Hello all : ) ~
 - 300 good reports  - 1000 good reports  - 5000 good reports
 - 300 good reports  - 1000 good reports  - 5000 good repots I love those, very clean badges, and you can see from far away from monitor cleary the Icon. I love both, maybe the 1st set is even better. |
|
|
|
~
What's the name of that campaign ? [/quote] You can pick any big campaign here on the forum, almost 90% of them they will have abusers with account hijack on their telegram campaing.(or multiaccount) |
|
|
|
|
This is what I'm hoping, but so many people are waiting for this so for this reason I don't think it will happen, is more lickly the pump will happen when Nobody will expect.
|
|
|
|
I think the reason why KYC exists is because of this. By requiring bounty hunters to present documents to verify their identities, then the management prevent scammers and make their bounty campaigns more productive.
Or to steal data and sell them. I can post different cases where we got a KYC and bounty was never paid. Your IDs are money on the black market. |
|
|
|
The total number of users who have had "last activity" within last 3 months is 425584. If we exclude Brand New's and Newbie's the number drops significantly and the number then is 82056.
~
So basically we had a +25% of new users on a Bitcoin low price, mumble mumble... I guess 90% of those are bots/alts  |
|
|
|
If all it takes is for someone to sign up on a spreadsheet with someone else's bitcointalk username then that's the ICO's problem and their fault for being so incompetent and allowing themselves to be cheated this way. They could easily solve this if they wanted, or you know, stop giving away tokens for something so stupid as this.
~
Yes they can, but they never will do cause, we know, big telegram number is the only thing that matters and since the tokens generated are free for them (for the major part of shitcoins), they really don't care about it. |
|
|
|
Atleast 5 of these accounts uses this  I think you found just the tip of the iceberg. |
|
|
|
Update, this is the lower number of merit earned on a single week so far.   |
|
|
|
|
Usually, if we look at the past years the end of the year is the best moment for cryptomarket. The hope is the same for this year, we need to wait what whales will do, we are small fishes and we can do nothing to influence the market.
We need to read and get informations around the web, and use what we find.
|
|
|
|
Recently evil IP payment has been threading all over the forum which I believed it will makes a lot of beginners to abandon their new account simply because they have no Idea on how to make the payment. Secondly some newbies are here with greedy habit to make huge money account night as a result they may fall into the wrong hands and get scam which will make them to abandon their account.
The evil IP works only if one user from that IP is banned, otherwise you can log in more accounts at the same time with a new fresh IP. |
|
|
|
~
The number of merit sources has remained pretty stable in the past 6 months or so. Currently the number of merit sources is at 84 - and I had assumed that the number of merit sources would have been higher by now....
Regarding whether the changed merit system is taking any dent out of spam, perhaps we are going to see what happens during the next bitcoin price spike, since your theory seems to be partly based on asserting such a spam to BTC price correlation... another reason to look forward to our next BTC price explosion.. Hopefully, soon!!!!tm
The number of sources is increase from start, was around 80 and now they are 84 but since they have a life outside of the forum some of them are no longer active so also for this reason the weekly merit is decreasing week after week. |
|
|
|
|
I think that the increase in the number of moderators can help the community but I do not think it will change much, even if we add 100 moderators, the spammers can make themselves in a few minutes even 10,000 accounts and spam, so in the end we are in the same situation where a user must report a spam and a moderator must delete the message.
So to conclude with more realistic numbers even if you add 5 moderators we are in the exact same situation.
|
|
|
|
It's however a bit of a dilemma: If a megathread is deleted, then spammers select the "easiest" of the remaining threads for their spam posts, in many case ruining the discussion in decent or even interesting threads.
~
It will change nothing, a spammer (boT) will be always a spammer, if a thread will be locked, it will spam on another one, it makes no diffence at all. This is not how we fix the spam, removing post from shitposter spammers. They uses bots, if they want, on the time that we ban one of them they will create 10 bots. This is a war we can't win at this stage, we need a restriction on posting, or registration (make harder?). |
|
|
|
|
This is a great example on why newbie accounts should not have the opportunity to write freely in all sections of the forum.
|
|
|
|
So it looks like it definitely takes a lot to gain merit to gain rank now. Haha Bitcointalk definitely up'ed the game for sure. Hopefully this will make post quality increase substantially.
Yes, if the number of merits continues to fall even if we have more and more merit sources and at this rate it will be very difficult for many people to get a +1 on their rank, however the drop in spam is relative for me and follows google trends, as soon as, and if ever Bitcoin will return on 15k + spam will increase new for the growing hype and the new number of new subscribers   I bet it is the same on this forum activity. |
|
|
|
|
Buying an account has multiple risks. The main risk is obviously to be scammed by the seller, the second risk is to buy a dangerous account, as they wrote before me some accounts here on the forum are dangerous for legal purposes for fraud problems, so who knows you can be at penal risk too.
|
|
|
|
±
Bounty campaigns already don't pay the highest stakes for signature campaigns because they are not efficient anymore. I have worked lately with few ICO's and all of them complained that signature campaigns give no results. There where hundreds of participants signed but after the first week they didn't sell any tokens.
~
The main problem is the missing of the regulation, too many shitcoins on the market and people lost interest on them since most are scams. If one day we will get a regulation and only 10% of actual ICOs the advertising will be very relevant again. |
|
|
|
|
Noone can tell you where to invest, you need to study the market and the coins, and what they can will be in few years.
It's you call if you want invest is a big "strong" coin like ethereum, or you want to "gamble" with a potential good coin like EOS, remember to invest only how much you can loose.
90% of traders are in loss on trading so why you need to listen losing people? Study and get your profit.
|
|
|
|
No, it's 403 for everyone... They must have worked out that they've been noticed now...
Maybe their Registrar worked out that they looked like a phishing site and closed their account...
it's not 403 for me, screenshot below  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
