Thanks for the answers. I understood my mistake.

I don't have the delete links. At all.



Yes, you are right. Many thanks!

In the past, iirc, the trust ratings I made had the option to remove them. For some while I don't seem to have that option anymore.
I wanted to change the text of a trust rating so I'd have to remove it, but I see I cannot.
Am I missing something? Did something change?
Thanks.

PS. I tried to also search for the subject but got no relevant answers.

I don't know if Minereum is for good or not, I didn't follow the drama.
From what I see Livecoin.net allows trading MNE (but beware, right now you can only deposit MNE and there are also scam accusations against livecoin).
If you indeed have 32k MNE and would sell, you'd get almost 0.16 BTC which is not bad imho.
Please don't get this as a trading advice though. It's your money, do as you think. Also DYOR about the coin and exchange(s).

I see STO as an ICO. A tiny bit different legal status, but the idea behind it is the same and also the risks.
It is most probably an over simplified view and may be also only partly correct, but it's good enough imho and easy to understand for those who were here in 2017 and 2018.

Indeed, newbie accounts may just do Google translate, or may make mistakes (like posting in wrong section). On the other hand newbies may be more eager to do tasks (of course this is not always true) or work for unlisted tokens. But can you be sure that older accounts are perfect?

Some businesses are willing to take such risks, some not. It worth spending time on adding the user rank to the list? Debatable, but can be a solution. I'm not convinced of its usefulness.

OP cannot really check the background for everybody, it would be a huge task. And checking everybody's translation is also impossible. So let's try to be realistic. The only thing that maybe should be there is a disclaimer that the ones offering the job should double check since OP is not responsible for the quality of the translations done (or something like this).

He may have not played for long enough to get indeed addicted. It's interesting that he's not really a gambler.
But since he won big twice out of 2 occasions, he may start thinking he is even luckier than he is and try again. Interesting to see what'll happen when he starts losing (hopefully not all his winnings).
On another hand, we could give him some credit. Maybe he won't return indeed. If he doesn't really enjoy gambling enough to play for fun with small amounts (and from what I see he doesn't), he may have taken a proper decision which is not that difficult to keep.

I wish him use his winning wisely.

I guess that you either didn't reflect enough, either trying to rise a fake problem.
There's a huge difference between goods/objects that take space (storage) and computer/virtual things that don't need warehouses.

The oil negative price was temporary to avoid getting the point they don't have any means to store it and also avoid shutting down production.
Bitcoin is generated in the same way and the transaction go on in the same way no matter what's its price in US Dollar. 1 BTC = 1 BTC.

So basically you compared apples with virtual oranges.

I think that OP should simply make the NR part much more visible, maybe write in some color (red?) in Legend and table too.
Right now it's easy to miss it. Keep in mind that many will "scan" the table, not properly read it, since there's a lot of info there (almost too much).
However, keep up the good work, @casperBGD

@examplens, you should remember that in the main/Bitcoin signatures overview table there was Betcoin with a big red star on it. Here's kinda the same situation, I'd say. Some are willing to take the risk, some not. Of course, if it's proven scam the campaign should be delisted.

Corect, dar la site-ul in Romana cred ca e mai relevant sa avem Bucuresti, Cluj, Constanta, Timisoara, Oradea samd decat Milano, Torino si Florenta.
Clar, face traducerea in general mai grea. Si stiu ca e mai usor sa comentezi "dupa razboi". Incerc doar sa ajut sa fie bun pentru cei mai noi. (Desi chiar si eu am fost placut surprins ca au ATM si relativ aproape de mine, credeam ca doar BitcoinRomania a iesit din Bucuresti)



Cred ca oricare ar fi topicul, este indicat sa fie adaptat, nu doar tradus. Altfel isi poate pierde din relevanta. Oricum, poti sa-l intrebi pe @fillippone pentru siguranta. 

Well, that simply means that you've missed some threads here and there.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5214564
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5214670
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=56509

If you don't read back much, it's easy to miss, January 3rd is mostly a day for hangover or getting back to work than reading 

The wording is bad and awfully misleading. The users are allowed to post everywhere, just only 3 subs are paid.
I don't find it against the rules. The real problem is that they require minimum 30 posts / week too and the combination of these rules can indeed lead to spam (although the altcoins area already has its fair share of spam).
But this will have to be dealt per user, I think.

It's a legitimate thought.
Just make sure you use different passwords for the sites you use, else your habits will be your worse enemy (one hacked website will expose multiple/all your accounts).

Well, there are many dates. You can read at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi_Nakamoto
In August bitcoin.org was registered.
In October the white paper was shown to the world.
In January the genesis block was created (so our blockchain) and the first Bitcoin was mined.

So everybody's right, in a way or another  

What I needed badly to get synchronized was the passwords. Bitwarden does that.
Sync for the rest of the data would be nice too, indeed, but it's not that important for me.

More and more seniors are also recommending to get rid of Chrome completely.
I am in the process of doing that. Brave + Bitwarden combined seem to be a good replacement and .. interesting for this topic: Brave has in-built ad blocker (which you can also disable for the websites you want).
Just another choice to think on  

I find that "happy trading" quite sarcastic.
Traders always have an eye on the oil price. The oil price makes history (I mean, ffs!?!). Panic makes them sell... Bitcoin?
I find it a bad moment to sell if this is how it works.

How low can it go until the miners decide to no longer sell?
Is it a manipulation again? Have this feeling for far too long and I start to think that may I am mistaking.

Somebody else wrote today that it can fall to 5k levels. I hope he's wrong and this is only a bear trap, but I simply don't know what to expect next.

So they keep the stable coins waiting and instead of buying now while the price is low, they are waiting for .. a certain block to pass in order to buy?
No. If they do that it'll be just a psychological tactic that'll actually do a big scale pump and dump. Which is not unusual at halving events.
Imho the real price growth may happen only when miners will not be willing anymore to sell cheap the much more hardly earned coins.

I use Chrome now. Yes, I know...it's bad   and even worse, I use it from all kind of devices. When Firefox had big issues long ago Google hooked me bad and now it's not easy to switch away.
I may be migrating to Brave in the (more or less) near future - I started doing some research in that direction.

On the other hand, at least I am not into Facebook, so only 1/4 of the world gets my data  

CPU mining is not a good business anymore. It's cheaper to find a few promising coins and invest the money you were prepared to pay for electricity.
However, if you have late/last generation CPU, you can take a look at Monero.