Ok Sharkie, let's take two hypothetical "PayCoin investors": 1) One who dumped his/her Paycoins at any point before ION and held on to his/her BTC. 2) One who converted his/her Paycoins into IONs. Which one has more money now? I go with what is in box 2.. |
|
|
|
You realize you have to SELL in order to create a profit, right? Just look at the books on Bittrex. Selling tanks the market. These MN's just create an endless supply that no one is buying.
Off course I do Just done a Bitrex grab Mistaken again people are buying 
Typical shill response. Typical troll response Typical promoter response (winner) As you see, there are 3 choices as to the motivation of my response... let's ignore the facts about what the coin is currently doing??? let's chat about IONs and Ionomy Vision??
The USD price of IONs are holding steady with 24hr volume of 2.8 BTC The Ionomy Vision is about to cross another bridge in their project... more info soom!!! The price of ION holding steady has nothing to do with ION. It's because of the increase of BTC. You know this but choose to use misdirection tactics. Here's a current chart with both values... still says it's going sideways with a little decrease in both prices  I predicted exiting PayCoin investors are getting double their investment +plus https://ion.community/topic/58/ion-investors-exit-the-ionomy-vision-with-75-100-profit |
|
|
|
You realize you have to SELL in order to create a profit, right? Just look at the books on Bittrex. Selling tanks the market. These MN's just create an endless supply that no one is buying.
Off course I do Just done a Bitrex grab Mistaken again people are buying Looks like there is coins still moving and the price going sideways.... from the weak hands to the strong handsTypical shill response. Typical troll response Typical promoter response (winner) As you see, there are 3 choices as to the motivation of my response... let's ignore the facts about what the coin is currently doing??? let's chat about IONs and Ionomy Vision?? Yes let's ignore the facts about what the coin is currently doing. The USD price of IONs are holding steady with 24hr volume of 2.8 BTC The Ionomy Vision is about to cross another bridge in their project... more info soom!!! |
|
|
|
You realize you have to SELL in order to create a profit, right? Just look at the books on Bittrex. Selling tanks the market. These MN's just create an endless supply that no one is buying.
Off course I do Just done a Bitrex grab Mistaken again people are buying Looks like there is coins still moving and the price going sideways.... from the weak hands to the strong handsTypical shill response. Typical troll response Typical promoter response (winner) As you see, there are 3 choices as to the motivation of my response... let's ignore the facts about what the coin is currently doing??? let's chat about IONs and Ionomy Vision?? |
|
|
|
You realize you have to SELL in order to create a profit, right? Just look at the books on Bittrex. Selling tanks the market. These MN's just create an endless supply that no one is buying.
Off course I do Just done a Bitrex grab  Mistaken again people are buying Looks like there is coins still moving and the price going sideways.... from the weak hands to the strong hands  |
|
|
|
Well, it looks like shark did too good a job convincing other suckers investors to start masternodes, so it became harder for them to generate rewards.
Good news for MN owners, the Ionomy LTD is shutting down the MNs that were being used to support the 12 month XPY Stakers The "harder to generate reward" is due to current decrease in the ION block reward (as per schedule of the white paper). I expect the number of MNs to increase as the coin migrates from staker to Masternodes...
So which is it, shutting down or increasing? There has been a drop in number of MNs to 330 (shut down) Increase on it's way over the next 2-3 days [/quote] UPDATE: There are now 362 Masternode and still increasing. The coins are moving from the small investors to the strong investor who is using the ION coin to invest in MNs. |
|
|
|
As a big investor in ION, a game centric coin, you don't care about the game play stats? Kind of foolish if you ask me. Then again, you are an ION whale, says a lot. You base your decisions on hopes and dreams, not transparent, factual information.
Today what I care about the most is ecosystem. Do Ionomy have the systems and processes in place to support their business intent. i.e. ION market buyback. The information you ask for is nice to have but at this stage tells me nothing I don't know already As a big investor in ION, I am more interested in using factual information to guide me thru a successful investment. The USD price that is displayed by different ION services and market is a good indicator Some of the xpy stakes investors got on xpy.io before the swap are cashing in on a profit https://ion.community/topic/55/paycoin-investors-exit-the-ionomy-vision-with-100-profit |
|
|
|
i sold 55 million digibyte (dgb) at highs. they have at least some gaming integration etc.
its clearly pump groups in action too...
whats it say for ion when even pump groups wont touch it? why cause huey has all the premine hah
There's this weird malaise going on with the team, who knew that the big staker release would be happening now and could have at least attempted to re engage with those investors who might be wondering what's going on before the release happened, and yet they chose the opposite and stayed silent instead. Moves like this make no sense to me from a strategic perspective. While I'm aware there's not a vast amount of selling (or buying) going on, there just appears to be very little effort to actually hold on to existing investors who might see the endless waiting for anything -- a single update to 'Crypto Gravity', even -- as a negative indicator. They don't have many investors or community members anyway, so I'd have thought retaining those who might be leaning towards selling would be a priority. This lethargic approach is a big part of why ion has and will continue to struggle to get a foothold with other investors or even, as you point out, pump groups. They're simply not active enough. I'd say that was a good start for the first month... I suppose it depends on your perspective. I'm not sure those sorts of amounts will add enough buy pressure to sustain your exchange prices, but I'll concede that it's a start. Not sure month two revenue will be as good, as the number of users seemed to slide after the first three - four weeks, but I guess it depends how dedicated the 40 or so weekly players are. I still think you'll struggle to maintain or generate larger numbers of users when the gestation for products and updates is so slow, and the quality is lacking. It leads to stagnation, and I've yet to see anything that will appeal to a larger audience from XPY.io or team Ion. Fair's fair, however; they said they would start a buyback mechanism, and (eventually) they did.  |
|
|
|
i sold 55 million digibyte (dgb) at highs. they have at least some gaming integration etc.
its clearly pump groups in action too...
whats it say for ion when even pump groups wont touch it? why cause huey has all the premine hah
There's this weird malaise going on with the team, who knew that the big staker release would be happening now and could have at least attempted to re engage with those investors who might be wondering what's going on before the release happened, and yet they chose the opposite and stayed silent instead. Moves like this make no sense to me from a strategic perspective. While I'm aware there's not a vast amount of selling (or buying) going on, there just appears to be very little effort to actually hold on to existing investors who might see the endless waiting for anything -- a single update to 'Crypto Gravity', even -- as a negative indicator. They don't have many investors or community members anyway, so I'd have thought retaining those who might be leaning towards selling would be a priority. This lethargic approach is a big part of why ion has and will continue to struggle to get a foothold with other investors or even, as you point out, pump groups. They're simply not active enough. I'd say that was a good start for the first month... |
|
|
|
Well, it looks like shark did too good a job convincing other suckers investors to start masternodes, so it became harder for them to generate rewards.
Good news for MN owners, the Ionomy LTD is shutting down the MNs that were being used to support the 12 month XPY Stakers The "harder to generate reward" is due to current decrease in the ION block reward (as per schedule of the white paper). I expect the number of MNs to increase as the coin migrates from staker to Masternodes... So which is it, shutting down or increasing? [/quote] There has been a drop in number of MNs to 330 (shut down) Increase on it's way over the next 2-3 days |
|
|
|
Well, it looks like shark did too good a job convincing other suckers investors to start masternodes, so it became harder for them to generate rewards.
Good news for MN owners, the Ionomy LTD is shutting down the MNs that were being used to support the 12 month XPY Stakers The "harder to generate reward" is due to current decrease in the ION block reward (as per schedule of the white paper). I expect the number of MNs to increase as the coin migrates from staker to Masternodes... How much ION do you need for a masternode?  20K IONs |
|
|
|
Satoshis aren't dead. You use the USD value cause it make the coin look like it rose in value significantly. If you would show the price in satoshis, you would realize that the value of the coin didn't change since the IOC purchases with BTC. Again, paycoiner logic at its finest. Use whatever data paints the prettiest picture.
I'll roll with USD until you tell me what this Satoshis plot represents. "the value of the coin didn't change lol  With out additional info, you can not tell me the price of ION using just this chart... I'm having a hard time " seeking that the value of the coin didn't change since the IOC" in the illustration Wrong, you stated "you cannot tell me the price of ION just using this chart..." and I told you. That chart was nothing about the point your brought up. What you just did here was your definition of a troll. Contradict much?
 |
|
|
|
@suchmoon I think you can relate to this article... "We’ve seen that power is a slippery slope, and that once a person or group has power, they will almost never relinquish it voluntarily. We’ve seen this with governments, with corporations, and with altcoin developers. The Etherum foundation for example has taken full control of the protocols future, including the rights to make sweeping changes to things such as the consensus algorithm, the coin supply, and even chain rollbacks. Most devs in the altcoin ecosystem maintain the same amount of control, which means users of this ‘decentralized’ ecosystem typically end up placing absolute trust in the dev team."Read the article @ https://blog.sia.tech/the-sia-ethos-48f72f1cf382 |
|
|
|
Satoshis aren't dead. You use the USD value cause it make the coin look like it rose in value significantly. If you would show the price in satoshis, you would realize that the value of the coin didn't change since the IOC purchases with BTC. Again, paycoiner logic at its finest. Use whatever data paints the prettiest picture.
I'll roll with USD until you tell me what this Satoshis plot represents. "the value of the coin didn't change lol With out additional info, you can not tell me the price of ION using just this chart... I'm having a hard time " seeking that the value of the coin didn't change since the IOC" in the illustration |
|
|
|
Satoshis aren't dead. You use the USD value cause it make the coin look like it rose in value significantly. If you would show the price in satoshis, you would realize that the value of the coin didn't change since the IOC purchases with BTC. Again, paycoiner logic at its finest. Use whatever data paints the prettiest picture.
I'll roll with USD until you tell me what this Satoshis plot represents. "the value of the coin didn't change lol With out additional info, you can not tell me the price of ION using just this chart... |
|
|
|
"USD price is still holding".
Two things, can I purchase ION with USD? If not, why the USD price? Two, I thought you stated the price would rise to the moon. Why the sudden "it's holding steady"?
A1. No, Investors and exchanges use the USD price for reference to value of the coin at the time of the coin is used. A2. Currently the price is going sideways thru the staker release. After release the USD price will head to the moon or tank like the titanic... Since you paid with crypto and all cryptos are based on BTC price, wouldn't it be more accurate and less misleading to quote the price in satoshis? the amount of satoshis is dead... I'll stick with the advertised ION USD price from the exchanges/Services.. they are accurate at moment of the transaction... |
|
|
|
"USD price is still holding".
Two things, can I purchase ION with USD? If not, why the USD price? Two, I thought you stated the price would rise to the moon. Why the sudden "it's holding steady"?
A1. No, Investors and exchanges use the USD price for reference to value of the coin at the time of the coin is used. A2. Currently the price is going sideways thru the staker release. After release the USD price will head to the moon or tank like the titanic... |
|
|
|
ION Block Reward Drop from 23 to 17... and should see inflation decrease...
 inflation or price decrease? i only see satoshi price decrease Inflation decreased from 50 to 40%... USD price is still holding  |
|
|
|
ION Block Reward Drop from 23 to 17... and should see inflation decrease...
|
|
|
|
When the fuck are you gonna stop using "trolls" as an excuse? When? Fucking pathetic is what it is.
My definition of a Troll is a person who sows discord by starting arguments, upsetting people, posting inflammatory, irrelevant, or off-topic messages.... You fit the mold for a troll to a tee... sharkie you made a post on ion community asking about who made that board up. it upset people so would you consider yourself a troll by your definition? I don't think the definition of Troll includes someone posting a question about a legal issue? https://ion.community/topic/25/ion-independent-dev-sponsoring-board-headed-by-ionomy-employeeyou irritated some on there though and one called to have you banned from forum... it fits your troll definition so classifies you as one. how does that differ from others asking for incorporation proof thats legal too yet you call troll. so hypocrite or troll? It freedom of speech if ONE user express a major concern about the legality question. If their post was really relevant, it wouldn't be deleted from the thread... I don't consider myself a troll, or a shill... Let's just keep me in the "promoter of IONs and Masternodes" title. I've got 300 postings in this this thread to prove it... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
