~
We due respect. First of all.. i say @My-Computer I have no connection with this id. I took bnb from my friend. Here is the proof. Now you will check carefully everything... Taking bnb from someone is a crime but my friend didn't think much of it. Please forgive this...thanks.  That screenshot doesn't prove anything. You could have had that conversation with yourself today. All it suggests is that ki kos is also an alt of Ripmix001, which I suspected already. I suppose this account isn't yours? RTR! (banned 12 days before your account was created) And I suppose these are just more "friends" of yours as well? ayonkhan523Sumon3@riya122I don't like to unfairly tag people who aren't cheaters, but its obvious that you have several alt accounts and some of them have been red tagged already. |
|
|
|
Ok, thanks for the input,
Can you help me track what I wrote?
I asked for text detection for the global version of the post and the Indonesian version of the post.
No, stop asking for our help and stop spamming my thread with nonsense. Just act like a human being, post your own words in your own Local section for a few months because your English is clearly not good enough to post elsewhere on this forum. Ask all the questions you have there or in Beginners & Help, not here. |
|
|
|
I translated it into English which is available on the internet, but many of my colleagues have also experienced cases like this, even though they typed it themselves looking for their own information, why is it considered AI?
Can you help me on how to detect AI writing or not...?
I don't really understand what you're saying but you can help yourself by reading the first post in this thread. Here is the best AI detection website: https://hivemoderation.com/ai-generated-content-detectionWhen I put your post I mentioned above into it, the result is this:  This is not conclusive proof, but it is evidence that suggests you are also using ChatGPT to write your native language posts for you, as Bahasa Indonesian is one of the languages supported by ChatGPT. This is not just lazy but it is also dishonest. If you can't write your own words, don't expect your posts to remain undeleted. |
|
|
|
Please just straighten it out, because I'm a beginner and I don't have a special teacher.
Are you willing to be my special teacher?
You don't need a "special teacher"; like the guy above you, Vvaanniieell (who is now banned BTW), you just need to post using your own brain & words and stop using ChatGPT to write your posts for you. People have been doing this for hundreds of years, it shouldn't be a big deal. Even your post in Bahasa comes back ChatGPT positive: Menurut versi saya ada beberapa cara yang dapat membantu individu meningkatkan penghasilan ekonomi masyarakat di Indonesia: - Pendidikan dan Keterampilan: Investasi dalam pendidikan dan pelatihan keterampilan dapat membuka pintu ke pekerjaan yang lebih baik dan peluang karier yang lebih tinggi.
- Kewirausahaan: Memulai usaha kecil atau bisnis sendiri dapat menjadi cara untuk meningkatkan penghasilan. Kewirausahaan dapat menciptakan peluang pendapatan tambahan.
- Investasi Keuangan: Berinvestasi dalam instrumen keuangan seperti saham, obligasi, atau reksadana dapat membantu menghasilkan pendapatan pasif dari dividen atau bunga.
- Kerja Sampingan: Mencari pekerjaan paruh waktu atau kerja sampingan adalah cara umum untuk meningkatkan penghasilan tambahan.
- Jasa Freelance atau Pekerjaan Online: Memanfaatkan platform freelance atau pekerjaan online dapat membantu individu memperoleh penghasilan tambahan, terutama jika mereka memiliki keterampilan dalam bidang seperti penulisan, desain, atau pemrograman.
- Investasi dalam Properti: Investasi dalam properti atau real estate, seperti menyewakan properti, bisa menghasilkan penghasilan sewa rutin.
- Mengambil Peluang dari Perkembangan Ekonomi Lokal: Misalnya memantau perkembangan ekonomi di wilayah atau sektor tertentu di Indonesia dan mencari peluang bisnis yang terkait.
Hivemoderation: 95.7% likely to be AI-Generated (language not supported by other detection services) It appears to be largely based on text in these links, as well: https://kudo.tips/apa-yang-dapatdi-lakukan-untuk-me-ningkatkan-penghasilan-penduduk-yang-masih-rendah.htmlhttps://brainly.co.id/tugas/54415936Use your time on the forum as an opportunity to not only learn about bitcoin, cryptocurrency and the blockchain, but about English as well. |
|
|
|
Jesus Cristo. Hey whoever said sex work isn't real work needs to take a look at this. The only good thing about this video is it makes me feel better about myself. I'm watching the whole thing anyway.  |
|
|
|
Before going ahead to make reports I advice you thoroughly make your investigations and not just handpicking phrases and Automatically assuming the whole context was AI generated.
It is obvious to any native English speaker that the majority of words you've written on this forum are from ChatGPT. If you don't want your posts deleted, stop using ChatGPT and start using your own brain. Its very simple. ...
Regarding the current situation, it's important to note that the block size of Bitcoin is actually limited to 1MB, not 4MB. However, the implementation of SegWit allows for more transaction capacity by separating some of the transaction data. This has helped alleviate some congestion on the network.
As for ORDI and its impact on the blockchain, there's no doubt that it's causing additional strain on the network due to the on-chain nature of its operations. Thereby resulting to a slower transaction times and higher fees for Bitcoin users. It's an ongoing challenge for the Bitcoin community to balance scalability and decentralization while accommodating new developments such as NFTs.
...
Hivemoderation: 99.5% likely to be AI-generated Sapling.ai: 100% fake You're correct that the Bitcoin blockchain cannot be rolled back, as it operates on a principle of immutability. Rolling back the blockchain would undermine the trust and integrity of the network.
In terms of addressing the congestion caused by ORDI transactions, it is indeed possible for mining pools and individual nodes to implement settings that exclude or prioritize certain transactions. This can be done to mitigate the impact of ORDI on the network and prioritize other transactions.
Hivemoderation: 100% likely to be AI-generated Sapling.ai: 100% fake I apologize for the confusion. You are correct that the maximum block size in terms of weight units is close to 4MB. While the maximum block size on-disk and over-the-wire can be almost 4MB, this size is rarely reached in practice.
The actual size of a block can vary depending on the number and format of the transactions included in it. If the block contains a large number of small, simple transactions, the block size will be smaller. On the other hand, if the block contains complex transactions with many inputs and outputs, the block size will be larger.
It's important to note that the Bitcoin network has a block size limit to ensure the stability and security of the blockchain. This limit helps prevent spam transactions and ensures that blocks can be propagated and validated by the network efficiently.
The block size debate in the Bitcoin community has revolved around finding the right balance between scalability and decentralization. Increasing the block size too much could lead to centralization concerns, while keeping it too small could limit the number of transactions the network can handle.
Overall, the actual size of a block will depend on the specific transactions included within it, and the block size limit is a critical factor in maintaining the functionality and security of the Bitcoin network.
Hivemoderation: 100% likely to be AI-generated Sapling.ai: 100% fake |
|
|
|
Much like "flat earthers," you are in the extreme minority here. Nobody cares about your opinion on whether or not ordinals are NFTs. Besides, we are not discussing the validity of science-based theories, we are talking about what words mean to the people who use them. Let's look at the words themselves: ✔️ Non-fungible: yes, ordinals are non-fungible as they are individual units of account. ✔️ Token: as applied to cryptocurrency, yes, they are distinguishable, named units or subsets that reside inside of a blockchain and can be transferred from one owner to another. I think the main problem is your understanding of NFTs is limited. Even in the face of a decade of mounting evidence that you often have little knowledge of what you're talking about, you remain overly self-assured with what little knowledge you actually possess, which is why nobody takes you seriously. Fungible tokens are even referred to as NFTs, as are Namecoin names, which are non-fungible but not really tokens. It's not up to you to decide what is or isn't an NFT. https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2021/08/31/rare-pepe-steeped-in-bitcoin-history-fetches-500k-on-nft-market-opensea/https://www.vice.com/en/article/dypj37/rare-pepe-nft-is-not-rare-enough-dollar500k-lawsuit-allegesYou can have the last word as I'm sure you will only further derail this thread with your usual uninformed, argumentative nonsense. I'm out. |
|
|
|
You can't "roll back ordinals" because ordinals is simply a system for numbering individual satoshis. In theory, they have been around since the genesis block. You can only ask for miners not to include transactions with taproot-assisted inscription data in the witness field. But they will because they want the fees. Despite this latest resurgence, I'm still of the opinion that Ordinals NFTs and BRC-20 are waning in activity and will not be popular for too long. Their infrastructure is fragile and could disappear when the money dries up. firstly its not even an NFT its a junk bit of data with no protected proof of transfer element
secondly its not even a shitcoin its a junk bit of data with no protected proof of transfer element
thirdly its not even a token its a junk bit of data with no protected proof of transfer element
They are, because you don't dictate definitions. Popular consensus of the user base does. A perfect example of this is when the word "literally" was redefined to also mean "not literally." |
|
|
|
By the way, I recently read in one of the Russian-language telegram chats how people shared information about abuse on the bitcointalk forum and how much they earned from it. They also complained that at some point the informers came and they were forced to leave the forum because of the bans. Are you talking about these forum members? It would be nice if you listed at least a few useful forum members who left because of Ratimov.
The ones in your screenshot are definitely not "useful." They appear to be run-of-the-mill bounty cheaters. A bit off-topic but one of the smartest scammers ever was amaclin. He actually managed to get about $3.27 worth of BTC from me one time. I think that was the last time I got scammed. Stolfi wrote him of the best trust feedbacks I've ever seen written about anyone: | | JorgeStolfi | | 2016-02-07 | | | | The user is a red-with-yellow-spots-hat hacker who enjoys finding bugs in the network and demonstrating them in the most irritating way possible. He is a great asset to the community. Just keep your hands firmly in your pockets, grabbing your wallet and phone, when interacting with him. |
I see that he is still around, recently logged in with his second account. Once I had a conversation with a known Counterparty/Dogeparty scammer about him, was trying to find out if they were the same person (they are not):  |
|
|
|
The victim's fund was sent to bc1qq0aheutystzzw4vc0kn5fkuvnp54ju3yckpmww. Am I getting you correctly?
If so, there is no outgoing transaction from that that address at all. The address has received 0.08949505 (which is around $3,100 worth of bitcoin, not $7,300) in the transaction in question and 0.20808782 in total, but hasn't spent any fund.
OP's story doesn't make complete sense. It sounds like a scam of sorts really did happen but I don't know how he determined that bc1qq0ah... is the scammer's address as the funds were sent to 18 different addresses. If the thief had TeamViewer installed on the phone, I don't think they'd need the OTP to make the Coinbase withdrawal... They'd be able to see the incoming SMS, or open the authenticator application. The "drained" addresses are associated with a wallet that has transactions going all the way back to Aug 2012, so it appears to actually belong to Coinbase. |
|
|
|
Lawl. Are NFTs still a thing?  A lot of NFTs are going to zero, or are already there, and won't recover. Older, scarce NFTs are still in demand. Some iconic Bitcoin NFT collections, like Spells of Genesis and Rare Pepe have held up quite well.   Both of these cards (Counterparty tokens) are rarely sold for under $200k. In 2014 I registered all 32 NFL team names on Counterparty. This year I put them up for sale. So far I've sold 25/60 sets. |
|
|
|
The Rare Pepe Curated collection has amassed 231 ETH in trading volume across 1,013 sales since Aug 21st of this year. Among the highest sales are a RAREPEPE (S1C1) for 55 ETH about 2 weeks ago, and a FEELSGOODMAN (S20C50) for 5 ETH late last month. FEELSGOODMAN was issued in Sept 2016 and set aside for a design by Matt Furie, the creator of Pepe the Frog. Furie finally got around to making the artwork a few years later, and the card has become one of the most iconic of all Rare Pepes since then.  |
|
|
|
@Ratimov: feel free to retaliate, that seems to be your thing. Just know that the users who excluded me are not exactly the most upstanding citizens of Bitcointalk. You'll be in terrible company:
tHAts BEcaUsE yOu'RE tHe LeADeR oF ThE dT mAFiA!!! Where is c-unter when we need him to explain how the DT Mafia punishes those that dare to go against their agenda? If its necessary to explain, I'm joking. I'm just wondering if there's some kind of correlation between an uptick in the price of BTC and an uptick in forum drama. Quite possibly. 1. He self admits directly that he copy-pastes / plagiarizes in 90% of his content => self admitted plagiarism.
As far as I'm concerned, this was a million years ago and its been discussed, analyzed and dissected to death; there's no real reason to keep rehashing it, unless he's still doing it. |
|
|
|
A look at the mempool as of about 3 hours ago demonstrating the BRC-20 takeover:  The little yellow blocks are the BRC-20 mint transactions, which occupy close to 50% of the total mempool space. This is a great site for checking in on what's going on exactly. The minting services are making bank. I can't see how anyone else will make money... There's like 1 transfer for every 10 mints for each token on average. |
|
|
|
|
NFL Week IX
'Merican footie, fuck yeah
Time flies up in here.
|
|
|
|
Actually that happened already with the founders of Grin. They used pseudonyms based on the Harry Potter series to launch their whitepaper, code & blockchain. At least one of them is still active here on the forum, from time to time. Even though it was based on some novel tech (mimble-wimble) that offered a greater degree of both anonymity and simplicity than Bitcoin, it never really caught on as a cryptocurrency (some blame their choice of tail emission model). Perhaps the most important thing it did was allow Litecoin to integrate Mweb which gives certain LTC transactions more privacy. |
|
|
|
What I'm asking is what websites/webapps that gives/shows us transaction data from Ordinals, like perhaps a "blockchain explorer" for Ordinals transactions? Thanks!
I've been looking at this when I want to know what is up with the current state of Ordinals: https://dune.com/dgtl_assets/bitcoin-ordinals-analysisYou can see that there's been a resurgence in BRC-20 activity:  (ignore the box around "video", it was an unfortunate misclick) I haven't looked into it but I bet its because some new ticker, like $POOP or something, just dropped and people are minting it... God knows why. The vast, overwhelming majority of all inscriptions are for BRC-20 mints. What's funny is Rodarmor doesn't even like BRC-20. It's pure junk done in just about the most bloat-ful and least elegant way possible. |
|
|
|
If needed, I can post chat with Chris Barth to show that he’s on his own. From what I recall, the screenshot of POA was around the time I had access to his account. I know this is like the scene where someone is stabbed and you’re with the knife and the cops finds you the first suspect. I have known Chris somewhere around 2021 or so, in fact we conversed down to the end of year 2021 and I think sometime in 2022 too. Let me know if you want to look at the conversation screenshot I have as evidence and I will send it you.
Thanks for offering but that's not necessary, I looked into it a bit more and I'm not leaving any tags. Furthermore, I believe that nobody should ever have to provide off-forum information about themselves. It is on the "investigator" to find everything they need to connect accounts, and they don't have the right to demand stuff from the accused, even if they are DT. |
|
|
|
You’re doing great work I must commend. First, Chris Barth is a friend and I have helped him out with a transaction once or twice I don’t understand if that’s how you determine who is whose alt.
Look again at this screenshot: it shows that Chris Barth posted oktana as a username before oktana did. This is pretty clear proof these are the same accounts.  Since Chris Barth is inactive and most of the accounts I found associated with that account are also inactive, I have no reason to leave any kind of tag, especially because I didn't find them applying for bounties together where alt accounts are not allowed. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
