Any chance you can add ZipConf (ZIP.A) to your list? IPO was this week. Each bond is paid a dividend = 1/50,000 of fees collected by the service. Details here. Thanks. You are probably on my downloadable table. It was getting difficult to do by hand so I made someting to do it automated. Now that I have it, anyone that pays a dividend should be detailed. Next week will have this new table sets.
|
|
|
GLBSE verifies the identity of the asset holder. There are 6 steps, e.g. telephone, home adress, facebook profile, e-mail adresse, photo id. 0/6 means that nothing about the asset holder has been verified.
Correct. Thought I would add this column for now and see how it goes.
|
|
|
Thanks to whoever sent me that tip. I just finished the automated dividend calculator and realized I had half a bitcoin sitting in my wallet.
|
|
|
Thanks for doing the monthly as well. It was quite different to what I thought it would be.
There's a little typo - you have PureMining with incorrect low and hi in the monthly, although the weighted mean looks ok.
If you're manually cut and pasting or typing, have you thought of using textplot in the gplots R package to print the table as a png or jpeg? It'll save you time, and make errors less likely.
Great work, stochastic.
Thanks for spotting the typo, it is fixed. I have been working on making this more streamlined. I will give texplot a go next time.
|
|
|
Yes, someone is playing games. Bidding a lot, then pulling their bids, then bidding a lot. Don't know if they plan on actually buying in the end or pulling their bids at the end. But, if you are more serious then just place your bids where you feel comfortable with the price and let it ride through the gaming.
People are likely trying to get the lowest possible price, not playing games.
|
|
|
Monthly returns for April has been updated.
|
|
|
Cutoff noticeIf your bid is under 1.065 BTC, you need to move it up, because that's where the 2000 bond depth cutoff is this rather depends on how many of those > 1.065 bids are (or may be) cost free shill bids that would get pulled at the last moment (doesn't it?) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ShillData on the first day trading of PPT.A and PPT.B .Open .High .Low .Close .Volume .Adjusted PPT.A 1.170000 1.170000 1.0680 1.1000 1704 1.080349 PPT.B 1.179990 1.179990 1.0700 1.1111 2625 1.092874
|
|
|
Why is the volume in BTC and not number of shares?
It's a more accurate method of representing trade volume, e.g. comparing an asset at ~0.10 BTC versus one at 1 BTC, assuming 100BTC trading of each, the first would have ten times as many shares traded, but the same real trade volume. I don't think it is more accurate. I always have to switch my thinking going between real markets and GLBSE. If an assets like you mentioned in your example trades like you mentioned, then asset A that is trading at 0.10 BTC will likely be much more liquid than asset B that is trading for 1 BTC as asset A has 10 times more volume asset B.
|
|
|
Why is the volume in BTC and not number of shares?
|
|
|
The new look is great, API is appreciated too (haven't looked into it yet, but will do soon). I've almost made a wrong trade twice due to the following mixup: I see "ASK 0.622" and instinctively go to put my own ASK there, type in the qty and price, and then realize that the button next to it is labeled "BUY", which is not exactly what I wanted to do. Maybe removing the words "ASK" and "BID" or making them much smaller than "BUY" and "SELL" would help? On Bitcoinica, for example, the BUY and SELL buttons are big enough that they draw attention first and there's no confusion. I did the same thing.
|
|
|
Does anyone go to nyse.com to track the stocks they are interested?
No, but the NYSE isn't the custodian of everybody's assets, either. A yahoo/google finance style site would be better considering there is more than one (and hopefully more) bitcoin denominated security exchange.
|
|
|
Does GLBSE offer some sort of parsable market stream?
I currently import the market data into a spreadsheet for analysis and updates to allow me to track portfolio value and a few other things. It's on a schedule, but I can refresh when I need to. I don't bother with every trade (but I think that's available). So, yes, the data should be around. I have added a link to all updated history starting on April 2, 2012 [ DO NOT POST SESC LINKS ]here[/url]. You linked with your session ID; the thread is here. How are you getting the raw market data? Are you pulling it off Twitter, or does Nefario offer that publicly? Lol, fixed that. I just pull it off of using the Twitter API then make it look nice in a table. I have it update every hour for now.
|
|
|
Does GLBSE offer some sort of parsable market stream?
I currently import the market data into a spreadsheet for analysis and updates to allow me to track portfolio value and a few other things. It's on a schedule, but I can refresh when I need to. I don't bother with every trade (but I think that's available). So, yes, the data should be around. I have added a link to all updated history starting on April 2, 2012 here.
|
|
|
Long-term, it'd be great for users to have their own "favorites" stocks they like to track, which could be set up through their preference settings. When GLBSE gets to be 300-400 stocks large, you want a way for users to visually pare that back a bit to just assets they're interested in. A real-time streaming ticker would be awesome at some point, but that might be asking too much at this stage. IMO all of these suggestions should be done by 3rd parties and not GLBSE. Does anyone go to nyse.com to track the stocks they are interested?
|
|
|
Noticed this typo in create an asset page: Future A contract where the issuer sells the Is a contract where
|
|
|
I have to look up on where/how to make a public spreadsheet, i am new at that docs.google.com
|
|
|
At that moment i had only sold 3 shares.
I will put it up once a significant number of bitcoins are released for each dividend.
|
|
|
GLBSE is pleased to announce the release of an updated and improved user interface for the exchange. We hope this will improve the user experience for all of our clients moving forward. As part of this update we will be requiring all that existing users and new registrations read and acknowledge acceptance of the Exchange's Terms of Service. To thank our users, and to encourage you all to try out the new platform, we are also announcing 2 days of commission free trading, ending at 4:00am UTC on May 3rd, 2012. Lastly we are giving notice of an amended fee schedule for use of the exchange, which will be implemented at 1:00am UTC on May 8th, 2012. Fees will be as follows: An 8 BTC fee for listing of a new asset. A 0.4% trade commission on both the buy and sell side of a trade. A 0.2% fee to directly transfer an asset between accounts. This transfer fee is not applicable to assets that have had less than 20 BTC of volume since the inception of the asset. This transfer fee will be based on the asset's average traded price over the last 5 days it was traded, or the assets initial price if no trading has taken place. GLBSE is a bitcoin denominated capital market. Inquiries can be directed to support@glbse.com. Is forced bond buyback included in this update?
|
|
|
As well as, if I read it right, the payouts were to two different non-contiguous continents also. You'd typically expect spouses to have their accounts within the same geographic region, so this would count as another red flag, begging to be verified.
-- Smoov
You forget the part where they asked Mt. Gox first before they did anything, Mt. Gox said it's OK, then after they made the transaction decided it was illegal and froze the account. WTF! Where is the documentation of that in the OP? I did not see that. I can't explain your inability to comprehend what you read nor can I determine which portions you did not read. Try P3 for a start. Directly quote in the OP where people from mtgox state that it is ok to wire money from his wife's mtgox account to his bank account in America. I only see emails stating that his wife account is verified and asking how long it will take for verification to be completed. While I personally don't like mtgox's verification procedures, but it is a price we have to pay since bitcoins are not accepted everywhere. From what I read in the OP they seemed to respond professionally.
|
|
|
|