You will have to explain how do you think that all the bitcoin will get lost all of a sudden?

Many holders have lost their keys, making their coins inaccessible unless they find them again. More will do it in the future. Those are lost coins. It's highly unlikely that every single bitcoin owner will lose their keys one day. Perhaps you think a malicious future update could render all keys useless, but if we take into account how difficult it is to make changes to the protocol that everyone will agree on, that's pretty much impossible. Finally, even if all of the bitcoin got hacked and stolen, we still can't say it's lost. The ownership, changed and those possessing the new keys have access to it. That would pretty much signal the death of Bitcoin, though. 

If we look at the graph you posted carefully, the first halving event caused the price to rise immediately. This wasn't the case with the 2nd and 3rd halving events. You can see on the image that bitcoin was following a downward trajectory the second and third time, before the prices moved upwards to reach new all-time-highs. It's going to be interesting to see how it will act this time around.

One shouldn't feel sorry for selling and exiting their positions at a time when they needed the money or felt it was time to sell. This is an economy that works in cycles. After a high there is always a low where you can stack up again and even recover from past losses. If the money you got from selling years ago was for a good use and spent intelligently, there is no need to feel that you have missed out on more profit and be sad about it.

This might be the first official case that we know of or the first one that has been reported in the media, but I am sure there were others that remained under the radar before this one. In some countries, people don't sign contracts for renting apartments. It's a black market wild west with no paper trail. Some of those deals have likely been negotiated in crypto if both parties agree and support the innovation. The more adoption there is, the better for everyone involved.

Their original statements and opinions on Bitcoin haven't changed. They have just learned how to go with the flow and not piss in the wind. What they are doing now is profiting from a brand-new way of making money of investors, and not by trying to increase adoption of BTC. They couldn't care if BTC adoption skyrocketed or plummeted to the ground if it made them richer. That's why I wouldn't pay too much attention on their statements. 

I wouldn't compare Blackrock with the early Bitcoin developers and holders and the reasons they got involved in this technology. Early adopters wanted an alternative, so they created a currency that anyone can use without requesting permission of a third party. Blackrock is an investment company. It's a cold-hearted business strategy to get involved with Bitcoin. They don't care about it nor will they be holders. They are trying to acquire more USD with a business that is booming. If they could profit more from destroying Bitcoin, believe me that they would try.

All three of the suggested investments (gold, bitcoin, and real estate) are good. But I will focus only on one feature that makes bitcoin different compared to the other two: It requires no servicing or maintaining. Land and real estate needs to be maintained, fixed, renewed, etc., otherwise it deteriorates, driving the value down. Gold doesn't need fixing once you purchase it, but consider that you need to keep it somewhere physically and protect it. Or you keep it with a custodian and pay monthly fees. There are no fees associated with holding bitcoin and it doesn't deteriorate or expire. But you have to understand and accept the volatility as an integral part of the game.

I have never head of Rami. I am not into punk rock, so it's not surprising, but I usually read and hear about famous people who have embraced BTC somewhere. Looking at his YouTube channel, view count, and subscriber count, it's fair to say that he isn't very popular. 

Regarding the misinformation about Bitcoin of those in power, we can see that it's changing. They have tried laughing at it, calling it a fraud, and stopping it. We are now in a stage where they are slowly changing their stance and even embracing it, as we can see from the approved Bitcoin ETFs of lately. 

Obviously, the negatives and the things that can be improved shouldn't have too much of a focus in your review. I just meant that you could mention it honestly if you notice that something is not according to your taste. Reading reviews where everything is explained as being perfect and top-notch also looks biased, so adding a bit of the opposite is good for the balance and makes it look like the writer knows what he is talking about and knows what he wants to see.

That red color was there from before the last update I made to the withdrawal fees and numbers last night and on 14 January. I still haven't take care of that part or the lists at the bottom of the OP. It should all be fixed tonight unless other responsibilities take priority.

I didn't finish the whole list of casinos that's why I didn't post an update. I actually stopped after Sportsbet.one, which would put Stake the next casino I need to look at. I also need to check the lists below the table since there have probably been some changes there was well. I hope I will have time to finish it tonight.

Yes, good thinking. I will do that.

I am surprised that the money you received from your father ($1.5-2k) was enough to finance everything. The furniture, all the permits, and other taxes you needed to pay. If the establishment isn't yours, you will also have to pay rent. The last picture shows an open area on the outside, is that also a part of your bar?

There is never a bad time to start accepting bitcoin, but the state of the network doesn't make it attractive for small payments, and it's been like that for a long time. I myself wouldn't be interested in paying a $2 coffee by spending $5 in fees on top of that. And that's what you are looking at right now, if not more.

I don't think it's a mistake. Especially if the person works for bitcoin or has a significant stash of it. Converting it to fiat would lose them a few percent, that's usually the case. If you are thinking about not spending your bitcoin because the price of it will increase in the future, you could find yourself in an endless loop where you never spend any coins expecting a higher and higher value.

I am guilty of saving too much of my bitcoin myself, but if no one was willing to spend it, it wouldn't look good and interest might drop, and with it, the price.

If you want to do things differently and be unique compared to the competition, you could focus a bit more on what you don't like about a specific crypto casino. Each review is usually about the good, but very few reviews have a well thought-out 'the bad' or 'what casino X could do better' section. In it, you can mention some things you didn't like. It could be anything like slow-loading pages, outdated UI, high wagering requirements, small welcome bonus, unfair T&Cs, etc.

Hi Steve, thanks for letting me know. Sure, I will make the change in the table. You must have changed the sum today or yesterday. I did an update on 14 January where I checked almost all casinos in the table in my OP and Sportsbet.io still had 0.002 BTC as min. withdrawal then.

I don't want to add any new columns to the table because it messes up the formatting, especially on phones and desktop machines with smaller screens. I have added BTC (LN) under the supported altcoins column for some casinos where I have noticed that they support the Lightning Network. It's not optimal, I know. But generally, I haven't paid too much attention to the fees on LN network. 

Yes, Blue Wallet has had many coin control options for several years ahead of Electrum. You get a full list of UTXOs and can decide what you want to do with them. Freezing is one option, spending from is a different one (an option that is still missing in Electrum). I think labelling is also a feature you can use on Blue Wallet. I have never had much use for coin control since mobile wallets aren't my preferred software for storing a lot of coins, and when I did use them, I transferred some coins there to be spent quickly when on the go.

This is great news and would almost put Android mobile on par with Blue Wallet in my book. This is proper coin control just worded differently. Just for the record, when you say the last version, are you talking about v4.4.6 or the v4.5.0 that came out a few days ago?

Najveća greška i jest što ljudi previše žure, nemaju vremena i hoće čim prije da završe stvar bez obaračanja pažnje na detalje. Ako nisi siguran, provjeri još jednom pa i treći i četvrti put. Ako te neko ometa i skreće ti pažnju, sačekaj dok se riješi ta situacija upravo iz razloga što jednom kad pogriješiš ode sve niz vodu jer u kriptu nema popravnog osim ako ona druga strana nije poštena pa ispravi tvoju grešku.

Tvoj prijatelj je davno trebao instalirati dobar ad-blocker da mu se ne prikazuju te prevarantske reklame od Google-a ili ne koristiti Google i Chrome uopšte. Ali kao i obično, lako je biti general poslje bitke.

Slažem se, to je stvarno odlična lova po trenutnoj cijeni. Pretpostavljam da nije toliko vrijedio u vrijeme isplate već da si hodlao i dočekao bolje dane. Gledajući po grafikonu, Arbitrum djeluje kao malo bolji shitcoin koji je samo 80% pao u odnosu na svoj ATH i druge tokene koji padaju 95-99%. Ali ne pratim projekat i takva statistika ne mora ništa da znači.

Ovo naravno nije skorije vrijeme, ali pamtim da je dosta ljudi pričalo o dobrom airdropu kojeg je Synthetix projekat davao korisnicima. To je bilo prije otprilike 3 godine.

FatFork je bio brži i objasnio zašto. To je prvi razlog. Drugi je taj što je i dkbit98 u prvom postu kojim počinje diskusija o ovom scamu koristio USDT kao primjer i onako usput bocnuo i Binance:


Been there, done that. Dok sam bio u FortuneJack kampanji, poslali su mi deset puta veću tjednu isplatu nego što me sljeduje. Isto je neko zarez stavio na pogrešnom mjestu.