume that the Russians are able to build more "Tsar Bomba" (1 was only ever officially built). You can use this website to check out what happens if you hit NY with only 1 of those.neat site. also, adding on to the nuclear testing thing, there were a series of detonations near some islands, the bikini atolls: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_testing_at_Bikini_Atoll#Nuclear_test_listdecades later, the locals that once inhabited the island cannot return to their home for fear of nuclear contamination. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/02/bikini-atoll-nuclear-test-60-yearsI do think that there are even more powerful unofficial weapons.
i think those 'more powerful weapons' would likely refer to biological/chemical weapons, both of which are officially "banned" from warfare, but i dont expect laws to stop anyone in the case the threat of a world-ending nuclear war is imminent. |
|
|
|
could be just alts of the same person.
just googled for those names. looks like they were taken from league of legends.
its fairly obvious its one person farming these accounts. that being said, i didnt really care much for it. however, looking at a few of the replied, its highly likely the user is making use of a spambot to make these posts. I don't care about his/her farming of accounts, my inquiry is about those consecutive posts made on a single thread by only one person(probably). I think it is some sort of spamming but I want someone to confirm it  It is highly probable that they are all related and also highly probable by the text used, are automated bots talking nonsense. |
|
|
|
That's right, you can't win a nuclear war. Multiple nuclear blasts would probably disrupt Earth's orbit and climate. We'd be killing ourselves over nothing, a piece of paper saying this side gave up first.
2474 Nukes detonated already and here we are. So stop that Hollywood bullshit. Nuclear war can be won. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons_teststhose were controlled detonations in locations that were deemed to have the least affect on human life. a nuclear war would result in nuclear weapons being hurled into populated areas, resulting in the obvious deaths from the explosions, but the irradiation of all surrounding areas as well. radiation sickness, cancer, deformities at birth, etc can be expected to follow, if not death. a war scenario cannot by any means be compared to weapon tests, such as are described in the link you put above. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
